Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Managing for resilience: a landscape framework for food and livelihood security and ecosystem services

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Food Security Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To address the twin pressures of land degradation and climate change in communities of agriculturalists, agro-pastoralists and pastoralists who are vulnerable to acute and chronic food and livelihood insecurity, we review emerging resilience approaches to agricultural development and present a resilience framework for agriculture and resource management at multiple scales and social-ecological interfaces. The paper draws on academic literature, field observation, insight from development researchers and practitioners, and agency reports to build a framework for guiding investment in initiatives that stand to sustainably improve the livelihoods of rural populations whose livelihood security is at risk from a combination of poverty and drought, deforestation, over-grazing, forced migration or other shocks. We suggest how working at landscape scale to link interventions in agroecological, livelihood, ecological and institutional dimensions of resilience, and integrating the four dimensions through stakeholder-engaged, adaptive collaborative management enables synergies to be captured and trade-offs reduced. We use the insights from development practitioners, political ecologists, and rural sociologists to highlight the need to historically, politically, and culturally situate this framework, and to emphasize the importance of participatory methods in successful resilient landscape management projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In the low scenario, sea levels are expected to rise between 28 and 60cm, and for the high scenario they are expected to rise between 37 and 72cm by 2100.

  2. This geographic region refers particularly to Ethiopia, Eritrea, Djibouti, Sudan, Kenya, and Somalia.

  3. Cultural ecologists subsequently used a similar term in describing cultural adaptations. Problematically, early conceptions of cultural adaptation were premised on Darwinian notions of survival. Thus, cultural survival, or success, was considered to be dependent on the ability of communities to adapt to social change (usually entailing cultural and economic assimilation into the dominant culture) (Smit and Wandel 2006). While much of the evolutionary framing underpinning adaptation studies has been eschewed, cultural ecologists largely agree that cultures (or societies) which are able to respond to or cope with change quickly and easily are considered to have high “adaptability”. Indeed "adaptive capacity" increasingly is viewed as strategic to understanding linkages between vulnerability and resilience (Engle 2011). In Adger’s conceptualization, adaptive capacity is an element of vulnerability associated predominantly with governance, civil and political rights, and literacy (2013).

  4. Agricultural, pastoral, and fishing communities are the most apparent or commonly cited examples of coupled social-ecological systems (or human-nature systems). Social-ecological systems in these communities are considered tightly coupled because of the direct relationships between livelihoods and ecosystem services—in these cases social-ecological dynamics, including adaptation, transformation and feedbacks are clear.

  5. Some of the more extreme examples can be seen in Australia, the American west, India, the Amazon, and many places in the middle east and Africa.

  6. For instance, Weis (2010: 319) notes, “an array of industrial dynamics have dramatically increased the magnitude and pace of soil degradation, such as: the use of ever larger and faster machines in ploughing, planting, spraying and fertilizing; the over-irrigation of land; the reduction of ground cover between rows; and declines in practices of fallowing, as time horizons shorten and livestock is moved from pastures into factory farms to expand and intensify its production”.

  7. Weis (2010: 320) describes the technological treadmill as follows: “Biological simplification and standardization also increase vulnerability to the spread of pests, weeds, fungi and disease, which are most efficiently overridden by insecticides, herbicides and fungicides, many derived from petrochemicals. The chemical fix for industrial agriculture has routinely led to a treadmill of dependence as resistance develops, natural controls diminish and more or new inputs are applied. It is also connected to the loss of much localized and shared biological knowledge in farming, and its displacement by the intellectual property of agro-input TNCs”.

References

  • Adger, W. N. (2000). Social and ecological resilience: are they related? Progress in Human Geography, 24, 347–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger, W. N. (2006). Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 268–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altiere, M. A. (1999). The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 74, 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, M. A. (1990). Agroecology and rural development in Latin America. In M. A. Altieri & S. B. Hecht (Eds.), Agroecology and small farm development (pp. 113–118). Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderies, J. M., Ryan, P., & Walker, B. H. (2006). Loss of resilience, crisis, and institutional change: lessons from an intensive agricultural system in southeastern Australia. Ecosystems, 9, 865–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, D. R., Plummer, R., Berkes, F., Arthur, R. I., Charles, A. T., Davidson-Hunt, I. J., et al. (2009). Adaptive co-management for social-ecological complexity. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(2), 95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, C., Mendez, V. E., Gliessman, S. R., Goodman, D., & Fox, J. A. (2008). Confronting the coffee crisis: Fair trade, sustainable livelihoods and ecosystems in Mexico and Central America. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., Folke, C., & Colding, J. (2000). Linking social and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., Kofinas, G.P., & Chapin, F. S. (2009). Conservation, community, and livelihoods: sustaining, renewing, and adapting cultural connections to the land. Principles of Ecosystem Stewardship, 129–147.

  • Bernstein, H., & Woodhouse, P. (2001). Telling environmental change like it is? reflections on a study in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Agrarian Change, 1, 283–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bessant, K. C. (2006). A farm household conception of pluriactivity in Canadian agriculture: motivation, diversification and livelihood. Canadian Review of Sociology, 43, 51–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boelee, E., Chiramba, T., & Khaka, E. (Eds.). (2011). An ecosystem services approach to water and food security: Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme. Colombo: International Water Management Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohensky, E., & Maru, Y. (2011). Indigenous knowledge, science, and resilience: what have we learned from a decade of international literature on “Integration”? Ecology and Society, 16(4), 6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borron, S. (2006). Building resilience for an unpredictable future: How organic agriculture can help farmers adapt to climate change. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin, F. S., Kofinas, G. P., Folke, C., & Chapin, M. C. (2009). Principles of ecosystem stewardship: Resilience-based natural resource management in a changing world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ching, L. L., & Stabinsky, D. (2011). Ecological agriculture is climate resilient. In: UN Climate Change Conference November 28-December 9, 2011, Durban, Third World Network Briefing Paper 1. Penang: Third World Network.

  • Colwell, R. (2004). The new landscape of science: a geographic portal. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94, 703–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, W. S. (2011). Units of nature or processes across scales? the ecosystem concept at age 75. New Phytologist, 1–14.

  • Darnhofer, I., Bellon, S., Dedieu, B., & Milestad, R. (2011). Adaptiveness to enhance the sustainability of farming systems: a review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 30, 545–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Schutter, O. (2010). Agroecology and the right to food. Report submitted by the Special Rapporteur on the right to food. New York: United Nations General Assembly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302, 907–1912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donald, P. F., & Evans, A. D. (2006). Habitat connectivity and matrix restoration: the wider implications of agri-environment schemes. Journal of Applied Ecology, 43, 209–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donald, P. F., Green, R. E., & Heath, M. F. (2001). Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe’s farmland bird populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 268, 25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duraiappah, A. (1996). Poverty and environmental degradation: A literature review and analysis. CREED Working Paper Series No. 8. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • EcoAgriculture Partners. (2013). WFP promotes resilience in chronic food insecure areas of Ethiopia. Washington, DC: EcoAgriculture Partners.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrada-Carmona, N., Hart, A. K., DeClerck, F. A. J., Harvey, C. A., & Milder, J. C. (2014). Integrated landscape management for agriculture, rural livelihoods and ecosystem conservation: an assessment of experience from Latin America and the Caribbean. Landscape and Urban Planning, 129, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (2014). The state of food and agriculture: Innovation in family farming. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, J. (1990). The anti-politics machine: Development, depoliticization, and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, J., Brosi, B., Daily, G. C., Ehrlich, P. R., Goldman, R., Goldstein, J., Lindenmayer, D. B., Manning, A. D., Mooney, A. H., Pejchar, L., Ranganathan, J., & Tallis, H. (2008). Should agricultural policies encourage land sparing or wildlife-friendly farming? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 6, 380–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foley, J. A., Ramankutty, N., Brauman, K. A., Cassidy, E. S., Gerber, J. S., et al. (2011). Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature, 478, 337–342.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C. (2004). Traditional knowledge in socio-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9(3), 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16, 253–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, E. D. G. (2007). Travelling in antique lands: using past famines to develop an adaptability/resilience framework to identify food systems vulnerable to climate change. Climatic Change, 83, 495–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getu, M., & Mulinge, M. M. (2013). Impacts of climate change and variability on pastoralist women in Sub-saharan Africa. Addis Ababa: Organization for Social Science Research in Eastern and Southern Africa (OSSREA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladwin, C. H., Thomson, A. M., Peterson, J. S., & Anderson, A. S. (2001). Addressing food security in Africa via multiple livelihood strategies of women farmers. Food Policy, 26(2), 177–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gliessman, S. R. (2007). Agroecology: The ecology of sustainable food systems. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowing, J. W., & Palmer, M. (2008). Sustainable agriculture development in sub-Saharan Africa: the case for a paradigm shift in land husbandry. Soil Use and Management, 24(1), 92–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L., & Holling, C. S. (2002). Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt-Gimenez, E. (2002). Measuring farmers’ agroecological resistance after hurricane mitch in Nicaragua: a case study in participatory, sustainable land management impact monitoring. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 93, 87–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt-Gimenez, E. (2006). Campesino a campesino: Voices from Latin America’s farmer to farmer movement for sustainable agriculture. Oakland: Food First Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • IFAD. (2013). Smallholders, food security and the environment. Rome: International Fund for Agricultural Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. (2014). Summary for policymakers. Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 1–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloppenburg, J. (2004). First the seed: The political economy of plant biotechnology. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kofinas, G. P., & Chapin, F. S. (2009). Sustaining livelihoods and human well-being during social-ecological change. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kozar, R., Buck, L. E., Barrow, E. G., Sunderland, T. C. H., Catacutan, D. E., Planicka, C., Hart, A. K., & Willemen, L. (2014). Toward viable landscape governance systems: What works? Washington, DC: EcoAgriculture Partners on behalf of the Landscapes for People, Food and Nature Initiative.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremen, C., Iles, A., & Bacon, C. (2012). Diversified farming systems: An agroecological, systems-based alternative to modern industrial agriculture. Ecology and Society, 17(4), 44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebel, L., Anderies, J. M., Campbell, B., Folke, C., Hatfield-Dodds, S., Hughes, T. P., & Wilson, J. (2006). Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 11, 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, B., Chappell, M. J., Vandermeer, J., Smith, G., Quintero, E., Bezner-Kerr, R., Griffith, D., et al. (2011). Effects of industrial agriculture on climate change and the mitigation potential of small-scale agro-ecological farms. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources, 6, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, B., Herren, H. R., Wakhungu, J., & Watson, R. T. (Eds.). (2009). International assessment of agricultural knowledge, science and technology for development: Synthesis report. Washington DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMichael, P. (2011). Food system sustainability: questions of environmental governance in the new world (dis)order. Global Environmental Change, 21(3), 804–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMichael, P. (2012). Development and social change: A global perspective. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michener, W. K., Baerwald, T. J., Firth, P., Palmer, M. A., Rosenberger, J. L., Sandlin, E. A., & Zimmerman, H. (2001). Defining and unraveling biocomplexity. BioScience, 51, 1018–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milder, J. C., Hart, A. K., Dobie, P., Minai, J., & Zaleski, C. (2014). Integrated landscape initiatives for African agriculture, development, and conservation: a region-wide assessment. World Development, 68, 68–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millenium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Biodiversity synthesis. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchel, T. (2002). Rule of experts: Egypt, techno-politics, modernity. Berkeley: UC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D. (2007). Dirt: The rrosion of civilizations. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimore, M., & Anderson, S. (2009). Dryland opportunities: A new paradigm for people, ecosystems and development. Gland: International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosse, D. (2005). Cultivating development: An ethnography of aid policy and practice. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, D. R., Adger, W. N., & Brown, K. (2007). Adaptation to environmental change: contributions of a resilience framework. Annual Review of Environmental Resources, 32, 395–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Netting, R. M. (1993). Smallholders, householders: Farm families and the ecology of intensive, sustainable agriculture. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavanello, S. (2009). Pastoralists’ vulnerability in the Horn of Africa. London: Humanitarian Policy Group, Overseas Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfecto, I., Vandermeer, J. H., & Wright, A. L. (2009). Nature’s matrix: Linking agriculture, conservation and food sovereignty. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimbert, M. P. (2010). Towards food sovereignty: Reclaiming autonomous food systems. London: International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretty, J. N. (1995). Regenerating agriculture: Policies and practice for sustainability and self-reliance. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretty, J. N. (2005). The earthscan reader in sustainable agriculture. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretty, J., Sutherland, W. J., Ashby, J., Auburn, J., Baulcombe, D., Bell, M., et al. (2010). The top 100 questions of importance to the future of global agriculture. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 8(4), 219–236.

  • Sayer, J., Sunderland, T., Ghazoul, J., Pfund, J. L., Sheil, D., Meijaard, E., & Buck, L. E. (2013). Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(21), 8349–8356.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, J.A., Margules, C., Boedhihartono, A.K., Dale, A., Sunderland, T. Supriatna, J. & Saryanthi. R. (2014). Landscape Approaches: what are the preconditions for success? Sustainability Science, 1862–4057.

  • Scherr, S. J., & McNeely, J. A. (2007). Farming with nature: The science and practice of ecoagriculture. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherr, S. J., & McNeely, J. A. (2008). Biodiversity conservation and agricultural sustainability: towards a new paradigm of ‘ecoagriculture’ landscapes. Philosopy Transaction R Society London B Biological Science, 363(1491), 477–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherr, S. J., Buck, L. E., Willemen, L., & Milder, J. C. (2014). Ecoagriculture: Integrated landscape management for people, food and nature. Encyclopedia of Agriculture and Food Systems, 3, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schusler, T. M., Decker, D. J., & Pfeffer, M. J. (2003). Social learning for collaborative natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources, 15, 309–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit, B., & Wandel, J. (2006). Adaptation, adaptive capacity, and vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16, 282–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D., Fargione, J., Wolff, B., D’Antonio, D. A., Howarth, R., Schindler, D., Schlesinger, W. H., Simberloff, D., & Swackhamer, D. (2001). Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. Science, 292(5515), 281–284.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D., Cassman, K. G., Matson, P. A., Naylor, R., & Polasky, S. (2002). Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature, 418(6898), 671–677.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tscharntke, T., Klein, A. M., Kruess, A., Steffan-Dewenter, I., & Thies, C. (2005). Landscape perspectives and agricultural intensification and biodiversity-ecosystem service management. Ecology Letters, 8(8), 857–874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. L., Matson, P. A., McCarthy, J. J., Corell, R. W., Christensen, L., Eckley, N., et al. (2003). Illustrating the coupled human-environment system for vulnerability analysis: three case studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 8080–8085.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environment Programme. (2011). Climate change, conflict and migration in the Sahel. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velazquez, A., Bocco, G., Romero, F. J., & Perez Vega, A. (2003). A landscape perspective on biodiversity conservation: the case of Central Mexico. Mountain Research and Development, 23(3), 230–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vos, C. C., Verboom, J., Opdam, P. F. M., & Ter Braak, C. J. F. (2001). Toward ecologically scaled landscape indices. The American Naturalist, 183(1), 24–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J., & Cooper, M. (2011). Genealogies of resilience: from systems ecology to the political economy of crisis adaptation. Security Dialogue, 42(2), 143–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., & Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, K., & Afifi, T. (2011). Introduction, special issue on environmentally induced migration in the context of social vulnerability. International Migration, 49, 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, M. J., & Bohle, H. G. (1993). The space of vulnerability: the causal structure of hunger. Progress in Human Geography, 17, 43–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weis, T. (2007). The global food economy: The battle for the future of farming. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weis, T. (2010). The accelerating biophysical contradictions of industrial capitalist agriculture. Journal of Agrarian Change, 10(3), 315–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhusen, P., Brechin, S. R., Fortwangler, C. L., & West, P. C. (2002). Reinventing a square wheel: critique of a resurgent ‘protection paradigm’ in international biodiversity conservation. Society and Natural Resources, 15, 17–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittman, H., Desmarais, A. A., & Wiebe, N. (2010). Food sovereignty: Reconnecting food, nature and community. Toronto: Fernwood Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerer, K. S. (2007). Agriculture, livelihoods, and globalization: the analysis of new trajectories (and avoidance of just-so stories) of human-environment change and conservation. Agriculture and Human Values, 24, 9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian Bailey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bailey, I., Buck, L.E. Managing for resilience: a landscape framework for food and livelihood security and ecosystem services. Food Sec. 8, 477–490 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-016-0575-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-016-0575-9

Keywords

Navigation