Skip to main content
Log in

Drainage morphometry and its influence on hydrology in an semi arid region: using SRTM data and GIS

Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An attempt has been made to study drainage morphometry and its influence on hydrology of Peddavanka watershed, South India. Drainage networks for the sub-basins were derived from topographical map (1:50,000) and Shuttle Radar Topographic Mission (SRTM) Digital Elevation Model (DEM) data used for preparing elevation, slope and aspects maps. Geographical information system (GIS) was used in evaluation of linear, areal and relief aspects of morphometric parameters. The study reveals that SRTM DEM and GIS-based approach in evaluation of drainage morphometric parameters and their influence on hydrological characteristics at watershed level is more appropriate than the conventional methods. The mean Bifurcation ratio (R b) of the entire basin is 3.88 which indicate that the drainage pattern is not much influenced by geological structures. VIII sub-basin have high elongation ratio (R e), basin relief (B h), Ruggedness number (Rn) and time of concentration (T c). It indicates that the erosion and peak discharges are high in these basins. Therefore, the construction of the check dams and earth dams will help in reducing peak discharge on the main channel. These studies are very useful for implementing rainwater harvesting and watershed management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  • Bhagwat TN, Shetty A, Hegde VS (2011) Spatial variation in drainage characteristics and geomorphic instantaneous unit hydrograph (GIUH); implications for watershed management—a case study of the Varada River basin, Northern Karnataka. Catena 87:52–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrough PA (1986) Principles of geographical information systems for land resources assessment. Oxford University Press, New York, p 50

    Google Scholar 

  • Chorley RJ, Donald EG, Malm, Pogorzelski HA (1957) A new standard for estimating drainage basin shape. Am J Sci 255:138–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow VT (ed) (1964) Handbook of applied hydrology. McGraw Hill Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad O (2006) SAGA—Program Structure and Current State of Implementation. In: Böhner J, McCloy KR, Strobl J (eds) SAGA—analysis and modelling applications. Verlag Erich Goltze GmbH, 115: 39–52

  • Dornkamp JC, King CAM (1971) Numerical analyses in geomorphology, an introduction. St. Martins press, New York, p 372

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorokhovich Y, Voustianiouk A (2006) Accuracy assessment of the processed SRTM-based elevation data by CGIAR using field data from USA and Thailand and its relation to the terrain characteristics. Remote Sens Environ 104:409–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grohmann CH, Riccomini C, Alves FM (2007) SRTM-based morphotectonic analysis of the Pocos de Caldas alkaline Massif, southeastern Brazil. Comput Geosci 33:10–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GSI (1995) Geological Quadrangle map 57 F. Printed at Info maps, Madras

    Google Scholar 

  • GSI (2004) Geological Quadrangle map 57 E. Printed the map printing division, Hyderabad

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadley RF, Schumm SA (1961) Sediment sources and drainage basin characteristics in upper Cheyenne river basin. US Geol Surv water-supply pap 1531-B:137–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton RE (1932) Drainage basin characteristics. Trans Am Geophys Union 13:350–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton RE (1945) Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Bull Geol Soc Amer 5:275–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirpich ZP (1940) Time of concentration of small agricultural watersheds. Civ Eng 10(6):362

    Google Scholar 

  • Martz LW, Garbrechet J (1992) Numerical definition of drainage network and sub catchment areas from digital elevation models. Comput Geosci 18(6):747–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DR, Dietrich WE (1992) Channel initiation and the problem of landscape scale. Science 255:826–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore ID, Grayson RB, Ladson AR (1991) Digital terrain modelling: a review of hydrological, geomorphological and biological applications. Hydrol Process 5(1):3–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obi Reddy GP, Maji AK, Gajbhiye KS (2004) Drainage morphometry and its influence on landform characteristics in a basaltic terrain, Central India—a remote sensing and GIS approach. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinfo 6:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olaya VF (2004) A gentle introduction to SAGA GIS. The SAGA User Group e.v, Gottingen, p 208

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozdemir H, Bird D (2009) Evaluation of morphometric parameters of drainage networks derived from topographic maps and DEM in point of floods. Environ Geol 56:1405–1415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarangi A, Madramootoo CA, Enright P (2003) Development of user Interface in ArcGIS for estimation of watershed geomorphology. CSAE/SCGR 2003 meeting, paper no. 03-120

  • Schumn SA (1956) Evaluation of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Bull Geol Soc Amer 67:597–646

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith KG (1950) Standards for grading texture of erosional topography. Am J Sci 248:655–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sreedevi PD, Subrahmanyam K, Shakeel A (2005) The significance of morphometric analysis for obtaining groundwater potential zones in a structurally controlled terrain. Environ Geol 47(3):412–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sreedevi PD, Owais S, Khan HH, Ahmed S (2009) Morphometric analysis of a watershed of south India using SRTM data and GIS. J Geol Soc India 73:543–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahler AN (1957) Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Trans Am Geophys Union 38:913920

    Google Scholar 

  • Strahler AN (1964) Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basins and channel networks. In: Chow VT (ed) Handbook of applied hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 4.39–4.76

  • Tribe A (1992) Automated recognition of valley heads from digital elevation models. Earth Surf Process Landf 16(1):33–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valeriano MM, Kuplich TM, Storino M, Amaral BD, Mendes JN Jr, Lima DJ (2006) Modeling small watershed in Brazilian Amazinia with shuttle radar topographic mission-90 m data. Comput Geosci 32:1169–1181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verstappen HTh (1983) Applied geomorphology for Environmental Management. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 437

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the Director NGRI for permission to publish this paper. The first author gratefully acknowledges the Department of Science and Technology (DST), New Delhi, for financial assistance in the form of Fast Track Young Scientist Project (No.SR/FTP/ES-49/2009).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. D. Sreedevi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sreedevi, P.D., Sreekanth, P.D., Khan, H.H. et al. Drainage morphometry and its influence on hydrology in an semi arid region: using SRTM data and GIS. Environ Earth Sci 70, 839–848 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-2172-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-2172-3

Keywords

Navigation