Skip to main content
Log in

Acquisition of suture skills during medical graduation by instructor-directed training: a randomized controlled study comparing senior medical students and faculty surgeons

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Due to shortage of time and limited availability of faculty surgeons to teach basic surgical skills during medical graduation, the search for alternative ways of simulated training with feedback is needed. The purpose of this study was to compare the simulated teaching of suture skills to novice medical students by senior medical students and by experienced faculty surgeons. Forty-eight novice medical students were randomly assigned to three practice conditions on bench model (n = 16): self-directed suture training (control), senior medical student-directed suture skills’ training, or experienced faculty surgeon-directed suture skills’ training. Pre- and post-tests were applied. Global Rating Scale with blinded evaluation and self-perceived confidence based on Likert scale were used to assess all suture performances in pre- and post-training. Effect size was also calculated. The analysis made after training showed that the students who received feedback from the instructors had better performance based on the Global Rating Scale (all p < 0.0000) and felt more confident to carry out sutures (all p < 0.0000) when compared to the control. There was no significant difference (all p > 0.05) between the student-directed teaching and faculty-directed teaching groups. The magnitude of the effect (instructor-directed training suture) was considered large (>0.80) in all measurements. The acquisition of suture skills after student-directed training was similar to the training supervised by faculty surgeon, and the increase in suture performances of trainees that received instructor administered training was superior to self-directed learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dubrowski A, MacRae H (2006) Randomised, controlled study investigating the optimal instructor: student ratios for teaching suturing skills. Med Educ 40(1):59–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Forbes SS, Fitzgerald PG, Birch DW (2006) Undergraduate surgical training: variations in program objectives and curriculum implementation across Canada. Can J Surg 49(1):46–50

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Friedlich M, Wood T, Regehr G, Hurst C, Shamji F (2002) Structured assessment of minor surgical skills (SAMSS) for clinical clerks. Acad Med 77(10 Suppl):S39–S41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hammond I, Karthigasu K (2006) Training, assessment and competency in gynaecologic surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 20(1):173–187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tokuhara KG, Boldt DW, Yamamoto LG (2004) Teaching suturing in a workshop setting: a comparison of several models. Hawaii Med J 63(9):258–259

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Taché S, Mbembati N, Marshall N, Tendick F, Mkony C, O’Sullivan P (2009) Addressing gaps in surgical skills training by means of low-cost simulation at Muhimbili University in Tanzania. Hum Resour Health 7:64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bastos EM, Silva RD (2011) Proposal of a synthetic ethylene-vinyl acetate bench model for surgical foundations learning. Suture training. Acta Cir Bras 26(2):149–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Denadai R, Bastos EM (2012) The synthetic ethylene-vinyl acetate bench model. Dermatol Surg 38(2):288–289

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Denadai R, Saad-Hossne R, Oshiiwa M, Bastos EM (2012) Training on synthetic ethylene-vinyl acetate bench model allows novice medical students to acquire suture skills. Acta Cir Bras 27(3):271–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Denadai R, Souto LR (2012) Organic bench model to complement the teaching and learning on basic surgical skills. Act Cir Bras 27(1):88–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Reznick RK, MacRae H (2006) Teaching surgical skills-changes in the wind. N Engl J Med 355(25):2664–2669

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jensen AR, Wright AS, Levy AE, McIntyre LK, Foy HM, Pellegrini CA, Horvath KD, Anastakis DJ (2009) Acquiring basic surgical skills: is a faculty mentor really needed? Am J Surg 197(1):82–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cannon-Bowers JA, Bowers C, Procci K (2010) Optimizing learning in surgical simulations: guidelines from the science of learning and human performance. Surg Clin North Am 90(3):583–603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Xeroulis GJ, Park J, Moulton CA, Reznick RK, Leblanc V, Dubrowski A (2007) Teaching suturing and knot-tying skills to medical students: a randomized controlled study comparing computer-based video instruction and (concurrent and summary) expert feedback. Surgery 141(4):442–449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Porte MC, Xeroulis G, Reznick RK, Dubrowski A (2007) Verbal feedback from an expert is more effective than self-accessed feedback about motion efficiency in learning new surgical skills. Am J Surg 193(1):105–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nousiainen M, Brydges R, Backstein D, Dubrowski A (2008) Comparison of expert instruction and computer-based video training in teaching fundamental surgical skills to medical students. Surgery 143(4):539–544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mann KV, Sutton E, Frank B (2007) Twelve tips for preparing residents as teachers. Med Teach 29(4):301–306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim MJ, Boehler ML, Ketchum JK, Bueno R Jr, Williams RG, Dunnington GL (2010) Skills coaches as part of the educational team: a randomized controlled trial of teaching of a basic surgical skill in the laboratory setting. Am J Surg 199(1):94–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rooney DM, Hungness ES, Darosa DA, Pugh CM (2012) Can skills coaches be used to assess resident performance in the skills laboratory? Surgery 151(6):796–802

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wadoodi A, Crosby JR (2002) Twelve tips for peer-assisted learning: a classic concept revisited. Med Teach 24(3):241–244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Graziano SC (2011) Randomized surgical training for medical students: resident versus peer-led teaching. Am J Obstet Gynecol 204(6):542.e1–542.e4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Field M, Burke JM, McAllister D, Lloyd DM (2007) Peer-assisted learning: a novel approach to clinical skills learning for medical students. Med Educ 41(4):411–418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Josephson SA, Whelan AJ (2002) A new first-year course designed and taught by a senior medical student. Acad Med 77(12 Pt 1):1207–1211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tolsgaard MG, Gustafsson A, Rasmussen MB, Høiby P, Müller CG, Ringsted C (2007) Student teachers can be as good as associate professors in teaching clinical skills. Med Teach 29(6):553–557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Weyrich P, Celebi N, Schrauth M, Möltner A, Lammerding-Köppel M, Nikendei C (2009) Peer-assisted versus faculty staff-led skills laboratory training: a randomised controlled trial. Med Educ 43(2):113–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hughes TC, Jiwaji Z, Lally K, Lloyd-Lavery A, Lota A, Dale A, Janas R, Bulstrode CJ (2010) Advanced cardiac resuscitation evaluation (ACRE): a randomised single-blind controlled trial of peer-led vs. expert-led advanced resuscitation training. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 18:3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Knobe M, Münker R, Sellei RM, Holschen M, Mooij SC, Schmidt-Rohlfing B, Niethard FU, Pape HC (2010) Peer teaching: a randomised controlled trial using student-teachers to teach musculoskeletal ultrasound. Med Educ 44(2):148–155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Janis JE, Kwon RK, Lalonde DH (2010) A practical guide to wound healing. Plast Reconstr Surg 125(6):230e–244e

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sobral DT (2002) Cross-year peer tutoring experience in a medical school: conditions and outcomes for student tutors. Med Educ 36(11):1064–1070

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Khan MS, Bann SD, Darzi A, Butler PE (2003) Use of suturing as a measure of technical competence. Ann Plast Surg 50(3):304–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Collins AM, Ridgway PF, Hassan MS, Chou CW, Hill AD, Kneafsey B (2010) Surgical instruction for general practitioners: how, who and how often? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63(7):1156–1162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Faulkner H, Regehr G, Martin J, Reznick R (1996) Validation of an objective structured assessment of technical skill for surgical residents. Acad Med 71(12):1363–1365

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Reznick R, Regehr G, MacRae H, Martin J, McCulloch W (1997) Testing technical skill via an innovative “bench station” examination. Am J Surg 173(3):226–230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hojat M, Xu G (2004) A visitor’s guide to effect sizes: statistical significance versus practical (clinical) importance of research findings. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 9:241–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Moulton CA, Dubrowski A, Macrae H, Graham B, Grober E, Reznick R (2006) Teaching surgical skills: what kind of practice makes perfect?: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Surg 244(3):400–409

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Klingensmith ME, Brunt LM (2010) Focused surgical skills training for senior medical students and interns. Surg Clin North Am 90(3):505–518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Rogers DA, Regehr G, Yeh KA, Howdieshell TR (1998) Computer-assisted learning versus a lecture and feedback seminar for teaching a basic surgical technical skill. Am J Surg 175(6):508–510

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Mitchell EL, Lee DY, Sevdalis N, Partsafas AW, Landry GJ, Liem TK, Moneta GL (2011) Evaluation of distributed practice schedules on retention of a newly acquired surgical skill: a randomized trial. Am J Surg 201(1):31–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Jamshidi R, Ozgediz D (2008) Medical student teaching: a peer-to-peer toolbox for time-constrained resident educators. J Surg Educ 65(2):95–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Vassiliou MC, Feldman LS (2011) Objective assessment, selection, and certification in surgery. Surg Oncol 20(3):140–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Darzi A, Datta V, Mackay S (2001) The challenge of objective assessment of surgical skill. Am J Surg 181(6):484–486

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. van Hove PD, Tuijthof GJ, Verdaasdonk EG, Stassen LP, Dankelman J (2010) Objective assessment of technical surgical skills. Br J Surg 97(7):972–987

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Dath D, Regehr G, Birch D, Schlachta C, Poulin E, Mamazza J, Reznick R, MacRae HM (2004) Toward reliable operative assessment: the reliability and feasibility of videotaped assessment of laparoscopic technical skills. Surg Endosc 18(12):1800–1804

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Bing-You RG, Sproul MS (1992) Medical students’ perceptions of themselves and residents as teachers. Med Teach 14(2–3):133–138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rafael Denadai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Denadai, R., Toledo, A.P., Oshiiwa, M. et al. Acquisition of suture skills during medical graduation by instructor-directed training: a randomized controlled study comparing senior medical students and faculty surgeons. Updates Surg 65, 131–140 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-013-0199-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-013-0199-y

Keywords

Navigation