Skip to main content
Log in

Use of the STR loci D18S53, D18S59, and D18S488 in the diagnosis of Edwards’ syndrome

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Genes & Genomics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of using short tandem repeats (STRs) to diagnose Edwards’ syndrome (ES). Quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) was performed to amplify STR loci on chromosome 18, specifically D18S53, D18S59, and D18S488. The amplified products were subjected to a fluorescence signal analysis and their application to ES diagnosis was examined. Among the 807 cases that showed normal results in the karyotype analysis, 793 showed one or two fluorescence bands with a fluorescence intensity ratio of 1:1, and 14 cases showed 3 bands, which were false-positive results. ES was diagnosed in 9 samples. The sensitivities of D18S53, D18S59, and D18S488 for the diagnosis of ES were 77.78, 44.44, and 55.56 % and the specificities were 96.16, 96.03, and 96.28 %, respectively. The combined sensitivity of the three loci for diagnosing DS was 100 % (9/9), with a specificity of 98.27 % (793/807). QF-PCR amplification of STR loci had high sensitivity, strong specificity, and was simple and rapid. Thus, it might have wide clinical applications, and could be an ideal tool for large-scale genetic and prenatal diagnosis of ES.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bruns DA (2010) Neonatal experiences of newborns with full trisomy 18. Adv Neonatal Care 10:25–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cereda A, Carey JC (2012) The trisomy 18 syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis 7:81

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cirigliano V, Voglino G, Ordoñez E, Marongiu A, Paz Cañadas M, Ejarque M, Rueda L, Lloveras E, Fuster C, Adinolfi M (2009) Rapid prenatal diagnosis of common chromosome aneuploidies by QF-PCR, results of 9 years of clinical experience. Prenat Diagn 29:40–49

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elsayed GM, El Assiouty L, El Sobky ES (2013) The importance of rapid aneuploidy screening and prenatal diagnosis in the detection of numerical chromosomal abnormalities. Springerplus 2:490

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gekas J, van den Berg DG, Durand A, Vallée M, Wildschut HI, Bujold E, Forest JC, Rousseau F, Reinharz D (2011) Rapid testing versus karyotyping in Down’s syndrome screening: cost-effectiveness and detection of clinically significant chromosome abnormalities. Eur J Hum Genet 19:3–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hills A, Donaghue C, Waters J, Waters K, Sullivan C, Kulkarni A, Docherty Z, Mann K, Ogilvie CM (2010) QF-PCR as a stand-alone test for prenatal samples: the first 2 years’ experience in the London region. Prenat Diagn 30:509–517

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Houlihan OA, O’Donoghue K (2013) The natural history of pregnancies with a diagnosis of trisomy 18 or trisomy 13; a retrospective case series. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 13:209–217

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hultén MA, Dhanjal S, Pertl B (2003) Rapid and simple prenatal diagnosis of common chromosome disorders: advantages and disadvantages of the molecular methods FISH and QF-PCR. Reproduction 126:279–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Irving C, Richmond S, Wren C, Longster C, Embleton ND (2011) Changes in fetal prevalence and outcome for trisomies 13 and 18: a population-based study over 23 years. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 24:137–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jain S, Agarwal S, Panigrahi I, Tamhankar P, Phadke S (2010) Diagnosis of Down syndrome and detection of origin of nondisjunction by short tandem repeat analysis. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 14:489–491

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kamyab AR, Shahrokhi F, Shamsian E, Hayat Nosaied M, Dibajnia P, Hashemi M, Mahdian R (2012) Determination of sensitivity and specificity of a novel gene dosage assay for prenatal screening of trisomy 21 syndrome. Clin Biochem 45:267–271

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lakovschek IC, Streubel B, Ulm B (2011) Natural outcome of trisomy 13, trisomy 18, and triploidy after prenatal diagnosis. Am J Med Genet A 155A:2626–2633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loane M, Morris JK, Addor MC et al (2013) Twenty-year trends in the prevalence of Down syndrome and other trisomies in Europe: impact of maternal age and prenatal screening. Eur J Hum Genet 21:27–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lubin MB, Elashoff JD, Wang SJ, Rotter JI, Toyoda H (1991) Precise gene dosage determination by polymerase chain reaction: theory, methodology, and statistical approach. Mol Cell Probes 5:307–317

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mann K, Ogilvie CM (2012) QF-PCR: application, overview and review of the literature. Prenat Diagn 32:309–314

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield ES (1993) Diagnosis of Down syndrome and other aneuploidies using quantitative polymerase chain reaction and small tandem repeat polymorphisms. Hum Mol Genet 2:43–50

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Papageorgiou EA, Karagrigoriou A, Tsaliki E, Velissariou V, Carter NP, Patsalis PC (2011) Fetal-specific DNA methylation ratio permits noninvasive prenataldiagnosis of trisomy 21. Nat Med 17:510–513

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Parker SE, Mai CT, Canfield MA, Rickard R, Wang Y, Meyer RE, Anderson P, Mason CA, Collins JS, Kirby RS, Correa A, Network National Birth Defects Prevention (2010) Updated National Birth Prevalence estimates for selected birth defects in the United States, 2004-2006. Birth Defects Res A 88:1008–1016

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Putzova M, Soldatova I, Pecnova L, Dvorakova L, Jencikova N, Goetz P, Stejskal D (2008) QF-PCR-based prenatal detection of common aneiploidies in the Czech population: five years of experience. Eur J Med Genet 51:209–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen SA, Wong LY, Yang Q, May KM, Friedman JM (2003) Population-based analyses of mortality in trisomy 13 and trisomy 18. Pediatrics 111:777–784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sibiude J, Gavard L, Floch-Tudal C, Mandelbrot L (2011) Perinatal care and outcome of fetuses with trisomies 13 and 18 following a parental decision not to terminate the pregnancy. Fetal Diagn Ther 29:233–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tekcan A, Tural S, Elbistan M, Kara N, Guven D, Kocak I (2014) The combined QF-PCR and cytogenetic approach in prenatal diagnosis. Mol Biol Rep 41:7431–7436

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson DJ, de Crespigny L, Lees C, Savulescu J, Thiele P, Tran T, Watkins A (2014) Perinatal management of trisomy 18: a survey of obstetricians in Australia, New Zealand and the UK. Prenat Diagn 34:42–49

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Education Commission of Tianjin (20050229) and Science and Technology Foundation in Tackle Key Problems of Tianjin (06YFSYSF01800).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ying Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

All of the authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest regarding this paper.

Ethical approval

This study was conducted with approval from the Ethics Committee of Tianjin Medical University General Hospital.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, X., Sun, L., Shi, Y. et al. Use of the STR loci D18S53, D18S59, and D18S488 in the diagnosis of Edwards’ syndrome. Genes Genom 38, 639–644 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13258-016-0412-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13258-016-0412-8

Keywords

Navigation