Skip to main content
Log in

Associations Between Patient Comfort with a Primary Care Provider and Three Measures of Behavioral Health Services Utilization

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Behavioral health services (BHS) can help improve and treat mental and emotional health problems. Yet, attitudinal and/or structural barriers often prevent individuals from accessing and benefiting from these services. Positive provider-patient interactions in healthcare, encompassing patient comfort with a primary care provider (PCP), which is often enhanced by shared decision-making, may mitigate the stigma associated with seeing a mental health professional; this may improve BHS utilization among patients who need these services. However, few studies have examined how patient comfort with a PCP, often through shared decision-making, may influence patients’ BHS utilization in the real world. This study sought to address this gap in practice.

Method

Multivariable regression analyses, using weighted data from an internet panel survey of Los Angeles County adults (n = 749), were carried out to examine the associations between patient comfort with a PCP and three measures of BHS utilization. Subsequent analyses were conducted to explore the extent to which shared decision-making moderated these associations.

Results

Participants who reported an intermediate or high comfort level with a provider had higher odds of reporting that they were likely to see (aOR = 2.10 and 3.84, respectively) and get advice (aOR = 2.75 and 4.76, respectively) from a mental health professional compared to participants who reported a low comfort level. Although shared decision-making influenced participants’ likelihood of seeing and getting advice from a mental health professional, it was not a statistically significant moderator in these associations.

Conclusion

Building stronger relationships with patients may improve BHS utilization, a provider practice that is likely underutilized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Data Availability

All data is available upon request.

References

  1. Ferrari A. Global, regional, and national burden of 12 mental disorders in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Psychiatry. 2022;9(2):137–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Andrade LH, Alonso J, Mneimneh Z, et al. Barriers to mental health treatment: results from the WHO World Mental Health surveys. Psychol Med. 2014;44(6):1303–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pachana NA, Laidlaw K, Konnert C, Petrovic-Poljak A. Barriers to mental healthcare utilization. In: The Oxford handbook of clinical geropsychology. Oxford University Press; 2014.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Wu T, Jia X, Shi H, et al. Prevalence of mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2021;281:91–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Theberath M, Bauer D, Chen W, Salinas M, Mohabbat AB, Yang J, et al. Effects of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health of children and adolescents: a systematic review of survey studies. SAGE Open Med. 2022;10.

  6. Kauhanen L, Wan Mohd Yunus WMA, Lempinen L, Peltonen K, Gyllenberg D, Mishina K, et al. A systematic review of the mental health changes of children and young people before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2023;32:995–1013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nguyen LH, Anyane-Yeboa A, Klaser K, Merino J, Drew DA, Ma W, et al. The mental health burden of racial and ethnic minorities during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS ONE. 2022;17: e0271661.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Vadivel R, Shoib S, El Halabi S, et al. Mental health in the post-COVID-19 era: challenges and the way forward. Gen Psychiatr. 2021;34(1):e100424.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Zangani C, Ostinelli EG, Smith KA, Hong JSW, Macdonald O, Reen G, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the global delivery of mental health services and telemental health: systematic review. JMIR Ment Health. 2022;9: e38600.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kola L, Kumar M, Kohrt BA, Fatodu T, Olayemi BA, Adefolarin AO. Strengthening public mental health during and after the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Lancet. 2022;399:1851–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Campion J, Javed A, Lund C, Sartorius N, Saxena S, Marmot M, et al. Public mental health: required actions to address implementation failure in the context of COVID-19. Lancet Psychiatry. 2022;9:169–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Carroll AE, Hayes D. The US mental health system is so broken that even money can’t fix it. JAMA Pediatr. 2023;177:8–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. World Health Organization. Comprehensive Mental Health Action Plan 2013–2030. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240031029. Accessed 17 Dec 2023.

  14. de Guzman E, Woods-Giscombe CL, Beeber LS. Barriers and facilitators of Hispanic older adult mental health service utilization in the USA. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2015;36(1):11–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jetty A, Petterson S, Westfall JM, Jabbarpour Y. Assessing primary care contributions to behavioral health: a cross-sectional study using medical expenditure panel survey. J Prim Care Community Health. 2021;12.

  16. Shannon PJ, Vinson GA, Cook TL, Lennon E. Characteristics of successful and unsuccessful mental health referrals of refugees. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2016;43(4):555–68.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kyanko KA, Curry AL, Keene ED, Sutherland R, Naik K, Busch SH. Does primary care fill the gap in access to specialty mental health care? A mixed methods study. J Gen Intern Med. 2022;37(7):1641.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Olfson M, Marcus SC, Druss B, Elinson L, Tanielian T, Pincus HA. National trends in the outpatient treatment of depression. JAMA. 2002;287(2):203–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Van Liew JR, Cvengros JA, Christensen AJ. Patient-provider interactions: promoting effective behavior and providing optimal care. Principles and Concepts of Behavioral Medicine: A Global Handbook; 2018. p. 595–621.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mathew BK, De Roza JG, Liu C, Goh LJ, Ooi CW, Chen E, et al. Which aspect of patient–provider relationship affects acceptance and adherence of insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus? A qualitative study in primary care. Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity. 2022;15:235–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ross LE, Vigod S, Wishart J, Waese M, Spence JD, Oliver J, et al. Barriers and facilitators to primary care for people with mental health and/or substance use issues: a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract. 2015;16:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kolcaba K. Comfort theory and practice: a vision for holistic health care and research. Springer Publishing Company; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Blinderman CD, Billings JA. Comfort care for patients dying in the hospital. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2549–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lin Y, Zhou Y, Chen C. Interventions and practices using Comfort Theory of Kolcaba to promote adults’ comfort: an evidence and gap map protocol of international effectiveness studies. Syst Rev. 2023;12:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Aubree Shay L, Lafata JE. Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes. Med Decis Making. 2014;35:114–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hughes TM, Merath K, Chen Q, Sun S, Palmer E, Idrees JJ, et al. Association of shared decision-making on patient-reported health outcomes and healthcare utilization. Am J Surg. 2018;216:7–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Drake RE, Cimpean D, Torrey WC. Shared decision making in mental health: prospects for personalized medicine. 2022;11(4):455–63.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Alegría M, Polo A, Gao S, et al. Evaluation of a patient activation and empowerment intervention in mental health care. Med Care. 2008;46(3):247–56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Chandra S, Mohammadnezhad M, Ward P. Trust and communication in a doctor- patient relationship: a literature review. J Healthc Commun. 2018;03(03).

  30. Deniz S, Akbolat M, Çimen M, Ünal Ö. The mediating role of shared decision-making in the effect of the patient-physician relationship on compliance with treatment. J Patient Exp. 2021;8.

  31. Loh A, Simon D, Wills CE, Kriston L, Niebling W, Härter M. The effects of a shared decision-making intervention in primary care of depression: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;67(3):324–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. American Psychiatric Association and Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine. Dissemination of integrated care within adult primary care settings: the collaborative care model. 2016. https://www.psychiatry.org/File%20Library/Psychiatrists/Practice/Professional-Topics/Integrated-Care/APA-APM-Dissemination-Integrated-Care-Report.pdf. Accessed 17 Dec 2023.

  33. Wensley C, Botti M, McKillop A, Merry AF. Maximising comfort: how do patients describe the care that matters? A two-stage qualitative descriptive study to develop a quality improvement framework for comfort-related care in inpatient settings. BMJ Open. 2020;10: e033336.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. United States Census Bureau. American Community Survey Questionnaire. http://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/methodology/questionnaires/2013/quest13.pdf. Accessed 17 Dec 2023.

  35. Department of Public Health - Health Assessment Unit - Background Methodology 2011. Accessed 27 Feb 2023.

  36. Robles B, Upchurch DM, Kuo T. Comparing complementary and alternative medicine use with or without including prayer as a modality in a local and diverse United States jurisdiction. Front Public Health. 2017;5(56). https://doi.org/10.3389/FPUBH.2017.00056.

  37. California Health Interview Survey. 2011 CHIS Adult Questionnaire. https://healthpolicy.ucla.edu/chis/design/Documents/_CHIS2011adultquestionnaireV24mar14.pdf. Accessed 27 Feb 2023.

  38. Thayaparan AJ, Mahdi E. The Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (PSQ-18) as an adaptable, reliable, and validated tool for use in various settings. Med Educ Online. 2013;18(1).

  39. Gregory PA, Austin Z. How do patients develop trust in community pharmacists? Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021;17:911–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Morgan PA, Smith VA, Berkowitz TSZ, Edelman D, Van Houtven CH, Woolson SL, et al. Impact of physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants on utilization and costs for complex patients. Health Aff (Millwood). 2019;38:1028–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Hartley S, Raphael J, Lovell K, Berry K. Effective nurse–patient relationships in mental health care: a systematic review of interventions to improve the therapeutic alliance. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020;102: 103490.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. D’Addario L, Kuo T, Robles B. Do knowledge about sodium, health status by self-report, and having hypertension predict sodium consumption behaviors among Southern California hospital employees? Transl Behav Med. 2021;11(6):1254–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/TBM/IBAA148.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Dewey G, Wickramasekaran RN, Kuo T, Robles B. Does sodium knowledge affect dietary choices and health behaviors? Results from a survey of Los Angeles County residents. Prev Chronic Dis. 2017;14(11). https://doi.org/10.5888/PCD14.170117.

  44. Chong K, Damiano PC, Hays RD. Psychometric Performance of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS ) 4.0 Adult Health Plan Survey. Primary Health Care. 2012.

  45. Berwick DM, Murphy JM, Goldman PA, Ware JE, Barsky AJ, Weinstein MC. Performance of a five-item mental health screening test. Med Care. 1991;29(2):169–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Robles B, Thomas CS, Lai ES, Kuo T. A geospatial analysis of health, mental health, and stressful community contexts in Los Angeles County. Prev Chronic Dis. 2019;16:E150. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd16.190138. PMID: 31701869; PMCID: PMC6880922.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Robles B, Kuo T, Tobin CST. What are the relationships between psychosocial community characteristics and dietary behaviors in a racially/ethnically diverse urban population in Los Angeles County? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH18189868.

  48. Birkhäuer J, Gaab J, Kossowsky J, et al. Trust in the health care professional and health outcome: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(2): e0170988.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Laugharne R, Priebe S. Trust, choice and power in mental health: a literature review. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2006;41(11):843–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00127-006-0123-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Grotts JH, Mead MM, Rab S, Walker IJ, Choi KR. Geospatial analysis of associations among mental health need, housing need, and involuntary psychiatric hospitalizations of people experiencing homelessness in Los Angeles County. Soc Sci Med. 2022;311.

  51. Lavingia R, Jones K, Asghar-Ali AA. A systematic review of barriers faced by older adults in seeking and accessing mental health care. J Psychiatr Pract. 2020;26(5):367–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Solway E, Estes CL, Goldberg S, Berry J. Access barriers to mental health services for older adults from diverse populations: perspectives of leaders in mental health and aging. J Aging Soc Policy. 2010;22(4):360–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Sorkin DH, Murphy M, Nguyen H, Biegler KA. Barriers to mental health care for an ethnically and racially diverse sample of older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;64(10):2138–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study is an analysis of existing data from an internet panel survey conducted by a survey firm in 2015. At the time, the firm was working with the Division of Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention in the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health to advance chronic disease prevention programming. Data analysis for the study was completed without funding support from any commercial or government entity.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

B.R. and T.K. conceptualized the initial survey design. B.R. was responsible for data collection. H.K. helped conceptualize the analysis plan and drafted the original version of the article. B.R. carried out the project’s analysis and drafted the final version of the article. T.K. provided iterative feedback and helped review and edit all versions of the main text for intellectual content. All authors contributed to the interpretation and presentation of the data and assisted with the preparation of the final version of the article. All authors have read and approved the article for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brenda Robles.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

The original internet panel survey, for which the present study is based on, was conducted according to the guidelines envisaged by the Declaration of Helsinki. All procedures involving study participants were approved by the Institutional Review Board at the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health.

Consent to Participate

Informed consent was obtained from all participants in the original internet panel survey.

Welfare of Animals

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 79 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Robles, B., Kwak, H. & Kuo, T. Associations Between Patient Comfort with a Primary Care Provider and Three Measures of Behavioral Health Services Utilization. Int.J. Behav. Med. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-024-10259-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-024-10259-5

Keywords

Navigation