Skip to main content
Log in

Level Control of Quadruple Tank System Based on Adaptive Inverse Evolutionary Neural Controller

  • Regular Paper
  • Intelligent Control and Applications
  • Published:
International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article proposes an adaptive inverse evolutionary neural (AIEN) controller for liquid level control of the quadruple tank system. Firstly, an inverse evolutionary neural model (IEN) that is utilized for offline identifying a dynamics of quadruple tank system, provides a feed-forward control signal from the reference liquid level. In which, the evolutionary neural model is a 3-layers neural network that is optimized by a hybrid method of modified differential evolution and backpropagation algorithm. Then, a hybrid feedforward and PID feedback control is realized to eliminate the steady-state error. Finally, to solve an uncertainty and disturbance characteristic, an adaptive law is proposed to adopt online in its operation. Simulation and real-time control experimental results demonstrated the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed approach for the quadruple-tank system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. I. Mizumoto, D. Ikeda, T. Hirahata, and Z. Iwai, “Design of discrete time adaptive PID control systems with parallel feedforward compensator,” Control Eng. Pract., vol. 18. no. 2, pp. 168–176, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Kumar and A. K. Singh, “Workload prediction in cloud using artificial neural network and adaptive differential evolution,” Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 81, pp. 41–52, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. L. Wei, F. Fang, and Y. Shi, “Adaptive backstepping-based composite nonlinear feedback water level control for the nuclear U-tube steam generator,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 369–377, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. K. H. Johansson, “The quadruple-tank process: a multi-variable laboratory process with an adjustable zero,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 456–465, 2000.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. C. Bennani, F. Bedouhene, H. Bibi, A. Zemouche, R. Ra-jamani, K. Chaib-Draa, and A. Aitouche, “Robust H∞ observer-based stabilization of linear discrete-time systems with parameter uncertainties,” Int. J. Control Autom. Syst., vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 2261–2273, 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Bououden, M. Chadli, and H. R. Karimi, “An ant colony optimization-based fuzzy predictive control approach for nonlinear processes,” Inf. Sci. (Ny)., vol. 299, pp. 143–158, 2015.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. T. Wang, H. Gao, and J. Qiu, “A combined adaptive neural network and nonlinear model predictive control for mul-tirate networked industrial process control,” IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 416–425, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Cetin, B. Bahtiyar, and S. Beyhan, “Adaptive uncertainty compensation-based nonlinear model predictive control with real-time applications,” Neural Comput. Appl, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 1029–1043, 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A. Thamallah, A. Sakly, and F. M’Sahli, “A new constrained PSO for fuzzy predictive control of Quadruple-Tank process,” Measurement, vol. 136, pp. 93–104, 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Yu, H. Dang, and L. Wang, “Fuzzy iterative learning control-based design of fault tolerant guaranteed cost controller for nonlinear batch processes,” Int. J. Control. Autom. Syst., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 2518–2527, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Kawato, “Feedback-error-learning neural network for supervised motor learning,” Adv. neural Comput., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 365–372, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  12. K. Sabahi, S. Ghaemi, and M. A. Badamchizadeh, “Feedback error learning-based type-2 fuzzy neural network predictive controller for a class of nonlinear input delay systems,” Trans. Inst. Meas. Control, 2019. DOI: 10.1177/0142331219834998

    Google Scholar 

  13. C. Zhang and J. Li, “Adaptive iterative learning control for nonlinear pure-feedback systems with initial state error based on fuzzy approximation,” J. Franklin Inst., vol. 351, no. 3, pp. 1483–1500, 2014.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Rawat and M. J. Nigam, “Feedback error based discontinuous and continuous variable learning rate CMAC,” Int. J. Electron. Electr. Eng, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 305–310, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. Sabahi and M. Teshnehlab, “Recurrent fuzzy neural network by using feedback error learning approaches for LFC in interconnected power system,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 938–946, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. H. Zhao, H. Liu, J. Xu, and W. Deng, “Performance prediction using high-order differential mathematical morphology gradient spectrum entropy and extreme learning machine,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 2019. DOI: 10.1109/TIM.2019.2948414

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. P. Piotrowski, “Differential evolution algorithms applied to neural network training suffer from stagnation,” Appl. Soft Comput., vol. 21, pp. 382–406, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Mohammadi, M. Lakestani, and M. H. Mohamed, “Intelligent parameter optimization of Savonius rotor using artificial neural network and genetic algorithm,” Energy, vol. 143, pp. 56–68, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. A. A. Alnaqi, H. Moayedi, A. Shahsavar, and T. K. Nguyen, “Prediction of energetic performance of a building integrated photovoltaic/thermal system thorough artificial neural network and hybrid particle swarm optimization models,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 183, pp. 137–148, 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. I. Aljarah, H. Faris, and S. Mirjalili, “Optimizing connection weights in neural networks using the whale optimization algorithm,” Soft Comput, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. A. ElSaid, F. El Jamiy, J. Higgins, B. Wild, and T. Desell, “Optimizing long short-term memory recurrent neural networks using ant colony optimization to predict turbine engine vibration,” Appl. Soft Comput., vol. 73, pp. 969–991, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. W. Deng, J. Xu, and H. Zhao, “An improved ant colony optimization algorithm based on hybrid strategies for scheduling problem,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 20281–20292, 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. W. Deng, H. Zhao, L. Zou, G. Li, X. Yang, and D. Wu, “A novel collaborative optimization algorithm in solving complex optimization problems,” Soft Comput., vol. 21, no. 15, pp. 4387–4398, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. A. Anand and L. Suganthi, “Hybrid GA-PSO optimization of artificial neural network for forecasting electricity demand,” Energies, vol. 11, no. 4, p. 728, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. R. Storn and K. Price, “Differential evolution-a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces,” J. Glob. Optim., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 341–359, 1997.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. B. Subudhi and D. Jena, “A differential evolution based neural network approach to nonlinear system identification,” Appl. Soft Comput., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 861–871, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. T. J. Choi, J.-H. Lee, H. Y. Youn, and C. W. Ahn, “Adaptive differential evolution with elite opposition-based learning and its application to training artificial neural networks,” Fundam. Informaticae, vol. 164, no. 2–3, pp. 227–242, 2019.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. S. N. Nguyen, V. Ho-Huu, and A. P. H. Ho, “A neural differential evolution identification approach to nonlinear systems and modelling of shape memory alloy actuator,” Asian J. Control, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 57–70, 2018.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. N. Ngoc Son, H. P. H. Anh, and N. Thanh Nam, “Robot manipulator identification based on adaptive multiple-input and multiple-output neural model optimized by advanced differential evolution algorithm,” Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst.,vol. 14, no. 1, 2016. DOI: 10.1177/1729881416677695

    Google Scholar 

  30. N. N. Son, H. P. H. Anh, and T. D. Chau, “Adaptive neural model optimized by modified differential evolution for identifying 5-DOF robot manipulator dynamic system,” Soft Comput., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 979–988, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. M. Wang, J. Luo, J. Fang, and J. Yuan, “Optimal trajectory planning of free-floating space manipulator using differential evolution algorithm,” Adv. Sp. Res., vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 1525–1536, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. J. Nakanishi and S. Schaal, “Feedback error learning and nonlinear adaptive control,” Neural Networks, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 1453–1465, 2004.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. X. Ruan, M. Ding, D. Gong, and J. Qiao, “On-line adaptive control for inverted pendulum balancing based on feedback-error-learning,” Neurocomputing, vol. 70, no. 4–6, pp. 770–776, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. K. Sabahi, S. Ghaemi, and S. Pezeshki, “Application of type-2 fuzzy logic system for load frequency control using feedback error learning approaches,” Appl. Soft Comput., vol. 21, pp. 1–11, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. K. Kurosawa, R. Futami, T. Watanabe, and N. Hoshimiya, “Joint angle control by FES using a feedback error learning controller,” IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 359–371, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nguyen Ngoc Son.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Recommended by Associate Editor Quoc Chi Nguyen under the direction of Editor-in-Chief Keum-Shik Hong. This work was supported by the National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED), under grant number MDT: 107.01-2018.318, Viet Nam. Supporting informations are available online at (https://youtu.be/PuARVJeQSac) and (https://drive.google.com/open?id=lmybyrhHiBvJtx3tSQzUz7hvLlYdTN2xL).

Nguyen Ngoc Son received his Ph.D. degrees from Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology in 2017. He is currently a Vice-Dean of the Faculty of Electronics Technology, Industrial University of Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam. His current research interests include artificial intelligence, robotics, identification, and intelligent control, internet of things.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Son, N.N. Level Control of Quadruple Tank System Based on Adaptive Inverse Evolutionary Neural Controller. Int. J. Control Autom. Syst. 18, 2386–2397 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-019-0504-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-019-0504-8

Keywords

Navigation