Skip to main content
Log in

Application of a visualization environment for the mission performance evaluation of civilian UAS

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
CEAS Aeronautical Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Future unmanned aerial vehicle applications require the development of new advanced design environments. To get an effective unmanned aerial system, UAS, solution, it is necessary to take into account all elements of the system, e.g., to bring together aircraft design, payload, communication and other elements into one multidisciplinary design process. Compared to manned aircraft, an unmanned aerial vehicle, UAV, interacts with the environment through the onboard sensors. Therefore, the sensor and communication performances as well as their implementation in the whole system play an important role in mission fulfillment. To take the interaction with the operational environment into account, this operational environment is simulated during the design and assessment process. Owing to the high resolution and elevation-based terrain data, geometry representation of the UAS elements and its interaction with the environment, the sensor and communication performance is simulated, evaluated and fed back into the aircraft design process. For this, the following data are obtained during the mission simulation for the evaluation: height of the terrain, sensor coverage area, presence of uncovered areas, slant range to the ground or objects of interest, obstacles in line of sight, probability of an object detection and detection of the camera field of view limitations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ACR:

Area coverage rate

b :

Sensor ground swath width

d c :

Object characteristic dimension

E :

Required energy for a mission

EACI:

Energy-rated area coverage index

f :

Degradation factor

FOV:

Field of view

ƒ :

Focal length of the camera

GSD:

Ground sample distance

GSDH :

Horizontal ground sample distance

GSDV :

Vertical ground sample distance

h :

Vertical distance from the sensor installed on the UAV to the ground

H :

Height of the object

HFOV:

Horizontal field of view

Hpix:

Number of horizontal pixels of the camera

LOS:

Line-of-sight vector of the camera

N :

Number of cycles across the target

P :

Distance between pixels of the camera

P():

Probability of achieving target discrimination task

R :

Slant range

UA:

Unmanned aircraft

UAV:

Unmanned aerial vehicle

UAS:

Unmanned aerial system

V :

Flight velocity

VFOV:

Vertical field of view

Vpix:

Number of vertical pixels of the camera

W :

Width of the object

θ Look :

Angle between the slant range and the sensor height over the ground

References

  1. Göktogan, A.H., Sukkarieh, S., Cole, D.T., Thompson, P.: Airborne vision sensor detection performance simulation. In: The interservice/industry training, simulation and education conference (I/ITSEC’05), pp. 1682–1687. Orlando, FL, USA (2005)

  2. Feger, J., Pozatzidis, F.: Simulationsmodell zur Bewertung der Missionserfuellung Unbemannter Fluggeraete im Vorentwurfsstadium” (Simulation Model for Mission Evaluation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in the Preliminary Design Stage). Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress, Rostock (2015) (September 22–24)

  3. Srikanth, A., Indhu, B., Krishnamurthy, L., Naidu, V.P.S.: Photoscenery for realistic scene generation and visualization in Flightgear: a tutorial. Int. J. Adv. Res. Electr Electron. Instrum. Eng. 3(Special issue 5), 577–582 (2014) (An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gimeres, R., Castro Silva, D., Paulo Reis, L., Oliveira, E.: Flight simulation environments applied to agent-based autonomous UAVs. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on enterprise information systems (ICEIS), pp. 243–246, Barcelona, 12–16 June 2008

  5. OpenSceneGraph Developer Community. OpenSceneGraph - Features (2017). http://www.openscenegraph.org/index.php/about/features

  6. Bertuccelli, L., Choi, H.-L., Cho, P., How, J.P.: Real-time multi- UAV task assignment in dynamic and uncertain environments. In: Proceedings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference. Chicago (2009) (August 10–13)

  7. Roessler, C.: Conceptual design of unmanned aircraft with fuel cell propulsion system. Ph.D. Dissertation, Technical University of Munich, Garching (2012) (ISBN: 9783843904063)

  8. Perez, D., Maza, I., Caballero, F., Scarlatti, D., Casado, E., Ollero, A.: A ground control station for a multi-UAV surveillance system. J. Intell. Rob. Syst. 69(1–4), 119–130 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-012-9759-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dannhauer, T.: Konzeption eines Sichsystemes für einen Flugsimulator unter Berücksichtigung von Zulassungsrandbedingungen (Concept of a visual system for a flight simulator taking into account licensing conditions). Diploma Thesis, Institute of Flight System Dynamics, Technical University of Munich, Garching near Munich, Institute Library (2009)

  10. Herbst, S., Hornung, M.: ADDAM: An object oriented data model for an aircraft design environment in MATLAB. AIAA Modelling and Simulation Technologies Conference. Kissimmee (2015) (January 5–9)

  11. Hochstrasser, M.: Erweiterung einer Hardware-in-the-Loop- Simulation um eine Flugzeug- Visualisierungsumgebung basierend auf OpenGL und Matlab/Simulink (Extension of the hardware-in-the-loop Simulation tool for an aircraft visualization environment based on OpenGL and Matlab/Simulink). Master Thesis, Institute of Flight System Dynamics, Technical University of Munich, Garching near Munich, Institue Library (2012)

  12. OpenSceneGraph Developer Community. osgVisual - Getting Started (2017). https://www.osgvisual.org/wiki/GettingStarted

  13. Gundlach, J.: Designing unmanned aircraft systems: a comprehensive approach. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Education Series, Reston, Virginia, USA (2012) (ISBN: 978-1-60086-843-6)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Fokina.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fokina, E., Feger, J. & Hornung, M. Application of a visualization environment for the mission performance evaluation of civilian UAS. CEAS Aeronaut J 10, 817–825 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-018-0350-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-018-0350-z

Keywords

Navigation