Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Streamflow response to future climate and land use changes in Xinjiang basin, China

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of climate and land use changes on the hydrological cycle are important factors affecting the evolution of aquatic ecosystems. In this study, the streamflow response to future climate change and land use change and their relative effect is investigated using a Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 multi-model ensemble, in conjunction with a raster-based Xin’anjiang model to simulate future streamflows under three climate change scenarios (RCP 2.6, RCP 4.5, and RCP 8.5) and three land use change scenarios (“constant,” “current rate,” and “double rate”) in the Xinjiang basin, China. The results show that the monthly streamflows in the period of 2020–2055 increase substantially at rates ranging from 5.9 to 35.5 % in the autumn and early winter months, but those decrease at rates ranging from −5.5 to −48.1 % in the other months. Annual streamflow also significantly decreases by 148–279 mm under different climate and land use change scenarios. The relative effect of climate change on annual and most monthly streamflows is significantly higher than that of land use change. However, the land use change effect becomes increasingly evident over time and can mitigate the climate change effect from January to August and enhance it in the other months. Moreover, the relative effect of land use change on streamflow is relatively greater in the dry period than that in wet period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrawal A, Sharma AR, Tayal S (2014) Assessment of regional climatic changes in the Eastern Himalayan region: a study using multi-satellite remote sensing data sets. Environ Monit Assess 186:6521–6536. doi:10.1007/s10661-014-3871-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahn K-H, Merwade V (2014) Quantifying the relative impact of climate and human activities on streamflow. J Hydrol 515:257–266. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.04.062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration—guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO irrigation and drainage paper 56. FAO, Rome 300:D05109

  • Ding Y, Ren G, Zhao Z, Xu Y, Luo Y, Li Q, Zhang J (2007) Detection, causes and projection of climate change over China: an overview of recent progress. Adv Atmos Sci 24:954–971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finger D, Vis M, Huss M, Seibert J (2015) The value of multiple data set calibration versus model complexity for improving the performance of hydrological models in mountain catchments. WRR 51(4):1939–1958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts P (2000) Geostatistical approaches for incorporating elevation into the spatial interpolation of rainfall. J Hydrol 228:113–129. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00144-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo H, Hu Q, Jiang T (2008) Annual and seasonal streamflow responses to climate and land-cover changes in the Poyang Lake basin, China. J Hydrol 355:106–122. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.03.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallema DW et al (2014) Framework for studying the hydrological impact of climate change in an alley cropping system. J Hydrol 517:547–556. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.05.065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Q, Feng S, Guo H, Chen G, Jiang T (2007) Interactions of the Yangtze river flow and hydrologic processes of the Poyang Lake, China. J Hydrol 347:90–100. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.09.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang J, Gao J, Xu Y, Liu J (2015) Towards better environmental software for spatio-temporal ecological models: lessons from developing an intelligent system supporting phytoplankton prediction in lakes. Ecol Inform 25:49–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang S, Ren L, Yong B, Singh V, Yang X, Yuan F (2011) Quantifying the effects of climate variability and human activities on runoff from the Laohahe basin in northern China using three different methods. Hydrol Process 25:2492–2505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang S, Ren L, Yong B, Fu C, Yang X (2012) Analyzing the effects of climate variability and human activities on runoff from the Laohahe basin in northern China. Hydrol Res 43:3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang C, Xiong L, Wang D, Liu P, Guo S, Xu C-Y (2015) Separating the impacts of climate change and human activities on runoff using the Budyko-type equations with time-varying parameters. J Hydrol 522:326–338. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.12.060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalantari Z, Lyon SW, Folkeson L, French HK, Stolte J, Jansson PE, Sassner M (2014) Quantifying the hydrological impact of simulated changes in land use on peak discharge in a small catchment. Sci Total Environ 466:741–754. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.07.047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalantari Z, Lyon SW, Jansson P-E, Stolte J, French HK, Folkeson L, Sassner M (2015) Modeller subjectivity and calibration impacts on hydrological model applications: an event-based comparison for a road-adjacent catchment in south-east Norway. Sci Total Environ 502:315–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahmer W, Pfützner B, Becker A (2001) Assessment of land use and climate change impacts on the mesoscale. Phys Chem Earth Part B 26:565–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legesse D, Vallet-Coulomb C, Gasse F (2003) Hydrological response of a catchment to climate and land use changes in Tropical Africa: case study South Central Ethiopia. J Hydrol 275:67–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng D, Mo X (2012) Assessing the effect of climate change on mean annual runoff in the Songhua River basin, China. Hydrol Process 26:1050–1061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myneni R, Williams D (1994) On the relationship between FAPAR and NDVI. Remote Sens Environ 49:200–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Williams JR (2011) Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation version 2009. Texas Water Resources Institute, College Station

    Google Scholar 

  • Neupane RP, Kumar S (2015) Estimating the effects of potential climate and land use changes on hydrologic processes of a large agriculture dominated watershed. J Hydrol 529(Part 1):418–429. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.07.050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niedda M, Pirastru M, Castellini M, Giadrossich F (2014) Simulating the hydrological response of a closed catchment-lake system to recent climate and land-use changes in semi-arid Mediterranean environment. J Hydrol 517:732–745. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.06.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyeko M (2015) Hydrologic modelling of data scarce basin with SWAT model: capabilities and limitations. Water Resour Manag 29:81–94. doi:10.1007/s11269-014-0828-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang F, Lü H, Zhu Y, Zhang J, Yu Z, Chen X, Li M (2014) Uncertainty analysis of downscaling methods in assessing the influence of climate change on hydrology. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 28:991–1010. doi:10.1007/s00477-013-0796-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavanelli D, Capra A (2014) Climate change and human impacts on hydroclimatic variability in the Reno River Catchment, Northern Italy. CLEAN Soil Air Water 42:535–545. doi:10.1002/clen.201300213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piao S et al (2010) The impacts of climate change on water resources and agriculture in China. Nature 467:43–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouge C, Cai XM (2014) Crossing-scale hydrological impacts of urbanization and climate variability in the Greater Chicago Area. J Hydrol 517:13–27. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpley AN, Williams JR (1990) EPIC-erosion/productivity impact calculator: 1. Model documentation. Technical Bulletin, United States Department of Agriculture

  • Smith I, Syktus J, McAlpine C, Wong K (2013) Squeezing information from regional climate change projections—results from a synthesis of CMIP5 results for south-east Queensland, Australia. Clim Change 121:609–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stocker T et al (2013) IPCC, 2013: climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

  • Sun S, Chen H, Ju W, Hua W, Yu M, Yin Y (2013) Assessing the future hydrological cycle in the Xinjiang Basin, China, using a multi-model ensemble and SWAT model. Int J Climatol 34:2972–2987. doi:10.1002/joc.3890

    Google Scholar 

  • Svoray T, Bar P, Bannet T (2005) Urban land-use allocation in a Mediterranean ecotone: Habitat Heterogeneity Model incorporated in a GIS using a multi-criteria mechanism. Landsc Urban Plan 72:337–351. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syvitski JP et al (2009) Sinking deltas due to human activities. Nat Geosci 2:681–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian D, Guo Y, Dong W (2015) Future changes and uncertainties in temperature and precipitation over China based on CMIP5 models. Adv Atmos Sci 32:487–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tisseuil C, Vrac M, Lek S, Wade AJ (2010) Statistical downscaling of river flows. J Hydrol 385:279–291. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.02.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu J (2009) Combined impact of climate and land use changes on streamflow and water quality in eastern Massachusetts, USA. J Hydrol 379:268–283. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.10.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA-SCS (1986) Urban hydrology for small watersheds. U.S. Department of Agriculture Technical Release No.55, Washington, DC

  • Van der Knijff J, De Roo A (2008) LISFLOOD. Distributed water balance and flood simulation model—revised user manual. European Commission [EUR 22166 EN/2] Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Ispra

  • Van Deursen W (1995) Geographical information systems and dynamic models: development and application of a prototype spatial modelling language. Universiteit Utrecht, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Hong Y, Gourley J, Adhikari P, Li L, Su F (2010) Quantitative assessment of climate change and human impacts on long-term hydrologic response: a case study in a sub-basin of the Yellow River, China. Int J Climatol 30:2130–2137. doi:10.1002/joc.2023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wisser D, Fekete BM, Vorosmarty CJ, Schumann AH (2010) Reconstructing 20th century global hydrography: a contribution to the Global Terrestrial Network-Hydrology (GTN-H). Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 14:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie D, Yan Y, Deng H, Fang Y, Fan Z (2009) A study on the hydrological characters in the five river-catchments in JiangxiProvince. Acta Agric Univ Jiangxiensis 31:364–369 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu CH, Xu Y (2012) The projection of temperature and precipitation over China under RCP scenarios using a CMIP5 multi-model ensemble. Atmos and Ocean Sci Lett 5:527–533

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan RH, Huang JC, Wang Y, Gao JF, Qi LY (2015) Modeling the combined impact of future climate and land use changes on streamflow of Xinjiang Basin. Hydrol Res, China. doi:10.2166/nh.2015.206

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang C, Yan Z, Shao Y (2012) Probabilistic precipitation forecasting based on ensemble output using generalized additive models and Bayesian model averaging. Acta Meteorol Sin 26:1–12. doi:10.1007/s13351-012-0101-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao C, Li Z, Yu Z, Zhang K (2012) A priori parameter estimates for a distributed, grid-based Xinanjiang model using geographically based information. J Hydrol 468–469:47–62. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.08.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Li L (2009) Development and application of an integrated surface runoff and groundwater flow model for a catchment of Lake Taihu watershed, China. Quat Int 208:102–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang A, Zhang C, Fu G, Wang B, Bao Z, Zheng H (2012) Assessments of impacts of climate change and human activities on runoff with SWAT for the Huifa River Basin, Northeast China. Water Resour Manag 26:2199–2217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao RJ (1992) The Xinanjiang model applied in China. JHydrol 135:371–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao GJ, Hörmann G, Fohrer N, Gao J, Li H, Tian P (2010) Application of a simple raster-based hydrological model for streamflow prediction in a humid catchment with polder systems. Water Resour Manag 25:661–676. doi:10.1007/s11269-010-9719-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou M, Ishidaira H, Hapuarachchi H, Magome J, Kiem A, Takeuchi K (2006) Estimating potential evapotranspiration using Shuttleworth–Wallace model and NOAA-AVHRR NDVI data to feed a distributed hydrological model over the Mekong River basin. J Hydrol 327:151–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported by National Basic Research Program of China (No. 2012CB417006) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41371061). We acknowledge Beijing National Climate Centre for providing processed future climate datasets.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junfeng Gao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yan, R., Gao, J. & Li, L. Streamflow response to future climate and land use changes in Xinjiang basin, China. Environ Earth Sci 75, 1108 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5805-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5805-0

Keywords

Navigation