Skip to main content
Log in

Reply to Tom Sterkenburg’s Commentary

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Philosophy & Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. This story is cited by Michel Foucault as the inspiration for his book The Order of Things, in which he writes that Borges’s celestial emporium “shattered…all the familiar landmarks of my thought…breaking up all the ordered surfaces and all the planes with which we are accustomed to tame the wild profusion of existing things, and continuing long afterwards to disturb and threaten with collapse our age-old distinction between the Same and the Other” (Foucault, 1970, p. xv).

References

  • Ben-David, S. & Ackerman, M. (2008). Measures of clustering quality: A working set of axioms for clustering. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 21.

  • Borges, J.L. (1999). John Wilkins’ Analytical Language. In E. Weinberger (Ed.), Selected nonfictions. (trans: Weinberger, E.). New York: Penguin, p. 231.

  • Cohen-Addad, V., Kanade, V., & Mallmann-Trenn, F. (2018). Clustering redemption: Beyond the impossibility of Kleinberg’s axioms. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 31.

  • Forster, M., & Sober, E. (1994). How to tell when simpler, more unified, or less ad hoc theories will provide more accurate predictions. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 45(1), 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things. (trans: Sheridan, A.). New York: Random House.

  • Kleinberg, J. (2002). An impossibility theorem for clustering. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 15, 463–470. MIT Press.

  • Valiant, L. (2013). Probably approximately correct. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vapnik, V. (2000). The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The author declares that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

This work was conceived and executed by DSW.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David S. Watson.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

N/A.

Consent to Participate

N/A.

Consent to Publish

N/A

Competing Interests

The author has no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Watson, D.S. Reply to Tom Sterkenburg’s Commentary. Philos. Technol. 36, 69 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00674-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00674-z

Navigation