Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Endoscopic Techniques and Technology in Cardiac Surgery

  • Published:
Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose This article reviews the development of endoscopic technology in the field of cardiac surgery. It examines the basis for application of endoscopic visualization to previous open incision procedures; namely, the desire to decrease surgical morbidity and to improve patient outcome. Methods A literature review is conducted to provide a historical perspective of endoscopic saphenous vein graft harvesting as the initial cardiac surgical procedure utilizing an endoscope. Histological and immunohistochemical studies demonstrating acute efficacy are cited, as well as studies evaluating postoperative reduction in wound complications. Results The studies cited support the growth of the endoscopic technique and its adoption as the standard of care in coronary revascularization procedures. Subsequent expansion of the endoscopic approach to visualization and treatment of the epicardial surface in a closed chest technique is delineated. Demonstrated ability of a transparent tipped endoscope to visualize inside a beating heart suggests future applications for endocardial endoscopic therapy. Conclusions Successful visualization in a soft tissue, fluid or blood filled environment allowed the development of less invasive techniques in cardiac surgery, starting with graft procurement and extending to epicardial access. Continued research will allow development of endocardial endoscopic procedures to address internal cardiac structures as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allen, D. S., and E. A. Graham. Intracardiac surgery—a new method preliminary report. JAMA 79:1028–1030, 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bitondo, J. M., W. M. Daggett, D. E. Torchiana, et al. Endoscopic versus opensaphenous vein harvest: a comparison of postoperative wound complications. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 73:523–528, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Burris, N. S., E. N. Brown, M. Grant, et al. Optical coherence tomography imaging as a quality assurance tool for evaluating endoscopic harvest of the radial artery. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 85(4):1271–1277, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cable, D. G., J. A. Dearani, E. A. Pfeifer, R. C. Daly, and H. V. Schaff. Minimally invasive saphenous vein harvesting: endothelial integrity and early clinical results. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 66:139–143, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carpino, P. A., K. R. Khabbaz, R. M. Bojar, et al. Clinical benefits of endoscopic vein harvesting in patients with risk factors for saphenectomy wound infections undergoing coronary artery bypass graftin. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 119:69–76, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheng, D., J. Martin, and F. D. Ferdinand. Endoscopic versus open vein-graft harvesting. N. Engl. J. Med. 361(19):1908–1909, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chin, A. K. Endoscopic vessel harvesting. In: Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery, edited by M. Mack, and R. Cohen. St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishing, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chin, A. K., F. H. Moll, and M. B. McColl. Balloon-assisted extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair. In: Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair, edited by A. Darzi, and J. R. T. Monson. Oxford: Isis Medical Media, Ltd., 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen, G., M. G. Tamariz, J. Y. Sever, et al. The radial artery versus the saphenous vein graft in contemporary CABG: a case-matched study. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 71(1):180–185, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Connolly, M. W., and R. S. Poston. Endoscopic versus open vein-graft harvesting. N. Engl. J. Med. 361(19):1907–1908, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cook, R. C., C. M. Crowley, R. Hayden, et al. Traction injury during minimally invasive harvesting of the saphenous vein is associated with impaired endothelial function. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 127:65–71, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Crouch, J. D., D. P. O’Hair, J. P. Keuler, T. P. Barragry, P. H. Werner, and L. H. Kleinman. Open versus endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting: wound complications and vein quality. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 68:1513–1516, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. DeLaria, G. A., J. A. Hunter, M. D. Goldin, C. Serry, H. Javid, and H. Najafi. Leg wound complications associated with coronary revascularization. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 81:403–407, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Greenfield, G. T., W. A. Whitworth, L. L. Tavares, et al. Minimally invasive vein harvest and wound healing using the SaphLITE retractor system. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 72:S1046–S1049, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Haissaguerre, M., P. Jais, D. C. Shah, et al. Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. N. Engl. J. Med. 339:659–666, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hannah, S. L., and A. Chin. Laparoscopic retropubic urethropexy. J. Am. Assoc. Gynecol. Laparosc. 4(1):47–52, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lancey, R. A., H. Cuenoud, and J. J. Nunnari. Scanning electron microscopic analysis of endoscopic versus open vein harvesting techniques. J. Cardiovasc. Surg. (Torino) 42(3):297–301, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lawton, J. S., H. B. Barner, T. J. Guthrie, et al. Radial artery grafts in women: utilization and results. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 80(2):559–563, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee, J. Y. Minimally invasive vein harvesting. Surg. Phys. 2:25–32, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lopes, R. D., G. E. Hafley, K. B. Allen, et al. Endoscopic versus open vein-graft harvesting in coronary-artery bypass surgery. N. Engl. J. Med. 361:235–244, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lumsden, A. B., and F. F. Eaves. Endoscopic vein harvest. In: Endoscopic Plastic Surgery, edited by J. Bostwick, F. F. Eaves, and F. Nahai. St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishing, 1995, pp. 535–547.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Meyer, D. M., T. E. Rogers, M. E. Jessen, A. S. Estrera, and A. K. Chin. Histologic evidence of the safety of endoscopic saphenous vein graft preparation. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 70:487–491, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. O’Regan, J., J. A. A. Borland, A. H. Chester, D. J. Pennell, M. Yacoub, and J. R. Pepper. Assessment of human long saphenous vein function with minimally invasive harvesting with the Mayo stripper. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 12:428–435, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Patel, A. N., C. A. Henry, C. Hunnicutt, C. A. Cockerham, B. Willey, and H. C. Urschel, Jr. Endoscopic radial artery harvesting is better than the open technique. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 78:149–153, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Poa, L. Thoracoscopic ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation: a 2-port approach. Heart Surg. Forum 9(2):E590–E591, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Poston, R., and P. Desai. Heparin administration prior to endoscopic vein harvest limits clot retention and improves graft patency. Presented at the Annual Scientific Meeting of the International Society of Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery, San Francisco, June 3–6, 2009.

  27. Schwann, T. A., A. Zacharias, C. J. Riordan, et al. Sequential radial artery grafts for multivessel coronary artery bypass graft surgery: 10-year survival and angiography results. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 88(1):31–39, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Thalgott, J. S., A. K. Chin, J. A. Ameriks, et al. Gasless endoscopic anterior lumbar interbody fusion utilizing the B.E.R.G. approach. Surg. Endosc. 14(6):546–552, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yun, K. L., Y. X. Wu, V. Aharonian, et al. Randomized trial of endoscopic versus open vein harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: six-month patency rates. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 129:496–503, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zenati, M. A., G. Bonanomi, A. K. Chin, and D. Schwartzman. Left heart pacing lead implantation using subxiphoid videopericardioscopy. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 14:949–953, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zenati, M. A., A. Shalaby, G. Eisenman, et al. Epicardial left ventricular mapping using subxiphoid video pericardioscopy. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 84:2106–2107, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pavilion Medical Innovations, LLC, 1031 Bing St., San Carlos, CA, 94070, USA

    Albert K. Chin

Authors
  1. Albert K. Chin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Albert K. Chin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chin, A.K. Endoscopic Techniques and Technology in Cardiac Surgery. Cardiovasc Eng Tech 1, 66–76 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13239-010-0003-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13239-010-0003-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation