Skip to main content
Log in

Efficacy of octopus feed encased within a collagen membrane

  • Original Article
  • Aquaculture
  • Published:
Fisheries Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A feeding method suitable for rearing octopuses was investigated by preparing basic feed (ground crab or squid meat) enclosed within a collagen casing. Growth was compared between basic feed sealed in the casing and feed provided without a casing. No difference in growth was observed when the feed was squid, but with crab meat, both feeding efficiency and weight gain rate tended to be improved by encasement. When feeding on encased feed, octopuses were observed to feed not only by consuming the entire casing membrane, but also by eating only the edible portion inside the casing. Feed that was about to be eaten by octopuses was collected and measured for the enzyme activity associated with the feed, detecting protease activity, which is considered to be derived from the posterior salivary glands. It was concluded that encasement of feed in a collagen membrane not only improves the retention of soft feed materials within the membrane, but also suppresses the dispersal of enzymes when the octopus feeds, thus enabling the octopus to feed more efficiently.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data supporting the findings of this study is available from the corresponding author, N. Akiyama, upon reasonable request.

References

  • Aguilar FDM, Novoa MAO, Morales SR, Vázquez CR (2014) Valor nutritivo de cuatro harinas de subproductos como fuentes potenciales de proteína en dietas para el pulpo Octopus maya. Hidrobiológica 24(1):69–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Akahori S (1965) Research methods in enzymology II. Asakura Shoten, Tokyo (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson RC, Wood JB, Mather JA (2008) Octopus vulgaris in the Caribbean is a specializing generalist. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps07649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastos P, Gallardo P, Rosas C, Vieira FN, Silva CP, Oliveira GB, Brignol FD, Guzella L, Mattioni B, Fracalossi DM (2020) Pelleted diet with thermal treatment of ingredients for Octopus americanus: Growth performance and enzymatic activity. Aquac Res. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.14968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dan S, Iwasaki H, Takasugi A, Yamazaki H, Hamasaki K (2018) An upwelling system for culturing common octopus paralarvae and its combined effect with supplying natural zooplankton on paralarval survival and growth. Aquaculture. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.05.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dan S, Shibasaki S, Takasugi A, Takeshima S, Yamazaki H, Ito A, Hamasaki K (2021) Changes in behavioural patterns from swimming to clinging, shelter utilization and prey preference of East Asian common octopus Octopus sinensis during the settlement process under laboratory conditions. Mar Biol Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2021.151537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dan S, Yamamoto Y, Nishiwaki D, Matsunari H, Kado Y, Yamaki D, Takeshima S, Kamei Y, Hara S, Sakiyama K, Isojima N, Narita A, Hamasaki K (2023) Dietary effects of intensively reared zoeae of Portunus trituberculatus on survival and growth of paralarvae of the East Asian common octopus Octopus sinensis. Aquaculture 573:739617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2023.739617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiorito G, Gherardi F (1999) Prey-handling behaviour of Octopus vulgaris (Mollusca, Cephalopoda) on Bivalve preys. Behav Proc 46:75–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • García JG, González LMR, García BG (2004) Cost analysis of octopus on growing installation in Galicia. Span J Agric Res 2(4):531–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García LEI, Ramírez DT, Rosas C, Córdova AIC, Suástegui JMM (2017) Digestive enzymes of the Californian two-spot octopus, Octopus bimaculoides (Pickford and McConnaughey, 1949). Comp Biochem Physiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpb.2017.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleadall IG (2016) Octopus sinensis d’Orbigny, 1841 (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae): valid species name for the commercially valuable East Asian common octopus. Species Divers. https://doi.org/10.12782/sd.21.1.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grisley MS, Boyle PR (1987) Bioassay and proteolytic activity of digestive enzymes from Octopus saliva. Comp Biochem Physiol 88B(4):1123–1177

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamada S (1974) Feeding behavior of Octopus vulgaris Cuvier on molluscs. Venus 33(3):138–143 (in Japanese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamdan M, Vidal AT, Martınez Valverde SJ, Moyano FJ (2014) Development of an in vitro model to assess protein bioavailability in diets for common octopus (Octopus vulgaris). Aquac Res. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.1215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanda A, Iwakoshi UE, Kuroda K, Minakata H (2003) Isolation and characterization of novel tachykinins from the posterior salivary gland of the common octopus Octopus vulgaris. Peptides. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-9781(02)00274-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Key LN, Boyle PR, Jaspars M (2002) Novel activities of saliva from the octopus Eledone cirrhosa (Mollusca; Cephalopoda) author links open overlay panel. Toxicon. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0041-0101(01)00254-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kolkovski S, King J, Watts N, Natale M, Mori A, Cammilleri C, Cammilleri C (2015) Development of octopus aquaculture. Final report FRDC Project No 2009/206. Western Australian Fisheries and Marine Research Laboratories, pp 105–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Statistics Department (2021) Statistical Investigation of Sea Surface Fishery Production. Ministry of Agriculture Forestry and Fisheries, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Morillo-Velarde PS, Valverde JC, Hernández MD, Giménez FA, García BG (2012) Growth and digestibility of formulated diets based on dry and freeze-dried ingredients in the common octopus (Octopus vulgaris). Aquaculture. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.09.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morishita T (1972) Studies on the distribution of proteolytic enzymes in the internal organs of octopus. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 38(8):839–843 (in Japanese with English abstract)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morishita T, Ueno R, Takahashi T (1974) Participation in digestion by the proteolytic enzymes of the posterior salivary gland in octopus I. Confirmation of the existence of protein digestive enzymes in the posterior salivary gland. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 40(6):595–600 (in Japanese with English abstract)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nixon M (1984) Is there external digestion by octopus? J Zool Lond 202:441–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okutani T (2013) Japanese octopus studies. Tokai University Press, Kanagawa (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Petza D, Katsanevakis S, Lykouri N, Spiliotis V, Verriopoulos G (2011) Investigation of the potential effect of diet, body mass and maturity on growth and feed performance of common octopus Octopus vulgaris: an information theory approach. Aquac Nutr. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2095.2010.00769.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Querol P, Gairin I, Guerao G, Monge R, Jover M, Tomas A (2014) Effect of to extruded diets with different fish and squid meal ratio on growth, digestibility and body composition of Octopus vulgaris (Cuvier, 1797). Aquac Res. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.12407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosas C, Tut J, Baeza J, Sánchez A, Sosa V, Pascual C, Arena L, Domingues P, Cuzon G (2008) Effect of type of binder on growth, digestibility, and energetic balance of Octopus maya. Aquaculture. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.01.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosas C, Valero A, Caamal-Monsreal C, Uriarte I, Farias A, Gallardo P, Sánchez A, Domingues P (2013) Effects of dietary protein sources on growth, survival and digestive capacity of Octopus maya juveniles (Mollusca: Cephalopoda). Aquac Res. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2012.03107.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakaguchi H (1968) Studies on digestive enzymes of devilfish. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 34(8):p716-721 (in Japanese with English abstract)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer WHH, Gleadall IG, Downey-Breedt N, Doubleday Z, Gillespie G, Haimovici M, Ibáñez CM, Katugin ON, Leporati S, Lipinski M, Markaida U, Ramos JE, Rosa R, Villanueva R, Arguelles J, Briceño FA, Carrasco SA, Che LJ, Chen C-S, Cisneros R, Conners E, Crespi-Abril AC, Kulik VV, Drobyazin EN, Emery T, Fernández-Álvarez FA, Furuya H, González LW, Gough C, Krishnan P, Kulik VV, Kumar B, Leite T, Lu C-C, Mohamed KS, Nabhitabhata J, Noro K, Petchkamnerd J, Putra D, Rocliffe S, Sajikumar KK, Sakaguchi H, Samuel D, Sasikumar G, Wada T, Xiaodong Z, Tian Y, Pang Y, Yamrungrueng A (2021) World octopus fisheries. Rev Fish Sci Aquac 29(3):279–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2019.1680603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzumura Y, Matsubara K, Morii S, Abe M, Gleadall IG, Nishikawa M, Katayama A, Nishitani G, Okawara Y, Kimura R, Akiyama N (2022) Shelters for aquaculture of Octopus sinensis: preferences for horizontal vs. vertical plates and for gap width. Fish Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12562-022-01582-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valverde JC, Hernández MD, Giménez FA, García BG (2008) Growth, feed efficiency and condition of common octopus (Octopus vulgaris) fed on two formulated moist diets. Aquaculture. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.01.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valverde JC, Hernández MD, Giménez FA, García BG (2017) Development of low-lipid formulated feeds with different protein/energy ratios for Octopus vulgaris ongrowing. Aquac Nutr. https://doi.org/10.1111/anu.12435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zúñiga Ó, Olivares A, Rosas C (2014) Octopus mimus. In: Iglesias J, Fuentes L, Villanueva R (eds) Cephalopod culture. Springer, pp 397–413

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by A-STEP (Adaptable and Seamless Technology Transfer Program through Target-driven R&D) Stage-3 NexTEP-A type, Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST). JST grant number JPMJTT19A2. We thank the Tokai University Aquaculture Lab. graduate and undergraduate students for their generous cooperation in carrying out this research.

Funding

This work was supported by A-STEP (Adaptable and Seamless Technology Transfer Program through Target-driven R&D) Stage-3 NexTEP-A type, Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST). JST grant number JPMJTT19A2.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nobuhiko Akiyama.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Suzumura, Y., Matsubara, K., Morii, S. et al. Efficacy of octopus feed encased within a collagen membrane. Fish Sci 90, 257–267 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12562-023-01743-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12562-023-01743-0

Keywords

Navigation