Abstract
Koreanohadra koreana (K. koreana) is an endemic species in South Korea that is listed as endangered. While the ecology and phylogenetics of K. koreana have been studied, its morphological similarity to the related species Koreanohadra kurodana (K. kurodana), can make species identification difficult. Furthermore, this has led to confusion when determining essential habitat information for the conservation of K. koreana. To bypass this issue, we have developed a non-invasive species identification method that can genetically differentiate between them. While there are already various non-invasive genomic DNA (gDNA) extraction methods that utilize the mucus from mollusks, they are limited as they require the target species to be physically located. To address this, in this investigation a method of extracting gDNA from the feces of snails was developed. The method utilized a primer set to amplify a cytochrome b fragment from K. koreana but not K. kurodana or other terrestrial snails. The feces of terrestrial snails could thus be used to obtain gDNA to a genetically usable level if collected within 5 days of excretion. This non-invasive species identification method using feces will help to facilitate genetic research without harming the endangered species and if the target species is not physically in the habitat. Moreover, K. koreana and K. kurodana could perhaps be further distinguished, using their habitat information to help facilitate essential conservation measures.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Koreanohadra koreana belongs to family Bradybaenidae and is an endemic terrestrial snail species in Hong-do and Hatae-do islands of southwestern South Korea. Species with limited habitats are especially vulnerable to sudden environmental change, such as those that occur with climate, habitat destruction, and human disturbance (Malcolm et al. 2006; Mullu 2016). To this end, K. koreana has been designated and protected as an endangered species (EN: Endangered, regional red list) by the Ministry of Environment of South Korea since 2012.
Another Korean terrestrial snail belonging to the genus Koreanohadra, K. kurodana, is morphologically similar to K. koreana (Lee and Kwon 1993) and their phylogenetic analyses are also very similar (Kimura et al. 2022). Consequently, comparisons of the morphological characteristics (such as umbilical width, aperture height and width, body whorl height) cannot be used to effectively distinguish between these species. This limits the identification of these species within the habitat if taxon experts are not involved. Due to the nature of endangered species, it is important to identify and protect the habitats of K. koreana, but as noted, defining their habitats is confusing due to their external similarity with K. kurodana, Sharing the distribution range according to literature record (Kimura et al. 2022), which creates a major hurdle in facilitating appropriate protection. Furthermore, accurate species identification methods also help to monitor populations and track changes in distribution and abundance over time.
Recently, various genetic analyzes using environmental DNA (eDNA) that comes from organisms has been studied to identify their presence or absence in the habitat (Weltz et al. 2017; Mizumoto et al. 2020; Ruiz-Ramos et al. 2023) and to verify host plants (Milla et al. 2022). These studies confirmed that large amounts of residual gDNA from organisms exists in the environment, and on this basis it was established that genetic research could be sufficiently conducted using eDNA. The use of eDNA has led to the development of non-invasive methods for the collection of DNA samples from mollusks using their mucus without damaging the target organisms (Armbruster et al. 2005; Palmer et al. 2008; Régnier et al. 2011). The non-invasive method can be used for genetic research (genetic diversity, phylogeography analyzes) without fatal effects on survival when collecting DNA samples from K. koreana tissue. The non-invasive technique for species identification is expected to bring a remarkable advancement in securing genetic analysis for the conservation of K. koreana, as it is not restricted by duration, area, or number of capture and re-capture according to “The Regulation on Captive Propagation of Endangered Wildlife (Ministry of Environment’s Regulation No. 621)”.
Considering the above circumstances and conditions, we aimed to develop an identification method for K. koreana to distinguish it from the morphologically indistinguishable from K. kurodana using non-invasive methods with non-tissue materials (feces and mucus). Then, like the eDNA method, we have determined whether the non-invasive method using feces can verify the habitat of K. koreana without visually identifying the target species. unlike using universal primer, which requires the sequencing process to know the species identification, specific primers have been designed to easy and quickly identify K. koreana by agarose electrophoresis. Moreover, to determine the detection time limits of gDNA in feces, The detection limit time was measured in an artificial environment mimicking the natural microhabitat of target terrestrial snails (K. koreana live under stone walls or groves of trees, where it is humid and the temperature is between from 22 to 25 °C, and where there is no direct sunlight). Finally, we aimed to determine whether it was possible to conduct genetic studies such as population genetics for K. koreana using the non-invasive method.
Materials and methods
Species collecting and rearing
Two types of terrestrial snails were collected for an indoor experiment from the following locations: Koreanohadra koreana was collected from the boundary between a village and a forest at Hong-do island (34.691438N, 125.198160E) and Hatae-do island (34.389398N, 125.297561E) which are located far southwest of South Korea. Although K. koreana were collected from the two islands, they were not reared individually at the time of capture and were reared together in one breeding container, so they were reared individually before the experiment. Koreanohadra kurodana, the comparative species for K. koreana, was collected from Mt. Cheonggye (37.415741N, 127.041662E), a mountain located near Seongnam-si in South Korea. The above two types of snails have been captured with various sizes regardless of whether they were sexually mature or not. All terrestrial snails (Achatina fulica, Euhadra herklotsi, Nesiohelix samarangae, Acusta despecta, and Euhadra dixoni) in this study, including the above two species, were reared in acryl cases with perforated plastic lid, respectively. All rearing cases were filled by substrate (coconut bark), up to 10 cm in height. Cabbage and carrot were provided as well a calcium source (i.e. egg shell) every 3 days. All rearing cases were placed at 24 °C with 90% relative humidity with a 16:8 h light: dark period until further use in the experiment. All terrestrial snails used in the experiment, including K. koreana and K. kurodana, were individually reared under the above rearing conditions. K. koreana is designated as a second-degree endangered species (EN: Endangered, regional red list) in South Korea. All capture activities and rearing were thus conducted after obtaining appropriate permits from the Yeongsangang River Basin Environmental Office (Permission No. 2020-7) and the Daegu Regional Environment Agency (Permission No. 2022-2).
DNA extraction from feces, mucus, and foot tissue
To isolate the residual gDNA originating from the epithelial cells included in the mucus from K. koreana and K. kurodana (Kawai et al. 2004), the mucus was collected by smoothly rubbing a sterile cotton swab 20 times between the foot and inner surface of the shell that meets snail’s flesh. In succession, the heads of swabs were cut off and put into 1.5 mL tubes with 180 µL of ATL buffer and 20 µL of proteinase K solution (DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit, QIAGEN, Germany) and then incubated for 1 h at 56 °C. Other steps were followed by manufacturer’s instructions except for the final elution volume of 25 µL of AE buffer. 5 µL of the eluted solution was used as PCR template. The feces were collected from rearing cases in the laboratory. 40 mg (wet weight) of feces from each rearing cases was put into a 1.5 mL tube and disrupted with plastic pestle. The gDNA was extracted in the extraction method used for mucus as above the described. Moreover, to compare the DNA extraction method with another extraction method, gDNA from the mucus and the feces was also extracted by DAP buffer method (Cha et al. 2020). The mucus and the feces was then collected as previously described. Then, 200 µL of DAP buffer (20 mM Sodium Hydroxide, 5% Polyethylene glycol 200, and 5% Dimethyl Sulfoxide) was put into a 1.5 mL tube which includes a swab head or 40 mg of feces. The tube with the swab was vortex briefly and the tube with feces was disrupted using a plastic pestle. The tube was then placed at room temperature (20–25 °C) for 10 min to dissolve the epithelial cells. After lysis, 5 µL of the lysate was used as a PCR template. Finally, to compare the efficiency of the gDNA extraction between non-tissue materials and tissue materials, gDNA was extracted from 20 mg of the snail foot tissue using a proteinase K solution method. All gDNA isolated from the foot tissue were used in a total 20 ng concentration as the PCR template.
Procedure of the PCR amplification
Paired primers were designed by selecting the most different 5’ region of each primer candidate sequence region from the alignment of cytochrome b sequences from six terrestrial snails (Aegista aubryana, Mastigeulota kiangsinensis, Camaena poyuensis, Dolicheulota formosensis, K. koreana, and K. kurodana) (Fig. 1). Moreover, primers were designed to only amplify the 624 base pairs partial fragment of cytochrome b from K. koreana to distinguish between K. koreana and other terrestrial snails. The primer sequences KK_FS_CYTB_F2 (forward direction) 5′-TACATATTAGGCGGGATGTG-3′ and KK_FS_CYTB_R3 (reverse direction) 5′-ATATCACTCAGGTTGAATATGC-3′ were used in PCR procedures. PCR was performed using AccuPower® PCR premix (Bioneer, South Korea) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Specifically, a total of 50 µL of PCR reagent consisting of 5 µL of gDNA from the mucus or the feces of snails extracted by DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit or 5 µL of the lysate from the mucus or the feces of snails was extracted by DAP buffer, 10 pmol of each primer pair, and 42.6 µL of nuclease-free water. The PCR reagent was then put into an enzyme pellet tube and mixed briefly. Most of the residual gDNA within feces or mucus remained a very small amount and most of it is in a decomposed condition. Thus, to amplify these small amounts of gDNA, we increased the number of thermal cycles, similar to the PCR process performed to amplify eDNA (Zeale et al. 2011; Thomsen and Sigsgaard 2019). The PCR amplification procedure was conducted for 3 min at 95 °C and 50 thermal cycles with 30 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 57 °C, and 1 min at 72 °C, and a final extension period of 3 min at 72 °C. In total 10 µL of PCR products was used for electrophoresis with 1.8% of agarose gel to determine the PCR success or failure. Furthermore, to confirm the reproducibility of the gDNA extraction with PCR methods, PCR amplifications were performed on feces and mucus samples from different K. koreana individuals. Finally, PCR products were sequenced to confirm whether the existing nucleotide sequence variation in the cytochrome b fragment of each individual snail or not. All the cytochrome b sequence used in this study are deposited in Genbank. Genbank accession numbers for 16 sequences of K. koreana (from OQ852448 to OQ852463) and for one sequence of K. kurodana (OQ852464), respectively.
Verification of primer specificity and reproducibility
To verify primer specificity, PCR with gDNA from the foot tissue of K. koreana and other terrestrial snails was conducted to determine whether a non-specific amplification reaction occurred in the other terrestrial snails. The PCR amplification was carried out as previously described, except that a total of 20 ng of gDNA was used from each snail as the PCR template, and the terrestrial snail species were used as negative controls, and they were as follows: Koreanohadra kurodana, Achatina fulica, Euhadra herklotsi, Nesiohelix samarangae, Acusta despecta, and Euhadra dixoni. To verify reproducibility, 8 mucus and 8 feces samples from 16 individuals of K. koreana were used to confirm whether the results were reproducible. The gDNA extraction method and PCR are the same as the method described in the procedure of the PCR amplification method above.
Limit of detection time from feces after excretion
To determine how long after excretion from the snails the gDNA in feces could still be amplified using a common PCR method, the feces were placed in the artificial environment condition through the following process: each 40 mg of the feces from K. koreana was collected immediately after excretion and placed on a cell culture dish (4 cm diameter × 1 cm height) which was filled with substrates (sand or coconut bark). All culture dishes were placed at 25 °C, 45% relative humidity (RH), and with a 16:8 h light: dark period, for 30 days. The limit of detection time was then confirmed by PCR amplification of the gDNA from the feces at intervals of 5 days. PCR amplification every 5 days was performed three times for each substrate.
Phylogenetic analysis
A total of 16 partial sequences (seven from feces, eight from mucus, and one from foot tissue) of cytochrome b from K. koreana with one reference out-group using cytochrome b from K. kurodana sequenced in this study were used for phylogenetic analyzes to determine the presence of K. koreana haplotypes. All sequences were aligned and trimmed using BioEdit (Hall 1999), and jModelTest 2.1.7 was used to select the best fit model TPM3uf + I under Akaike information criterion (AIC) (Darriba et al. 2012). For the Maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) analyzes, the FASTA file was converted to NEXUS and PHYLIP files using MEGA 7.0 (Tamura et al. 2011), and the jModelTest results (Invariable sites: 0.6960, freqA: 0.2404, freqC: 0.1868, freqG: 0.1867, freqT: 0.3861, AC = CG: 0.1850, AG = CT: 2.1313, AT = GT 1.0000) were used. ML analysis was conducted using PhyML version 3.1 and 1,000 bootstrap replicates (Guindon et al. 2010). BI assessment was conducted using MrBayes 3.2.2 (Ronquist et al. 2012) with a chain length of 1,000,000 generations. Trees were sampled every 100 generations with a prior burn-in of 2000 trees. A neighbor-joining test was carried out using MEGA 7.0 (Tamura et al. 2011) with the Kimura 2-parameter distance option (Kimura 1980) with 1,000 bootstrapping. Molecular trees were visualized using the FigTree v1.4.1 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/spftware/figtree/, written by A. Rambaut).
Results and discussion
Efficiency of gDNA extraction using non-tissue materials
To compare the efficiency of gDNA extraction using DAP buffer and Proteinase K from non-tissue material, feces and mucus samples were obtained from K. koreana and K. kurodana, and foot tissue was used as a positive control. The foot tissues of mollusks are considered one of their best sources of DNA, as they are the largest and most accessible organ in living animals, but also because other tissues (such as digestive glands) are often contaminated with microorganisms (Sokolov 2000). The results for the efficiency of gDNA extraction using non-tissue materials (feces and mucus, KFQ in Fig. 2a and KMQ in Fig. 2b) showed that PCR amplification when using tissue material (foot tissue, KTQ in Fig. 2) was greater than with the non-tissue materials. The reason for this may be because of PCR inhibitors, such as mucopolysaccharides (Adema 2021) in the mucus and humic acid in the feces (Schrader et al. 2012), as well as low concentration of residual gDNA in the non-tissue materials. In addition, the direct gDNA extraction method (using DAP buffer) and the column filter method (using DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit) had shown significantly different efficiencies for PCR amplification. Specifically, PCR amplicon from gDNA of the non-tissue materials extracted using the direct extraction method were only weakly amplified or were not amplified more when compare with the gDNA extracted using column filter method. These results indicate that more impurities (mucopolysaccharides, humic acid, etc.) remain in the lysate of the direct extraction method, and that the degree of PCR inhibition for PCR using gDNA extracted by the direct extraction method is higher than the column filter method. The used of the snail mucus with CTAB (hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide) could effectively overcome the PCR inhibition caused by mucopolysaccharides (Goodacre and Wade 2001), and increasing the foot tissue rubbing from the snail can help to increase the amount of DNA obtained from mucus (Armbruster et al. 2005). Nevertheless, the PCR using gDNA from non-tissue materials showed less amplification than PCR using gDNA extracted from the foot tissue, but the amplification was sufficient for the identification of K. koreana (KFQ in Fig. 2a and KMQ in Fig. 2b) and K. kurodana (BFQ in Fig. 2a and BMQ in Fig. 2b).
Specificity and reproducibility of PCR amplification using non-tissue materials
Koreanohadra koreana and K. kurodana are highly similar species morphologically and genetically, as was previously discussed. In addition to the genetic similarities between two species, identification using their morphological characteristics via the naked eye is also very difficult and even experts can confuse the two species. Although the universal primer is broadly used for species identification, it have a disadvantage because it would create unexpected non-specific amplicon in PCR process for this reason it requires the sequencing process for species identification. If specific molecular markers for the target species, K. koreana were identified, however, then this should provide a solution (easy and quick identification of species using electrophoresis) to this issue.
To date, various non-invasive techniques for obtaining gDNA from mollusks for genetic studies have been developed (Huelskens et al. 2011; Jaksch et al. 2016). Despite the advantage of being non-harmful physically to target species, the non-invasive species identification method for the classification of species that are morphologically indistinguishable has not yet been widely developed.
In this study, the verification of primer specificity using closely related terrestrial snails showed that a pair of primers for the 624 bp fragment of cytochrome b from K. koreana had high levels target specificity and only amplified the gDNA from K. koreana (Fig. 3). This result indicates that a set of primers could be used to distinguish K. koreana from terrestrial snails including K. kurodana which show high levels of genetic similarity, using the gDNA extracted from non-tissue materials (feces and mucus). In addition, the primer’s that showed high levels of species specificity, also showed high levels of reproducibility when using fresh non-tissue materials. It was confirmed that the target amplification product was amplified in all gDNA extracted from mucus and feces samples (Fig. 4).
Detection limits of residual DNA in the feces from terrestrial snails
While mucus can only be obtained when the snail is identified within their habitat, their feces can be collected via habitat survey, and thus without locating the actual snail. Above all, the strength of using feces for species identification of terrestrial snails rather than mucus is that in most countries, capturing endangered species is strictly prohibited and their numbers are small, making them difficult to find. As mentioned above, terrestrial snail feces would be easy to find if one knows the characteristics of the environment in which the target terrestrial snails can inhabit, and it has the advantage of not causing harm to the target species for collecting mucus. However, the duration of time after feces excretion cannot be confirmed when collected from the field. To address this, artificial environmental condition (using substrates such as sand or soil, 25 °C, and 45% RH) mimicking the K. koreana habitat were used to determine how long residual gDNA persists in the feces (Fig. 5).
Feces containing only plant materials lost their water content and shrink within 2 days but feces containing calcium debris maintained their form for approximately 30 days. Nevertheless, the gDNA from the shrunken feces could still be extracted and amplified. The results showed that gDNA in the feces could be amplified 30 days after excretion from the snail. In detail, PCR with gDNA from feces which is placed in the artificial environmental condition was not amplified constantly but was amplified according to an individual sample (Fig. 5). The reason for this seems to be due to the original amount of gDNA in the feces as well as various factors such as the damage to the gDNA due to factors such as the light source and free radicals (Dizdaroglu et al. 2002; Sinha and Häder 2002). Moreover, the gDNA from the feces placed on the soil tended to result in less amplification than when it was placed on the sand, and the phenomenon seems to be related to soil-based PCR inhibitors (Braid et al. 2003).
In summary, as a result of detection limit time in artificial environmental conditions shown, gDNA within feces has not only the characteristic of easily decomposing but also has a very small amount remaining in feces. For this reason, if feces is used for species identification by field survey, it should be collected in as fresh a condition as possible and in large quantities. Furthermore, collecting feces from sand, stone, or tree branches rather than the soil seems to help prevent PCR inhibition due to the inhibitors found in the soil.
Presence or absence of genetic variation in cytochrome b from K. Koreana
Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) markers offer an effective approach for deducing the phylogeny and evolutionary history of closely related organisms because of their rapid rates of evolution, limited or negligible meiotic recombination, and predominantly uniparental inheritance (Avise 2000). The cytochrome b region, specifically, is recognized for having noteworthy intra-specific variability that allows for extensive molecular identification at detailed taxonomic levels, such as within a species complex (Yokoyama et al. 2001; Biswas et al. 2003), and for population genetic assessments (Chen et al. 2007). The results of the phylogenetic analyzes indicate that partial sequences of cytochrome b between interspecies (K. koreana and K. kurodana) differed by 4.9–5.4% (differences in 21 to 26 of the 483 bp of sequences). Furthermore, the intraspecies sequence differences for the cytochrome b of K. koreana were found to ranges from 0 to 1.5% in 16 individuals (Table 1). The results of the phylogenetic analysis generated using the Maximum-likelihood tree, showed that there were two haplogroups which consisted of four haplotypes that were observed in the sample population for K. koreana with high supporting values (Fig. 6) and this was thought to be due to the differences in the genetic characteristics between the individuals that were isolated in each habitat (Hong-do and Hatae-do islands are 35 km apart in the straight line) which is surrounded by a sea barrier to dispersal (Jensen et al. 2013). However, due to the omission of information on the clear habitat location of each individual from K. koreana used in this study, further studies that utilized specimen samples or non-tissue materials that provide clear location information, and the comparison of other genes will be required to elucidate whether the genetic differences between intraspecies are due to the genetic isolation caused by their habitats. Although many genetic issues still need to be resolved, the results of phylogenetic analyses have indicated that gDNA using non-tissue materials could be used in genetic studies.
Conclusion
Taken together, in this study a new non-invasive species identification method has been developed, which uses non-tissue materials (mucus and feces) and newly designed cytochrome b primers for K. koreana and K. kurodana. The advantage of this newly developed method when compared to previous methods for obtaining gDNA from the mucus of mollusks, is that it enables genetic research using only feces and without identifying a target species. Furthermore, previously, the limitation when identifying endangered species habitats using eDNA has been that most of the organism targeted lived in water bodies. The newly designed non-invasive method, however, indicates that using residual DNA in the feces from terrestrial organisms can be used for forensic applications and population genetic research of endangered species.
Data availability
All the cytochrome b sequence used in this study are deposited in Genbank. Genbank accession numbers for 16 sequences of K. koreana (from OQ852448 to OQ852463) and for one sequence of K. kurodana (OQ852464), respectively. Two internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) from K. koreana (OQ789637) and K. kurodana (OQ789638) are also deposited in Genbank. All sequence data will be released on May 31 in 2024.
References
Adema CM (2021) Sticky problems: extraction of nucleic acids from molluscs. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 376:20200162. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0162
Armbruster GFJ, Koller B, Baur B (2005) Foot mucus and periostracum fraction as non-destructive source of DNA in the land snail Arianta Arbustorum, and the development of new microsatellite loci. Conserv Genet 6:313–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-004-7823-9
Avise JC (2000) History and conceptual background. Phylogeography: the history and formation of species. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, p 447
Biswas SK, Wang L, Yokoyama K, Nishimura K (2003) Molecular analysis of Cryptococcus neoformans mitochondrial cytochrome b gene sequences. J Clin Microbiol 41:5572–5576. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.41.12.5572-5576.2003
Braid MD, Daniels LM, Kitts CL (2003) Removal of PCR inhibitors from soil DNA by chemical flocculation. J Microbiol Methods 52:389–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7012(02)00210-5
Cha D, Kim D, Choi W, Park S, Han H (2020) Point-of-care diagnostic (POCD) method for detecting Bursaphelenchus xylophilus in pinewood using recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) with the portable optical isothermal device (POID). PLoS ONE 15:e0227476. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227476
Chen WJ, Delmotte F, Richard-Cervera SR, Douence L, Greif C, Corio-Costet MF (2007) At least two origins of fungicide resistance in grapevine downy mildew populations. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:5162–5172. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00507-07
Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D (2012) JModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods 9:772
Dizdaroglu M, Jaruga P, Birincioglu M, Rodriguez H (2002) Free radical-induced damage to DNA: mechanisms and measurement. Free Radic Biol Med 32:1102–1115. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-5849(02)00826-2
Goodacre SL, Wade CM (2001) Patterns of genetic variation in Pacific island land snails: the distribution of cytochrome b lineages among society island partula. Biol J Linn 73:131–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2001.tb01351.x
Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O (2010) New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol 59:307–321. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syq010
Hall T (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41:95–98
Huelskens T, Schreiber S, Hollmann M (2011) COI amplification success from mucus-rich marine gastropods (Gastropoda: Naticidae) depends on DNA extraction method and preserving agent. Mitt Dtsch Malakozool Ges 85:17–26
Jaksch K, Eschner A, Rintelen TV, Haring E (2016) DNA analysis of molluscs from a museum wet collection: a comparison of different extraction methods. B M C Res Notes 9:348. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2147-7
Jensen H, Moe R, Hagen IJ, Holand AM, Kekkonen J, Tufto J, Sæther B-E (2013) Genetic variation and structure of house sparrow populations: is there an island effect? Mol Ecol 22:1792–1805. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12226
Kawai K, Shimizu M, Hughes RN, Takenaka O (2004) A non-invasive technique for obtaining DNA from marine intertidal snails. J Mar Biol Assoc U K 84:773–774. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315404009907h
Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01731581
Kimura K, Chiba S, Prozorova L, Pak JH (2022) Long-distance dispersal from island to island: colonisation of an oceanic island in the vicinity of the Asian continent by the land snail genus Karaftohelix (Gastropoda: Camaenidae). Molluscan Res 42:168–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/13235818.2022.2066454
Lee JS, Kwon OK (1993) Morphological analyses of 15 species of Bradybaenidae in Korea. Korean J Malacol 9:44–56
Malcolm JR, Liu C, Neilson RP, Hansen L, Hannah L (2006) Global warming and extinctions of endemic species from biodiversity hotspots. Conser Biol 20:538–548. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00364.x
Milla L, Schmidt-Lebuhn A, Bovill J, Encinas-Viso F (2022) Monitoring of honey bee floral resources with pollen DNA metabarcoding as a complementary tool to vegetation surveys. Ecol Sol Evid 3:e12120. https://doi.org/10.1002/2688-8319.12120
Mizumoto H, Mitsuzuka T, Araki H (2020) An environmental DNA survey on distribution of an endangered salmonid species, Parahucho perryi, in Hokkaido, Japan. Front Ecol Evol 8:569425. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2020.569425
Mullu D (2016) A review on the effect of habitat fragmentation on ecosystem. J Nat Sci Res 6(15):1–15
Palmer ANS, Styan CA, Shearman DCA (2008) Foot mucus is a good source for non-destructive genetic sampling in Polyplacophora. Conserv Genet 9:229–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-007-9320-4
Régnier C, Gargominy O, Falkner G, Puillandre N (2011) Foot mucus stored on FTA® cards is a reliable and non-invasive source of DNA for genetics studies in molluscs. Conserv Genet Resour 3:377–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-010-9345-8
Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark PVD, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP (2012) MrBayes 3.2: efficient bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol 61:539–542
Ruiz-Ramos DV, Meyer RS, Toews D, Stephens M, Kolster MK, Sexton JP (2023) Environmental DNA (eDNA) detects temporal and habitat effects on community composition and endangered species in ephemeral ecosystems: a case study in vernal pools. Environ D N A 5:85–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.360
Schrader C, Schielke A, Ellerbroek L, Johne R (2012) PCR inhibitors – occurrence, properties and removal. J Appl Microbiol 113:1014–1026. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05384.x
Sinha RP, Häder DP (2002) UV-induced DNA damage and repair: a review. Photochem Photobiol Sci 1:225–236. https://doi.org/10.1039/b201230h
Sokolov EP (2000) An improved method for DNA isolation from mucopolysaccharide-rich molluscan tissues. J Molluscan Stud 66:573–575
Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28:2731–2739. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msr121
Thomsen PF, Sigsgaard EE (2019) Environmental DNA metabarcoding of wild flowers reveals diverse communities of terrestrial arthropods. Ecol Evol 9:1665–1679. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4809
Weltz K, Lyle JM, Ovenden J, Morgan JAT, Moreno DA, Semmens JM (2017) Application of environmental DNA to detect an endangered marine skate species in the wild. PLoS ONE 12:e0178124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178124
Yokoyama K, Wang L, Miyaji M, Nishimura K (2001) Identification, classification and phylogeny of the aspergillus section Nigri inferred from mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. F E M S Microbiol lett 200:241–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2001.tb10722.x
Zeale MRK, Butln RK, Barker GLA, Lees DC, Jones G (2011) Taxon-specific PCR for DNA barcoding arthropod prey in bat faeces. Mol Eco Resour 11:236–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02920.x
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Dr. In-Seong Yoo and Mrs. Min-Hee Koh for their cooperation on snail rearing.
Funding
This research was supported by genetic diversity and peculiarity of the endangered species 2023 (NIE-2023-45) from the National Institute of Ecology (NIE), Republic of Korea.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: DC and JYK; Data curation: DC and KSK; Formal analysis: DC; Investigation: DC and JYK; Methodology: DC and KSK; Resources: JYK; Supervision: JYK and YJK; Visualization: DC and KSK; Writing—original draft: DC and JYK; Writing—review and editing: DC, JYK, KSK, and YJK. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Cha, D., Kim, JY., Kim, KS. et al. Species identification method by a new non-invasive technique in Korean endangered terrestrial snail, Koreanohadra Koreana (Gastropoda: Mollusca). Conservation Genet Resour 16, 27–37 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-023-01332-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-023-01332-4