Abstract
Blood loss during cesarean section was calculated based on post-operative decrement of hemoglobin (Hb) and hematocrit (Hct) level. The model used for pregnant women was previously validated for non-pregnant women who underwent gynecological surgery. 1,068 pregnant women who underwent cesarean section and 517 women who underwent gynecological surgery were included in the study. Regression lines between collected (x) and calculated (y) blood loss in pregnant women (y = 0.164 + 0.602x) and non-pregnant (y = 0.255 + 0.750x) women were statistically parallel. This study confirmed the applicability of one-compartmental model based on the drop in Hb levels for blood loss calculations for both gynecological surgery and cesarean section. Improved methods for calculating blood loss, V after cesarean section as V = [0.0115 × body weight (kg) × ln (preoperative Hb/postoperative Hb)] + [0.1905 × height3 (m) × ln (preoperative Hb/postoperative Hb)] + 0.3158 and after gynecological surgery V = [0.004 × body weight (kg) × ln (preoperative Hb/postoperative Hb)] + [0.4624 × height3 (m) × ln (preoperative Hb/postoperative Hb)] + 0.0472 were suggested.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen TH, Peng MT, Chen KP, Huang TF, Chang C, Fang HS (1956) Prediction of blood volume and adiposity in man from body weight and cube of height. Metabolism 5:328–345
Campbell CD (2000) Physiological changes of pregnancy. Semin Anesth 19(3):149–156. doi:10.1053/sa.2000.9038
Carlin A, Alfirevic Z (2008) Physiological changes of pregnancy and monitoring. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 22(5):801–823. doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2008.06.005
Flordal PA (1997) Measurement of blood loss in clinical studies. Eur J Anesth 14(14):35–37
Fraser RB (2006) Obesity complicating pregnancy. Curr Obstet Gynaecol 16:295–298. doi:10.1016/j.curobgyn.2006.07.005
Kavle JA, Khalfan SS, Stoltzfus RJ, Witter F, Tielsch JM, Caulfield LE (2006) Measurement of blood loss at childbirth and postpartum. Int J Gynecol Obstet 95:24–28. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.06.010
Kuhn KS, Wojdyla D, Say L, Gulmezoglu AM, VanLook PFA (2006) WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. Lancet 367:1066–1074
Lyon M, Blaivas M, Brannam L (2005) Sonographic measurement of the inferior vena cava as a maker of blood loss. Am J Emerg Med 23:45–50
Murphy DJ, MacGregor H, Munishankar B, McLeod G (2009) A randomised controlled trial of oxytocin 5 IU and placebo infusion versus oxytocin 5 IU and 30 IU infusion for the control of blood loss at elective cesarean section—Pilot study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 142:30–33. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.09.004
Nadler SB, Hidalgo JU, Bloch T (1962) Prediction of blood volume in normal human adults. Surgery 51:224–232
Popovic J, Grujic Z (2008) Influence of pregnancy on one-compartmental bio-metric blood loss calculations after cesarean section and gynecological surgery. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 33(1):53–59
Rains AJH (1955) Experience in the measurement of blood- and fluid-loss at operation. Br J Surg 43:191–196
Read MD, Andeton JM (1977) Radioisotope dilution technique for measurement of blood loss associated with lower segment cesarean section. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 84:859–861
Schorn NM (2010) Measurment of blood loss: review of the literature. J Midwifery Womens Health 55(1):20–27. doi:10.1016/j.jmwh.2009.02.014
Stafford I, Dildy GA, Clark SL, Belford MA (2008) Visually estimated and calculated blood loss in vaginal and cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199:519 e1–519 e7
Thornton JA (1963) Estimation of blood loss during surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 33(3):164–174
Wu WC, Hsieh CH, Huang LC, Chang YY, Hung YC, Chang WC (2009) Surgical blood loss and laparascopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 48(4):400–402
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Milosevic, N., Popovic, J., Grujic, Z. et al. One-compartmental biometric blood loss calculation after cesarean section. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 36, 183–188 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13318-011-0042-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13318-011-0042-0