Abstract
The process capability indices (PCIs) are frequently adopted to measure the performance of a process within the specifications. Although higher PCIs indicate higher process “quality”, yet it does not ascertain fewer rates of rejection. Thus, it is more appropriate to adopt a loss-based PCI for measuring the process capability. In this paper, our first objective is to introduce a new capability index called \({\mathcal {C}}^{\prime }_{pm}\) which is based on asymmetric loss function (linear exponential) for normal process which provides a tailored way of incorporating the loss in capability analysis. Next, we estimate the PCI \(\mathcal C^{\prime }_{pm}\) when the process follows the normal distribution using six classical methods of estimation and compare the performance of the considered methods of estimation in terms of their mean squared errors through simulation study. Besides, four bootstrap methods are employed for constructing the confidence intervals for the index \({\mathcal {C}}^{\prime }_{pm}\). The performance of the bootstrap confidence intervals (BCIs) are compared in terms of average width and coverage probabilities using Monte Carlo simulation. Finally, for illustrating the effectiveness of the proposed methods of estimation and BCIs, two real data sets from electronic industries are analyzed. Simulation results show that \({\mathcal {P}}\)-boot provides higher coverage probability for almost all sample sizes and for all the considered methods of estimation. In addition, among all considered methods of estimation, maximum product spacing estimator is the best as it produces the least width of the estimates. Further, real data analysis shows that width of bias-corrected accelerated bootstrap confidence interval is minimum among all other considered BCIs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The link of the dataset used in this study is included within the article, and data set also provided in the article.
References
Abdel Ghaly AA, Aly H, Salah R (2016) Different estimation methods for constant stress accelerated life test under the family of the exponentiated distributions. Qual Reliab Eng Int 32(3):1095–1108
Abdolshah M, Yusuff RM, Hong TS, Ismail MYB (2011) Loss-based process capability indices: a review. Int J Prod Qual Manag 71:1–21
Ali S, Riaz M (2014) On the generalized process capability under simple and mixture models. J Appl Stat 41:832–852
Chan LK, Cheng SW, Spiring FA (1988) A new measure of process capability: \(C_{pm}\). J Qual Technol 30:162–175
Chen JP, Tong LI (2003) Bootstrap confidence interval of the difference between two process capability indices. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 21:249–256
Cheng RCH, Amin NAK (1979) Maximum product-of-spacings estimation with applications to the log-normal distribution. Math Rep 66:79
Cheng RCH, Amin NAK (1983) Estimating parameters in continuous univariate distributions with a shifted origin. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol 45(3):394–403
Dennis JE, Schnabel RB (1983) Numerical methods for unconstrained optimization and non-linear equations. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Dey S, Saha M (2020) Bootstrap confidence intervals of process capability index \(S_{pmk}\) using different methods of estimation. J Stat Comput Simul 90(1):28–50
Dey S, Kumar D, Ramos PL, Louzada F (2017a) Exponentiated Chen distribution: properties and estimation. Commun Stat Simul Comput 46:8118–8139
Dey S, Josmar MJ, Nadarajah S (2017b) Kumaraswamy distribution: different methods of estimation. Comput Appl Math. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-017-0441-1
Dey S, Saha M, Zhang S, Wang M (2021) Classical and objective Bayesian estimation and confidence intervals of an asymmetric loss based capability index \(C^{\prime }_{pmk}\). Qual Reliab Eng Int. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.3042
Erfanian M, Gildeh BS (2021) A new capability index for non-normal distributions based on linex loss function. Qual Eng 33(1):76–84
Hsiang TC, Taguchi G (1985) A tutorial on quality control and assurance. Annual Meeting on the American Statistical Association, Las Vegas, NV (unpublished presentation)
Ihaka R, Gentleman R (1996) R: a language for data analysis and graphics. J Comput Graph Stat 5:299–314
Juran JM (1974) Juran’s quality control handbook, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
Kackar RN (1986) Taguchi’s quality philosophy: analysis and commentary. Qual Prog 19:21–30
Kane VE (1986) Process capability indices. J Qual Technol 18:41–52
Kao JHK (1958) Computer methods for estimating Weibull parameters in reliability studies. Trans IRE Reliab Qual Control 13:15–22
Kao JHK (1959) A graphical estimation of mixed Weibull parameters in life testing electron tube. Technometrics 1:389–407
Kumar S, Yadav AS, Dey S, Saha M (2021) Parametric inference of generalized process capability index \(C_{pyk}\) for the power Lindley distribution. Qual Technol Quant Manag. https://doi.org/10.1080/16843703.2021.1944966
MacDonald PDM (1971) Comment on an estimation procedure for mixtures of distributions by Choi and Bulgren. J R Stat Soc Ser B 33(2):326–329
Nassar M, Dey S (2018) Different estimation methods for exponentiated Rayleigh distribution under constant-stress accelerated life test. Qual Reliab Eng Int. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.2349
Pearn WL, Kotz S, Johnson NL (1992) Distributional and inferential properties of process capability indices. J Qual Technol 24:216–231
Ranneby B (1984) The maximum spacing method. An estimation method related to the maximum likelihood Method. Scand J Stat 11(2):93–112
Saha M, Dey S, Yadav AS, Ali S (2021) Confidence intervals of the index \(C_{pk}\) for normally distributed quality characteristics using classical and Bayesian methods of estimation. Braz J Probab Stat 35(1):138–157
Seifi S, Nezhad MSF (2017) Variable sampling plan for resubmitted lots based on process capability index and Bayesian approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88(9–12):2547–2555
Stevens DP, Baker RC (1994) A generalized loss function for process optimization. Decis Sci 25:41–56
Swain J, Venkatraman S, Wilson J (1988) Least squares estimation of distribution function in Johnsons translation system. J Stat Comput Simul 29:271–297
Varian HR (1975) Studies in Bayesian econometric and statistics in Honor of Leonard J. Savage. North-Holland Pub. Co, New York, pp 195–208. A Bayesian approach to real estate assessment
Wu CW, Pearn WL (2008) A variables sampling plan based on \(C_{pmk}\) for product acceptance determination. Eur J Oper Res 184:549–560
Acknowledgements
The authors express their sincere thanks to the esteemed Reviewers and the Editor-in-Chief for making some useful suggestions on an earlier version of this manuscript which resulted in this improved version.
Funding
This research received no external or internal funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed equally to this work, have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Informed consent for publication
Consent given to IJSA.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Saha, M., Dey, S. Estimation and confidence intervals of a new loss based process capability index \({\mathcal {C}}^{\prime }_{pm}\) with applications. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 14, 1827–1840 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-023-02004-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-023-02004-0