Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Evolving Silvicultural Practices to Meet Sustainability Objectives in Forested Wetlands of the Southeastern United States

  • Silviculture in Forested Wetlands
  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Development and implementation of forestry best management practices (BMPs) to minimize effects on wetland soils and hydrology represents a great success of the Clean Water Act (CWA). The “silvicultural exemption” as specified in Section 404(f) of the CWA allows management activities within jurisdictional forested wetlands so long as practices meet specified criteria and wetlands are not converted to uplands. This is particularly important for establishing and maintaining forest roads and site preparation of harvested stands in jurisdictional wetlands. The presence of poorly drained soils and seasonally high-water tables in the Coastal Plain led to the development of site preparation practices that enhance seedling survival, vigor, and growth. Collaboration among universities, governmental agencies, and the forest products industry has resulted in numerous applied research projects assessing environmental responses to management in forested wetlands. Today, all southeastern Coastal Plain states recommend the use of site preparation BMPs that reduce soil and hydrology disturbances, while facilitating stand regeneration. State forestry agencies routinely monitor BMP implementation to assess application and functionality of BMPs. Additionally, forest landowners and wood procurement entities who participate in voluntary third-party forest certification programs have increased BMP implementation on a scale that contributes to watershed-level benefits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen HL, Campbell RG (1988) Wet site pine management in the Southeastern United States. Paper no. 10631 of the journal series of the North Carolina state agriculture research service. Pgs. 173-184

  • Appelboom TW, Chescheir GM, Skaggs RW, Hesterberg DL (2002) Management practices for sediment reduction from forest roads in the coastal plains. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 45:337–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Aust WM, Tippett MD, Burger JA, McKee WH Jr (1995) Compaction and rutting during harvesting affect better drained soils more than poorly drained soils on wet pine flats. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 18:72–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Aust WM, Burger JA, McKee WH, Scheerer GA, Tippett MD (1998) Bedding and fertilization ameliorate effects of designated wet-weather skid trails after four years for loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) plantations. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 22:222–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Aust WM, Bolding MC, Barrett SM (2018) Silviculture in forested wetlands: summary of current forest operations, potential effects, and long-term experiments. Wetlands

  • Batzer DP, Jackson CR, Mosner M (2000) Influences of riparian logging on plants and invertebrates in small, depressional wetlands of Georgia, U.S.A. Hydrobiologia 441:123–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Batzer DP, George BM, Braccia A (2005) Aquatic invertebrate responses to timber harvest in a bottomland hardwood wetland of South Carolina. Forest Science 51:284–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Bethume JE (1963) Ridging: low-cost techniques for increasing growth on wet Flatwoods sites. Forest Farmer 23(6–8):18

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton JD (1971) Prolonged flooding inhibits growth of loblolly pine seedlings. Res. Note SO–124. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station, New Orleans 4 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Clawson RG, Lockaby BG, Jones RH (1997) Amphibian responses to helicopter harvesting in forested floodplains of low order, Blackwater streams. Forest Ecology Management 90:225–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Conner WH, Messina MG (1998) Southern forested wetlands ecology and management. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton 616 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Cristan R, Aust WM, Bolding MC, Barrett SM, Munsell JF (2018) National status of state developed and implemented forestry best management practices for protecting water quality in the United States. Forest Ecology Management 418:73–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl TE (2006) Status and trends of wetlands in the conterminous United States 1998 to 2004. U.S. Department of the Interior; Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C. 112 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl TE (2011) Status and trends of wetlands in the conterminous United States 2004 to 2009. U.S. Department of the Interior; Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C. 108 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl TE, Stedman SM (2013) Status and trends of wetlands in the coastal watersheds of the conterminous United States 2004 to 2009. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service. 46 p

  • Daniel C III (1981) Hydrology, geology and soils of pocosins: a comparison of natural and altered systems. In: Richardson CJ (ed) Pocosin wetlands. Hutchinson Ross Publishing Company, Pennsylvania, pp 69–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Domec JC, Noormets A, King JS, Sun G, McNulty SG, Gavazzi MJ, Boggs JL, Treasure EA (2009) Decoupling the influence of leaf and root hydraulic conductances on stomatal conductance and its sensitivity to vapor pressure deficit as soil dries in a drained loblolly pine plantation. Plant, Cell & Environment. 32:980–991. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.365-3040.2009.01981.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duzan HW Sr (1980) Site preparation techniques for artificial regeneration. In: Mann JW (ed) Proceedings of a seminar on site preparation and regeneration management. Clemson University, South Carolina, pp 54–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenbies MH, Burger JA, Aust WM, Patterson SC (2004) Loblolly pine response to wet-weather harvesting on wet flats after 5 years. Water Air Soil and Pollution 4:217–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida Forest Service (FLFS) (2008) Silviculture best management practices. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services –Forest Service, Tallahassee

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox TR, Jokela EJ, Allen HL (2007) The development of pine plantation silviculture in the southern United States. Journal of Forestry 105:337–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaddis DA, Cubbage FB (1998) Wetland regulation: development and current practices, chap. 3. In: Messina MG, Conner WH (eds) Southern forested wetlands ecology and management. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 49–84 616 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Gent JA Jr, Allen HL, Campbell RG, Wells CG (1986) Magnitude, duration, and economic analysis of loblolly pine growth response following bedding and phosphorus fertilization. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 10:124–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgia Forestry Commission (GAFC) (1999) Georgia’s best management practices for forestry. Georgia Forestry Commission, Macon

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchell GE (1981) Site preparation and fertilizer increase pine growth on soils compacted in logging. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 5:79–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Husak AL, Grado SC, Bullard SH (2005) Silvicultural best management practice compliance monitoring programs in the southern United States. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 29:48–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchens JJ, Batzer DP, Reese E (2004) Bioassessment of silvicultural impacts in streams and wetlands of the eastern United States. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 4:37–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Ice GG, Schilling EB, Vowell J (2010) Trends for forestry best management practices implementation. Journal of Forestry 108:267–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Interagency Coastal Wetlands Workgroup (ICWWG) (2017) Summary findings of pilot studies conducted by the Interagency Coastal Wetlands Workgroup. Chaired by the Environmental Protection Agency, also includes the Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Geological Survey, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and U.S. Department of Transportation 6 pp.

  • Kellison RC, Young MJ (1997) The bottomland hardwood forest of the southern United States. Forest Ecology and Management 90:101–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang AJ, Cristan R, Aust WM, Bolding MC, Strahm BD, Vance ED, Roberts ET Jr (2016) Long-term effects of wet and dry site harvesting on soil physical properties mitigated by mechanical site preparation in coastal plain loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) plantations. Forest Ecology and Management 359:162–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockaby BG, Jones RH, Clawson RG, Meadows JS, Stanturf JA, Thorton FC (1997a) Influences of harvesting on functions of floodplain forests associated with low-order, Blackwater streams. Forest Ecology and Management 90:217–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockaby BG, Stanturf JA, Messina MG (1997b) Effects of silvicultural activity on ecological processes in floodplain forests of the southern United States: a review of existing reports. Forest Ecology and Management 90:93–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Loehle C, Wigley TB, Schilling E, Tatum V, Beebe J, Vance E, Van Deusen P, Weatherford P (2009) Achieving conservation goals in managed forests of the southeastern coastal plain. Environmental Management 44:1136–1148

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maki TE (1960) Improving site quality by wetland drainage. In: Burns PY (ed) 8th Annual forestry symposium: southern forest soils. Louisiana State University Press, Louisiana, pp 106–114

    Google Scholar 

  • McKee WH Jr, Shoulders E (1970) Depth of water table and redox potential of soil affect slash pine growth. Forest Science 16:399–402

    Google Scholar 

  • McKee WH Jr, Shoulders E (1974) Slash pine biomass response to site preparation and soil properties. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 38:144–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Messina MG, Conner WH (1998) Southern forested wetlands ecology and management. CRC Prerss LLC, Boca Raton 616pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Messina MG, Schoenholtz SH, Lowe MW, Wang Z, Gunter DK, Londo AJ (1997) Initial responses of woody vegetation, water quality, and soils to harvesting intensity in a Texas bottomland hardwood ecosystem. Forest Ecology and Management 90:201–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller WD, Maki TE (1957) Planting pine in pocosins. Journal of Forestry 55:659–663

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association of State Foresters (NASF) (2015) Protecting water quality through state forestry best management practices. National Association of State Foresters. http://stateforesters.org/sites/default/files/issues-and-policies-document-attachments/Protecting_Water_Quality_through_State_Forestry_BMPs_FINAL.pdf. Accessed 8 Nov 2018

  • National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc. (NCASI) (2009) Compendium of forestry best management practices for controlling nonpoint source pollution in North America. Technical Bulletin No. 966. Research Triangle Park, NC: National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc.

  • Neaves CM, Aust WM, Bolding MC, Barrett SM, Trettin CC, Vance E (2017) Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) productivity 23 years after wet site harvesting and site preparation in the lower Atlantic coastal plain. Forest Ecology and Management 401:207–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Noormets A, McNulty SG, Gavazzi MJ, Sun G, Domec JC, King J, Chen J (2009) Response of carbon fluxes to drought in a coastal plain loblolly pine forest. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.365-2486.009.01928.x

  • North Carolina Forest Service (NCFS) (2006) Forestry best management practices manual to protect water quality. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Forest Resources, Raleigh

    Google Scholar 

  • North Carolina Forest Service (NCFS) (2018) Forestry Leaflet #WQ-7: Harvesting Timber Using the Shovel (Mat) Logging Method Available via https://www.ncforestservice.gov/publications/Forestry%20Leaflets/WQ-7.pd. Accessed 8 Nov 2018

  • Otte LJ, Loftin LK (1983) Water chemistry of the pocosins of the Croatan National Forest, North Carolina. Unpublished report to the water resources research institute of the University of North Carolina, Raleigh, NC, USA. WRRI 84-02-62002

  • Perison D, Phelps J, Pavel C, Kellison R (1997) The effects of timber harvest in a South Carolina Blackwater bottomland. Forest Ecology and Management 90:171–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Rummer B (1999) Water quality effects of forest roads in bottomland hardwood stands. In: 1999 ASAE/CSAE-SCGR Annual International Meeting Sheraton Centre, Toronto, Canada, July 18-21, 1999, paper no. 99-5051. Available via https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/2097. Accessed 1 Apr 2019

  • Rummer B (2004) Managing water quality in wetlands with forestry BMPs. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 4:55–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell KR, Hanlin HG, Wigley TB, Guynn DC (2002) Responses of isolated wetland herpetofauna to upland forest management. Journal of Wildlife Management 66:603–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlaudt EA (1955) Drainage in forestry management in the south. In: Stefferud A (ed) Water, the yearbook of agriculture 1955, Washington DC, pp 564-568

  • Shepard JP (1994) Effects of forest management on surface water quality in wetland forests. Wetlands 14:18–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Skaggs RW, Phillips BD, Chescheir GM, Trettin CC (2011) Effects of minor drainage on hydrology of forested wetlands. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 54:2139–2149

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith LF (1966) Site preparation and cultivation improve survival and growth of planted slash pine. Tree Planters’ Notes 64:12–15

    Google Scholar 

  • South Carolina Forestry Commission (SCFC) (1994) South Carolina’s best management practices for forestry. South Carolina Forestry Commission, Columbia

    Google Scholar 

  • Southern Group of State Foresters (SGSF) (2007) Silvicultural best management practices implementation monitoring: a framework for state forestry agencies. Southern Group of State Foresters Water Resources Committee. 28pp

  • Southern Group of State Foresters (SGSF) (2012) Implementation of forestry best management practices: 2012 southern region report. Southern Group of State Foresters Water Resources Committee. 18pp

  • Sun G, McNulty SG, Amatya DM, Skaggs RW, Swift LW, Shepard JP, Riekerk H (2002) A comparison of the hydrology of the coastal forested wetlands/pine Flatwoods and the mountainous uplands in the southern US. Journal of Hydrology 263:92–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun G, Noormets A, Gavazzi MJ, McNulty SG, Chen J, Domec JC, King JS, Amatya DM, Skaggs RW (2010) Energy and water balance of two contrasting loblolly pine plantations on the lower coastal plain of North Carolina, USA. Forest Ecology and Management 259:1299–1310

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatum VL, Shepard JP, Wigley TB, Lucier AA (2006) Lessons learned from the NCASI forest wetlands research program. In: Amatya DM, Nettles J (eds) Proceedings of the international conference on hydrology and Management of Wetlands pp 377-382

  • Terry TA, Campbell RG (1981). Soil management considerations in intensive forest management. In Forest regeneration proceedings from the symposium on engineering systems for forest regeneration. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. St. Joseph, MI. pp. 98–106

  • Terry TA, Hughes JH (1975) The effects of intensive management on planted loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) growth on poorly drained soils of the Atlantic coastal plain. In: Bernier B, Winget CH (eds) Forest soils and forest land management. Les Presses de L’Universite Laval, Quebec, pp 351–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Terry TA, Hughes JH (1978) Drainage of excess water—why and how? P. 148–166. In: Balmer WE (ed) Proceedings of the soil moisture and site productivity symposium, Myrtle Beach, Nov. 1–3, 1977. US Forest Service, Atlanta, GA

  • United States Army Corps of Engineers (ACE) (2004) Information regarding compliance with the federal Clean Water Act section 404(f)(1) provisions for the construction of forest roads within wetlands in North Carolina. In: Regional Guidance Letter. Wilmington District, Regulatory Division. Available via https://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/Forest_Rd_Guidance-final-11-9-2004.pdf.

  • Warrington BM, Aust WM, Barrett SM, Ford WM, Dolloff CA, Schilling EB, Wigley TB, Bolding MC (2017) Forestry best management practices relationships with aquatic and riparian fauna: a review. Forests 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8090331

  • Wells CG, Crutchfield DM (1974) Intensive culture of young loblolly pine. In: Balmer WE, Williston HL, (eds) Proceedings: a symposium on management of young pines, Georgia, pp 212–228

  • Williams M (1989) Americans and their forests. A historical geography. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 599 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams TM, Askew GR (1988) Impact of drainage and site conversion of pocosin lands on water quality. In: Hook DD, McKee WH Jr, Smith HK, Gregory J, Burrell VG Jr, MIL DV, Sojka RE, Gilbert S, Banks R, Stolzy L II, Brooks C, Matthews TD, Shear TH (eds) The ecology and management of wetlands. Timber Press, Oregon, pp 213–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Burger JA, Aust WM, Patterson SC, Miwa M, Preston DP (2002) Changes in surface water table depth and soil physical properties after harvest and establishment of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) in Atlantic coastal plain wetlands of South Carolina. Soil and Tillage Research 63:109–121

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Forestry Research, Southeastern U.S., National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc., 104 East Bruce Street, Aubrey, TX, 76227, USA

    Erik B. Schilling

  2. Watershed and Conservation Staff Forester, North Carolina Forest Service, 1616 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27699, USA

    A. J. Lang

  3. Timber Operations Forester, Sonoco Products Company, 1 N. 2nd Street, Hartsville, SC, 29550, USA

    Herbert Nicholson

  4. Southern Environmental Research, Weyerhaeuser Company, PO Box 2288, Columbus, MS, 39704-2288, USA

    Jami Nettles

  5. Water Resources Staff Forester, North Carolina Forest Service, 1616 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27699, USA

    Tom A. Gerow Jr

  6. Environmental Issues and Policy Analyst, U.S. Forest Service, 1720 Peachtree Road NW, Atlanta, GA, 30309, USA

    Daniel McInnis

Authors
  1. Erik B. Schilling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. J. Lang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Herbert Nicholson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jami Nettles
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tom A. Gerow Jr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Daniel McInnis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erik B. Schilling.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schilling, E.B., Lang, A.J., Nicholson, H. et al. Evolving Silvicultural Practices to Meet Sustainability Objectives in Forested Wetlands of the Southeastern United States. Wetlands 40, 37–46 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-019-01152-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-019-01152-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation