Abstract
Purpose
To develop a novel model composed solely of Col I and Col III with the lower and upper limits set to include the ratios of Col I and Col III at 3:1 and 9:1 in which the structural and mechanical behavior of the resident CM can be studied. Further, the progression of fibrosis due to change in ratios of Col I:Col III was tested.
Methods
Collagen gels with varying Col I:Col III ratios to represent a healthy (3:1) and diseased myocardial tissue were prepared by manually casting them in wells. Absorbance assay was performed to confirm the gelation of the gels. Rheometric analysis was performed on each of the collagen gels prepared to determine the varying stiffnesses and rheological parameters of the gels made with varying ratios of Col I:Col III. Second Harmonic Generation (SHG) was performed to observe the 3D characterization of the collagen samples. Scanning Electron microscopy was used for acquiring cross sectional images of the lyophilized collagen gels. AC16 CM (human) cell lines were cultured in the prepared gels to study cell morphology and behavior as a result of the varying collagen ratios. Cellular proliferation was studied by performing a Cell Trace Violet Assay and the applied force on each cell was measured by means of Finite Element Analysis (FEA) on CM from each sample.
Results
Second harmonic generation microscopy used to image Col I, displayed a decrease in acquired image intensity with an increase in the non-second harmonic Col III in 3:1 gels. SEM showed a fiber-rich structure in the 3:1 gels with well-distributed pores unlike the 9:1 gels or the 1:0 controls. Rheological analysis showed a decrease in substrate stiffness with an increase of Col III, in comparison with other cases. CM cultured within 3:1 gels exhibited an elongated rod-like morphology with an average end-to-end length of 86 ± 28.8 µm characteristic of healthy CM, accompanied by higher cell growth in comparison with other cases. Finite element analysis used to estimate the forces exerted on CM cultured in the 3:1 gels, showed that the forces were well dispersed, and not concentrated within the center of cells, in comparison with other cases.
Conclusion
This study model can be adopted to simulate various biomechanical environments in which cells crosstalk with the Collagen-matrix in diseased pathologies to generate insights on strategies for prevention of fibrosis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acosta, Y., Q. Zhang, A. Rahaman, H. Ouellet, C. Xiao, J. Sun, et al. Imaging cytosolic translocation of Mycobacteria with two-photon fluorescence resonance energy transfer microscopy. Biomed. Opt. Exp. 5(11):3990–4001, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.5.003990
Alonso-Latorre, B., J. C. Del Alamo, J. Rodriguez-Rodriguez, A. Aliseda, R. Meili, R. Firtel, and J. C. Lasheras. Traction forces exerted by crawling cells. APS 59:002, 2006.
AnilKumar, S., S. C. Allen, N. Tasnim, T. Akter, S. Park, A. Kumar, et al. The applicability of furfuryl-gelatin as a novel bioink for tissue engineering applications. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 107(2):314–323, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34123.
Asgari, M., N. Latifi, H. K. Heris, H. Vali, and L. Mongeau. In vitro fibrillogenesis of tropocollagen type III in collagen type I affects its relative fibrillar topology and mechanics. Sci. Rep. 7(1):1–10, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01476-y.
Blissett, A. R., D. Garbellini, E. P. Calomeni, C. Mihai, T. S. Elton, and G. Agarwal. Regulation of collagen fibrillogenesis by cell-surface expression of kinase dead DDR2. J. Mol. Biol. 385(3):902–911, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2008.10.060.
Bluestone, J. A., K. Herold, and G. J. N. Eisenbarth. Genetics, pathogenesis and clinical interventions in type 1 diabetes. Nature 464(7293):1293, 2010.
Brower, G. L., J. D. Gardner, M. F. Forman, D. B. Murray, T. Voloshenyuk, S. P. Levick, et al. The relationship between myocardial extracellular matrix remodeling and ventricular function. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 30(4):604–610, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.07.006.
Campagnola, P. Second harmonic generation imaging microscopy: applications to diseases diagnostics. ACS 2011. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac1032325.
Carrow, J. K., P. Kerativitayanan, M. K. Jaiswal, G. Lokhande, and A. K. Gaharwar. Polymers for bioprinting. Essentials of 3D biofabrication and translation. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 229–248, 2015.
Chang, F., and K. C. Huang. How and why cells grow as rods. BMC Biol. 12(1):1–11, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-014-0054-8.
Chen, Z., X. C. M. Lu, D. A. Shear, J. R. Dave, A. R. Davis, C. A. Evangelista, et al. Synergism of human amnion-derived multipotent progenitor (AMP) cells and a collagen scaffold in promoting brain wound recovery: pre-clinical studies in an experimental model of penetrating ballistic-like brain injury. Brain Res. 1368:71–81, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2010.10.028.
Chen, X., O. Nadiarynkh, S. Plotnikov, and P. J. Campagnola. Second harmonic generation microscopy for quantitative analysis of collagen fibrillar structure. Nat. Protoc. 7(4):654–669, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2012.009.
Chistiakov, D. A., A. N. Orekhov, and Y. V. Bobryshev. The role of cardiac fibroblasts in post-myocardial heart tissue repair. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 101(2):231–240, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexmp.2016.09.002.
Cox, G., E. Kable, A. Jones, I. Fraser, F. Manconi, and M. D. Gorrell. 3-Dimensional imaging of collagen using second harmonic generation. J. Struct. Biol. 141(1):53–62, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1047-8477(02)00576-2.
Fan, D., A. Takawale, J. Lee, and Z. Kassiri. Cardiac fibroblasts, fibrosis and extracellular matrix remodeling in heart disease. Fibrogen. Tissue Rep. 5(1):15, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1186/1755-1536-5-15.
Frahs, S. M., J. T. Oxford, E. E. Neumann, R. J. Brown, C. R. Keller-Peck, X. Pu, et al. Extracellular matrix expression and production in fibroblast-collagen gels: towards an in vitro model for ligament wound healing. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 46(11):1882–1895, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-018-2064-0.
Frisk, M., M. Ruud, E. K. Espe, J. M. Aronsen, Å. T. Røe, L. Zhang, et al. Elevated ventricular wall stress disrupts cardiomyocyte t-tubule structure and calcium homeostasis. Cardiovasc. Res. 112(1):443–451, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvw111.
Gabasa, M., P. Duch, I. Jorba, A. Giménez, R. Lugo, I. Pavelescu, et al. Epithelial contribution to the profibrotic stiff microenvironment and myofibroblast population in lung fibrosis. Mol. Biol. Cell 28(26):3741–3755, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e17-01-0026.
Glowacki, J., and S. Mizuno. Collagen scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biopolymers 89(5):338–344, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1002/bip.20871.
Göktepe, S., O. J. Abilez, K. K. Parker, and E. Kuhl. A multiscale model for eccentric and concentric cardiac growth through sarcomerogenesis. J. Theor. Biol. 265(3):433–442, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2012.03.005.
Guo, G.-R., L. Chen, M. Rao, K. Chen, J.-P. Song, and S.-S. Hu. A modified method for isolation of human cardiomyocytes to model cardiac diseases. J. Transl. Med. 16(1):288, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-018-1649-6.
Hadjipanayi, E., V. Mudera, and R. Brown. Close dependence of fibroblast proliferation on collagen scaffold matrix stiffness. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 3(2):77–84, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1002/term.136.
Harvey, P. A., and L. A. Leinwand. Cellular mechanisms of cardiomyopathy. J. Cell Biol. 194(3):355–365, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201101100.
Huveneers, S., M. J. Daemen, and P. L. Hordijk. Between Rho (k) and a hard place: the relation between vessel wall stiffness, endothelial contractility, and cardiovascular disease. Circ. Res. 116(5):895–908, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.305720.
Ingber, D. E., and I. Tensegrity. Cell structure and hierarchical systems biology. J. Cell Sci. 116(7):1157–1173, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.00359.
Jian, Z., Y.-J. Chen, R. Shimkunas, Y. Jian, M. Jaradeh, K. Chavez, et al. In vivo cannulation methods for cardiomyocytes isolation from heart disease models. PLoS ONE 11(8):e0160605, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160605.
Joddar, B., E. Garcia, A. Casas, and C. M. Stewart. Development of functionalized multi-walled carbon-nanotube-based alginate hydrogels for enabling biomimetic technologies. Sci. Rep. 6(1):1–12, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32456.
Jugdutt, B. I. Ventricular remodeling after infarction and the extracellular collagen matrix: when is enough enough? Circulation 108(11):1395–1403, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000085658.98621.
Kohl, P., and R. G. Gourdie. Fibroblast–myocyte electrotonic coupling: does it occur in native cardiac tissue? J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 70:37–46, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjmcc.2013.12.024.
LaComb, R., O. Nadiarnykh, S. S. Townsend, and P. J. Campagnola. Phase matching considerations in second harmonic generation from tissues: effects on emission directionality, conversion efficiency and observed morphology. Opt. Commun. 281(7):1823–1832, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2007.10.040.
Lewis, P. R. Forensic Polymer Engineering: Why polymer products fail in service. Sawston: Woodhead, 2016.
Li, Y., A. Asadi, M. R. Monroe, and E. P. Douglas. pH effects on collagen fibrillogenesis in vitro: electrostatic interactions and phosphate binding. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 29(5):1643–1649, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2009.01.001.
Lindsey, M. L., R. P. Iyer, R. Zamilpa, A. Yabluchanskiy, K. Y. DeLeon-Pennell, M. E. Hall, et al. A novel collagen matricryptin reduces left ventricular dilation post-myocardial infarction by promoting scar formation and angiogenesis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 66(12):1364–1374, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvw206.
Lu, H., T. Hoshiba, N. Kawazoe, and G. Chen. Autologous extracellular matrix scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 32(10):2489–2499, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.12.016.
Lu, H., T. Hoshiba, N. Kawazoe, I. Koda, M. Song, and G. Chen. Cultured cell-derived extracellular matrix scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 32(36):9658–9666, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.091.
Mio, T., Y. Adachi, D. J. Romberger, R. F. Ertl, and S. I. Rennard. Regulation of fibroblast proliferation in three-dimensional collagen gel matrix. Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 32(7):427–433, 1996.
Nielsen, M. J., and M. A. Karsdal. Chapter 3-Type III Collagen. In: Biochemistry of Collagens, Laminins and Elastin, edited by M. A. Karsdal. New York: Academic Press, 2016, pp. 21–30.
Pandey, P., W. Hawkes, J. Hu, W. V. Megone, J. Gautrot, N. Anilkumar, et al. Cardiomyocytes sense matrix rigidity through a combination of muscle and non-muscle myosin contractions. Dev. Cell 44(3):326–336, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2017.12.024.
Pathak, M., S. Sarkar, E. Vellaichamy, and S. Sen. Role of myocytes in myocardial collagen production. Hypertension 37(3):833–840, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.hyp.37.3.833.
Pauschinger, M., A. Doerner, A. Remppis, R. Tannhäuser, U. Kühl, and H.-P. Schultheiss. Differential myocardial abundance of collagen type I and type III mRNA in dilated cardiomyopathy: effects of myocardial inflammation. Cardiovasc. Res. 37(1):123–129, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.99.21.2750.
Ribeiro, A. J., Y.-S. Ang, J.-D. Fu, R. N. Rivas, T. M. Mohamed, G. C. Higgs, et al. Contractility of single cardiomyocytes differentiated from pluripotent stem cells depends on physiological shape and substrate stiffness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112(41):12705–12710, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1508073112.
Richardson, W. J., S. A. Clarke, T. A. Quinn, and J. W. Holmes. Physiological implications of myocardial scar structure. Compr. Physiol. 5(4):1877–1909, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.c140067.
Sarber, R., B. Hull, C. Merrill, T. Sorrano, and E. Bell. Regulation of proliferation of fibroblasts of low and high population doubling levels grown in collagen lattices. Mech. Ageing Dev. 17(2):107–117, 1981. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-6374(81)90077-4.
Semeraro, R., V. Cardinale, G. Carpino, R. Gentile, C. Napoli, R. Venere, et al. The fetal liver as cell source for the regenerative medicine of liver and pancreas Ann. Transl. Med. 2013. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2012.10.02.
Severin, E., and B. Ohnemus. Flow cytometric analysis of chromosomes and cells using a modified BrdU-Hoechst method. Histochemistry 76(1):113–121, 1982. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00493290.
Shayegan, M., and N. R. Forde. Microrheological characterization of collagen systems: from molecular solutions to fibrillar gels. PLoS ONE 8(8):e70590, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070590.
Stuart, K., and A. Panitch. Characterization of gels composed of blends of collagen I, collagen III, and chondroitin sulfate. Biomacromology 10(1):25–31, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm800888u.
Talman, V., and H. Ruskoaho. Cardiac fibrosis in myocardial infarction-from repair and remodeling to regeneration. Cell Tissue Res. 365(3):563–581, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-016-2431-9.
Tracy, R. E. Cardiac myocyte sizes in right compared with left ventricle during overweight and hypertension. J. Am. Soc. Hypertens. 8(7):457–463, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jash.2014.05.004.
Tseliou, E., G. De Couto, J. Terrovitis, B. Sun, L. Weixin, L. Marbán, et al. Angiogenesis, cardiomyocyte proliferation and anti-fibrotic effects underlie structural preservation post-infarction by intramyocardially-injected cardiospheres. PLoS ONE 9(2):e88590, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088590.
Weber, K. T., and J. Díez. Targeting the cardiac myofibroblast secretome to treat myocardial fibrosis in heart failure. Circulation 9(8):e003315, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.116.003315.
Yu, Y., G. Yin, S. Bao, and Z. Guo. Kinetic alterations of collagen and elastic fibres and their association with cardiac function in acute myocardial infarction. Mol. Med. Rep. 17(3):3519–3526, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2017.8347.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the technical assistance received from Dr. Armando Varela for kindly assisting us with the bright field microscopy and Dr. David Roberson for his help with the SEM.
Author contributions
BR and BJ conceptualized the study and were responsible for the experimentation, data collection, curation and analysis. SAK helped in selected experiments, writing and editing of the manuscript. SCA and LJS performed the rheological analysis for this manuscript. MD helped with the cell culture experiments. SM and RC performed the Cell Force Estimation Analysis. AMR and CL performed the SHG experiments for this manuscript. All authors participated in the writing and editing of the manuscript.
Funding
The Joddar Lab (IMSTEL) acknowledges NIH BUILD Pilot 8UL1GM118970-02, the NSF PREM (DMR 1205302), the NSF-MRI Grant # DMR-1828268 and NIH 1SC2HL134642-01. CL acknowledges the NSF MRI Grant #DBI 1429708 and both CL and RC acknowledges the NSF-PREM program (#DMR-1827745).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Consent for publication
All authors have consented to this manuscript and their role and order of authorship.
Statement of Human and Animal Rights
No human or animal experimentation was executed as a part of this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Associate Editor Ajit P. Yoganathan oversaw the review of this article.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roman, B., Kumar, S.A., Allen, S.C. et al. A Model for Studying the Biomechanical Effects of Varying Ratios of Collagen Types I and III on Cardiomyocytes. Cardiovasc Eng Tech 12, 311–324 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13239-020-00514-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13239-020-00514-7