Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Can protectionism improve food security? Evidence from an imposed tariff on imported edible oil in Tanzania

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Food Security Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To improve food security, many countries adopt protectionist measures and block actions that are needed to improve the competitiveness and efficiency of domestic food commodity production. This article evaluates the policy of imposing an import tariff in order to improve the domestic production of sunflower oil in Tanzania. Promoting domestic production of edible oil in Tanzania through reduction in production costs and increase in productivity efficiency could lead to a stable and sustainable supply of edible oil at affordable prices to consumers. Annual edible oil demand currently is around 400,000 t, a figure that is increasing at a rate of 3% annually. Tanzania imports 60% of its edible oil needs, consuming much of its scarce foreign currency reserves. There is growing interest and efforts by the government and other stakeholders to improve the competitiveness of domestic sources of edible oils in order to substitute for imports. Tanzania, in line with its edible oil strategy 2016–2020, has imposed a 10% tariff on imported edible oils as an import substitution trade policy. There is a strong need for evidence-based assessment of this policy intervention, with this paper evaluating it, using the Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM) approach. Three central issues – competitiveness, efficiency, and policy transfers – are analyzed here. Results show that domestic edible oil producers have a comparative advantage but taxes on tradable inputs render domestic edible oil producers uncompetitive. Therefore, there is a need for Tanzania to protect domestic edible oil producers by reducing taxes on tradable inputs, as this will enable an increase in the domestic production of edible oils, which consequently would save the country the foreign currency that is spent on edible oil imports. Tanzania needs to adopt policies that can improve the competitiveness and efficiency of agriculture rather than increased protectionism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BoT. (2017). Bank of Tanzania: Potentiality of Sunflower Sub-sector in Tanzania. BoT Working Paper Series 10: http://www.bot.go.tz/Publications/Working%20Papers/Potentiality%20of%20Sunflower%20Sub-sector%20in%20Tanzania.pdf. Accessed 1 May 2017.

  • Diao, X., Fan, S., Headey, D., Johnson, M., Nin Pratt, A., & Yu, B. (2008). Accelerating Africa’s food production in response to rising food prices: Impacts and requisite actions. Discussion paper no. 825. Washington DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dibrova, A., & Chan-khi, O. (2013). Policy analysis matrix: an analysis of the effectiveness of state agricultural policy for the dairy sector in Ukraine. Scientific Journal Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 13(4), 18–24.

  • Elsedig, E. A. A., Mohd, M. I., & Fatimah, M. A. (2015). Assessing the competitiveness and comparative advantage of broiler production in Johor using policy analysis matrix. International Food Research Journal, 22, 116–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2005). Import Surges in Developing Countries. FAO Briefs. http://www.fao.org/es/esc/en/378/406/index.html.

  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2011). Why has Africa become a net food importer? FAO. Rome. http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/est/PUBLICATIONS/Books/AFRICA_STUDY_BOOK_REVISED_low_res.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2017.

  • Gillson, I., & Amir, F. (Eds.). (2015). Trade policy and food security: Improving access to food in developing countries in the wake of high world prices. Directions in development. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Given, L. M. (2008). The sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 697–698). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hassanpour, B., Asadi, E., & Biniaz, A., (2013). Investigation of policies effects and comparative advantage of rainbow trout farming in KB Province, Iran. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences, 6(1), 31–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kajimbwa, M., Kondowe, A., & Mhanga, S. (2010). Edible oil seeds value chain development programme 2007–2015: SNV Tanzania.http://www.snv.org/public/cms/sites/default/files/explore/download/edible_oils_tanzania_result_report_final.pdf. Accessed 15 Dec 2016.

  • Mamza, A. O., et al. (2014). Competitiveness of beef processing in the Borno state of Nigeria: A policy analysis matrix approach. Journal of Agriculture and Sustainability, 6, 132–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Master, A. W., & Winter-Nelson, A. (1995). Measuring the comparative advantage of agricultural activities: Domestic resource costs and the social cost-benefit ratio. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77, 243–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minot, N. (2014). Food price volatility in sub-Saharan Africa: Has it really increased? Food Policy, 45, 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, S., Fang, C., & Chaudhary, J. (2003). Assessing the competitiveness of Indian cotton production: A policy analysis matrix approach. Journal of Cotton Science, 7, 65–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monke, E. A., & Pearson, S. R. (1989). The policy analysis matrix for agricultural development (pp. 4–7). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nwigwe, C., Okoruwa, V., Adenegan, K. A., & Olajide, A. (2016). Competitiveness of beef cattle production systems in Nigeria: A policy analysis approach. Journal of Agriculture and Sustainability, 9, 175–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omamo, S., Diao, X., Wood, S., Chamberlin, J., You, L., Benin, S., Wood-Sichra, U., & Tatwangire, A. (2006). Strategic priorities for agricultural development in eastern and Central Africa. Research report no. 150. Washington DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, R. S., Gotsch, C., & Bahri, S. (2004). Application of the policy analysis matrix in Indonesian agriculture (1st ed.pp. 19–20). Yayasan Obor: Development Alternatives Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • RLDC. (2008). Sunflower sector market development strategy. Rural livelihood development company. http://www.rldp.org/downloads/sunflower_strategy.pdf. Accessed 1 Jan 2017.

  • TEOSA. (2012). Assessment of the potential of edible oilseeds produced in Tanzania: The case of sunflower and sesame. http://www.best-dialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/TEOSA_Edible_Oils_Study_10_-2012.pdf?eae10f. Accessed 5 Jan 2017.

  • Ude, M., Adeoye, I. B., Yusuf, S. A., Balogun, O. L., & Akinlade, R. J. (2013). Competitiveness of rice processing and marketing in Ebonyi state: A policy analysis approach. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 3, 410–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ugulumu, E. S., & Inanga, E. L. (2013). Tanzania’s small-scale sunflower farmers: Upgrading the value chain. International Journal of Sciences: Basic And Applied Research (IJSBAR), 10, 126–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • URT. (2015). United Republic of Tanzania sunflower sector development strategy 2016–2020. http://www.mit.go.tz/uploads/files/Tanzania%20Sunflower%20Strategy.pdf. Accessed 1 Feb 2017.

  • Wodon, Q., & Zaman, H. (2010). Higher food prices in sub-Saharan Africa: Poverty impact and policy responses. The World Bank Research Observer, 25, 157–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao, S. (1997). Comparative advantages and crop diversification: A policy analysis matrix for Thai agriculture. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 48, 211–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, S., Lambert, D., Wang, S., & Wang, Z. (2013). Effects of agricultural subsidy policies on comparative advantage and production protection in China. Chinese Economy, 46, 20–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work described in this study was supported by a grant from the German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL) under the Federal Office for Agriculture and Food-BundesanstaltfürLandwirtschaft und Ernährung (BLE) organization and the support of the Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF). The authors thank the reviewers and editors for their helpful comments and valuable suggestions, which substantially improved this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles Peter Mgeni.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mgeni, C.P., Sieber, S., Amjath-Babu, T.S. et al. Can protectionism improve food security? Evidence from an imposed tariff on imported edible oil in Tanzania. Food Sec. 10, 799–806 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-017-0746-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-017-0746-3

Keywords

Navigation