Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Are the Major Knowledge-producing Countries Converging in Science and Technology Capabilities?

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The global production of scientific and technology knowledge continues to grow. Advanced Western countries such as the USA and the EU countries continue to lead science and technology (S&T) in the world. The emergence of other knowledge-producing countries that occupy prominent positions in knowledge production have been changing the geography of world science and technology. By investigating the production of scientific publications and patents from a sample of traditional S&T powerhouses and the main emerging knowledge-producing countries, this paper attempts to test whether the remarkable development of S&T systems in the latter in the past few decades has led to a convergence with the former countries in S&T capabilities. The empirical analysis of convergence highlights the presence of clubs of convergence instead of absolute convergence. Four groups of countries have been identified as converging regarding their scientific publications per capita, and six convergence clubs have emerged when the production of patents per capita is considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Values of RSA (RTA) greater (or lesser) than 1 mean that of the country has a comparative advantage (disadvantage) in that scientific (technological) field relative to the world average.

References

  • Abdih, Y., & Joutz, F. L. (2006). Relating the knowledge production function to total factor productivity: An endogenous growth puzzle. IMF Staff Papers, 53(2), 242–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acosta, M., Coronado, D., León, M. D., & Martínez, M. A. (2009). Production of university technological knowledge in European regions: Evidence from patent data. Regional Studies, 43, 1167–1181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, J. (2012). The rise of research networks. Nature, 490, 335–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1992). A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60, 323–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldieri, L., Sena, V., & Vinci, C. P. (2018). Domestic R&D spillovers and absorptive capacity: Some evidence for US, Europe and Japan. International Journal of Production Economics, 198, 38–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albuquerque, E. (2001). Scientific infrastructure and catching up process. Revista Brasileira De Economia, 55(4), 545–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asongu, S. A., & Nwachukwu, J. C. (2016). Brief future of time in the monopoly of scientific knowledge. Comparative Economic Studies, 58, 638–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asongu, S. A., & Andrés, A. R. (2020). Trajectories of knowledge economy in SSA and MENA countries. Technology and Society, 63, 101119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ausdrestch, D., & Feldman, M. (2004). Audretsch. The geography of innovation and spillovers. In V. Henderson & J. F. Thisse (Eds.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics (4th ed.). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

  • Barnett, J. M. (2020). Patent tigers: The new geography of global innovation. The Criterion Journal on Innovation, 2, 429–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrios, C., Flores, E., & Martínez, M. A. (2021). Scientific production convergence: An empirical analysis across nations. Minerva. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-021-09443-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J. A. (1989). Technological innovation and multinational corporations. Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castellacci, F. (2007). Evolutionary and new growth theories. Are they converging? Journal of Economic Surveys, 21, 585–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castellacci, F. (2008). Technology clubs, technology gaps and growth trajectories. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 19, 301–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castellacci, F., & Natera, J. M. (2013). The dynamics of national innovation systems: A panel cointegration analysis of the coevolution between innovative capability and absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 42, 579–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castellacci, F., & Natera, J. M. (2015). The convergence paradox: The global evolution of national innovation systems. In D. Archibugi & A. Filippetti (Eds.), The Handbook of Global Science, Technology, and Innovation (1st ed., pp. 15–45). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, D. S., & Yokoyama, K. (2011). The role of good governance in the knowledge-based economic growth of East Asia—A study on Japan, newly industrialized economies. Graduate School of Economics, Kyushu University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlot, S., Crescenzi, R., & Musolesi, A. (2015). Econometric modelling of the regional knowledge production function in Europe. Journal of Economic Geography, 15, 1227–1259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, R.H.-G., & Chen, C.-M. (2016). Visualizing the world’s scientific publications. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67, 2477–2488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia, M. (2019). Why do nations produce science advances and new technology? Technology in Society, 59, 101124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Confraria, H., Godinho, M. M., & Wang, L. (2017). Determinants of citation impact: A comparative analysis of the Global South versus the Global North. Research Policy, 46, 265–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coronado, D., Flores, E., & Martínez, M. A. (2017). The role of regional economic specialization in the production of university-owned patents. The Annals of Regional Science, 59, 513–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crescenzi, R., Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Storper, M. (2012). The territorial dynamics of innovation in China and India. Journal of Economic Geography, 12, 1055–1085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Barrio-Castro, T., & Garcia-Quevedo, J. A. (2005). Effects of university research on the geography of innovation. Regional Studies, 39, 1217–1229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagerberg, J. (1987). A technology gap approach to why growth rates differ. Research Policy, 16, 87–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagerberg, J. (1994). Technology and international differences in growth rates. Journal of Economic Literature, 32, 1147–1175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerberg, J., & Srholec, M. (2008). National innovation systems, capabilities and economic development. Research Policy, 37, 1417–1435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, M., & Slavtchev, V. (2007). Universities and innovation in space. Industry and Innovation, 14, 201–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, X., Pitrobelli, C., & Soete, L. (2011). The role of foreign technology and indigenous innovation in the emerging economies: Technological change and catching-up. World Development, 39, 1204–1212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fung, H.-N., & Wong, C.-Y. (2017). Scientific collaboration in indigenous knowledge in context: Insights from publication and co-publication network analysis. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 117, 57–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furman, J. L., Porter, M. E., & M. E., & Stern, S. (2002). The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 31, 899–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geng, D., & Saggi, K. (2015). The nature of innovative activity and the protection of intellectual property in Asia. Asian Economic Policy Review, 10, 71–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindaraju, V. C., & Wong, C. Y. (2011). Patenting activities by developing countries: The case of Malaysia. World Patent Information, 33(1), 51–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (1979). Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 92–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1991). Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurmu, S., Black, G. C., & Stephan, P. E. (2010). The knowledge production function for university patenting. Economic Inquiry, 48, 192–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollanders, H., & Soete, L. (2011). The growing role of knowledge in the global economy. UNESCO Science Report 2010 (pp. 1–28). Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horta, H. (2018). The declining scientific wealth of Hong Kong and Singapore. Scientometrics, 117, 427–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, A. G. (2015). Innovation and economic growth in East Asia: An overview. Asian Economic Policy Review, 10, 19–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, M.-C., & Mathews, J. A. (2005). National innovative capacity in East Asia. Research Policy, 34, 1322–1349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. H., & Lee, K. (2015). Different impacts of scientific and technological knowledge on economic growth: Contrasting science and technology policy in East Asia and Latin America. Asian Economic Policy Review, 10, 43–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laranja, M., Uyarra, E., & Flanagan, K. (2008). Policies for science, technology and innovation: Translating rationales into regional policies in a multi-level setting. Research Policy, 37, 823–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loikkanen, T., Ahlqvist, T., & Pellinen, P. (2009). The role of the technology barometer in assessing the performance of the national innovation system. Technological Forecasting & Social Change., 76, 1177–1186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 3–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B. -Å. (2007). National innovation systems—Analytical concept and development Tool. Industry and Innovation, 14, 95–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B. -Å. (2016). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. In B. -Å. Lundvall (Ed.), The Learning Economy and the Economics of Hope (4th ed., pp. 85–106). London: Anthem Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McGilvray, A. (2016). Singapore: The brain-gain game. Nature, 537(7618), S16–S17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marrocu, E., Paci, R., & Usai, S. (2013). Proximity, networking and knowledge production in Europe: What lessons for innovation policy? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80, 1484–1498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monfort, M., Cuestas, J. C., & Ordóñez, J. (2013). Real convergence in Europe: A cluster analysis. Economic Modelling, 33, 689–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, R., Paci, R., & Usai, S. (2005). Geographical and sectoral clusters of innovation in Europe. The Annals of Regional Science, 39, 715–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation. (2016). National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. http://www.nsf.gov/

  • Nguyen, C. M., & Choung, J.-Y. (2020). Scientific knowledge production in China: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 124, 1279–1303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlando, M. J. (2004). Measuring Spillovers from Industrial R&D: On the Importance of Geographic and Technological Proximity. The RAND Journal of Economics, 35(4), 777–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, P. C., & Sul, D. (2007). Economic transition and growth. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 24(7), 1153–1185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, P. C., & Sul, D. (2009). Transition modeling and econometric convergence test. Econometrica, 75(6), 1771–1855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponds, R., van Oort, F., & Frenken, K. (2010). Innovation, spillovers, and university–industry collaboration: An extended knowledge production function approach. Journal of Economic Geography, 10, 231–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radosevic, S., & Yoruk, E. (2014). Are there global shifts in the world science base? Analysing the catching-up and falling-behind of world regions. Scientometrics, 101, 1897–1924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radosevic, S., & Yoruk, E. (2016). Why do we need a theory and metrics of technology upgrading? Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 24(sup1), 8–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002–1036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 71–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapira, P., & Youtie, J. (2006). Measures for knowledge-based economic development: Introducing data-mining techniques to economic developers in the state of Georgia and the US South. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 73, 950–965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shashnov, S., & Kotsemir, M. (2018). Research landscape of the BRICS countries: Current trends in research output, thematic structures of publications, and the relative influence of partners. Scientometrics, 117, 1115–1155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 65–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, P. E. (1996). The economics of science. Journal of Economic Literature, 34, 1199–1235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, H.-N. (2017). Collaborative and legal dynamics of international R&D—Evolving patterns in East Asia. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 117, 217–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swan, T. W. (1956). Economic growth and capital accumulation. Economic Record, 32, 334–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tchamyou, V. S. (2017). The role of knowledge economy in African business. Journal of the Knowledge Economy., 8, 1189–1228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verspagen, B. (1991). A new empirical approach to catching up or falling behind. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2, 359–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verspagen, B. (1993). Uneven growth between interdependent economies: Evolutionary view on technology gaps, trade and growth. Aldershot: Avebury.

  • Veugelers, R. (2010). Towards a multipolar science world: Trends and impact. Scientometrics, 82, 439–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, C.-H., & Goh, K.-L. (2012). The sustainability of functionality development of science and technology: Papers and patents of emerging economies. Journal of Informetrics, 6, 55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, C.-H., & Goh, K.-L. (2015). Catch-up models of science and technology: A theorization of the Asian experience from bi-logistic growth trajectories. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 95, 312–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, P., & Li, J. (2015). Is the word of science moving to the East? What bibliometrics says. In D. Archibugi & A. Filippetti (Eds.), The Handbook of Global Science, Technology, and Innovation (pp. 109–123). John Wiley & Sons.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Economía Aplicada Y Métodos Cuantitativos, Universidad de La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain

    Candelaria Barrios

  2. Department of Economics, University of Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain

    Esther Flores & M. Ángeles Martínez

  3. Department of Business Administration, University of Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain

    Marta Ruiz-Martínez

Authors
  1. Candelaria Barrios
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Esther Flores
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Ángeles Martínez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marta Ruiz-Martínez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marta Ruiz-Martínez.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barrios, C., Flores, E., Martínez, M. et al. Are the Major Knowledge-producing Countries Converging in Science and Technology Capabilities?. J Knowl Econ 14, 4534–4560 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-01075-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-01075-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation