Abstract
Because of the complexity of the causative factors and the uncertainty in their measurement, it is generally difficult to analyze them quantitatively and to predict the probability of landslide occurrence. A major issue with landslide susceptibility analysis models based on decision tree algorithm is the difficulty in quantifying triggering factors (precipitation). To address this issue, a new method based on an uncertain decision tree algorithm (DTU) is proposed to assess landslide susceptibility model. Thematic maps representing various factors related to landslide activity were generated using GIS technology. Areas susceptible to landslides were analyzed and mapped in the city district by the ID3, C4.5 and DTU algorithms using the same landslide-occurrence factors. For the quantitative assessment of landslide susceptibility, the accuracy of the area under the curve (AUC) in the ID3 and C4.5 algorithms was 83.74 and 85.89%, respectively; the accuracy of the AUC using the DTU algorithm was 89.25%. The prediction accuracy of the DTU model for the landslide susceptibility zone map is greater than the accuracy of the ID3 and C4.5 algorithms. Thus, the DTU algorithm can be utilized capably for landslide susceptibility analysis and has the potential to be widely applied in the prediction spatial events.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chen SH, Chou HT (2014) Characteristics of rainfall-induced landslides in Miocene formations: a case study of the Shenmu watershed, Central Taiwan. Eng Geol 169:133–146
Chui C, Kao B, Hung E (2009) Mining frequent item sets from uncertain data. Lect Notes Comput Sci 4426:47–58
Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20:37–46
Cussents J (1993) Bayes and pseudo-bayes estimates of conditional probabilities and their reliabilities. In: Proceedings of European conference on machine learning, Springer, Berlin, pp 136–152
Dahal RK, Hasegawa S, Nonoumra (2008) Predictive modeling of rainfall-induced landslide hazard in the Lesser Himalaya of Nepal based on weights-of-evidence. Geomorphology 102:496–510
Dai FC, Lee CF (2001) Terrain-based mapping of landslide susceptibility using a geographical information system: a case study. Can Geotech J 38:911–923
Derbyshire E, Meng XM, Dijkstra TA (2001) Landslide in the thick loess terrain of north-west China. Eng Geol 59:201–202
Edwin LH, Mark ER (2009) Mapping of hazard from rainfall-triggered landslides in developing countries: examples from Honduras and Micronesia. Eng Geol 104:295–311
Fawcett T (2004) ROC graphs: notes and practical considerations for researchers. Pattern Recogn Lett 27:882–891
Ferri C, Flach PA, Hernndze-Orallo J (2003) Improving the AUC of probabilistic estimation trees. In: Proceeding of the 14th European conference on machine learning, Croatia, pp 121–132
Guglielmo SS (2014) Landslide triggered by rainfall a semi-automated procedure to define consistent intensity-duration thresholds. Comput Geosci 63:123–131
Guo P, Meng XM, Li YJ (2015) Effect of large dams and irrigation in the upper reaches of the Yellow River of China, and the geohazards burden. Proc Geol Assoc 126:367–376
Hoehler FK (2000) Bias and prevalence effects on kappa viewed in terms of sensitivity and specificity. J Clin Epideminol 53:499–503
Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174
Miller HJ, Han J (2001) Geographic data mining and knowledge discovery. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 352–366
Nefeslioglu H, Sezer E, Gokceoglu C, Bozkir A, Duman T (2010) Assessment of landslide susceptibility by decision trees in the metropolitan area of Istanbul, Turkey. Math Probl Eng 2010:242–256
Pal M, Mather PM (2003) An assessment of the effectiveness of decision tree methods for land cover classification. Remote Sense Environ 86:554–556
Pang PK, Tay LT, Lateh H (2012) Landslide hazard mapping of Penang Island using decision tree model. In: International conference on systems and electronic engineering, Phuket, pp 20–22
Pradhan B (2010) Remote sensing and GIS-based landslide hazard analysis and cross-validation using multivariate logistic regression model on three test areas in Malaysia. Adv Space Res 45:1244–1256
Pradhan B (2013) A comparative study on the predictive ability of the decision tree, support vector machine and neuro-fuzzy models in landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS. Comput Geosci 51:350–365
Pradhan B, Ahmed M (2009) Manifestation of remote sensing data and GIS on landslide hazard analysis using spatial-based statistical models. Arab J Geosci 46:1–12
Pradhan B, Lee S (2007) Utilization of optical remote sensing data and GIS tools for regional landslide hazard analysis by using artificial neural network model. Earth Sci Front 14:143–152
Pradhan B, Lee S (2008) Utilization of optical remote sensing data and geographic information system tools for regional landslide hazard analysis by using binomial logistic regression model. Appl Remote Sens 36:1–11
Pradhan B, Lee S (2009) Landslide risk analysis using artificial neural network model focusing on different training sites. Nat Phys Sci 3:1–15
Pradhan B, Lee S (2010) Delineation of landslide hazard areas on Penang Island, Malaysia, by using frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network model. Environ Model Softw 25:747–759
Provost FJ, Domingos P (2003) Tree induction for probability-based ranking. Mach Learn 52:199–215
Qing B, Xue YN (2009) DTU: a decision tree for uncertain data. Lect Notes Comput Sci 5476:4–15
Quinlan JR (1986) Induction of decision trees. Mach Learn 1:86–106
Quinlan JR (1996) C4.5: induction of decision trees. Mach Learn 35:23–36
Saito H, Nakayama D, Matsuyama H (2009) Comparison of landslide susceptibility based on a decision-tree model and actual landslide occurrence: the Akaishi Mountains, Japan. Geomorphology 109:108–121
Tehran MS, Pradhan B, Jebur MN (2013) Spatial prediction of flood susceptible areas using rule based decision tree (DT) and a novel ensemble bivariate and multivariate statistical models in GIS. J Hydrol 504:69–79
Tsangaratos P, llia I (2015) Landslide susceptibility mapping using a modified decision tree classifier in the Xanthi Perfection, Greece. Landslides 28:78–94
Vijith H, Madhu G (2008) Estimating potential landslide sites of an upland sub-watershed in Western Ghat’s of Kerala (India) through frequency ratio and GIS. Environ Geol 55:1397–1405
Wu XL, Ren F, Niu RQ (2014) Landslide susceptibility assessment using object mapping units, decision tree, and support vector machine models in the Three Gorges of China. Environ Earth Sci 71:4725–4738
Xu C, Xu XW (2012) Landslide hazard mapping using GIS and weight of evidence model in Qingshui river watershed of 2008 Wenchuan earthquake struck the region. J Earth Sci 23:97–120
Yeon YK, Han JG, Keun HR (2010) Landslide susceptibility mapping in Injae, Korea, using a decision tree. Eng Geol 116:274–283
Zadrozny B, Elkan C (2001) Learning and making a decision when costs and probabilities are both unknown. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, pp 204–213
Zhang MS, Liu J (2010) Controlling factors of loess landslide in western China. Environ Earth Sci 59:1671–1680
Zhang FY, Chen WW, Guo L (2012) Relationships between landslide type and topographic attributes in loess catchment, China. J Mt Sci 9:742–751
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41362015, 41562019, 41530640), the Survey Project of National Land and Resources (12120113008900) and Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi (20161BAB203093, GJJ151531).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mao, Y., Zhang, M., Sun, P. et al. Landslide susceptibility assessment using uncertain decision tree model in loess areas. Environ Earth Sci 76, 752 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-7095-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-7095-6