Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Adequate Assessment Can Affect the Management of Breast Cancer in Geriatric Population

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Breast cancer (BC) risk increases with age; about a third of patients are diagnosed in age older than 65. Treatment of this age group remains controversial, leading to inferior outcomes with lower survival rates than younger patients. We aimed to evaluate performance status tools as well as the outcome of management of breast cancer in the geriatric population. We have conducted a retrospective database analysis looking into the management of breast cancer patients older than 65 years old presenting to our unit during the period between June 2015 and June 2019. All patients had triple assessment as well as multimodality performance status assessment with their treatment modalities, and outcomes are recorded and assessed. We have included 578 patients, 0.8% male and 99.2% female, and our patients’ mean age was 71 years. Most of our patients scored one or two on the WHO/ECOG performance status score and Clinical Frailty Score, as well as ASA-PS score. 3.2% had no treatment, 4.3% had endocrine therapy only, 0.5% had primary endocrine therapy followed by surgery, and 92.3% underwent surgery with 4.1% complication rate. Patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery had adjuvant breast radiotherapy, and 23.7% had adjuvant chest wall radiotherapy, 78.8% had adjuvant endocrine treatment, and 4.8% had adjuvant chemotherapy out of which 30.7% had adjuvant chemotherapy and Herceptin. Objective assessment tools should be used for patients older than 65 years diagnosed with primary breast cancer to be able to scarify patients’ individualised treatment options to reach the optimum outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BC:

Breast cancer

HER2:

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)

ECOG PS:

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status

WHO:

World Health Organization

ASA-PS:

American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status

CFS:

Clinical Frailty Score

AI:

Aromatase inhibitors

pCR:

Pathological complete response

NACT:

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy

References

  1. Sieber CC (2007) Der ältere Patient-weristdas? Der Internist 48:1190–1194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cancer Research UK (2017) Cancer incidence for common cancers, Cancer Research UK.Avaliable from. https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/.../cancer-statistics/incidence/common-cancers-compared. Accessed July 2020

  3. Duggan MA, Anderson WF, Altekruse S, Penberthy L, Sherman ME (2016) The surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) program and pathology: toward strengthening the critical relationship. Am J SurgPathol 28:94–102. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000000749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cancer statistics review, 1975–2013 - previous version - SEER Cancer Statistics Review. [cited. 2020 Jun]. Available from). https://seer.cancer.gov/archive/csr/1975_2013

  5. Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC et al (1982) Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 5(6)

  6. Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C et al (2005) A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. Can Med Assoc J 30:495. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.050051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. ASA physical status classification system | American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA). Available from: https://www.asahq.org/standards-and-guidelines/asa-physical-status-classification-system. Accessed July 2020

  8. Balducci L (2016) Treatment of breast cancer in women older than 80 years is a complex task. J OncolPract 12(2):133–134. https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.2015.010405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Scher KS, Hurria A (2012) Under-representation of older adults in cancer registration trials: known problem, little progress. J Clin Oncol 30:2036–2038. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.41.6727

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gosain R, Pollock Y, Jain D (2016) Age-related disparity: breast cancer in the elderly. Curr Oncol Rep 69

  11. Glaser R, Marinopoulos S, Dimitrakakis C (2018) Breast cancer treatment in women over the age of 80: a tailored approach. Maturitas 110:29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.01.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cardoso F, Bartlett JMS, Slaets L et al (2018) Characterization of male breast cancer: results of the EORTC 10085/TBCRC/BIG/NABCG International Male Breast Cancer Program. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol 29:405–417. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx651

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fentiman IS (2016) Male breast cancer is not congruent with the female disease. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 101:119–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.02.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cortadellas T, Argacha P, Acosta J et al (2017) Estimation of tumor size in breast cancer comparing clinical examination, mammography, ultrasound and MRI-correlation with the pathological analysis of the surgical specimen. Gland Surg 6:330–5. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs.2017.03.09

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Oluogun WA, Adedokun KA, Oyenike MA, Adeyeba OA (2019) Histological classification, grading, staging, and prognostic indexing of female breast cancer in an African population: a 10-year retrospective study. Int J Health Sci (Qassim) 3–9

  16. Rakha EA, Aleskandarany MA, Toss MS et al (2018) Impact of breast cancer grade discordance on prediction of outcome. Histopathology 73:904–915. https://doi.org/10.1111/his

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Morgan J, Wyld L, Collins KA, Reed MW (2014) Surgery versus primary endocrine therapy for operable primary breast cancer in elderly women (70 years plus). Vol. 2014, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. John Wiley and Sons Ltd.https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004272.pub2

  18. Brain E, Caillet P, de Glas N et al (2019) HER2-targeted treatment for older patients with breast cancer: an expert position paper from the International Society of Geriatric Oncology. J Geriatr Oncol 10:1003–1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2019.06.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hurria A, Levit LA, Dale W et al (2015) improving the evidence base for treating older adults with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Statement. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 3826–33. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.63.0319

  20. Cherny N, Paluch-Shimon S, Berner-Wygoda Y (2018) Palliative care: needs of advanced breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer: Targets Therapy 10:231–243. https://doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S160462

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cortadellas T, Córdoba O, Gascón A et al (2015) Surgery improves survival in elderly with breast cancer. A study of 465 patients in a single institution. Eur J Surg Oncol J Eur Soc Surg Oncol Br Assoc Surg Oncol 41:635–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13670-017-0223-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Clough KB, van la Parra RFD, Thygesen HH et al (2018) Long-term results after oncoplastic surgery for breast cancer: a 10-year follow-up. Ann Surg 268:165–71. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Davis C, Williams P, Redman S (2000) Early discharge following breast surgery: assessing care, support, and informational needs of women with early breast cancer in Australia. Aust N Z J Surg 70:569–572. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1622.2000.01900.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Smith IE, Dowsett M, Ebbs SR et al (2005) Neoadjuvant treatment of postmenopausal breast cancer with anastrozole, tamoxifen, or both in combination: the Immediate Preoperative Anastrozole, Tamoxifen, or Combined with Tamoxifen (IMPACT) multicenter double-blind randomized trial. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 23:5108–5116. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.04.005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pepping RMC, Portielje JEA, van de Water W, de Glas NA (2017) Primary endocrine therapy in older women with breast cancer. Curr Geriatr Rep 6:239–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13670-017-0223-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Jeon YW, You SH, Lee JE et al (2019) Optimal treatment of breast cancer in women older than 75 years: a Korea Breast Cancer Registry analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 178:693–701

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kocik J, Pajączek M, Kryczka T (2019) Worse survival in breast cancer in elderly may not be due to underutilization of medical procedures as observed upon changing healthcare system in Poland. BMC Cancer 19:749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ageing and health. [cited. 2020 Jul]. Available from). https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HH was responsible for the surgery and ongoing care of the patients in the hospital and provided the data as well as result analysis.SM and ME researched, drafted and conceived the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sherif Monib.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

No ethical approval was needed for this study as it was an analysis of standard practice.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Monib, S., Elkorety, M. & Habashy, H. Adequate Assessment Can Affect the Management of Breast Cancer in Geriatric Population. Indian J Surg Oncol 12, 785–791 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-021-01442-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-021-01442-1

Keywords

Navigation