Skip to main content
Log in

Lead equivalence testing using a custom-built testing kit

  • Note
  • Published:
Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Radiation protective garments should undergo a quality assurance regime comprising of an acceptance test of the lead equivalence before the garment is introduced into clinical service, followed by routine periodic visual and fluoroscopic inspections throughout its remaining clinical lifespan. The IEC 61331-1:2014 [1] is the leading standard outlining the methodology for testing of lead equivalence of these garments and forms the basis of the Australian/New Zealand Standards (1999) [2]. This study outlines the design and development of an IEC compliant broad beam lead equivalence testing setup, using an in-house custom-built testing kit (CBTK). The practicality and robustness of this kit was performance tested using lead equivalence measurements on 97% pure lead sheets. Hospital radiation protective garments are predominantly made of lead-free or lead-composite materials due to their light weight, as such, a set of lead-free (N-Pb) samples was also performance tested. These samples were tested using two different beam qualities; a total filtration of 2.5 mmAl and 0.25 mmCu added filtration, both at 102 kVp. Samples with thicknesses of 0.25 mm, 0.35 mm and 0.50 mm were used. The differential between labelled and measured lead equivalence averaged 3% for both the ‘pure-lead’ samples and N-Pb samples, with uncertainty of less than 7%. At 102 kVp, the use of Cu or Al filtration has marginal effect on measured lead equivalence for pure lead or N-Pb samples. The efficacy of utilizing the CBTK with a solid-state detector for lead equivalence testing was demonstrated through its ease of use, consistency and precision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. IEC 61331-1:2014 (2014) Protective devices against diagnostic medical X-radiation – Part 1: Determination of attenuation properties of materials. International Electrotechnical Commission. Version 2.0

  2. Australian/New Zealand Standard : AS/NZS 4543.1:1999 (IEC 61331-1:1994) (1999) Protective devices against diagnostic medical X-radiation – Part 1:Determination of attenuation properties of materials

  3. IEC 61331-1:1994 (1994) Protective devices against diagnostic medical X-radiation – Part 1: Determination of attenuation properties of materials. International Electrotechnical Commission. Version 1.0

  4. ARPANSA (2015) Aprons for protection against X-rays, Australian Government – Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency, Fact Sheet 28 https://www.arpansa.gov.au/understanding-radiation/radiation-sources/more-radiation-sources/aprons-protection-against-x-rays. Accessed 2 December 2020

  5. Yaffe MJ, Mawdsley GE, Lilley M, Servant R, Reh G (1991) Composite materials for x-ray protection. Health Phys 60(5):661–664

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Australian/New Zealand Standard : AS/NZS 4543.3:2000 (2000) Protective devices against diagnostic medical X-radiation – Part 3:Protective clothing and protective devices for gonads

  7. Jones K, Wagner L (2013) One the (f)utility of measuring the lead equivalence of protective garments. Journal of Med Phys 40 (6)

  8. Radiological Council of Western Australia (2015) Diagnostic X-ray Equipment Compliance Testing – Major Digital Radiographic Equipment, Department of Health – The Government of Western Australia under the Radiation Safety Act 1975

  9. Siewerdsen JH, Waese AM, Moseley DJ, Richard S, Jaffray DA (2004) Spektr: a computational tool for x-ray spectral analysis and imaging system optimization. Journal of Medical Physics 31 (11)

  10. National Institute of Standards and Technology, X-ray Form Factor, Attenuation, and Scattering Tables. https://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/FFast/html/form.html. Accessed 1 February 2021

  11. Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholdt EM, Boone JM (2002) The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging, 2nd Edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, USA

  12. J Laban Understanding Lead Aprons - Setting the Standards, RADsafe. https://radsafemedical.com/resources/understanding-lead-aprons/setting-the-standards/. Accessed 5 May 2022

  13. Eder H, Panzer W, Schöfer H (2005) Is the lead-equivalent suited for rating protection properties of lead-free radiation protective clothing? Rofo. Fortschr Röntgenstr 177:399–404

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dance DR et al (2014) Diagnostic Radiology Physics – A Handbook for Teachers and Students. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, design and development of the custom-built testing kit was performed by Robert Parin. Data collection and analysis was performed by Lesley Maddox under the direction of Benjamin Khoo. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Lesley Maddox and Benjamin Khoo has commented on previous versions and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lesley Maddox.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest/competing interests

Authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maddox, L., Parin, R. & Khoo, B. Lead equivalence testing using a custom-built testing kit. Phys Eng Sci Med 45, 1325–1334 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-022-01182-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-022-01182-8

Keywords

Navigation