Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Valorisation of Biowaste and Aquatic Invasive Plants Through Compost Production for Agricultural Use

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Waste and Biomass Valorization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study evaluates the quality of compost produced from household biowaste (CBIO), aquatic invasive plants (CAIP) and a mixture of the invasive plants and biowaste (CBAIP) and the effect of their application on maize yield in comparison with mineral fertilizer (NPK). The composts were produced using Aerobin 400 Composter with aquatic invasive plant harvested from the Owabi dam and solid biowaste collected from households within the Owabi catchment in the Ashanti Region of Ghana as feedstock. A field experiment in a 35 × 19 m plot of maize was conducted with 9 treatments of the different compost produced and mineral fertilizers in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with 4 replications. The results show that the composts produced have acceptable quality with regards to nutrients (NPK), organic matter (OM), organic carbon (OC), bulk density, porosity, and heavy metal contents (Cu, Zn, Cd, Pb, As, Ni) among other properties. Grain yields following treatment with CAIP (2.06 ± 0.692 tons/ha), CBAIP (2.15 ± 0.668 tons/ha) and CBIO (2.052 ± 0.915 tons/ha) were similar to grain yields from NPK application (2.55 ± 0.611 tons/ha) but significantly higher than the control (1.34 ± 0.500 tons/ha) at 5%. The results show that the different compost types produced have beneficial impacts on maize yields comparable to NPK application. It is, therefore, concluded that aquatic invasive plants and biowaste are suitable feedstock to produce high-quality compost that can be applied to significantly improve grain yields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Plate 1

Source: https://www.exaco.com/aerobin-composter.php

Plate 2
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Sullivan, D.M., Bary, A.I., Miller, R.O., Brewer, L.J.: Interpreting compost analyses. Oregon State University Extension Service, Corvallis (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sayara, T., Sánchez, A.: Gaseous emissions from the composting process: controlling parameters and strategies of mitigation. Processes 9(10), 1844 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9101844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Vaverková, M.D., Adamcová, D., Winkler, J., Koda, E., Petrželová, L., Maxianová, A.: Alternative method of composting on a reclaimed municipal waste landfill in accordance with the circular economy: benefits and risks. Sci. Total Environ. 723, 137971 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lin, C., Cheruiyot, N.K., Bui, X.-T., Ngo, H.H.: Composting and its application in bioremediation of organic contaminants. Bioengineered 13(1), 1073–1089 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2021.2017624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Akanmu, A.O., et al.: Plant disease management: leveraging on the plant-microbe-soil interface in the biorational use of organic amendments. Front. Plant Sci. (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.700507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ayilara, M., Olanrewaju, O., Babalola, O., Odeyemi, O.: Waste management through composting: challenges and potentials. Sustainability 12(11), 4456 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pérez-Gimeno, A., Navarro-Pedreño, J., Almendro-Candel, M.B., Gómez, I., Zorpas, A.A.: The use of wastes (organic and inorganic) in land restoration in relation to their characteristics and cost. Waste Manag. Res.: J. Sustain. Circ. Econ. 37(5), 502–507 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X19828171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Said, M.I.: Livestock waste and its role in the composting process: a review. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 492(1), 012087 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/492/1/012087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kadir, A.A., Jamaludin, S.N., Azhari, N.W.: An overview of composting based on variable feedstock material. MATEC Web Conf. 47, 05016 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20164705016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Barthod, J., Rumpel, C., Dignac, M.-F.: Composting with additives to improve organic amendments: A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 38(2), 17 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-018-0491-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Macias-Corral, M.A., Cueto-Wong, J.A., Morán-Martínez, J., Reynoso-Cuevas, L.: Effect of different initial C/N ratio of cow manure and straw on microbial quality of compost. Int. J. Recycl. Org. Waste Agric. 8(S1), 357–365 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40093-019-00308-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Peña, H., Mendoza, H., Diánez, F., Santos, M.: Parameter selection for the evaluation of compost quality. Agronomy 10(10), 1567 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10101567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Miller, J., Beasley, B., Drury, C., Larney, F., Hao, X.: Influence of long-term application of composted or stockpiled feedlot manure with straw or wood chips on soil cation exchange capacity. Compost Sci. Util. 24(1), 54–60 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/1065657X.2015.1055009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hassan, M.A.E., Abo-Elyousr, K.A.M.: Impact of compost application on Fusarium wilt disease incidence and microelements contents of basil plants. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot. 46(16), 1904–1918 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/03235408.2013.780696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mutungwazi, A., Ijoma, G.N., Ogola, H.J.O., Matambo, T.S.: Physico-chemical and metagenomic profile analyses of animal manures routinely used as inocula in anaerobic digestion for biogas production. Microorganisms 10(4), 671 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10040671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Usman, M.: Cow dung, goat and poultry manure and their effects on the average yields and growth parameters of tomato crop. J. Biol. Agric. Healthcare 5(5), 7–10 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Majbar, Z., et al.: Farmers’ perceptions and willingness of compost production and use to contribute to environmental sustainability. Sustainability 13(23), 13335 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ghinea, C., Leahu, A.: Monitoring of fruit and vegetable waste composting process: relationship between microorganisms and physico-chemical parameters. Processes 8(3), 302 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8030302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Musa, A.M., Ishak, C.F., Karam, D.S., Jaafar, N.M.D.: Effects of fruit and vegetable wastes and biodegradable municipal wastes co-mixed composts on nitrogen dynamics in an oxisol. Agronomy 10(10), 1609 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10101609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sembera, J.A., Waliczek, T.M., Meier, E.J.: Composting as an alternative management strategy for wild taro waste. HortTechnology 29(2), 205–209 (2019). https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH04194-18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mayfield, A.E., et al.: Impacts of invasive species in terrestrial and aquatic systems in the United States”. In: Invasive species in forests and rangelands of the United States, pp. 5–39. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2021)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Albano Pérez, E., et al.: Seed germination and risks of using the invasive plant Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms-Laub. (water hyacinth) for composting, ovine feeding and biogas production. Acta Botanica Gallica 162(3), 203–214 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/12538078.2015.1056227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Meier, E.J., Waliczek, T.M., Abbott, M.L.: Composting invasive plants in the rio grande river. Invasive Plant Sci. Manag. 7(3), 473–482 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1614/IPSM-D-13-00089.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Montoya, J.E., Waliczek, T.M., Abbott, M.L.: Large scale composting as a means of managing water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes). Invasive Plant Sci. Manag. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1614/IPSM-D-12-00013.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nguyen, Q.N., Cloutier, A., Achim, A., Stevanovic, T.: Effect of process parameters and raw material characteristics on physical and mechanical properties of wood pellets made from sugar maple particles. Biomass Bioenergy 80, 338–349 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.06.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Abdel-Shafy, H.I., Mansour, M.S.M.: Solid waste issue: Sources, composition, disposal, recycling, and valorization. Egypt. J. Pet. 27(4), 1275–1290 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2018.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Azeem, A., Sun, J., Javed, Q., Jabran, K., Du, D.: The effect of submergence and eutrophication on the trait’s performance of Wedelia Trilobata over its congener native Wedelia Chinensis. Water (Basel) 12(4), 934 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/w12040934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. APHA: Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st edn. American Public Health Association, Washington (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  29. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “Method 1683: standard oxygen uptake rate in biosolids - draft,” 2001.

  30. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Federation, “Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater © Copyright 1999 by American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation 4500-Norg NITROGEN (ORGANIC)*#(1,” 1999

  31. USEPA, “Method 365.1, Revision 2.0: Determination of Phosphorus by Semi-Automated Colorimetry,” 1993. [Online]. Available: www.epa.gov

  32. F. Wenbiao, “The method of visual colorimetric determination measured soil nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium,” CN109211819A, 1902

  33. USEPA, “METHOD 7000B Flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry,” 2007

  34. OECD, “OECD Guideline for testing of chemicals,” 1992.

  35. A. Segatelli, A. Pimenta, G. Peixoto, M. Silva, and T. D. Bosco, Quality of organic compost for vegetable planting,” in The 5th Ibero-american congress on entrepreneurship, energy, environment and technology—cieEMAT 2019, Jan. 2020, p. 14. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019038014

  36. Heyman, H., Bassuk, N., Bonhotal, J., Walter, T.: Compost quality recommendations for remediating urban soils. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16(17), 3191 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16173191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Y. Geng, G. Cao, L. Wang, and S. Wang, “Effects of equal chemical fertilizer substitutions with organic manure on yield, dry matter, and nitrogen uptake of spring maize and soil nitrogen distribution,” PLoS One, vol. 14, no. 7, p. e0219512, Jul. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219512.

  38. Paul, N., Giri, U., Roy, G.: Composting. In: Organic fertilizers—history, production and applications. IntechOpen (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Robinson, J.S., Baumann, K., Hu, Y., Hagemann, P., Kebelmann, L., Leinweber, P.: Phosphorus transformations in plant-based and bio-waste materials induced by pyrolysis. Ambio 47(S1), 73–82 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-017-0990-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Bhadha, J.H., Capasso, J.M., Khatiwada, R., Swanson, S., LaBorde, C.: Raising soil organic matter content to improve water holding capacity. EDIS (2017). https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-ss661-2017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Mironov, V., Vanteeva, A., Merkel, A.: Microbiological activity during co-composting of food and agricultural waste for soil amendment. Agronomy 11(5), 928 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11050928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ho, T.T.K., et al.: Compost to improve sustainable soil cultivation and crop productivity. Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng. 6, 100211 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2022.100211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Khater, E.-S.G.: Chemical and physical properties of compost. Misr J. Agric. Eng. 29(4), 1567–1582 (2012). https://doi.org/10.21608/mjae.2012.101382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Crohn, D.M.: Assessing compost quality for agriculture. University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources (2016)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  45. Oviedo-Ocaña, E.R., Dominguez, I., Komilis, D., Sánchez, A.: Co-composting of green waste mixed with unprocessed and processed food waste: influence on the composting process and product quality. Waste Biomass Valoriz. 10(1), 63–74 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-017-0047-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Bekier, J., et al.: Changes in selected hydrophobic components during composting of municipal solid wastes. J Soils Sediments 14(2), 305–311 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-013-0696-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Schwarz, M., Bonhotal, J.: Characteristics of a sampling of New York State composts. Cornell University, New York (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Briffa, J., Sinagra, E., Blundell, R.: Heavy metal pollution in the environment and their toxicological effects on humans. Heliyon 6(9), e04691 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Irfan, M., et al.: Heavy metals immobilization and improvement in maize (Zea mays L.) growth amended with biochar and compost. Sci. Rep. 11(1), 18416 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97525-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Hoornweg, D.L., Thomas, L.O.: Composting and its applicability in developing countries. Published for Urban Development Division, Washington (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Ibrahim, M., Chee Kong, Y., Mohd Zain, N.: Effect of cadmium and copper exposure on growth, secondary metabolites and antioxidant activity in the medicinal plant Sambung Nyawa (Gynura procumbens (Lour.) Merr)”. Molecules 22(10), 1623 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22101623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Warman, P.R., Munroe, M.D.: The effects of high metal concentrations in soil-compost mixtures on soil enzymes. J. Environ. Sci. Health B 45(7), 633–638 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2010.502421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Clemente, R., Sáez-Tovar, J.A., Bernal, M.P.: Extractability, distribution among different particle size fractions, and phytotoxicity of Cu and Zn in composts made with the separated solid fraction of pig slurry. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Antonangelo, J.A., Sun, X., Zhang, H.: The roles of co-composted biochar (COMBI) in improving soil quality, crop productivity, and toxic metal amelioration. J. Environ. Manag. 277, 111443 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Trupiano, D., et al.: The effects of biochar and its combination with compost on lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) growth, soil properties, and soil microbial activity and abundance. Int. J. Agronomy 2017, 1–12 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3158207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Narayanasamy, M., Dhanasekaran, D., Thajuddin, N.: Frankia. In: Beneficial microbes in agro-ecology, pp. 185–211. Elsevier (2020)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST) and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark (DANIDA), DFC Project Building Stronger Universities Programme Phase III (BSU III KNUST) for providing funds for this research.

Funding

This study was funded by Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST) and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark (DANIDA), DFC Project Building Stronger Universities Programme Phase III (BSU III KNUST).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. The first draft of the manuscript was written by AB and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Albert Banunle.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interest

There is no financial or non-financial interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Banunle, A., Fei-Baffoe, B., Miezah, K. et al. Valorisation of Biowaste and Aquatic Invasive Plants Through Compost Production for Agricultural Use. Waste Biomass Valor 14, 4127–4139 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-023-02119-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-023-02119-2

Keywords

Navigation