Skip to main content
Log in

Emergency Peripartum Hysterectomy: A 13-Year Review at a Tertiary Center in Kuwait

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To determine the incidence, indications, risk factors, and complications of emergency peripartum hysterectomy (EPH) and to evaluate total versus subtotal hysterectomy for EPH.

Materials and Methods

This is a retrospective case series involving thorough examination of the files of all women who had EPH between January 2000 and December 2012 in the department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Al-Jahra hospital, Kuwait after taking approval from the ethics committee. Incidence, indications, risk factors, type of hysterectomy, and complications of EPH were obtained from patient files.

Results

There were 63,337 deliveries of which 70.3 % were vaginal deliveries, and 29.6 % were by cesarean section (CS). Sixty-eight women underwent EPH representing an overall incidence of 1 case per 1,000 deliveries. The indications for EPH included abnormal placentation (77.4 %), uterine atony (14.5 %), and uterine rupture (8.1 %). There was one maternal death. Maternal morbidity occurred in 25 (40.3 %) women. The most common complications were mild to severe coagulopathy (19.35 %) and injury to the urinary tract (17.74 %). Injury to the ureter was avoided by placing ureteric stents preoperatively. Our population was significant in having higher rate of CS deliveries (91.9 %), women with prior CS (83.87 %), and high parity (mean 5.8).

Conclusion

Abnormal placentation was the most common indication to perform EPH. The relative risk of EPH was 27 for CS deliveries as compared to vaginal deliveries. There was no significant difference between subtotal versus total hysterectomy with respect to age, parity, previous CS, operative time, blood transfusion, and intra and post operative complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

EPH:

Emergency peripartum hysterectomy

CS:

Cesarean section

References

  1. Clark SL, Yeh SY, Pheldon JP, et al. Emergency hysterectomy for obstetric hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol. 1984;64:376–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chestnut DH, Eden RD, Gall SA, et al. Peripartum hysterectomy: a review of caesarean and postpartum hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 1985;65:365–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Sibai MH, Rahman J, Rahman MS, et al. Emergency hysterectomy in obstetrics-a review of 117 cases. Aust N Z Obstet Gynaecol. 1987;27:180–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Awan N, Bennett MJ, Walters WA. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: a 10-year review at the Royal hospital for women, Sydney. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;51:210–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Christopaulos P, Hassiakos D, Tsitoura A, et al. Obstetric hysterectomy: a review of cases over 16 years. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;31:139–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Selo-Ojeme DO, Bhattacharjee P, Izuwa-Njoku NF, et al. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy in a tertiary London hospital. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2005;271:154–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Basket TF. Emergency obstetric hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;23:353–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kwee A, Boto ML, Visser GH, et al. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: a prospective study in The Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006;124:187–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zealop CM, Harlow BL, Frigoletto FD, et al. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;168:1443–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Demirci O, Tugrul AS, Yilmaz E, et al. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy in a tertiary obstetric center: nine years evaluation. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2011;37:1054–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yucel O, Ozdemir I, Yucel N, et al. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: a 9 year review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2006;274:84–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Machado LSM. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: incidence, indications, risk factors and outcome. N Am J Med Sci. 2011;3:358–61.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Roethlisberger M, Womastek I, Posch M, et al. Early postpartum hysterectomy: incidence and risk factors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89:1040–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Obiechina NJ, Eleje GU, Ezebialu IU, et al. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy in Nnewi, Nigeria: A 10 year review. Niger J Clin Pract. 2012;15:168–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Knight M on behalf of UKOSS. Peripartum hysterectomy in the UK: management and outcomes of the associated haemorrhage. BJOG. 2007;114:1380–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chibber R, Al Hijji J, Fouda M, et al. A 26 year review of emergency peripartum hysterectomy in a tertiary teaching hospital in Kuwait-Years 1983-2011. Med Princ Pract. 2012;21:217–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. El-Jallad MF, Zayed F, Al Rimawi HS. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy in Northern Jordan: indications and obstetric outcome (an 8-year review). Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2004;270:271–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yalinkaya A, Guzel AI, Kangal K. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: sixteen year experience of a medical hospital. J Chin Med Assoc. 2010;73:360–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Smith J, Mousa HA. Peripartum hysterectomy for primary postpartum haemorrhage: incidence and maternal morbidity. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;27:44–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stanco LM, Schrimmer DB, Paul RH, et al. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy and associated risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;168:879–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Miller DA, Chollet JA, Goodwin TM. Clinical risk factors for placenta previa—placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177:210–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chanrachakul B, Chaturchinda K, Phuspradit W, et al. Cesarean and postpartum hysterectomy. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1996;54:109–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Roopnarinesingh R, Fay L, Mckenna P. A 27 year review of obstetric hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;23:252–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ogunniyi SO, Esen UI. Obstetric hysterectomy in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1990;32:23–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Eller A, Porter T, Soisson R, et al. Optimal management strategies for placenta accreta. BJOG. 2009;116:648–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Steins Bisschop CN, Schaap TP, Vogelvang TE, et al. Invasive placentation and uterus preserving treatment modalities: a systematic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;284:491–502.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kayam G, Clement D, Giffinet F. Recurrence following conservative management of placenta accreta. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007;99:142–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

We have not received any financial assistance or funds for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ramadevi V. Wani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wani, R.V., Abu-Hudra , N.M.S. & Al-Tahir, S.I. Emergency Peripartum Hysterectomy: A 13-Year Review at a Tertiary Center in Kuwait. J Obstet Gynecol India 64, 403–408 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-014-0554-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-014-0554-z

Keywords

Navigation