Skip to main content
Log in

A co-training approach for sequential three-way decisions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, three-way decisions have received much attention in uncertain decision and cost-sensitive learning communities. However, in many real applications, labeled samples are usually far from sufficient. In this case, it is a reasonable choice to defer the decision rather than make an immediate decision without sufficient supported information, thus it constructs a boundary region. In order to label more available samples, a traditional co-training method employs two classifiers on two complementary views to extend the existing training sets. However, the wrong predictions of new labels may lead to a high misclassification cost, especially when few labeled samples are available. To address this problem, a co-training method is incorporated into three-way decisions, which can label new samples with higher confidence. When we obtain sufficient labeled samples, the non-commitment decisions are directly decided to a positive or a negative region, which finally generates a two-way decisions result. Experiments on several face databases are conducted to validate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhi HL, Li JH (2019) Granule description based knowledge discovery from incomplete formal contexts via necessary attribute analysis. Inf Sci 485:347–361

    Google Scholar 

  2. Liang DC, Xu ZS, Liu D (2017) A new aggregation method-based error analysis for decision-theoretic rough sets and its application in hesitant fuzzy information systems. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 25(6):1685–1697

    Google Scholar 

  3. Liang DC, Liu D (2015) A risk decision making based on decision-theoretic rough sets under hesitant fuzzy information. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 23(2):237–247

    Google Scholar 

  4. He XL, Wei L, She YH (2018) L-fuzzy concept analysis for three-way decisions: basic definitions and fuzzy inference mechanisms. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 9(11):1857–1867

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yao JT, Azam N (2015) Web-based medical decision support systems for three-way medical decision making with game-theoretic rough sets. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 23(1):3–15

    Google Scholar 

  6. Li JZ, Yang XB, Song XN, Li JH, Wang PX, Yu DJ (2019) Neighborhood attribute reduction: a multi-criterion approach. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 10(4):731–742

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hao C, Li JH, Min F, Liu WQ, Tsang ECC (2017) Optimal scale selection in dynamic multi-scale decision tables based on sequential three-way decisions. Inf Sci 415:213–232

    Google Scholar 

  8. She YH, Li JH, Yang HL (2015) A local approach to rule induction in multi-scale decision tables. Knowl-Based Syst 89:398–410

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jia XY, Li WW, Shang L (2019) A multiphase cost-sensitive learning method based on the multiclass three-way decision-theoretic rough set model. Inf Sci 485:248–262

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang QH, Yang SH, Wang GY (2018) Measuring uncertainty of probabilistic rough set model from its three regions. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 47:3299–3309

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang LB, Li HX, Zhou XZ, Huang B (2020) Sequential three-way decision based on multi-granular autoencoder features. Inf Sci 507:630–643

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yao YY (2010) Three-way decisions with probabilistic. Inf Sci 180(3):341–353

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Yao YY (2018) Three-way decision and granular computing. Int J Approx Reason 103:107–123

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Yao YY (2016) Three-way decisions and cognitive computing. Cogn Comput 8:543–554

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yao YY (2019) Tri-level thinking: models of three-way decision. Int J Mach Learn Cybern. https://doi.org/10.1007/13042-019-01040-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li HX, Zhang LB, Huang B, Zhou XZ (2016) Sequential three-way decision and granulation for cost-sensitive face recognition. Knowl-Based Syst 91:241–251

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang SY, Li SG, Yang HL (2019) Three-way convex systems and three-way fuzzy convex systems. Inf Sci 510:89–98

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhi HL, Qi JJ, Qian T, Wei L (2019) Three-way dual concept analysis. Int J Approx Reason 114:151–165

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Yu H, Chen Y, Lingras P, Wang GY (2019) A three-way cluster ensemble approach for large-scale data. Int J Approx Reason 115:32–49

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Fang Y, Gao C, Yao YY (2020) Granularity-driven sequential three-way decisions: a cost-sensitive approach to classification. Inf Sci 507:644–664

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang Y, Zhou ZH (2010) Cost-sensitive face recognition. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 32(10):1758–1769

    Google Scholar 

  22. Li HX, Zhang LB, Zhou XZ, Huang B (2017) Cost-sensitive sequential three-way decision modeling using a deep neural network. Int J Approx Reason 85:68–78

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Yu H, Chang ZH, Wang GY, Chen XF (2019) An efficient three-way clustering algorithm based on gravitational search. Int J Mach Learn Cybern. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-019-00988-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yu H, Wang XC, Wang GY, Zeng XH (2020) An active three-way clustering method via low-rank matrices for multi-view data. Inf Sci 507:765–776

    Google Scholar 

  25. Xia SY, Liu YS, Ding X, Wang GY, Yu H, Luo YG (2019) Granular ball computing classifiers for efficient, scalable and robust learning. Inf Sci 483:136–152

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Shi Y, Mi YL, Li JH, Liu WQ (2019) Concurrent concept-cognitive learning model for classification. Inf Sci 496:65–81

    Google Scholar 

  27. Liu D, Li TR, Liang DC (2014) Three-way decisions in stochastic decision-theoretic rough sets. Trans Rough Sets 8449:110–130

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Li HX, Zhang LB, Huang B, Zhou XZ (2020) Cost-sensitive dual-bidirectional linear discriminant analysis. Inf Sci 510:283–303

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Liang DC, Wang MW, Xu ZS, Liu D (2020) Risk appetite dual hesitant fuzzy three-way decisions with TODIM. Inf Sci 507:585–605

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Min F, Zhang ZH, Zhai WJ, Shen RP (2020) Frequent pattern discovery with tri-partition alphabets. Inf Sci 507:715–732

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Qian YH, Liang XY, Lin GP, Guo Q, Liang JY (2017) Local multigranulation decision-theoretic rough sets. Int J Approx Reason 82:119–137

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Liu D, Ye XQ (2019) A matrix factorization based dynamic granularity recommendation with three-way decisions. Knowl-Based Syst. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2019.105243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Huang B, Wu WZ, Yan JJ, Li HX, Zhou XZ (2020) Inclusion measure-based multi-granulation decision-theoretic rough sets in multi-scale intuitionistic fuzzy information tables. Inf Sci 8171:421–448

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ju HR, Pedrycz W, Li HX, Ding WP, Yang XB, Zhou XZ (2019) Sequential three-way classifier with justifiable granularity. Knowl-Based Syst 163:103–119

    Google Scholar 

  35. Dai D, Zhou XZ, Li HX, Liu LF (2019) Co-training based sequential three-way decisions for cost-sensitive classification. In: Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control. pp. 157-162

  36. Blum A, Mitchell T (1998) Combining labeled and unlabeled data with co-training. In: Proceedings of the 11th annual conference on computational learning theory, pp 92–100

  37. Abdelgayed TS, Morsi WG, Sidhu TS (2018) Fault detection and classification based on co-training of semisupervised machine learning. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 65(2):1595–1605

    Google Scholar 

  38. Xu XX, Li W, Xu D, Tsang IW (2010) Co-labeling for multi-view weakly labeled learning. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 38(6):1113–1125

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zhou ZH, Li M (2005) Tri-training: exploiting unlabeled data using three classifiers. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 17(11):1529–1541

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang ZX, Coutinho E, Deng J, Schuller B (2015) Cooperative learning and its application to emotion recognition from speech. IEEE Trans Audio Speech 23(1):115–126

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kim D, Seo D, Cho S, Kang P (2019) Multi-co-training for document classification using various document representations: TF-IDF, LDA, and Doc2Vec. Inf Sci 477:15–29

    Google Scholar 

  42. Li WW, Jia XY, Wang L, Zhou B (2019) Multi-objective attribute reduction in three-way decision-theoretic rough set model. Int J Approx Reason 105:327–341

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Yu H, Jiao P, Yao YY, Wang GY (2016) Detecting and refining overlapping regions in complex networks with three-way decisions. Inf Sci 373:21–41

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Liang DC, Pedrycz W, Liu D (2017) Determining three-way decisions with decision-theoretic rough sets using a relative value approach. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 47(8):1785–1799

    Google Scholar 

  45. Li JH, Huang CC, Qi JJ, Qian YH, Liu WQ (2017) Three-way cognitive concept learning via multi-granularity. Inf Sci 378:244–263

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Liu JB, Li HX, Zhou XZ, Huang B, Wang TX (2019) An optimization-based formulation for three-way decisions. Inf Sci 495:185–214

    Google Scholar 

  47. Zhang ML, Zhou ZH (2011) Cotrade: confident co-training with data editing. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Cybern 41(6):1612–1626

    Google Scholar 

  48. Martinez AM, Benavente R (1998) The AR face database. Tech Report 24

  49. Sim T, Baker S, Bsat M (2003) The CMU pose, illumination, and expression database. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 25(12):1615–1618

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for helpful comments. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 71671086, 61876079, 71732003, 61773208), and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Nos. 2016YFD0702100, 2018YFB1402600).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huaxiong Li.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dai, D., Li, H., Jia, X. et al. A co-training approach for sequential three-way decisions. Int. J. Mach. Learn. & Cyber. 11, 1129–1139 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-020-01086-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-020-01086-7

Keywords

Navigation