Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Conceptualizing educational leadership: does exploring macro-level facets matters?

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Education Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present review attempts to examine the present status of educational leadership highlighting the role of macro-level facets in Asian Pacific context. The conceptualization of educational leadership among researchers so far had been found to vary according to different contexts and situations. Theoretical perspectives associated with educational leadership have either approached the concept from dimensions working outside the school or from dimensions reflecting the personality trait of the principal. There is an urgent need to shift the focus of attention toward understanding educational leadership through an interactive collaboration of these dimensions. Specifically, in school contexts, the phenomenon of educational leadership was explored and theorized from one perspective only, giving less space to have multidisciplinary view, which need to be revived in terms of contexts and associated metaphors of educational leadership. Although the importance of educational leadership has been widely acknowledged, its role still remains unheeded in various sections of education. The purpose of the review, thus, is to gain macro-level insight into this concept which can hopefully answer many aspects of education which are otherwise left unanswered, thereby helping in formulating better educational reforms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, G. (1990). Toward a critical constructivist approach to school administration: Invisibility, legitimation, and the study of non-events. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26, 38–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, G. (1991). Cognitive politics in principals and teachers: Ideological control in an elementary school. In J. Blase (Ed.), The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict, and cooperation (pp. 120–138). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K. D. (2004). The nature of teacher leadership in schools as reciprocal influences between teacher leaders and principals. School Effectiveness and School Improvements: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice, 15(1), 97–113.

  • Angus, L. (1989). New leadership and the possibility of education reform. In J. Smyth (Ed.), Critical perspectives on educational leadership (pp. 63–92). London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational dynamics, 18(3), 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B., & Avolio, B. (1989). Potential biases in leadership measures: How prototypes, lenience, and general satisfaction relate to ratings and rankings of transformational and transactional leadership construct? Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 509–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, B. R. (2000). The emotions of educational leadership: Breaking the silence. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 3(4), 331–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, C. (1993). Learning to live the good life. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begley, P. (1996). Cognitive perspectives on values in administration: A quest for coherence and relevance. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32, 403–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blase, J. (1989). The micropolitics of the school: The everyday political orientations of teachers toward open school principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 25, 377–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blase, J. (1993). The micropolitics of effective school-based leadership: Teachers’ perspectives. Educational Administration Quarterly, 29, 142–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, E. (1982). Researches on the school administrator: The state-of-the-art, 1967–1980. Educational Administration Quarterly, 18(3), 12–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, T. (2007). Educational leadership and management: Theory, policy, and practice. South African Journal Education, 27(3), 391–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacciari, C. (1998). Why do we speak metaphorically? Reflections on the functions of metaphor in discourse and reasoning. In A. N. Katz, C. Cacciari, R. W. Gibbs Jr., & M. Turner (Eds.), Figurative language and thought (pp. 119–157). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, J. M. C. (2007). Meta-analysis of transformational school leadership effects on school outcomes in Taiwan and the USA. Asia Pacific Education Review, 8(2), 166–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, H., Firestone, W., & Rossman, G. (1987). Resistance to planned change and the sacred in school cultures. Educational Administration Quarterly, 23(4), 36–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994). Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1–8). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donmoyer, R. (1999). The continuing quest for a knowledge base, 1976–1998. In J. Murphy & K. Seashore Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (2nd ed., pp. 25–43). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duke, D. (1986). The aesthetics of leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 22, 7–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duke, D., & Iwanicki, E. (1992). Principal assessment and the notion of fit. Peabody Journal of Education, 68(1), 25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everhart, R. (1988). Fieldwork methodology in education administration. In N. Boyan (Ed.), The handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 703–727). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, W. P. (1986). Paradigms and promises: New approaches to educational administration. Buffalo and New York: Prometheus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York and London: Continuum.

  • Gaziel, H. (2003). Images of leadership and their effect upon school principal performance. International Review of Education, 49(5), 475–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodlad, J., Soder, R., & Sirotnik, K. (1990). The moral dimensions of teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, T. (1980). The man who comes back through the door in the wall: Discovering truth, discovering self, discovering organizations. Educational Administration Quarterly, 16(3), 25–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, T. B. (1986). Leaders and schools: wilful and nonnatural order in organization. In T. J. Sergiovanni & J. E. Corbally (Eds.), Leadership and organizational culture: New perspectives on administrative theory and practice (pp. 142–169). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, W. (1991). The micropolitics of leadership in an urban elementary school. In J. Blase (Ed.), The politics of life in a school: Power, conflict, and cooperation (pp. 161–184). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronn, P. (1984). “I have a solution”…: Administrative power in a school meeting. Educational Administration Quarterly, 20(2), 65–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronn, P. C. (1993). Psychobiography on the couch: Character, biography and the comparative study of leaders. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 29(3), 343–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronn, P. C. (1994). Educational administration’s Weber. Educational Management and Administration, 22(4), 224–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronn, P., & Ribbins, P. (1996). Leaders in context: Postpositivist approaches to understanding educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32, 452–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronn, P. (2003). The new work of educational leaders: Changing leadership practice in an era of school reform. London: Paul Chapman.

  • Guzman, A. B., & Guillermo, M. L. (2007). The serendipity of principalship: Meaning-making of a Filipino secondary school principal. Asia Pacific Education Review, 8(2), 216–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (1996a). The principal‘s role in school effectiveness: An assessment of methodological progress, 1980–1995. In K. Leithwood, J. Chapman, D. Corson, P. Hallinger, & A. Weaver-Hart (Eds.), International handbook of research on education leadership (pp. 723–783). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (1996b). Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of the empirical research, 1980–1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, S. A. (2001). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, A. S., Reicher, S. D., & Platow, M. J. (2011). The new psychology of leadership: Identity, influence and power. Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heck, R. (1991). Towards the future: Rethinking the leadership role of the principal as philosopher-king. Journal of Educational Administration, 29(3), 67–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heck, R. H. (1998). Conceptual and methodological issues in investigating principal leadership across cultures. Peabody Journal of Education, 73(2), 51–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2005). The study of educational leadership and management: Where does the field stand today? Educational Management Administration Leadership, 33(2), 229–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heck, R., Larson, T., & Marcoulides, G. (1990). Principal instructional leadership and school achievement: Validation of a causal model. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26, 94–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heine, P. J. (1971). Personality and social theory. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • HodgeKinson, C. (1983). The philosophy of leadership. Oxford, England: Brasil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgekinson, C. (1991). Educational leadership: The moral art. Albany, NY: Sunny Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Motivation, leadership, and organization: Do American theories apply abroad? Organizational Dynamics, 9(1), 42–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. B. (2005). What we know about leadership? Review of General Psychology, 9, 169–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M. A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 184–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, W. (1994). Foundations of educational administration: Traditional and emerging perspectives. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30, 178–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, W., & Miskel, C. (1996). Educational administration: Theory, research and practice (5th ed.). New York: Longterm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, H. C., & Chang, J. C. (2011). The role of organizational learning in transformational leadership and organizational innovation. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(4), 621–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahanbegloo, R. (2009). India analysed: Sudhir Kakar in conversation with Ramin Jahanbegloo. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jantzi, D., & Leithwood, K. (1996). Toward an exploration of variation in teachers’ perceptions of transformational school leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32, 512–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, Y. T., & Printy, S. (2009). Leadership to build a democratic community within school: A case study of two Korean high schools. Asia Pacific Education Review, 10(2), 237–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kantabutra, S. (2005). Improving public school performance through vision-based leadership. Asia Pacific Education Review, 6(2), 124–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karaköse, T. (2007). High school teachers’ perceptions regarding principals’ ethical leadership in Turkey. Asia Pacific Education Review, 8(3), 464–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kets de Vries, M. F. R. (1993). Leaders, fools and imposters: Essays on the psychology of leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kincheloe, J. L. (1999). The Foundations of a Democratic Educational Psychology. In J. L. Kincheloe, S. R. Steinberg & L. E. Villaverde (Eds.), Rethinking Intelligence: Confronting psychological assumptions about teaching and learning (pp. 1–26). Routledge: New York and London.

  • Kmetz, J., & Willower, D. (1981). Elementary school principals’ work behaviour. Educational Administration Quarterly, 18(4), 62–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knipe, H., & Maclay, G. (1972). The dominant man: The mystique of personality and prestige. Britain: Souvenir Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh, H. H., Gurr, D., Drysdale, L., & Ang, L. L. (2011). How school leaders perceive the leadership role of middle leaders in Singapore primary schools? Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(4), 609–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, L. & Walker, D (2002). Constructing school change-school stories. In L. Lambert, D. Walker, D. P. Zimmerman, J. E. Cooper, M. D. Lambert, et al. (Eds.), The constructivist leader (2nd ed., pp. 127–163). New York: Teachers College Press.

  • Leithwood, K. (1994). Leadership for school restructuring. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30, 498–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., Begley, P., & Cousins, B. (1992). Developing expert leaders for future schools. Bristol, PA: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., & Stager, F. (1989). Expertise in principals’ problem solving. Educational Administration Quarterly, 25, 126–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., & Steinbach, R. (1991). Indicators of transformational leadership in the everyday problem solving of school administrators. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 7, 221–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levay, C. (2010). Charismatic leadership in resistance to change. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 127–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewellen, T. (1992). Political anthropology: An introduction (2nd ed.). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, G. B., Sherman, R., & Gill, P. B. (2007). Making meaning of educational leadership: The principalship in metaphor. NASSP Bulletin, 91(2), 161–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lum, J. (1997). Student mentality: Intentionalist perspectives about the principal. Journal of Educational Administration, 35(3), 210–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macpherson, R. (1996). Educative accountability policy research: Methodology and epistemology. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32, 80–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, C. (1995). Imagining leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31, 484–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxcy, S. J. (1991). Educational leadership: A critical pragmatic perspective. Toronto: OISE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxcy, S. J. (1995). Responses to commentary: Beyond leadership frameworks. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32, 473–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meindl, J. R. (1990). On leadership: An alternative to the conventional wisdom. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behaviour (Vol. 12, pp. 159–203). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meindl, J. R., Ehrlich, S. B., & Dukerich, J. M. (1985). The romance of leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 78–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meindl, J. R. (1995). The romance of leadership as a follower-centric theory: A social constructionist approach. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(3), 329–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (1997). Images of organization. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscovici, S. (1993). The invention of society: Psychological explanations for social phenomenon. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogawa, R. (1991). Enchantment, disenchantment, and accommodation: How a faculty made sense of the succession of its principal? Educational Administration Quarterly, 27, 30–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogawa, R., & Bossert, S. (1995). Leadership as an organizational quality. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31, 224–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogbu, J. (2008). Minority status, oppositional culture, & schooling. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oritz, F. (1992). Women’s ways of becoming leaders: Personal stories. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.

  • Park, J. H. (2012). The effects of principal’s leadership style on support for innovation: Evidence from Korean vocational high school change. Asia Pacific Education Review, 13(1), 89–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T. J., & Waterman, R. H. (1982). In search of excellence: Lessons from America’s best run companies. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, K. (1978). The principal’s tasks. Administrator’s Notebook, 26, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reicher, S., Haslam, S. A., & Hopkins, N. (2005). Social identity and the dynamics of leadership: Leaders and followers as collaborative agents in the transformation of social reality. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 547–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reicher, S. D., & Hopkins, N. (1996). Self-category constructions in political rhetoric: An analysis of Thatcher’s and Kinnock’s speeches concerning the British Miners’ strike (1984–1985). European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 353–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenholtz, S. (1989). Teacher’s work: A social-organizational analysis. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salley, C., McPherson, R. B., & Baehr, M. E. (1979). What principals do: A preliminary occupational analysis. In D. Erickson & T. Reller (Eds.), The principal in metropolitan schools (pp. 22–39). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing Corporation.

  • Seddon, T. (1994). Context and beyond: Reframing the theory and practices of education. London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergiovanni, T. J. (1991). The principalship: A reflective practice perspective. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergiovanni, T. J. (1992). Moral leadership. San Fancisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergiovanni, T. J. (1996). Leadership for the schoolhouse. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergiovanni, T. J., & Corbally, J. E. (Eds.). (1986). Leadership and organizational culture: New perspective on administrative theory and practice. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silins, H. (1994). The relationship between transformational and transactional leadership and school improvement outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5, 272–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, J. B. P. (1980a). The nurturant-task leader. New Delhi: Concept.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, J. B. P. (1980b). The nurturant task leader. New Delhi: Concept.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, C. (2011). R. Jahanbegloo. [Review of the book India Analysed: Sudhir Kakar in conversation with Ramin Jahanbegloo, by R. Jahanbegloo]. Psychological Studies, 56(4), 416–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, R. (1995). The sociology of leadership and educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31, 449–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soltis, J. (1984). On the nature of educational research. Educational Researcher, 13(10), 5–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. D. (2004). Toward a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(1), 3–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, R. (1989). Studies of managerial jobs and behaviour: The ways forward. Journal of Management Studies, 26(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, H. V., Yin, M. S., & Min, J. C. H. (2011). A comparative study of educational leadership in Taiwan and the USA. African Journal of Business Management, 5(1), 30–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaill, P. (1986). The purposing of high performing systems. In T. Sergiovanni & J. Corbally (Eds.), Leadership and organizational culture: New perspectives on administrative theory and practice (pp. 85–104). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van de Grift, W. (1990). Educational leadership and academic achievement in elementary education. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 1(3), 26–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen, L. S., & Hwang, K. P. (2008). A study on the application of Laozi’s thoughts on educational leadership and management. Asia Pacific Education Review, 9(3), 262–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willower, D. (1996). Inquiry in educational administration and the spirit of the times. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32, 344–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolcott, H. (1973). The man in the principal’s office: An ethnography. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolcott, H. (1992). Posturing in qualitative research. In M. LeCompte, W. Millroy, & J. Preissle (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 3–52). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, K. C. (1998). Culture and moral leadership in education. Peabody Journal of Education, 73(2), 106–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yammarino, F. J., & Bass, B. M. (1990). Transformational leadership and multiple levels of analysis. Human Relations, 43(10), 975–995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, H. (2002). A shift in Hong Kong principals’ leadership conceptions. Asia Pacific Education Review, 3(1), 37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. (1994). Leadership in organization. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. A. (1998). Leadership in organizations. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. A. (2002). Leadership in organizations (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chetan Sinha.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sinha, C. Conceptualizing educational leadership: does exploring macro-level facets matters?. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 14, 141–150 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-012-9239-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-012-9239-4

Keywords

Navigation