Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A New Concept of Horizontal Bone Augmentation Using Collagen Bovine Bone Blocks Without Membrane at Implant Placement: A Preliminary Study

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

A buccal bone thickness (BBT) of at least 1.8–2 mm is necessary to ensure long-term implant stability, and a bone grafting procedure is commonly needed to restore this BBT. This study aims to prove the effectiveness of a novel bone augmentation technique in which minero-organic bone substitutes are solely used to restore adequate BBT, excluding the need for coverage membranes.

Methods

Fifty partially edentulous patients having a residual bone width ranging between 5 and 6 mm were enrolled in this study. The horizontal buccal defects were grafted simultaneously at implant placement. Minero-organic collagen bovine bone blocks (CBBB) were placed on the outer side of the buccal bone wall, and adapted to the defect morphology through slow compressive movements. The grafted sites were not covered with any type of membrane nor stabilized with fixation pins. Cone-beam computed tomography scans were obtained pre-operatively, immediately post-surgery, and four months later. Scans were superimposed on the ITK-Snap software to measure the amount of bone gain and assess the percentage of CBBB resorption. Measurements were effectuated at four different levels apically to crestal level.

Results

Radiographic findings showed BBT increase and CBBB resorption in all cases, four months post-grafting. A mean horizontal bone gain of 1.39 mm was calculated at a crestal level.

Conclusion

Based on these findings, it appears that this novel and user-friendly bone grafting technique can achieve positive outcomes from both clinical and radiographic perspectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Barone A, Alfonsi F, Derchi G, Tonelli P, Toti P, Marchionni S et al (2016) The effect of insertion torque on the clinical outcome of single implants: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 18(3):588–600

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Monje A, Chappuis V, Monje F, Muñoz F, Wang HL, Urban IA et al (2019) The critical peri-implant buccal bone wall thickness revisited: an experimental study in the beagle dog. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 34(6):1328–1336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Spray JR, Black CG, Morris HF, Ochi S (2000) The influence of bone thickness on facial marginal bone response: stage 1 placement through stage 2 uncovering. Ann Periodontol 5(1):119–128

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Aghaloo TL, Misch C, Lin G-H, Iacono VJ, Wang H-L (2016) Bone augmentation of the edentulous maxilla for implant placement: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 2(31):s19-30

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dahlin C, Sennerby L, Lekholm U, Linde A, Nyman S (1989) Generation of new bone around titanium implants using a membrane technique: an experimental study in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 4(1):19–25

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Elgali I, Omar O, Dahlin C, Thomsen P (2017) Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited. Eur J Oral Sci 125(5):315–337

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Rasia dal Polo M, Poli PP, Rancitelli D, Beretta M, Maiorana C (2014) Alveolar ridge reconstruction with titanium meshes: a systematic review of the literature. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 19(6):e639-46

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Bunyaratavej P, Wang HL (2001) Collagen membranes: a review. J Periodontol 72(2):215–229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. de AzambujaCarvalho PH, Dos Santos TG, Moura LB, Cunha G, Gabrielli MAC, Pereira-Filho VA (2019) Horizontal ridge augmentation using xenogenous bone graft-systematic review. Oral Maxillofac Surg 23(3):271–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mir-Mari J, Wui H, Jung RE, Hämmerle CHF, Benic GI (2016) Influence of blinded wound closure on the volume stability of different GBR materials: an in vitro cone-beam computed tomographic examination. Clin Oral Implant Res 27(2):258–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Araújo MG, Linder E, Lindhe J (2010) Bio-Oss® Collagen in the buccal gap at immediate implants: a 6-month study in the dog. Clin Oral Implant Res 22(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jung RE, Philipp A, Annen BM, Signorelli L, Thoma DS, Hämmerle CHF et al (2013) Radiographic evaluation of different techniques for ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 40(1):90–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nart J, Barallat L, Jimenez D, Mestres J, Gómez A, Carrasco MA et al (2017) Radiographic and histological evaluation of deproteinized bovine bone mineral vs. deproteinized bovine bone mineral with 10% collagen in ridge preservation. A randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implant Res 28(7):840–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Degidi M, Daprile G, Nardi D, Piattelli A (2013) Buccal bone plate in immediately placed and restored implant with Bio-Oss® collagen graft: a 1-year follow-up study. Clin Oral Implant Res 24(11):1201–1205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Viguet-Carrin S, Garnero P, Delmas PD (2006) The role of collagen in bone strength. Osteoporos Int 17(3):319–336

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Garnero P (2015) The role of collagen organization on the properties of bone. Calcif Tissue Int 97(3):229–240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yushkevich PA, Piven J, Hazlett HC, Smith RG, Ho S, Gee JC et al (2006) User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage 31(3):1116–1128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tan WL, Wong TLT, Wong MCM, Lang NP (2012) A systematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans. Clin Oral Implant Res 23(Suppl 5):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Baffone GM, Botticelli D, Pereira FP, Favero G, Schweikert M, Lang NP (2013) Influence of buccal bony crest width on marginal dimensions of peri-implant hard and soft tissues after implant installation. An experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implant Res 24(3):250–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bengazi F, Botticelli D, Favero V, Perini A, Urbizo Velez J, Lang NP (2014) Influence of presence or absence of keratinized mucosa on the alveolar bony crest level as it relates to different buccal marginal bone thicknesses. An experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implant Res 25(9):1065–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Retzepi M, Donos N (2010) Guided bone regeneration: biological principle and therapeutic applications. Clin Oral Implant Res 21(6):567–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Omar O, Elgali I, Dahlin C, Thomsen P (2019) Barrier membranes: more than the barrier effect? J Clin Periodontol 2(46):103–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rakhmatia YD, Ayukawa Y, Furuhashi A, Koyano K (2013) Current barrier membranes: titanium mesh and other membranes for guided bone regeneration in dental applications. J Prosthodont Res 57(1):3–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gutta R, Baker RA, Bartolucci AA, Louis PJ (2009) Barrier membranes used for ridge augmentation: is there an optimal pore size? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67(6):1218–1225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Benic GI, Thoma DS, Jung RE, Sanz-Martin I, Unger S, Cantalapiedra A et al (2017) Guided bone regeneration with particulate vs. block xenogenic bone substitutes: a pilot cone beam computed tomographic investigation. Clin Oral Implant Res 28(11):e262-70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ortiz-Vigón A, Martinez-Villa S, Suarez I, Vignoletti F, Sanz M (2017) Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical evaluation of collagen containing xenogeneic bone blocks used for lateral bone augmentation in staged implant placement. Int J Implant Dent 3(1):24

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Schwarz F, Mihatovic I, Ghanaati S, Becker J (2017) Performance and safety of collagenated xenogeneic bone block for lateral alveolar ridge augmentation and staged implant placement. A monocenter, prospective single-arm clinical study. Clin Oral Implant Res 28(8):954–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pratiwi AR, Yuliati A, Ariani MD (2017) Vascular endothelial growth factor expression after induced by chicken shank collagen scaffold in bone regeneration. J Int Dent Med Res 10(2):333–337

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang D, Wu X, Chen J, Lin K (2017) The development of collagen based composite scaffolds for bone regeneration. Bioact Mater 3(1):129–138

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Geistlich Pharma AG. The authors have no conflict of interest related to this study.

Funding

No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GK contributed to Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Validation. SM contributed to Data curation, Writing-original draft preparation. JB contributed to Writing-reviewing and editing, Validation. NG contributed to Data curation, Methodology. RY contributed to Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Validation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephanie Mrad.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Saint Joseph University (IRB: USJ-2019–112), and was registered in the clinical trials register (NCT04338139).

Consent to Participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for Publication

The participant has consented to the submission of the case report to the journal.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khoury, G., Mrad, S., Bassil, J. et al. A New Concept of Horizontal Bone Augmentation Using Collagen Bovine Bone Blocks Without Membrane at Implant Placement: A Preliminary Study. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 22, 1099–1109 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-023-01917-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-023-01917-4

Keywords

Navigation