Abstract
Seven genotypes of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) were evaluated under semi-controlled conditions at the Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Bangladesh to analyze genotypic variability in leaf water status under water stress. The plants were grown under two moisture regimes, viz. 80% field capacity (FC) and 50% FC throughout the growing season. The genotypes showed significant variation in water relation traits. Genotypes BB24 and BB43 maintained higher relative water content (RWC), but lower turgid weight/dry weight ratio (TW/DW) and water uptake capacity (WUC). When drought susceptibility index (DSI) among the genotypes was considered, BB24 was found the most tolerant to drought and BB04 was the most susceptible one. A close positive relationship between leaf TW/DW and DSI under drought was recorded (R 2 = 0.627). Leaf TW/DW was decreased considerably due to water stress by 10% in genotype BB24 followed by BB43 (13%), and both BARI bushbean-2 and BB04 (19%). Stomatal aperture and whole plant transpiration rate were found minimal in the BB24 and BB43 compared to that of BB04 and BARI bushbean-2. Considering these water relation traits, genotypes BB24 and BB43 may be considered as relatively tolerant to tissue dehydration. The study also revealed that the TW/DW, WUC, stomatal aperture, and whole plant transpiration rate was negatively and significantly associated with yield; however, the RWC was positively correlated with yield under water stress conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acosta-Gallegos JA. 1988. Selection of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes with enhanced drought tolerance and biological nitrogen fixation. Ph.D. thesis. Michigan State University, East Lansing (Diss Abstr 8824816).
Acevedo E, Ceccarelli S. 1989. Role of the physiologist-breeder in a breeding program for drought resistance conditions. In FWG Baker, ed, Drought Resistance in Cereals, CAB International, Wallingford, pp 117–139
Blum A, Munns R, Passioura JB, Turner NC, Sharp RE, Boyer JS, Nguyen HT, Hsiao TC. 1996. Genetically engineered plants resistant to soil drying and salt stress: how to interpret osmotic relations? Plant Physiol. 110: 1051–1053
Clarke JM, DePauw RM, Townley-Smith TF. 1992. Evaluation of methods for quantification of drought tolerance in wheat. Crop Sci. 32: 723–728
Fairbairn JN. 1993. Evaluation of soils, climate and land use information at three scales: The case of low income bean farming in Latin America. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Reading, Reading, UK
Fischer RA, Maurer R. 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield responses. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 29: 897–912
Ghosh AK, Ishuiki K, Toyota M, Kusutani A, Asanuma K. 2000. Water potential, stomatal dimension and leaf gas exchange in soybean plants under long-term moisture deficit. Jpn. J. Trop. Agr. 44: 30–37
Haterlein AJ. 1983. Bean. In ID Tearce, MM Peet, eds, Crop-Water Relations, Wiley Pub., New York, pp 157–185
Islam MS, Haque MM, Khan MM, Hidaka T, Karim MA. 2004. Effect of fertilizer potassium on growth, yield and water relations of bushbean (Phaseolus vulgaris L). under water stress conditions. Jpn. J. Trop. Agr. 48: 1–9
Jones HG. 1979. Stomatal behaviour and breeding for drought resistance. In H Mussel, RC Staples, eds, Stress Physiology in Crop Plants, Wiley Interscience, New York, pp 408–428
Kumar A, Elston J. 1992. Genetic difference in leaf water relations between Brassica juncea and B. napus. Ann. Bot. 70: 3–9
Lizana C, Wentworth M, Martinez JP, Villegas D, Meneses R, Murchie EH, Pastenes C, Lercari B, Vernieri P, Horton P, Pinto M. 2006. Differential adaptation of two varieties of common bean to abiotic stress. I. Effects of drought on yield and photosynthesis. J. Exp. Bot. 57: 685–697
Martinez JP, Silva H, Ledent JF, Pinto M. 2007. Effect of drought stress on the osmotic adjustment, cell wall elasticity and cell volume of six cultivars of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Europ. J. Agron. 26: 30–38
Mkandawire ABC. 1987. Productivity of Malawian landrace dry beans under intercropping and drought conditions. Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan State University, East Lansing (Diss. Abstr. 8807094).
Munoz-Perea CG, Teran H, Allen RG, Wright JM, Westermann DT, Singh SP. 2006. Selection for drought resistance in dry bean landraces and cultivars. Crop Sci. 46: 2111–2120
Nuñez-Barrios A, Hoogenboom G, Nesmith DC. 2005. Drought stress and the distribution of vegetative and reproductive traits of bean cultivar. Sci. Agric. (Piraciaba, Brazil), 62: 18–22
Omae H, Kumar A, Kashiwaba K, Shono M. 2007. Assessing drought tolerance of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) from genotypic differences in leaf water relations, shoot growth and photosynthetic parameters. Plant Prod. Sci. 10: 28–35
Omae H, Kumar A, Egawa Y, Kashiwaba K, Shono M. 2005. Genotypic differences in plant water status and relationship with reproductive responses in snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) during water stress. Jpn. J. Trop. Agr. 49: 1–7
Parsons LR, Howe TK. 1984. Effects of water stress on the water relations of Phaseolus vulgaris and the drought resistant Phaseolus acutifolius. Physiol. Plant 60: 197–202
Ramirez-Vallejo P, Kelly JD. 1998. Traits related to drought resistance in common bean. Euphytica 99: 127–136
Rosales-Serna R, Kohashi-Shibat, J, Acosta-Gallegos JA, Trejo-Lopez C, Ortiz-Cereceres J, Kelly JD. 2004. Biomass distribution, maturity acceleration and yield in droughtstressed common bean cultivars. Field Crops Res. 85: 203–211
Sánchez J, Manzanares M, de Andres EF, Tenorio JL, Ayerbe L. 1998. Turgor maintenance, osmotic adjustment and soluble sugar and proline accumulation in 49 pea cultivars in response to water stress. Field Crops Res. 59: 225–235
Sangakkara UR, Hartwig UA, Nosberger J. 1996. Response of root branching and shoot water potentials of french beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to soil moisture and fertilizer potassium. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 177: 165–173
Shen XY, Webster BD. 1986. Effects of water stress on pollen of Phaseolus vulgaris L. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 111: 907–810
Singh SP. 2001. Broadening the genetic base of common bean cultivars: a review. Crop Sci. 41: 1659–1675
Suzuki K, Tsukaguchi T, Takeda H, Egawa Y. 2001. Decrease of pollen stainability of snap bean at high temperatures and relationship to heat tolerance. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 126: 571–574
Terán H, Singh SP. 2002. Comparison of sources and lines selected for drought resistance in common bean. Crop Sci. 42: 64–70
Tsukaguchi T, Kawamitsu Y, Takeda K, Suzuki H, Egawa Y. 2003. Water status of flower buds and leaves as affected by temperature in heat-tolerant and heat-sensitive cultivars of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Plant Prod. Sci. 6: 24–27
Turner NC. 1986. Adaptation to water deficits: a changing perspective. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 13: 175–190
van den Boogaard R, de Boer M, Veneklaas EJ, Lanibers H. 1996. Relative growth rate, biomass allocation pattern and water use efficiency of three wheat cultivars during early ontogeny as dependent on water availability. Physiol. Plant. 98: 493–504
White JW, Singh SP. 1991. Breeding for adaptation to drought. In A van Shoonhoven, O Voysest, eds, Common Beans: Research for crop improvement. CABI, Walingford, and CIAT, Cali. pp 501–560
White JW, Ochoa R, Ibarra F, Singh SP. 1994. Inheritance of seed yield, maturity and seed weight of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) under semiarid rainfed conditions. J. Agr. Sci. (Cambridge) 122: 265–273
Wortmann CS, Kirby RA, Eledu CA, Allan DJ. 1998. Atlas of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) production in Africa. CIAT, Cali.
Wu DX, Wang GX. 2000. Interaction of CO2 enrichment and drought on growth, water use, and yield of broad bean (Vicia faba). Environ. Exp. Bot. 43: 131–139
Yang HM, Wang GX. 2001. Leaf stomatal density and distribution in Triticum aestivum under drought and CO2 enrichment. Acta Phytoecol. Sin. 25: 312–316
Yang H.M, Zhang XY, Wang GX. 2004. Relationships between stomatal character, photosynthetic character and seed chemical composition in grass pea at different water avail abilities. J. Agr. Sci. (Cambridge) 142: 675–668
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Choudhury, A.K., Karim, A., Haque, M. et al. Genotypic variability in plant water status of French bean under drought stress. J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol. 14, 17–24 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-010-0082-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-010-0082-z