Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Shifts in Leukocyte Counts Drive the Differential Expression of Transcriptional Stroke Biomarkers in Whole Blood

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Translational Stroke Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our group recently identified a panel of ten genes whose RNA expression levels in whole blood have utility for detection of stroke. The purpose of this study was to determine the mechanisms by which these genes become differentially expressed during stroke pathology. First, we assessed the transcriptional distribution of the ten genes across the peripheral immune system by measuring their expression levels on isolated neutrophils, monocytes, B-lymphocytes, CD-4+ T-lymphocytes, CD-8+ T-lymphocytes, and NK-cells generated from the blood of healthy donors (n = 3). Then, we examined the relationship between the whole-blood expression levels of the ten genes and white blood cell counts in a cohort of acute ischemic stroke patients (n = 36) and acute stroke mimics (n = 15) recruited at emergency department admission. All ten genes displayed strong patterns of lineage-specific expression in our analysis of isolated leukocytes, and their whole-blood expression levels were correlated with white blood cell differential across the total patient population, suggesting that many of them are likely differentially expressed in whole blood during stroke as an artifact of stroke-induced shifts in leukocyte counts. Specifically, factor analysis inferred that over 50% of the collective variance in their whole-blood expression levels across the patient population was driven by underlying variance in white blood cell counts alone. However, the cumulative expression levels of the ten genes displayed a superior ability to discriminate between stroke patients and stroke mimics relative to white blood cell differential, suggesting that additional less prominent factors influence their expression levels which add to their diagnostic utility. These findings not only provide insight regarding this particular panel of ten genes, but also into the results of prior stroke transcriptomics studies performed in whole blood.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tang Y, Xu H, Du X, Lit L, Walker W, Lu A, et al. Gene expression in blood changes rapidly in neutrophils and monocytes after ischemic stroke in humans: a microarray study. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Off J Int Soc Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2006;26:1089–102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Stamova B, Xu H, Jickling G, Bushnell C, Tian Y, Ander BP, et al. Gene expression profiling of blood for the prediction of ischemic stroke. Stroke J Cereb Circ. 2010;41:2171–7.

  3. O’Connell GC, Petrone AB, Treadway MB, Tennant CS, Lucke-Wold N, Chantler PD, et al. Machine-learning approach identifies a pattern of gene expression in peripheral blood that can accurately detect ischaemic stroke. Npj Genomic Med. 2016;1:16038–8.

  4. Raman K, O’Donnell MJ, Czlonkowska A, Duarte YC, Lopez-Jaramillo P, Peñaherrera E, et al. Peripheral blood MCEMP1 gene expression as a biomarker for stroke prognosis. Stroke J Cereb Circ. 2016;47:652–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Barr TL, Conley Y, Ding J, Dillman a, Warach S, Singleton a, et al. Genomic biomarkers and cellular pathways of ischemic stroke by RNA gene expression profiling. Neurology 2010;75:1009–1014.

  6. O’Connell GC, Chantler PD, Barr TL. Stroke-associated pattern of gene expression previously identified by machine-learning is diagnostically robust in an independent patient population. Genomics Data. 2017;14:47–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chamorro Á, Meisel A, Planas AM, Urra X, van de Beek D, Veltkamp R. The immunology of acute stroke. Nat Rev Neurol. 2012;8:401–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Iadecola C, Anrather J. The immunology of stroke: from mechanisms to translation. Nat Med. 2011;17:796–808.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Macrez R, Ali C, Toutirais O, Le Mauff B, Defer G, Dirnagl U, et al. Stroke and the immune system: from pathophysiology to new therapeutic strategies. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10:471–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Urra X, Cervera Á, Obach V, Climent N, Planas AM, Chamorro A. Monocytes are major players in the prognosis and risk of infection after acute stroke. Stroke. 2009;40:1262–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Vogelgesang A, Grunwald U, Langner S, Jack R, Bröker BM, Kessler C, et al. Analysis of lymphocyte subsets in patients with stroke and their influence on infection after stroke. Stroke. 2008;39:237–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Guo Z, Yu S, Xiao L, Chen X, Ye R, Zheng P, et al. Dynamic change of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and hemorrhagic transformation after thrombolysis in stroke. J Neuroinflammation. 2016;13:199–9.

  13. Rosell A, Cuadrado E, Ortega-Aznar A, Hernández-Guillamon M, Lo EH, Montaner J. MMP-9-positive neutrophil infiltration is associated to blood-brain barrier breakdown and basal lamina type IV collagen degradation during hemorrhagic transformation after human ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2008;39:1121–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Maestrini I, Strbian D, Gautier S, Haapaniemi E, Moulin S, Sairanen T, et al. Higher neutrophil counts before thrombolysis for cerebral ischemia predict worse outcomes. Neurology. 2015;85(16):1408–16.

  15. Urra X, Cervera Á, Villamor N, Planas a M, Chamorro Á. Harms and benefits of lymphocyte subpopulations in patients with acute stroke. Neuroscience. 2009;158:1174–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Abbas a R, Baldwin D, Ma Y, Ouyang W, Gurney a MF, et al. Immune response in silico (IRIS): immune-specific genes identified from a compendium of microarray expression data. Genes Immun. 2005;6:319–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Whitney AR, Diehn M, Popper SJ, Alizadeh AA, Boldrick JC, Relman DA, et al. Individuality and variation in gene expression patterns in human blood. Proc Natl Acad Sci U A. 2003;100:1896–901.

  18. Kidwell CS, Warach S. Acute ischemic cerebrovascular syndrome: diagnostic criteria. Stroke. 2003;34:2995–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bamford J, Sandercock P, Dennis M, Burn J, Warlow C. Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction. Lancet Lond Engl. 1991;337:1521–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee LJ, Kidwell CS, Alger J, Starkman S, Saver JL. Impact on stroke subtype diagnosis of early diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance angiography. Stroke. 2000;31:1081–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Heckmann L-H, Sørensen PB, Krogh PH, Sørensen JG. NORMA-gene: a simple and robust method for qPCR normalization based on target gene data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:250–0.

  22. O’Connell GC, Treadway MB, Petrone AB, Tennant CS, Lucke-Wold N, Chantler PD, et al. Leukocyte dynamics influence reference gene stability in whole blood: data-driven qRT-PCR normalization is a robust alternative for measurement of transcriptional biomarkers. Lab Med. 2017;48:346–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ross I, Robert G, Ihaka R, Gentleman R. R: a language for data analysis and graphics. J Comput Graph Stat. 1996;5:299–314.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A, Tiberti N, Lisacek F, Sanchez J-C, et al. pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Venables WN, Ripley BD. Modern applied statistics with S [Internet]. Springer New York: New York, NY; 2002. Available from: http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/MASS4

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44:837–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc. 1995:289–300.

  28. Droste A, Sorg C, Högger P. Shedding of CD163, a novel regulatory mechanism for a member of the scavenger receptor cysteine-rich family. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999;256:110–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. O’Connell GC, Tennant CS, Lucke-Wold N, Kabbani Y, Tarabishy AR, Chantler PD, et al. Monocyte-lymphocyte cross-communication via soluble CD163 directly links innate immune system activation and adaptive immune system suppression following ischemic stroke. Sci Rep. 2017;7:12940–0.

  30. Leclerc JL, Lampert AS, Loyola Amador C, Schlakman B, Vasilopoulos T, Svendsen P, et al. The absence of the CD163 receptor has distinct temporal influences on intracerebral hemorrhage outcomes. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2017;0271678X1770145-0271678X1770145.

  31. Liu R, Cao S, Hua Y, Keep RF, Huang Y, Xi G. CD163 expression in neurons after experimental intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2017;48:1369–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Petrone AB, O’Connell GC, Regier MD, Chantler PD, Simpkins JW, Barr TL. The role of arginase 1 in post-stroke immunosuppression and ischemic stroke severity. Transl Stroke Res. 2016;7:103–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Jickling GC, Ander BP, Zhan X, Noblett D, Stamova B, Liu D. MicroRNA expression in peripheral blood cells following acute ischemic stroke and their predicted gene targets. PLoS One. 2014;9:e99283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Dykstra-Aiello C, Jickling GC, Ander BP, Shroff N, Zhan X, Liu D, et al. Altered expression of long noncoding RNAs in blood after ischemic stroke and proximity to putative stroke risk loci. 2016.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would foremost like to thank the subjects and their families, as this work was truly made possible by their selfless contribution. In addition, we would like to thank the stroke team at Ruby Memorial Hospital for supporting this research effort.

Funding

Work was funded via a Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Nurse Faculty Scholar award to TLB (70319), a National Institutes of Health CoBRE sub-award to TLB (P20 GM109098), and Case Western Reserve University FPB School of Nursing start-up funds issued to GCO.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grant C. O’Connell.

Ethics declarations

Procedures were approved by the institutional review boards of West Virginia University and Ruby Memorial Hospital (IRB protocol 1410450461R001), and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects or their authorized representatives prior to study procedures.

Conflict of Interest

GCO and TLB have a patent pending re: genomic patterns of expression for stroke diagnosis. TLB serves as chief scientific officer for Valtari Bio Incorporated. Work by GCO is part of a pending licensing agreement with Valtari Bio Incorporated. GCO has received consulting fees from Valtari Bio Incorporated. The remaining authors report no potential conflicts of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 1655 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

O’Connell, G.C., Treadway, M.B., Tennant, C.S. et al. Shifts in Leukocyte Counts Drive the Differential Expression of Transcriptional Stroke Biomarkers in Whole Blood. Transl. Stroke Res. 10, 26–35 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-018-0623-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-018-0623-1

Keywords

Navigation