Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Configurational Analysis of ESG Performance, Innovation Intensity, and Financial Leverage: a Study on Total Factor Productivity in Chinese Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Firms

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance has emerged as a critical aspect of responsible investing, garnering global attention within the investment community. Unlike traditional financial metrics, ESG encompasses non-financial factors such as corporate sustainability, governance practices, and ethical considerations. This paper delves into the interplay between ESG pillars, innovation intensity, financial leverage, and total factor productivity (TFP) within Chinese pharmaceutical manufacturing firms. We scrutinize the complex causal relationships among these variables by employing a hybrid methodology combining necessary condition analysis (NCA) and fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA). Our findings reveal that individual ESG factors, R&D investment, and financial leverage are not singularly necessary conditions for high TFP. Instead, a balanced approach that integrates social performance, financial leverage, and innovation intensity emerges as a critical driver of TFP in this industry. The study identifies specific configurations that lead to high TFP, emphasizing the multifaceted nature of productivity determinants. Our research provides actionable insights for pharmaceutical manufacturing companies. They can enhance their enterprise value by strategically allocating resources and capabilities, considering factors like ESG performance and financial leverage. Additionally, the study underscores the importance of transparency through CSR initiatives, suggesting that publishing non-financial information can bolster corporate reputation and ultimately drive TFP. This study advances theoretical understanding and offers valuable implications for practitioners seeking to optimize productivity in the pharmaceutical manufacturing sector while adhering to sustainable and socially responsible business practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data will be made on request.

References

  • Abraham, J. (2023). Science, politics and the pharmaceutical industry: Controversy and bias in drug regulation. Taylor & Francis.

  • Admati, A. R., DeMarzo, P. M., Hellwig, M. F., & Pfleiderer, P. (2018). The leverage ratchet effect. The Journal of Finance, 73(1), 145–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arjun, K., Sankaran, A., Kumar, S., & Das, M. (2020). An endogenous growth approach on the role of energy, human capital, finance and technology in explaining manufacturing value-added: A multi-country analysis. Heliyon, 6(7).

  • Atif, M., & Ali, S. (2021). Environmental, social and governance disclosure and default risk. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 3937–3959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, B. W., & Davidson, W. N., III. (2009). Reexamining the managerial ownership effect on firm value. Journal of Corporate Finance, 15(5), 573–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergin, T. (2018). An introduction to data analysis: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods. An Introduction to Data Analysis, 1–296.

  • Bissoondoyal-Bheenick, E., Brooks, R., & Do, H. X. (2023). ESG and firm performance: The role of size and media channels. Economic Modelling, 121, 106203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadstock, D. C., Matousek, R., Meyer, M., & Tzeremes, N. G. (2020). Does corporate social responsibility impact firms’ innovation capacity? The indirect link between environmental & social governance implementation and innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 119, 99–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cangialosi, N. (2023). Fuzzy-SET QUALITATIVE COMPARATIVE ANAlysis (fsQCA) in organizational psychology: Theoretical overview, research guidelines, and a step-by-step tutorial using R software. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 26, e21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casillas, J. C., & Moreno-Menéndez, A. M. (2014). Speed of the internationalization process: The role of diversity and depth in experiential learning. Journal of International Business Studies, 45, 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, X., Fu, K., Jin, Y., & Liem, P. F. (2022). Sustainable finance: ESG/CSR, firm value, and investment returns. Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 51(3), 325–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., Lan, Q., Gao, M., & Sun, Y. (2018). Green total factor productivity growth and its determinants in China’s industrial economy. Sustainability, 10(4), 1052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., Peng, X., & Yu, L. (2023). Interest rate liberalization and firm leverage in China: Effects and channels. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2023.

  • Chouaibi, S., Chouaibi, J., & Rossi, M. (2022). ESG and corporate financial performance: The mediating role of green innovation: UK common law versus Germany civil law. EuroMed Journal of Business, 17(1), 46–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demmou, L., & Franco, G. (2021). Mind the financing gap: Enhancing the contribution of intangible assets to productivity.

  • Deng, X., Li, W., & Ren, X. (2023). More sustainable, more productive: Evidence from ESG ratings and total factor productivity among listed Chinese firms. Finance Research Letters, 51, 103439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Simone, L., Petracci, B., & Piva, M. (2022). Economic sustainability, innovation, and the ESG factors: An empirical investigation. Sustainability, 14(4), 2270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, Y., & Kim, P. H. (2021). One size does not fit all: Strategy configurations, complex environments, and new venture performance in emerging economies. Journal of Business Research, 124, 272–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dul, J. (2019). Conducting necessary condition analysis for business and management students. Conducting Necessary Condition Analysis for Business and Management Students, 1–160.

  • Dul, J., Van der Laan, E., & Kuik, R. (2020). A statistical significance test for necessary condition analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 23(2), 385–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eliwa, Y., Aboud, A., & Saleh, A. (2021). ESG practices and the cost of debt: Evidence from EU countries. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 79, 102097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fainshmidt, S., Witt, M. A., Aguilera, R. V., & Verbeke, A. (2020). The contributions of qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) to international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 51, 455–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, Y., Chen, H. H., & Tang, J. (2018). The impacts of social responsibility and ownership structure on sustainable financial development of China’s energy industry. Sustainability, 10(2), 301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Vidal, J., Gonzalez, R., Gasco, J., & Llopis, J. (2022). Digitalization and corporate transformation: The case of European oil & gas firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnari, S., Crilly, D., Misangyi, V. F., Greckhamer, T., Fiss, P. C., & Aguilera, R. V. (2021). Capturing causal complexity: Heuristics for configurational theorizing. Academy of Management Review, 46(4), 778–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Quevedo, J., & Jové-Llopis, E. (2021). Environmental policies and energy efficiency investments. An Industry-Level Analysis. Energy Policy, 156, 112461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W., Schwanen, T., Sorrell, S., Jenkins, K., & Sovacool, B. K. (2018). Reducing energy demand through low carbon innovation: A sociotechnical transitions perspective and thirteen research debates. Energy Research & Social Science, 40, 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandguillaume, L., Lavernhe, S., & Tournier, C. (2016). A tool path patching strategy around singular point in 5-axis ball-end milling. International Journal of Production Research, 54(24), 7480–7490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greckhamer, T., & Gur, F. A. (2021). Disentangling combinations and contingencies of generic strategies: A set-theoretic configurational approach. Long Range Planning, 54(2), 101951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, S., & Zhang, Z. (2023). Green credit policy and total factor productivity: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Energy Economics, 107115.

  • Habib, M., Abbas, J., & Noman, R. (2019). Are human capital, intellectual property rights, and research and development expenditures really important for total factor productivity? An empirical analysis. International Journal of Social Economics, 46(6), 756–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, T., Figge, F., Pinkse, J., & Preuss, L. (2018). A paradox perspective on corporate sustainability: Descriptive, instrumental, and normative aspects. Journal of Business Ethics, 148, 235–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harasheh, M., & De Vincenzo, F. (2023). Leverage-value nexus in Italian small-medium enterprises: Further evidence using dose-response function. EuroMed Journal of Business, 18(2), 165–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hua, J., Zhu, D., & Jia, Y. (2022). Research on the policy effect and mechanism of carbon emission trading on the total factor productivity of agricultural enterprises. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(13), 7581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, X., & Liu, X. (2019). The impact of environmental regulation on productivity and exports: A firm-level evidence from China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 55(11), 2589–2608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiao, J., Liu, C., & Xu, Y. (2020). Effects of stakeholder pressure, managerial perceptions, and resource availability on sustainable operations adoption. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3246–3260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitzing, L., Jensen, M. K., Telsnig, T., & Lantz, E. (2020). Multifaceted drivers for onshore wind energy repowering and their implications for energy transition. Nature Energy, 5(12), 1012–1021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kliestik, T., Michalkova, L., & Kovacova, M. (2018). Is a tax shield really a function of net income, interest rate, debt and tax rate? Evidence from Slovak companies. Journal of International Studies, 11(4).

  • Kong, W. (2023). The impact of ESG performance on debt financing costs: Evidence from Chinese family business. Finance Research Letters, 103949.

  • Kumar, M. K., Masvood, Y., Palani, B., Sethumadhavan, R., Nawale, R., & Singh, M. A. K. (2023). A study on perception and preferences towards green marketing, it’s influence on consumer. Journal of Informatics Education and Research, 3(2).

  • Lafuente, E., Acs, Z. J., Sanders, M., & Szerb, L. (2020). The global technology frontier: Productivity growth and the relevance of Kirznerian and Schumpeterian entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 55, 153–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lan, S., Tseng, M. L., Yang, C., & Huisingh, D. (2020). Trends in sustainable logistics in major cities in China. Science of the Total Environment, 712, 136381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavin, J. F., & Montecinos-Pearce, A. A. (2022). Heterogeneous firms and benefits of ESG disclosure: Cost of debt financing in an emerging market. Sustainability, 14(23), 15760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Du, Y., Sun, N., & Xie, Z. (2023). Ecosystems of doing business and living standards: A configurational analysis based on Chinese cities. Chinese Management Studies.

  • Li, N., Wang, X., Wang, Z., & Luan, X. (2022). The impact of digital transformation on corporate total factor productivity. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1071986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, P., Zhu, B., Yang, M., & Chu, X. (2022). ESG and financial performance: A qualitative comparative analysis in China’s new energy companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 379, 134721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Dilanchiev, A., Xu, K., & Hajiyeva, A. M. (2022). Financing SMEs and business development as new post COVID-19 economic recovery determinants. Economic Analysis and Policy, 76, 554–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luan, X., & Wang, X. (2023). Open innovation, enterprise value and the mediating effect of ESG. Business Process Management Journal, 29(2), 489–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luzardo-Luna, I., & Luzardo-Luna, I. (2019). The particular Colombian case in Latin America: A singular path with the same results. Colombia’s Slow Economic Growth: From the Nineteenth to the Twenty-First Century, 1–10.

  • Madden, B. J. (2020). Value creation principles: The pragmatic theory of the firm begins with purpose and ends with sustainable capitalism. John Wiley & Sons.

  • Mahajan, V. (2020). Is productivity of Indian pharmaceutical industry affected with the introduction of product patent act? Indian Growth and Development Review, 13(1), 227–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marrucci, L., Iannone, F., Daddi, T., & Iraldo, F. (2022). Antecedents of absorptive capacity in the development of circular economy business models of small and medium enterprises. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(1), 532–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meles, A., Salerno, D., Sampagnaro, G., Verdoliva, V., & Zhang, J. (2023). The influence of green innovation on default risk: Evidence from Europe. International Review of Economics & Finance, 84, 692–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng-tao, C., Da-peng, Y., Wei-qi, Z., & Qi-jun, W. (2023). How does ESG disclosure improve stock liquidity for enterprises—Empirical evidence from China. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 98, 106926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nabawanuka, C. M., & Lee, S. (2009). Impacts of timeshare operation on publicly traded US hotels’ firm value, risk and accounting performance. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 28(2), 221–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, C., Rand, J., Tarp, F., & Trifkovic, N. (2020). Corporate social responsibility in a competitive business environment. The Journal of Development Studies, 56(8), 1455–1472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikou, S., Mezei, J., Liguori, E. W., & El Tarabishy, A. (2022). FsQCA in entrepreneurship research: Opportunities and best practices. Journal of Small Business Management, 1–18.

  • Qiu, Y., Han, W., & Zeng, D. (2023). Impact of biased technological progress on the total factor productivity of China’s manufacturing industry: The driver of sustainable economic growth. Journal of Cleaner Production, 409, 137269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qu, K., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., & Feng, T. (2023). Examining the impact of China’s new environmental protection law on enterprise productivity and sustainable development. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1–26.

  • Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry : fuzzy sets and beyond. Univ Of Chicago Press.

  • Sabherwal, R., & Jeyaraj, A. (2015). Information technology impacts on firm performance. MIS Quarterly, 39(4), 809–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sami, M., & El Bedawy, R. (2020). Assessing the impact of knowledge management on total factor productivity. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, 11(1), 134–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao, J. (2021). The impact of corporate social responsibility on operational and financial outcomes: Three empirical studies in China.

  • Shrestha, A., Tamošaitienė, J., Martek, I., Hosseini, M. R., & Edwards, D. J. (2019). A principal-agent theory perspective on PPP risk allocation. Sustainability, 11(22), 6455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Signori, S., San-Jose, L., Retolaza, J. L., & Rusconi, G. (2021). Stakeholder value creation: Comparing ESG and value added in European companies. Sustainability, 13(3), 1392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorjonen, K., & Melin, B. (2019). Paradoxical results in and a possible extension of necessary condition analysis (NCA).

  • Su, J., Wei, Y., Wang, S., & Liu, Q. (2023). The impact of digital transformation on the total factor productivity of heavily polluting enterprises. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 6386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, P., Qu, Z., & Liao, Z. (2018). How and when do subnational institutions matter for R&D investment? Evidence from the Chinese pharmaceutical sector. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 65(3), 379–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thai, P. K., Binh, V. N., Nhung, P. H., Nhan, P. T., Hieu, N. Q., Dang, N. T., & Anh, N. T. K. (2018). Occurrence of antibiotic residues and antibiotic-resistant bacteria in effluents of pharmaceutical manufacturers and other sources around Hanoi, Vietnam. Science of the Total Environment, 645, 393–400.

  • Thomann, E., & Maggetti, M. (2020). Designing research with qualitative comparative analysis (QCA): Approaches, challenges, and tools. Sociological Methods & Research, 49(2), 356–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toth, Z., & Williams, D. M. (2019). Embracing the causal complexity of intersectionality: Introducing a configurational perspective using fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative. British Management Academy 2019.

  • Uhrenholt, J. N., Kristensen, J. H., Rincón, M. C., Adamsen, S., Jensen, S. F., & Waehrens, B. V. (2022). Maturity model as a driver for circular economy transformation. Sustainability, 14(12), 7483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vo, H., Phan, A., Trinh, Q. D., & Vu, L. N. (2022). Does economic policy uncertainty affect trade credit and firm value in Korea? A comparison of chaebol vs. non-chaebol firms. Economic Analysis and Policy, 73, 474–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vollero, A., Conte, F., Siano, A., & Covucci, C. (2019). Corporate social responsibility information and involvement strategies in controversial industries. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(1), 141–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, K., Chen, X., & Wang, C. (2023). The impact of sustainable development planning in resource-based cities on corporate ESG–Evidence from China. Energy Economics, 107087.

  • Wang, Y. C., Phillips, F., & Yang, C. (2021). Bridging innovation and commercialization to create value: An open innovation study. Journal of Business Research, 123, 255–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., Chu, E., & Hao, Y. (2023). Towards sustainable development: How does ESG performance promotes corporate green transformation. International Review of Financial Analysis, 102982.

  • Wen, J., & Deng, Z. (2023). Internet development, resource allocation and total factor productivity: Empirical evidence from China’s listed manufacturing enterprises. Applied Economics, 1–12.

  • Wu, Q., Li, Y., Wu, Y., Li, F., & Zhong, S. (2022). The spatial spillover effect of environmental regulation on the total factor productivity of pharmaceutical manufacturing industry in China. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 11642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia, J. (2022). A systematic review: How does organisational learning enable ESG performance (from 2001 to 2021)? Sustainability, 14(24), 16962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, G., Bai, X., & Yang, S. (2023). Analysis strategy configurations in risk taking using fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis model. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 29(3), 981–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, D., & Vigne, S. A. (2021). How does innovation efficiency contribute to green productivity? A financial constraint perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 280, 124000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, S., Cao, Y., Feng, C., Guo, K., & Zhang, J. (2022). How do heterogeneous R&D investments affect China’s green productivity: Revisiting the Porter hypothesis. Science of the Total Environment, 825, 154090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zumente, I., & Bistrova, J. (2021). ESG importance for long-term shareholder value creation: Literature vs. practice. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(2), 127.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the editor of this paper and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments that greatly improved the quality of our work.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, Tianjin University of Technology, Xiqing District, 391 Binshui Xidao, Tianjin, 300384, People’s Republic of China

    Juan Tan & Jinyu Wei

Authors
  1. Juan Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jinyu Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Tan Juan: conceptualization, methodology, software, writing—original draft; Wei Jinyu: validation, supervision, writing—review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Tan.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Innovation Management in Asia

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tan, J., Wei, J. Configurational Analysis of ESG Performance, Innovation Intensity, and Financial Leverage: a Study on Total Factor Productivity in Chinese Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Firms. J Knowl Econ (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01678-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01678-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation