Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Identifying the role of conservation biology for solving the environmental crisis

AMBIO Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Humans are altering their living environment to an extent that could cause environmental collapse. Promoting change into environmental sustainability is therefore urgent. Despite a rapid expansion in conservation biology, appreciation of underlying causes and identification of long-term solutions have largely been lacking. I summarized knowledge regarding the environmental crisis, and argue that the most important contributions toward solutions come from economy, political sciences, and psychology. Roles of conservation biology include providing environmental protection until sustainable solutions have been found, evaluating the effectiveness of implemented solutions, and providing societies with information necessary to align effectively with environmental values. Because of the potential disciplinary discrepancy between finding long-term solutions and short-term protection, we may face critical trade-offs between allocations of resources toward achieving sustainability. Since biological knowledge is required for such trade-offs, an additional role for conservation biologists may be to provide guidance toward finding optimal strategies in such trade-offs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrow, K., B. Bolin, R. Costanza, P. Dasgupta, C. Folke, C.S. Holling, B.O. Jansson, S. Levin, et al. 1995. Economic growth, carrying capacity and the environment. Science 268: 520–521.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bamberg, S., and G. Möser. 2007. Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology 27: 14–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borucke, M., D. Moore, G. Cranston, K. Gracey, K. Iha, J. Larson, E. Lazarus, J.C. Morales, et al. 2013. Accounting for demand and supply of the biosphere’s regenerative capacity: The National Footprint Accounts’ underlying methodology and framework. Ecological Indicators 24: 518–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardinale, B.J., J.E. Duffy, A. Gonzalez, D.U. Hooper, C. Perrings, P. Venail, A. Narwani, G.M. Mace, et al. 2012. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486: 59–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, R. 1962. Silent spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czech, B. 2000. Shovelling fuel for a runaway train. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czech, B. 2008. Prospects for reconciling the conflict between economic growth and biodiversity conservation with technological progress. Conservation Biology 22: 1389–1398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily, G.C., and P.R. Ehrlich. 1999. Managing Earth’s ecosystems: An interdisciplinary challenge. Ecosystems 2: 277–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, H.E. 1973. Towards a steady-state economy. San Fransico: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, H.E. 1990. Towards some operational principles of sustainable development. Ecological Economics 2: 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J.M. 2005. Collapse: How societies choose to fall or survive. New York: Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P.R. 1968. The population bomb. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P.R. 2009. The MAHB, the culture gap and some really inconvenient truths. PLoS Biology 8: e1000330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P.R., and A.H. Ehrlich. 2013. Can a collapse of global civilization be avoided? Proceedings of the Royal Society Series B 280: 20122845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P.R., and J.P. Holden. 1971. Impact of population growth. Science 171: 1212–1217.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P.R., and D. Kennedy. 2005. Millennium assessment of human behavior: A challenge to scientists. Science 309: 562–563.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Engelman, R. 2012. Nine population strategies to stop short of 9 billion. In Worldwatch Institute, State of the World 2012. Moving towards a sustainable prosperity, Worldwatch Institute, 121–128, Washington: Island Press.

  • Fazey, I., J. Fischer, and D.B. Lindenmayer. 2005. What do conservation biologists publish? Biological Conservation 124: 63–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu-Roegen, N. 1971. The entropy law and the economic process. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, R.A., and M. Dos Santos. 2012. Trends in conservation biology: Progress or procrastination in a new millennium? Biological Conservation 153: 153–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, T. 2009. Prosperity without growth. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva, P., and M. Marvier. 2012. What is conservation science? BioScience 62: 962–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollmuss, A., and J. Agyeman. 2002. Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research 8: 239–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, J.J., J.E. Aukema, J.B. Grant, B.S. Halpern, P. Kareiva, C.R. Nelson, K. Ohleth, J.D. Olden, et al. 2006. Conservation science: A 20 year report card. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 4: 473–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leader-Williams, N., W.M. Adams, and R.J. Smith (eds.). 2010. Trade-offs in conservation. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomborg, B. 2001. The sceptical environmentalist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, B. 1996. Time to turn: towards a sustainable society. Stockholm: Sveriges Utbildningsradio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, W., and R. Qiang. 2002. Determinants of human population growth. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Series B 357: 1197–1210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw, N.G. 2009. Macroeconomics. New York: Worth Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mascia, M.B., J.P. Brosius, T.A. Dobson, B.C. Forbes, L. Horowitz, M.A. McKean, and N.J. Turner. 2003. Social sciences and conservation. Conservation Biology 17: 649–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matutinović, I. 2012. The prospects of transition to sustainability from the perspective of environmental values and behaviors in the EU 27 and globally. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 19: 526–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, R.M. 1977. Thresholds and breakpoints in ecosystems with a multiplicity of stable states. Nature 269: 471–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McShane, T.O., P.D. Hirsch, T.C. Trung, A.N. Songorwa, A. Kinzig, B. Monteferri, D. Mutekanga, H. Van Thang, et al. 2011. Hard choices: making trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and human well-being. Biological Conservation 144: 966–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, D.W., D.L. Meadows, J. Randers, and W.W. Behrens. 1972. The limits to growth. New York: Universe Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meine, C., M. Soulé, and R.F. Noss. 2006. A mission-driven discipline: The growth of conservation biology. Conservation Biology 20: 631–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T.R., B.A. Minteer, and L.C. Malan. 2011. The new conservation debate: The view from practical ethics. Biological Conservation 144: 948–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, C. 2009. Unscientific America: How scientific illiteracy threatens our future. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, R. 1989. The rights of nature: A history of environmental ethics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, M.C., and C. Mooney. 2007. Framing science. Science 316: 56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robelia, B., and T. Murphy. 2012. What do people know about key environmental issues? A review of environmental knowledge surveys. Environmental Education Research 18: 299–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J.G. 2006. Conservation biology and real world conservation. Conservation Biology 20: 658–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J.G. 2011. Ethical pluralism, pragmatism, and sustainability in conservation practice. Biological Conservation 144: 958–965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer, M., S. Carpenter, J.A. Foley, C. Folke, and B. Walker. 2001. Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413: 591–596.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turnhout, E., C. Watertorn, K. Neves, and M. Buizer. 2014. Rethinking biodiviersity: From goods and services to “living with”. Conservation Letters 6: 154–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNEP United Nations Environment Programme. 2011. Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth. A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Cambridge: United Nations Environment Programme.

  • Union of Concerted Scientists. 1992. World scientists’ warning to humanity. Cambridge: Union of Concerted Scientists.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. 2011. World population prospects: The 2010 revision, highlights and advance tables. Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP.220. New York: United Nations.

  • Wackernagel, M., N.B. Schulz, D. Deumling, A. Callejas Linares, M. Jenkins, V. Kapos, C. Monfreda, J. Loh, N. Myers, et al. 2002. Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 99: 9266–9271.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walther, G.R., E. Post, P. Convey, A. Menzel, C. Parmesan, T.J.C. Beebee, J.M. Fromentin, O.H. Guldberg, et al. 2002. Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416: 389–395.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whitten, T., D. Holmes, and K. McKinnon. 2001. Conservation biology: A displacement behaviour for academia? Conservation Biology 15: 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a research fellowship from University of Pretoria, South Africa, and incentive funds from the National Research Foundation. The author wishes to thank two anonymous reviewers for constructive criticism of earlier drafts of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fredrik Dalerum.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dalerum, F. Identifying the role of conservation biology for solving the environmental crisis. AMBIO 43, 839–846 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0546-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0546-3

Keywords

Navigation