Skip to main content
Log in

One-compartmental biometric blood loss calculation after cesarean section

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Blood loss during cesarean section was calculated based on post-operative decrement of hemoglobin (Hb) and hematocrit (Hct) level. The model used for pregnant women was previously validated for non-pregnant women who underwent gynecological surgery. 1,068 pregnant women who underwent cesarean section and 517 women who underwent gynecological surgery were included in the study. Regression lines between collected (x) and calculated (y) blood loss in pregnant women (y = 0.164 + 0.602x) and non-pregnant (y = 0.255 + 0.750x) women were statistically parallel. This study confirmed the applicability of one-compartmental model based on the drop in Hb levels for blood loss calculations for both gynecological surgery and cesarean section. Improved methods for calculating blood loss, V after cesarean section as V = [0.0115 × body weight (kg) × ln (preoperative Hb/postoperative Hb)] + [0.1905 × height3 (m) × ln (preoperative Hb/postoperative Hb)] + 0.3158 and after gynecological surgery V = [0.004 × body weight (kg) × ln (preoperative Hb/postoperative Hb)] + [0.4624 × height3 (m) × ln (preoperative Hb/postoperative Hb)] + 0.0472 were suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen TH, Peng MT, Chen KP, Huang TF, Chang C, Fang HS (1956) Prediction of blood volume and adiposity in man from body weight and cube of height. Metabolism 5:328–345

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell CD (2000) Physiological changes of pregnancy. Semin Anesth 19(3):149–156. doi:10.1053/sa.2000.9038

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlin A, Alfirevic Z (2008) Physiological changes of pregnancy and monitoring. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 22(5):801–823. doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2008.06.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flordal PA (1997) Measurement of blood loss in clinical studies. Eur J Anesth 14(14):35–37

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser RB (2006) Obesity complicating pregnancy. Curr Obstet Gynaecol 16:295–298. doi:10.1016/j.curobgyn.2006.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavle JA, Khalfan SS, Stoltzfus RJ, Witter F, Tielsch JM, Caulfield LE (2006) Measurement of blood loss at childbirth and postpartum. Int J Gynecol Obstet 95:24–28. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.06.010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn KS, Wojdyla D, Say L, Gulmezoglu AM, VanLook PFA (2006) WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. Lancet 367:1066–1074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon M, Blaivas M, Brannam L (2005) Sonographic measurement of the inferior vena cava as a maker of blood loss. Am J Emerg Med 23:45–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy DJ, MacGregor H, Munishankar B, McLeod G (2009) A randomised controlled trial of oxytocin 5 IU and placebo infusion versus oxytocin 5 IU and 30 IU infusion for the control of blood loss at elective cesarean section—Pilot study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 142:30–33. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.09.004

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nadler SB, Hidalgo JU, Bloch T (1962) Prediction of blood volume in normal human adults. Surgery 51:224–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Popovic J, Grujic Z (2008) Influence of pregnancy on one-compartmental bio-metric blood loss calculations after cesarean section and gynecological surgery. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 33(1):53–59

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rains AJH (1955) Experience in the measurement of blood- and fluid-loss at operation. Br J Surg 43:191–196

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Read MD, Andeton JM (1977) Radioisotope dilution technique for measurement of blood loss associated with lower segment cesarean section. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 84:859–861

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schorn NM (2010) Measurment of blood loss: review of the literature. J Midwifery Womens Health 55(1):20–27. doi:10.1016/j.jmwh.2009.02.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stafford I, Dildy GA, Clark SL, Belford MA (2008) Visually estimated and calculated blood loss in vaginal and cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199:519 e1–519 e7

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton JA (1963) Estimation of blood loss during surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 33(3):164–174

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu WC, Hsieh CH, Huang LC, Chang YY, Hung YC, Chang WC (2009) Surgical blood loss and laparascopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 48(4):400–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jovan Popovic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Milosevic, N., Popovic, J., Grujic, Z. et al. One-compartmental biometric blood loss calculation after cesarean section. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 36, 183–188 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13318-011-0042-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13318-011-0042-0

Keywords

Navigation