Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of the feeding control on the final properties of ethylene/propylene copolymers obtained in laboratory semi-batch reactor

  • Article
  • Published:
Macromolecular Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The slurry polymerization reactors on the industrial scale operate in continuous mode at low monomer conversion per pass to minimize mass and heat transfer limitations. Nevertheless, for the screening of catalytic systems, the laboratory tests are carried out using batch or semi-batch reactors. In this work, ethylene/propylene copolymers were synthesized in a semi-continuous reactor under similar conditions, where the only difference involves the modification of the feed ratio during the reaction. The key point of the control system is a micro-gas chromatograph (MGC), which analyzes the molar ratio ethylene (C 2) to propylene (C 3) in the gas phase during the reaction, and the composition in the liquid phase was calculated using the Soave-Redlich-Kwong equation of state. The effect of the ethylene/propylene copolymer microstructure has been studied using different techniques that allow us to conclude that the method of synthesis influences the comonomer distribution and the final copolymer properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. A. Ozzeti, A. P. De Oliveira Filho, U. Schuchardt, and D. Mandelli, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 85, 734 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Pires, R. S. Mauler, and S. A. Liberman, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 92, 2155 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. O. P. Grigoryeva, A. M. Fainleib, A. L. Tolstov, O. M. Starostenko, E. Lievana, and J. Karger-Kocsis, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 95, 659 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Bia ek, K. Czaja, and B. Sacher-Majewska, Thermochim. Acta, 429 149 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. E. Kolodka, W. Wang, S. Zhu, and A. E. Hamielec, Macromolecules, 35, 10062, (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. H. W. Park, J. S. Chung, S. S. Lim, and I. K. Song, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 264, 202 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. E. O. Dare, G. A. Olatunji, D. S. Ogunniyi, S. O. Oguntoye, and J. T. Bamgbose, J. Sci. Ind. Res., 65, 578 (2006).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. R. Kravchenko and R. M. Waymouth, Macromolecules, 31, 1 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Galimberti, F. Piemontesi, O. Fusco, I. Camurati, and M. Destro, Macromolecules, 31, 3409 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. C. Lethinen and B. Löfgren. Eur. Polym. J., 33, 115 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M. C. Haag, C. Krug, J. Dupont, G. B. de Galland, J. H. Z. dos Santos, T. Uozumi, T. Sano, and K. Soga, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 169, 275 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Galimberti, F. Piemontesi, O. Fusco, I. Camurati, and M. Destro, Macromolecules, 32, 7968 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. E. C. Carlson, Chem. Eng. Prog., 10, 35 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Voegele, C. Troll, and B. Rieger, Macromol. Chem. Phys., 203, 1918 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Zambelli, A. Grassi, M. Galimberti, R. Mazzocchi, and F. Piemontesi, Makromol. Chem. Rapid Commun., 12, 523 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. C. Piel, F. G. Karssenberg, W. Kaminsky, and V. B. F. Mathot, Macromolecules, 38, 6789 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. F. T. Wall, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 63, 1862 (1941).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. F. R. Mayo and F. M. Lewis, Am. Chem. Soc., 66, 1594 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. F. P. Price, J. Chem. Phys., 36, 209 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. K. Ito and Y. Yamashita, J. Polym. Sci. Part A: General Papers, 3, 2165 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. J. C. Randall, Macromol. Chem. Phys., 29, 201 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. M. Kakugo, Macromolecules, 15, 1150 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. H. Dweik, A. Al-Jabareen, G. Marom, and E. Assouline, Int. J. Polym. Mater., 52, 655 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. J. R. Isasi, L. Mandelkern, M. J. Galante, and R. G. Alamo, J. Polym. Sci. Part B: Polym. Phys., 37, 323 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. R. Benavente, E. Pérez, and R. Quijada, J. Polym. Sci. Part B: Polym. Phys., 39, 277 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. E. Pérez, R. Benavente, A. Bello, J. M. Pereña, D. Zucchi, and M. C. Sacchi, Polymer, 38, 5411 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. J. Brandrup and J. D. Immergut, Polymer Handbook, 4th ed., Wiley, New York, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  28. F. J. B. Calleja, Adv. Polym. Sci., 66, 117 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. D. Arrowsmith, W. Kaminsky, A. Schauwienold, and U. Weingarten, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 160, 97 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. D. Bianchini, K. D. Bichinho, and J. H. Z. Dos Santos, Polymer, 43, 2937 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. N. Herfert, P. Montag, and G. Fink, Makromol. Chem., 194, 3167 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Y. Feng and J. N. Hay, Polymer, 39, 6589 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. A. Alizadeh, L. Richardson, J. Xu, S. McCartney, H. Marand, W. Y. Cheung, and S. Chum, Macromolecules, 32, 6221 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. M. Carlberg, D. Colombini, and F. H. J. Maurer, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 94, 2240 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. S. Mansel, E. Perez, R. Benavente, J. M. Perena, A. Bello, W. Roll, R. Kirsten, S. Beck, and H. Brintzinger, Macromol. Chem. Phys., 200, 1292 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. C. H. Stephens, B. C. Poon, P. Ansems, S. P. Chum, A. Hiltner, and E. Baer, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 100, 1651 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. J. Mark, K. Ngai, W. Graessley, L. Mandelkern, E. Samulski, J. Koening, and G. Wignall, Physical Properties of Polymers, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  38. J. N. Hay and Y. Feng, Polymer, 39, 6723 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. M. L. Cerrada, R. Benavente, B. Peña, and E. Pérez, Polymer, 41, 5957 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. I. M. Ward and J. Sweeney, An Introduction to the Mechanical Properties of Solids Polymers, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Inmaculada Suarez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Grieken, R., Calleja, G., Suarez, I. et al. Influence of the feeding control on the final properties of ethylene/propylene copolymers obtained in laboratory semi-batch reactor. Macromol. Res. 21, 137–145 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13233-012-0187-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13233-012-0187-y

Keywords

Navigation