Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The gap between expectations and reality: integrating computers into mathematics classrooms

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Education Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As a result of dramatic changes in mathematics education around the world, in Turkey both elementary and secondary school mathematics curriculums have changed in the light of new demands since 2005. In order to perform the expected change in newly developed curriculum, computer should be integrated into learning and teaching process. Teachers’ beliefs play a key role in this integration process. Negative beliefs against using computer in mathematics teaching may lead to failure of this process. With the help of this study, it is aimed to detect mathematics teachers’ beliefs concerning Computer Assisted Mathematics Instruction (CAMI). Within the scope of this aim, the conducted questionnaire (The opinions of teachers about using computer in Mathematics Instruction) has been carried out on 91 mathematics teachers in the city of Trabzon. The acquired results have shown that mathematics teachers have developed negative opinions against CAMI. This state has revealed that there is a huge inconsistency between curriculum’s positive expectations arising from computer usage and teachers’ convictions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akşit, N. (2007). Educational reform in Turkey. International Journal of Educational Development, 27(2), 129–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albion, P., & Ertmer, P. A. (2002). Beyond the foundations: The role of vision and belief in teachers’ preparation for integration of technology. TechTrends, 46(5), 34–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albirin, A. (2006). Teachers-attitudes toward information and communication technologies: The case of Syrian EFL teachers. Computers & Education, 47, 373–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydın, Y. (1990). Mathematics teacher preparation in Turkey today. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21(5), 471–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baki, A. (2000). Preparing student teachers to use computers in mathematics classrooms through a long-term pre-service course in Turkey. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9(3), 343–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baki, A. (2002). Bilgisayar destekli matematik [Computer-supported mathematics]. İstanbul: Ceren publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baki, A., & Çelik, D. (2005). Grafik hesap makinelerinin matematik derslerine adaptasyonu ile ilgili matematik öğretmenlerinin görüşleri [Mathematics teachers’ opinions about integrating graphic calculators into mathematics classrooms]. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 4(4), 146–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L. (1996). Teacher learning and the mathematics reforms: What we think we know and what we need to learn. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(7), 500–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. J., & Ravitz, J. (1999). The influence of computer and internet use on teachers’ pedagogical practices and perceptions. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 4, 356–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, J. H., & Hazelip, K. (1995). Teachers’ beliefs and belief systems. In L. W. Anderson (Ed.), International encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 25–28). New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan, P. A., Edwards, T., & Erickson, D. (1996). An exploration of change in teachers’ beliefs and practices during implementation of mathematics standards. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 18(4), 35–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownlee, J. (2003). Changes in primary school teachers’ beliefs about knowing: A longitudinal study. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 31(1), 86–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold & underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuban, L., Kilpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). Paradox high access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 813–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dexter, S. L., & Anderson, R. E. (1999). Teacher’s views of computers as catalysts for changes in their teaching practices. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(3), 221–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durmuş, S. (2004). A diagnostic study to determine learning difficulties in mathematics. Kastamonu Education Journal, 12(1), 125–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekici, G. (2005). An Investigation of the attitudes of students’ toward the student selection examination (SSE) through a number of variables. Hacettepe University Educational Faculty Journal, 28, 82–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erbas, A. K., Ledford, S., Orrill, C. H., & Polly, D. (2005). Promoting problem solving across geometry and algebra by using technology. Mathematics Teacher, 98(9), 599–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A., Addison, P., Lane, M., Ross, E., & Woods, D. (1999). Examining teachers’ beliefs about the role of technology in the elementary classroom. Journal of research on Computing in Education, 32(1–2), 54–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, A., & Fleener, M. J. (1994). Calculators as instructional tools: Perceptions of three preservice teachers. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 13(1), 83–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, M. I. (1994). Teachers’ beliefs about mathematical problem solving in the elementary school. School Science and Mathematics, 94(6), 314–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forgazs, H. J. (2002). Teachers and computers for secondary mathematics. Education and Information Technologies, 7(2), 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M., & Stegelbauer, S. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ha, A. S. C., Lee, J. C. K., & Chan, D. W. K. (2004). Teachers’ perceptions of in-service teacher training to support curriculum change in physical education: The Hong Kong experience. Sport, Education and Society, 9(3), 421–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakinken, P. (2002). Challenges for design of computer-based learning environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(4), 461–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handal, B., & Herrington, T. (2003). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and curriculum reform. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 15(1), 59–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implications of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27, 65–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelsey, J. S., Carl, E. R., & Holly, A. T. (2004). Improving computer-assisted instruction in teaching higher-order skills. Computers & Education, 42, 169–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, T. (2006). Teachers’ beliefs and practices in technology-based classrooms: A development view. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(2), 157–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, C. P., & Chai, C. S. (2008). Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and their planning and conduct of computer-mediated classroom lessons. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 807–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumpe, A. T., & Chambers, E. (2001). Assessing teachers’ context beliefs about technology use. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(1), 93–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, B. (2000). Internet provision of enrichment opportunities to school and home. Journal of the Australian Council for Educational Computing, 15(1), 17–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcinkiewicz, H. R. (1993). Computers and teachers: Factors influencing computer use in the classroom. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26, 220–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, S. C., & Ragan, T. R. (1998). An implementation model for integrated learning systems. St. Louis, MO: National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT).

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, E. (2000). Strangers in a strange land: Teachers’ beliefs about teaching and learning French as a second or foreign language in online learning environments. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Universite Laval, Montreal.

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

  • Newhouse, P. (1998). The impact of portable computers on classroom learning environments. The Australian Journal of Educational Computing, 13(1), 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niederhauser, D. S., & Stoddart, T. (2001). Teachers’ instructional perspectives and use of educational software. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, S. (1999) Secondary mathematics teachers’ responses to computers and their beliefs about the role of computers in their teaching. In J. M. Truran & K. M. Truran (Eds.), Making the Difference: Proceedings of the Twenty-second Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (MERGA), Adelaide (pp. 404–410), July 1999.

  • Norton, S. J., McRobbie, C., & Cooper, T. (2002). Teachers’ responses to an investigative mathematics syllabus: Their goals and practices. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 14(1), 37–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, M. E. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parr, J. M. (1995). How successful is “Successmaker”? Issues arising from an evaluation of computer assisted learning in a secondary school. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 11(1), 20–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, S., & Liu, M. (2003). Teachers’ beliefs about issues in the implementation of a student-centered learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(2), 57–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, B., Howard, P., & Tracey, D. (1999). Head mathematics teachers’ beliefs about the learning and teaching of mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 11(1), 39–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stipek, D. J., Givvin, K. B., Salmon, J. M., & MacGyvers, V. L. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs and practices related to mathematics instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(2), 213–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turkish Ministry of Education. (2005). Matematik 6–8. sınıflar öğretim program [6–8th grade mathematics curriculum]. Ankara: MEB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vale, C. M., & Leder, G. C. (2004). Student views of computer-based mathematics in the middle years: Does gender make a difference. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56(2–3), 287–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windschitl, M., & Sahl, K. (2002). Tracing teachers’ use of technology in a laptop computer school: The interplay of teacher beliefs. American Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 105–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H.-K., Hsu, Y.-S., & Hwang, F. K. (2007). Factors affecting teachers’ adoption of technology in classrooms: Does school size matter? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(1), 63–85.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fatih Faculty of Education, Secondary School Science and Mathematics Education Department, Karadeniz Technical University, Sogutlu, Akçaabat, Trabzon, Turkey

    Bülent Güven & Ünal Çakiroğlu

  2. Fatih Faculty of Education, Elementary Education Department, Karadeniz Technical University, Sogutlu, Akçaabat, Trabzon, Turkey

    Yaşar Akkan

Authors
  1. Bülent Güven
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ünal Çakiroğlu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yaşar Akkan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bülent Güven.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Güven, B., Çakiroğlu, Ü. & Akkan, Y. The gap between expectations and reality: integrating computers into mathematics classrooms. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 10, 505–515 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-009-9047-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-009-9047-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation