Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Examining the social, physical and institutional determinants of pineapple farmers’ choice of production systems in Central Ghana

  • Published:
Organic Agriculture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Various researchers have determined the different factors influencing farmers’ decisions to adopt certified organic production, without considering factors about the social and institutional environments of smallholder farmers in developing countries. In this paper, we examined the social, physical and institutional factors that affect farmers’ choice of production systems for pineapple in Ghana. A multinomial logit model was used to examine the factors influencing the pineapple farmers’ choice of a production system. Empirical findings indicate that apart from personal and attitudinal factors, the social, physical and institutional factors are also very important in individual farmer’s decisions to adopt certified organic production systems. Policy implications of these findings are that besides farmers’ personal and attitudinal characteristics, the social, physical and institutional features were also crucial in their decision to adopt certified organic production systems. The identified factors contribute to informing the government and other key players along the pineapple value chain on the elements to strive for when designing strategies and programmes to promote certified organic pineapple production. The study proposes that to encourage and sustain certified organic pineapple production systems, stakeholders in the pineapple sector should help farmers to consider the environmental sustainability in their production decision making and educate farmers on the potential cost and benefits of certifying their products organically. Effective policy and strategy design should, therefore, consider these factors to improve the adoption rate from conventional to certified organic production systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achaw MA (2010) The impact of large-scale pineapple companies on rural livelihoods in the Akuapim South Municipality of Ghana. Master’s Thesis, Norway: Unversity of Oslo Blindern Centre for Development and the Environment

  • Babyak MA (2004) What you see may not be what you get: a brief, nontechnical introduction to overfitting in regression-type models. Psychosom Med 66:411–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Best H (2010) Environmental concern and the adoption of organic agriculture. Soc Nat Resour 23(5):451–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beus EB, Dunlap RE (1994) Agricultural paradigms and the practice of agriculture. Rural Sociol 59:620–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton M, Rigby D, Young T (1999) Analysis of the determinants of adoption of organic horticultural techniques in the UK. J Agric Econ 50(1):47–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carolyn PE (1999) Attitudes, backgrounds and information preferences of Canadian organic and conventional farmers: implications for organic farming advocacy and extension. J Sustain Agric 13(3):45–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constance DH, Choi JY (2010) Overcoming the barriers to organic adoption in the United States: a look at pragmatic conventional producers in Texas. Sustainability 2:163–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cranfield J, Henson S, Holliday J (2010) The motives, benefits, and problems of conversion to organic production. Agric Hum Values 27:291–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Souza G, Cyphers D, Phipps T (1993) Factors affecting the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices. J Agric Resour Econ 22:159–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danielou M, Ravry C (2005) The rise of Ghanas pineapple industry: from successful takeoff to sustainable expansion. Africa region working paper series no. 93. World Bank, Washington DC Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/788441468035966030/The-rise-of-Ghanas-pineapple-industry-from-successful-takeoff-to-sustainable-expansion. Accessed 20 June 2018

    Google Scholar 

  • Darnhofer I, Schneeberger W, Freyer B (2005) Converting or not converting to organic farming in Austria: farmer types and their rationale. Agric Hum Values 22:39–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djokoto JG, Owusu V, Awunyo-Vitor D (2016) Adoption of organic agriculture: evidence from cocoa farming in Ghana. Cogent Food Agric 2(1):1242181

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather JR (1999) Understanding how farmers choose between organic and conventional production: results from New Zealand and policy implications. Agric Hum Values 16:51–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genius M, Christos JP, Tzouvelekas V (2006) Information acquisition and adoption of organic farming practices. J Agric Resour Econ 31(1):93–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Green WH (2000) Econometric analysis, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrell FE Jr (2001) Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression and survival analysis. Springer Series in Statistics, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hollaway G, Shankar B, Rahman S (2002) Bayesian spatial probit estimation: a primer and an application to HYV rice adoption. Agric Econ 27:383–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IFOAM, FiBL (2006) The world of organic agriculture, statistics and emerging trends 2006. International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM) and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Born, Germany. Retrieved from http://orgprints.org/5161/2/willer-yussefi-2005-world-of-organic.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2017

  • IFOAM, FiBL (2008) The world of organic agriculture, statistics and emerging trends 2008. International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM) and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Born, Germany. Retrieved from http://orgprints.org/13123/4/world-of-organic-agriculture-2008.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2017

  • IFOAM, FiBL (2014) The world of organic agriculture, statistics and emerging trends 2014. International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM) and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Born, Germany. Retrieved from https://shop.fibl.org/chen/mwdownloads/download/link/id/638/. Accessed 20 June 2017

  • IFOAM, FiBL (2015) The world of organic agriculture, statistics and emerging trends 2015. International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM) and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Born, Germany. Retrieved from https://shop.fibl.org/chen/mwdownloads/download/link/id/686/. Accessed 20 June 2017

  • Jansen HGP (1992) Inter-regional variation in the speed of adoption of modern cereal cultivars in India. J Agric Econ 43:88–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jumba FR, Freyer B (2016) Perception of quality in certified organic pineapples by farmers in Kayunga district, Central Uganda: implications for food security. J Agr Rural Dev Tropics and Subtropics 117(1):137–148

  • Kallas Z, Serra T, Gil JM (2010) Farmers’ objectives as determinants of organic farming adoption: the case of Catalonian vineyard production. Agric Econ 41:409–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karki L, Schleenbecker R, Ulrich H (2011) Factors influencing a conversion to organic farming in Nepalese tea farms. J Agric Rural Dev Trop 112(2):113–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassie M, Zikhali P, Manjur K, Edwards S (2009) Adoption of organic farming techniques evidence from a semi-arid region of Ethiopia. Environment for Development Discussion paper EfD DP09-01. University of Gothenburg environmental economics unit, Sweden and Resources for the future, Washinton DC. Retrieved from http://www.rff.org/files/sharepoint/WorkImages/Download/EfD-DP-09-01.pdf. Accessed 23 Dec 2013

  • Khaledi M, Weseen S, Sawyer E, Ferguson S, Gray R (2010) Factors influencing partial and complete adoption of organic farming practices in Saskatchewan, Canada. Can J Agric Econ 58:37–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kisaka-Lwayo M (2008) A discriminant analysis of factors associated with the adoption of certified organic farming by smallholder farmers in Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa. Proceedings of 2nd International conference of the African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE)., Accra, Ghana, pp. 411–416. 20–22 August 2007

  • Kleemann L (2014) Knowing where organic markets move next - an analysis of developing countries in the pineapple market. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Jpournal 8(2014–14)

  • Kleemann L, Abdulai A, Buss M (2014) Certification and access to export market: adoption and return on investment on organic-certified pineapple farming in Ghana. World Dev 64:79–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kothari CR (2004) Research methodology: methods and techniques, 2nd edn. New Age International Publishers, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Läpple D (2010) Adoption and abandonment of organic farming: an empirical investigation of the Irish dry stock sector. J Agric Econ 61(3):697–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Läpple D, Van Rensburg T (2011) Adoption of organic farming: are there differences between early and late adoption? Ecol Econ 70:1406–1414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohr L, Park TA (2002) Choice of insect management portfolios by organic farmers: lessons and comparative analysis. Ecol Econ 43:87–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohr L, Salomonsson L (2000) Conversion subsidies for organic production: results from Sweden and lesson for the United States. Agric Econ 22:133–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddala GS (1992) Introduction to econometrics, 2nd edn. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York

  • Mensah A, Brümmer B (2015) Determinants of MD2 adoption, production efficiency and technology gaps in the Ghanaian pineapple production sector. Proceedings of 29th International Conference of Agricultural Economists (ICAE). Milan, Italy. 8–14 August 2015

  • Michelsen J, Lynggaard K, Padel S, Foster C (2001) Organic farming development and agricultural institutions in Europe: a study of six countries. Organic farming in Europe: Econ Policy, volume 9, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart,p 179

  • Mutebi KR, Twebaze J, Kamugisha R, Tenywa M, Sabiiti M, Kugonza I, Tenywa M, Nyamwaro S (2018) Multi-stakeholder partnerships in value chain development: a case of the organic pineapple in Ntungamo district, Western Uganda. J Agrib Dev Emer Econ 8(1):171–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemeyer K, Lombard J (2003) Identifying problems and potential of the conversion to organic farming in South Africa. Proceedings of 41st Annual conference of Agricultural Economic Association of South Africa (AEASA). Pretoria, South Africa. 2–3 October 2003

  • Offermann F, Nieberg H, Zander K (2009) Dependency of organic farms on direct payments in selected EU member states: today and tomorrow. Food Policy 34(3):273–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okon UE, Idiong IC (2016) Factors influencing adoption of organic vegetable farming among farm households in south-south region of Nigeria. Am Eur J Agric Environ Sci 16(5):852–859

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Overseas Development Institute (2011) Ghana’s sustained agricultural growth: putting underused resources to work. ODI publications, London Retrieved from https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/resource-documents/11558.pdf. Accessed 10 July 2018

    Google Scholar 

  • Parra López CP, Calatrava Requena J (2005) Factors related to the adoption of organic farming in Spanish olive orchards. Span J Agric Res 3(1):5–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrott N, Sockyew AC, Makunike C, Ntambi SN (2006) Organic farming in Africa. In: Helga W, Yussefi M (eds) The world of organic farming agriculture: statistics and emerging trends 2006. International Federation of Organic Agricuture movement (IFOAM) and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Bonn Retrieved from http://orgprints.org/5161/2/willer-yussefi-2005-world-of-organic.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietola KS, Oude-Lansink A (2001) Farmer response to policies promoting organic farming technology in Finland. Eur Rev Agric Econ 28(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pornpratansombat P, Bauer B, Boland H (2011) The adoption of organic rice farming in northeastern Thailand. J Organ Syst 6(3):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan M, Tripura B, Mondal TK, Darnnel R, Murasing J (2017) Factors influencing the adoption of organic farming by the farmers of North District of Sikkim. Int J Adv Sci Res Dev 4(2):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Saha A, Love HA, Schwart R (1994) Adoption of emerging technologies under output uncertainty. Amer J Agric Econ 76:836–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saker MA, Itohara Y, Hoque M (2010) Determinants of adoption decisions: the case of organic farming (OF) in Bangladesh. Ext Farm Syst J 5(2):39–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneeberger W, Darnhofer I, Eder M (2002) Barriers to the adoption of organic farming by cash crop producers in Austria. Am J Alternive Agric 17(1):24–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Serra T, Zilberman D, Gil JM (2008) Differential uncertainties and risk attitudes between conventional and organic producers: the case of Spanish crop farmers. Agric Econ 39(2):219–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sodjinou E, Glin L, Nicolay G, Tovignan S, Hinvi J (2015) Socioeconomic determinants of organic cotton adoption in Benin, West Africa. Agric Food Econ 3:12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svotwa E, Baipai R, Jiyane J (2009) Organic farming in the smallholder farming sector of Zimbabwe. J Organic Syst 4:8–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Thapa GB, Rattanasuteerakul K (2011) Adoption and extent of organic vegetable farming in Mahasarakham province, Thailand. Appl Geogr 31:201–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United State Agency for International Development (USAID) (2012) Trade and investment program for a competitive export economy in Ghana: a synthesis of findings. Policy Brief 01-2012. USAID, Washington DC Retrieved from http://www.jfoehmke.com/uploads/9/4/1/8/9418218/ghana_tipcee_mango_pineapple _impact.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuepper D, Sauer J, Kleemann L (2017) Sustainable intensification amongst Ghana’s pineapple farmers: the complexity of an innovation determines the effectiveness of its training. Environ Dev Econ:1–22

  • Zulveraa Z, Sumardjob S, Slametc M, Ginting B (2016) Factors influencing the adoption of the organic vegetable farming system in Agam and Tanah Datar Districts of West Sumatra. Int J Sci Basic Appl Res 26(1):425–432

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farida Badu-Gyan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Badu-Gyan, F., Henning, J.I.F., Grové, B. et al. Examining the social, physical and institutional determinants of pineapple farmers’ choice of production systems in Central Ghana. Org. Agr. 9, 315–329 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-018-0233-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-018-0233-y

Keywords

Navigation