Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Progression to Higher Economic Complexity: The Role of Institutions

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper attempts to examine the impact of institutional quality on economic complexity. We employ system general method of moments in a sample of 98 countries from 2002 to 2017. The empirical analysis consistently shows that (1) institutional quality has a positive impact on economic sophistication; (2) each component of institutions has a distinct effect on economic sophistication; and (3) the contribution of institutions on economic sophistication across country sub-groups is heterogeneous. The study implies that different countries require different sets of institutions for enhancing economic sophistication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The authors are grateful for this helpful comment from an anonymous reviewer.

References

  • Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity and poverty. Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acosta, M., Coronado, D., León, M. D., & Moreno, P. J. (2020). The production of academic technological knowledge: An exploration at the research group level. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 11(3), 1003–1025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (2009). The economics of growth. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderlini, L., Felli, L., Immordino, G., & Riboni, A. (2013). Legal institutions, innovation, and growth. International Economic Review, 54(3), 937–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonietti, R., & Franco, C. (2021). From FDI to economic complexity: A panel Granger causality analysis. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 56, 225–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968

  • Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucar, B., Glas, M., & Hisrich, R. D. (2003). Ethics and entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 261–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busenitz, L. W., Gomez, C., & Spencer, J. W. (2000). Country institutional profiles: Unlocking entrepreneurial phenomena. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 994–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bustos, S., & Yildirim, M. A. (2017). Arab country product space report introduction and methodology. The Lebanese Center for Policy Studies. https://www.lcps-lebanon.org/publications/1486465992-intro_and_methodology.pdf

  • Caria, S., Troyano, M. C., & Martín, R. D. (2017). Can the monkeys leave the export processing zones? Exploring the maquiladora bias in the Economic Complexity Index in Latin America. Journal of Economics and Development Studies, 5(1).

  • Casadella, V., & Uzunidis, D. (2021). On the relevance of innovation capacities in the institutionalist approach applied to developing countries: Bases of analysis. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12(1), 293–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castelnovo, P., Del Bo, C. F., & Florio, M. (2019). Quality of institutions and productivity of state-invested enterprises: International evidence from major telecom companies. European Journal of Political Economy, 58, 102–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, L. K. (2020). The effects of financial development on economic sophistication: Evidence from panel data. Applied Economics Letters, 27(15), 1260–1263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, L. K. (2021). Economic structure and environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: New evidence from economic complexity. Applied Economics Letters, 28(7), 612–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, L. K., & Hoang, D. P. (2020a). The impact of corporate political activity on innovation in Sub-Saharan African countries: A double-edged sword. Borsa Istanbul Review, 20(4), 358–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, L. K., & Hoang, D. P. (2020b). How does economic complexity influence income inequality? New evidence from international data. Economic Analysis and Policy, 68, 44–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coe, D. T., Helpman, E., & Hoffmaister, A. W. (2009). International R&D spillovers and institutions. European Economic Review, 53(7), 723–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortinovis, N., Xiao, J., Boschma, R., & Oort, F. (2016). Quality of government and social capital as drivers of regional diversification in Europe. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography.

  • Costinot, A. (2009). On the origins of comparative advantage. Journal of International Economics, 77(2), 255–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crescenzi, R., & Rodriguez-Pose, A. (2013). R&D, Socio-economic conditions and regional innovation in the U.S. Growth and Change, 44(2), 287–320

  • Dias, J., & Tebaldi, E. (2012). Institutions, human capital, and growth: The institutional mechanism. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 23(3), 300–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhrifi, A. (2019). Does environmental degradation, institutional quality, and economic development matter for health? Evidence from African countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 10(3), 1098–1113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elhiraika, A. B., & Mbate, M. (2014). Assessing the determinants of export diversification in Africa. Journal of Applied Econometrics and International Development, 14(1), 147–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felipe, J., Kumar, U., Abdon, A., & Bacate, M. (2012). Product complexity and economic development. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 23(1), 36–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1996). Trust: Human nature and the reconstitution of social order. Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue), 109–122.

  • Greif, A. (2006). Institutions and the path to the modern economy: Lessons from Medieval trade. Cambridge University Press.

  • Hall, B. H., and J. Lerner (2010). “The financing of R&D and innovation.” In B. H. Hall and N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of innovation. Elsevier-North.

  • He, Q., Xue, C., & Zhu, C. (2017). Financial development and patterns of industrial specialization: Evidence from China. Review of Finance, 21(4), 1593–1638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, D., Jara-Figueroa, C., Hidalgo, C. A., Guevara, M. R., & Aristarán, M. (2017). Linking Economic Complexity, Institutions, and Income Inequality. World Development, 93, 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.020

  • Harvard Growth Lab. (2018). Complexity rankings The atlas of economic complexity. https://atlas.cid.harvard.edu/rankings

  • Hausmann, R., & Hidalgo, C. A. (2011). The network structure of economic output. Journal of Economic Growth, 16(4), 309–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausmann, R., Hidalgo, C. A., Bustos, S., Coscia, M., Simoes, A., & Yildirim, M. A. (2014). The atlas of economic complexity: Mapping paths to prosperity. MIT Press.

  • Hausmann, R., Hidalgo, C. A., Bustos, S., Coscia, M., Chung, S., Jemenez, J., Simoes, A., & Yidirim, M. A. (2011). The atlas of economic complexity. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausmann, R., Hwang, J., & Rodrik, D. (2007). What you export matters. Journal of Economic Growth, 12(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrix, C. S. (2017) Kicking a crude habit: Diversifying away from oil and gas in the 21st century. Peterson Institute for International Economics Working Paper WP 17–2.

  • Hidalgo, C. A., Hausmann, R., & Dasgupta, P. (2009). The building blocks of economic complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(26), 10570–10575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hidalgo, C. A. (2015). Why information grows: The evolution of order, from atoms to economies. Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidalgo, C. A. (2021). Economic complexity theory and applications. Nature Review Physics, 3, 92–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jankowska, A., Nagengast, A., & Perea, J. R. (2012). The product space and the middle-income trap: Comparing Asian and Latin American experiences. OECD Development Centre working papers No. 311.

  • Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2011). The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 3(2), 220–246. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1876404511200046I

  • Kafka, K. I., Kostis, P. C., & Petrakis, P. E. (2021). Institutional effects on innovation and the requirements for structural reformS. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00705-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapatinas, A. (2018). The effect of the Internet on economic sophistication: An empirical analysis. Economics Letters, 174, 35–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapatinas, A., & Litina, A. (2019). Intelligence and economic sophistication. Empirical Economics, 57(5), 1731–1750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. -A., & Lin, L.Y. -H. (2021). Legal institutions of human capital: Property, contract, and organisation. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00858-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. K., & Vu, T. V. (2020). Economic complexity, human capital, and income inequality: A cross-country analysis. Japanese Economic Review, 71, 695–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Licht, A. N., & Siegel, J. I. (2006). The social dimensions of entrepreneurship. In B. Anuradha, C. Mark, W. Nigel, & Y. Bernard (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Entrepreneurship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Mansoor, A. M., & Quillin, B. (Eds.). (2006). Migration and remittances: Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. World Bank Publications.

  • Mariani, M. S., Vidmer, A., Medo, M., & Zhang, Y. -C. (2015). Measuring economic complexity of countries and products: Which metric to use? European Physical Journal B, 88(11), 293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, B., Canh, N. P., & Thanh, S. D. (2021). Institutions, human capital and entrepreneurship density. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12(3), 1270–1293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, C. P. (2021). Gender equality and economic complexity. Economic Systems, 45(4), 100921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, C. P., Schinckus, C., & Su, T. D. (2020). The drivers of economic complexity: International evidence from financial development and patents. International Economics, 164, 140–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Okunlola, O. C., & Ayetigbo, O. A. (2021). Economic freedom and human development in ECOWAS: does political-institutional strength play a role? Journal of the Knowledge Economy.

  • Poppo, L., & Zenger, T. (2002). Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 707–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Proeger, T. (2020). Knowledge spillovers and absorptive capacity—Institutional evidence from the “German Mittelstand.” Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 11(1), 211–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Relial. (2020). Institutional Quality Index: Desinformation and the risks for freedom. https://relial.org/uploads/files/ICI_INGLES_2020_36pags2.pdf

  • Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Di Cataldo, M. (2014). Quality of government and innovative performance in the regions of Europe. Journal of Economic Geography, 15(4), 673–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., & Trebbi, F. (2004). Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth, 9(2), 131–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roodman, D. (2009). How to do Xtabond2: An Introduction to Difference and System GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 9(1), 86–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0900900106

  • Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests and identities. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1776). The wealth of nations. Scotland: Random House.

  • Svaleryd, H., & Vlachos, J. (2005). Financial markets, the pattern of industrial specialization and comparative advantage: Evidence from OECD countries. European Economic Review, 49(1), 113–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweet, C. M., & Maggio, D. S. E. (2015). Do stronger intellectual property rights increase innovation? World Development, 66(Supplement C), 665–677.

  • Tamberi, M., & Parteka, A. (2013). What determines export diversification in the development process? Empirical Assessment, the World Economy, 36(6), 807–826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tebaldi, E., & Elmslie, B. (2013). Does institutional quality impact innovation? Evidence from Cross-Country Patent Grant Data. Applied Economics, 45(7), 887–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullberg, E. (2017). Coordination of inventions and innovations through patent markets with prices. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 8(2), 704–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varsakelis, N. C. (2006). Education, political institutions and innovative activity: A crosscountry empirical investigation. Research Policy, 35(7), 1083–1090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vu, T. V. (2019). Does institutional quality foster economic complexity? (p. 1909). University of Otago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. (2013). Can institutions explain cross country differences in innovative activity? Journal of Macroeconomics, 37, 128–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1991). Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, S., & Fu, X. (2013). Drivers of export upgrading. World Development, 51, 221–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, S., & Li, R. (2017). Economic complexity, human capital and economic growth: Empirical research based on cross-country panel data. Applied Economics, 49(38), 3815–3828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lan Khanh Chu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 8 Country list

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hoang, D.P., Chu, L.K. Progression to Higher Economic Complexity: The Role of Institutions. J Knowl Econ 14, 4339–4366 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-01059-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-01059-x

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation