Skip to main content
Log in

Seismic Hazard Assessment for Nuclear Power Plants: How to Cope with Rare Events?

  • Published:
Journal of the Geological Society of India

Abstract

Nuclear power plants (NPP) play increasing role in power supply worldwide. To meet demands of the human society, the NPPs have to be built where the energy is required, including seismoactive regions. Therefore, the safety issues related to reliable assessment of earthquake hazard are crucial. The basic concept of seismic hazard assessment is that the seismic regime is stable, i.e. the prediction of future hazard is defined by the past observations. As a consequence, huge efforts are spent to get seismic history as long as possible. Palaeoearthquake studies can provide information on past earthquakes occurred 15,000–20,000 years before present. But for such time-intervals, the basic concept might be wrong, at least for certain regions. For example, for regions where earthquakes in the past were generated due to post-glacial processes — the geodynamic situation there today is different now. So, the time-arrow of geodynamic evolution has to be somehow incorporated in hazard assessment.

In hazard assessment very rare occurrences are taken into account now: such as having 10−5 or 10−6 annual frequencies of occurrence (return period 100,000–1,000,000 years). This demands very accurate interpretation of the nature of past seismic event. In the paper, some examples are given when effects similar to earthquakes can be caused by other natural phenomena.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aven, T. (2016) On the use of conservatism in risk assessments. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, v.146, pp.33–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandes, Ch., Steffen, H., Sandersen, P.B.E., Wu, P., Winsemann, J. (2018) Glacially induced faulting along the NW segment of the Sorgenfrei-Tornquist Zone, northern Denmark: Implications for neotectonics and Lateglacial fault-bound basin formation. Quaternary Sci. Rev., v.189, pp.149–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IAEA (2010) Seismic Hazards in Site Evaluation for Nuclear Installations. Specific Safety Guide SSG-9. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, M. (2010) Earthquake fault scaling: Self-consistent relating of rupture length, width, average displacement, and moment release. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer., v.100(5A), pp.1971–1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, M. (2014) Self-Consistent Earthquake Fault-Scaling Relations: Update and Extension to Stable Continental Strike-Slip Faults. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer., v.104(6), pp.2953–2965. doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120140087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, E.R. (2018) Glacitectonics. In: John Menzies, Jaap J.M. van der Meer (Eds.) Past Glacial Environments. Elsevier, Second Edition, Chapter 13, pp.467–502. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100524-8.00014-2.

  • Pisarska-Jamroiy, M., Belzyt, S., Bitinas, A., Jusienë, A., Woronko, B. (2019) Seismic shocks, periglacial conditions and glaciotectonics as causes of the deformation of a Pleistocene meandering river succession in central Lithuania. Baltica, v.32(1), pp.63–77. doi: 5200/baltica.2019.1.6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatevossian, R. and Mokrushina, N. (2019) On the Nature of Seismic Phenomena in Platform Areas: A Case Study of Belarus. Seismic Instruments, v.55(3), pp.255–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topal, S. and Özkul, M. (2014) Soft-Sediment Deformation Structures Interpreted as Seismites in the Kolankaya Formation, Denizli Basin (SW Turkey). The Scientific World Jour., v., Article ID 352654, 13 pages. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/352654

  • Wells, D.L. and Coppersmith, K.J. (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer., v.84(4), pp.974–1002.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was carried out under the state task of the Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruben Tatevossian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tatevossian, R. Seismic Hazard Assessment for Nuclear Power Plants: How to Cope with Rare Events?. J Geol Soc India 97, 1504–1507 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-021-1905-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-021-1905-x

Navigation