Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Geological disaster information sharing based on Internet of Things standardization

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nowadays the recent development of new information generation processes in the Internet of Things (IoT) is applied in various factors such as the development of modern sensors, wireless networks, big data applications, automatic monitoring systems, etc. Landslide disaster monitoring is an important and practical direction of Internet of Things technology in a disaster monitoring system, which has the advantages of low cost and mature technology. With the continuous development of IoT technology, standardized data sharing and interoperability have been put forward on the agenda. Based on the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) Sensor Thing Application Programming Interface (API) standard, this article analyzes landslide monitoring data sharing and interoperability from the data model, shared service content, and system construction and provides a reference for the standardization of geological disaster data sharing and interoperability regarding IoT applications. Due to the characteristics of a simple layout, strong anti-damage and self-healing ability, self-organization, etc., based on the ZigBee multi-sensor and wireless Mesh network, it is widely used in the data collection and transmission of geological disaster monitoring systems. The experimental analysis is carried out based on various parameters namely computational cost, power utilization, fitness function, danger rate, evacuation time, total travel time as well as root mean square error. Finally, the results conclude that the proposed approach attained better performances in terms of cost, power utilization, and error rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • Chen G, Li S (2020) Research on location fusion of spatial geological disaster based on fuzzy SVM. Comput Commun 153:538–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C, Hui Q, Xie W, Wan S, Zhou Y, Pei Q (2021) Convolutional Neural Networks for forecasting flood process in Internet-of-Things enabled smart city. Comput Netw 186:107744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dachyar M, Nilasari T (2020) The improvement of disaster relief distribution by accommodating Internet of Things (Iot) real-time data. Int J Adv Sci Technol 29(7):3654–3664

    Google Scholar 

  • Durrani TS, Wang W, Forbes SM (2019) Geological disaster monitoring based on sensor networks. Springer

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gao X, Wu G, Chen J, Zeng Q (2020) Design and implementation of geological hazard monitoring system via the Internet of Things. Arab J Geosci 13(21):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goudarzi S, Anisi MH, Abdullah AH, Lloret J, Soleymani SA, Hassan WH (2019) A hybrid intelligent model for network selection in the industrial Internet of Things. Appl Soft Comput 74:529–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaur A, Sood SK (2020) Cloud-Fog based framework for drought prediction and forecasting using artificial neural network and genetic algorithm. J Exp Theor Artif Intell 32(2):273–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan R, Yousaf S, Haseeb A, Uddin MI (2021) Exploring a design of landslide monitoring system. Complexity. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5552417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Cui T, Alam M (2021) Reliability analysis of the Internet of Things using Space Fault Network. Alex Eng J 60(1):1259–1270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Dhakal S (2020) Internet of Things technology in mineral remote sensing monitoring. Int J Circuit Theory Appl 48(12):2065–2077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salam A (2020) Internet of Things for sustainability: perspectives in privacy, cybersecurity, and future trends. Internet of Things for sustainable community development. Springer, pp 299–327

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Savari GF, Krishnasamy V, Sathik J, Ali ZM, Aleem SHA (2020) Internet of Things-based real-time electric vehicle load forecasting and charging station recommendation. ISA Trans 97:431–447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha BB, Dhanalakshmi R (2022) Recent advancements and challenges of Internet of Things in smart agriculture: a survey. Futur Gener Comput Syst 126:169–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei T, Feng W, Chen Y, Wang CX, Ge N, Lu J (2021) Hybrid satellite-terrestrial communication networks for the maritime Internet of Things: key technologies, opportunities, and challenges. IEEE Internet Things J 8(11):8910–8934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang L, Li D, Zhao J, Tang J, Qiu Y, Lu J (2019) Development of digital mine information platform based on Internet of things technology. In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Computation, Communication and Engineering (ICCCE), pp 91–94

  • Zhang W (2020) Geological disaster monitoring and early warning system based on big data analysis. Arab J Geosci 13(18):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Z, Bai Y, Dai W, Liu D, Hu Y (2021) Quality of e-commerce agricultural products and the safety of the ecological environment of the origin based on 5G Internet of Things technology. Environ Technol Innov 22:101462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang L, He J, Yong Z, Deng X, Xu D (2020) Disaster information acquisition by residents of China’s earthquake-stricken areas. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 51:101908

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GZ, XL, FZ, YS and GL agreed on the content of the study. GZ, XL, FZ, YS and GL collected all the data for analysis. GZ agreed on the methodology. GZ, XL, FZ, YS and GL completed the analysis based on agreed steps. Results and conclusions are discussed and written together. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guocai Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, G., Liu, X., Zheng, F. et al. Geological disaster information sharing based on Internet of Things standardization. Environ Earth Sci 83, 148 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-11353-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-11353-9

Keywords

Navigation