Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of Neurosensory Disturbance Following Orthognathic Surgery: A Prospective Study

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim and Objectives

The prospective study was to evaluate the incidence, type of neurosensory disturbance (NSD), grade its severity and monitor its recovery occurring in the lower lip and chin due to damage to inferior alveolar nerve following orthognathic surgery involving mandible.

Materials and Methods

The study included 10 patients who have undergone sagittal split osteotomy, genioplasty, and anterior subapical osteotomy (ASO). All the patients examined preoperatively and post operatively 1 week, 1 and 6 months according to standardized test to clarify the subjective and objective neurosensory status of the injured nerve. Pin prick test, blunt test, two-point discrimator test, brush stoke direction, light touch test, warm and cold test were used bilaterally to lower lip and chin area.

Results

Seven patients underwent bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) (70 %), one patient had BSSO with genioplasty (10 %), two patients had BSSO with ASO (20 %). During the operation none of the nerves were transectioned, in 60 % of patients nerve was not visible and in 40 % of patients nerve was seen in distal segment. 70 % of patients underwent setback, 30 % of patients underwent advancement. The subjective evaluation of the patients revealed the incidence of 90 % at 1 week, 30 % at 1 month, 20 % at 6 months and 10 % at 1 year post operatively. The altered sensation reported subjectively was hypoesthesia in 50 % of the patients, anaesthesia in 40 % of the patients. There was 100 % recovery in advancement cases and 93.5 % recovery in setback cases.

Conclusion

There is a high incidence of NSD of the lower lip and chin after BSSO related to advancement, setback, intraoperative nerve encounter and surgical skill. However, recovery of sensation occurs with increasing frequency during the follow-up period. The clinical neurosensory tests are effective guides to study the neurosensory deficit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pratt CA, Tippett H, Barnard JDW, Birnie DJ (1996) Labial sensory function following sagittal split osteotomy. Br J Of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery 34:75–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Poort LJ, van Neck JW (2009) Sensory testing of inferior alveolar nerve injuries: a review of methods used in prospective studies. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67:292–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Steel BJ, Cope MR (2012) Unusual and rare complications of orthognathic surgery: a literature review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70:1678–1691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Van Merkesteyn JPR, Zweers A, Corputty JEM (2007) Neurosensory disturbances one year after bilateral sagittal split mandibular ramus osteotomy performed with separators. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 35:222–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mouro M, Ghali E, Lahen EP, Waite DP et al (2004) Peterson’s principles of oral & maxillofacial surgery, 2nd edn. BC Decker Inc. Hamilton, London

  6. Fonseca (2009) Textbook oral and maxillofacial surgery, vol 3, 2nd edn. W.B Saunders Company, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

  7. Cmpbell RL, Shamaskin RG, Harkins SW (1987) Assessment of recovery from injury to inferior alveolar and mental nerves. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 64:519–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nishioka GJ, Zysset MK, Van Sickels JE (1987) Neurosensory disturbance with rigid fixation of the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 45:20–26

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. MacIntosh RB (1981) Experience with the sagittal osteotomy of the mandibular ramus: a 13 year review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 8:151–165

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yamauchi K, Takahashi T, Kaneuji T, Nogami S, Yamamoto N, Miyamoto I, Yamashita Y (2012) Risk factors for neurosensory disturbance after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy based on position of mandibular canal and morphology of mandibular angle. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70:401–406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Westermark A, Bystedt H, von Konow L (1998) Inferior alveolar nerve function after sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible: correlation with degree of intraoperative nerve encounter and other variables in 496 operations. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 36:429–433

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Westermark A, Bystedt H, Von Konow L (1998) Inferior alveolar nerve function after mandibular osteotomies. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 36:425–428

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Posnick JC, Al-Quattan MM, Stepner NM (1996) Alteration in facial sensibility in adolescents following sagittal split and chin osteotomies of the mandible. Plast Reconstr Surg 97:920–927

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lindquist CC, Obeid G (1988) Complications of genioplasty done alone or in combination with sagittal split-ramus osteotomy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 66:13–16

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saikrishna Degala.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Degala, S., Shetty, S.K. & Bhanumathi, M. Evaluation of Neurosensory Disturbance Following Orthognathic Surgery: A Prospective Study. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 14, 24–31 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-013-0577-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-013-0577-5

Keywords

Navigation