Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Agglutinated foraminifera (superfamily Hormosinacea) across the Indian margin oxygen minimum zone (Arabian Sea)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Marine Biodiversity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a semi-quantitative survey of ‘live’ (stained) and dead hormosinacean foraminifera at six sites (500–2,000 m water depth; bottom-water oxygen concentrations 0.007–2.43 ml L−1) across the Indian margin oxygen minimum zone (OMZ). Abundance of stained and dead specimens was highest at 800 m followed by 1,100 m, lowest at 2,000 m (stained) and 500 m (dead). The peak at 800 m possibly represents a release from oxygen stress combined with a rich food supply (‘edge effect’). We recognised 31 species (27 Reophax, 2 Hormosinella, 1 Hormosina and 1 Nodosinella) among the 605 stained and dead specimens; the majority (21) are apparently undescribed. Species richness was low at 2,000 m; within the OMZ, it was maximal at 1,100 m and minimal at 500 m for both stained and dead populations. Three species (R. agglutinatus, R. aff. bilocularis and R. dentaliniformis) occurred across the entire depth range. However, most species were either confined to the 2,000-m site or to one or more sites within the OMZ. Multivariate analysis of assemblage composition revealed that the 2,000-m site was distinct from shallower sites. Within the OMZ, the 900- and 1,100-m sites were the most similar, and the 500-m site the most distinct. Stained:dead test ratios were maximal at 500–835 m, perhaps reflecting enhanced preservation of cytoplasm at very low oxygen concentrations. At least two Reophax species are common to the Indian and Pakistan margin OMZ; one of these may be confined to the core of the Arabian Sea OMZ.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akimoto K, Hattori M, Uematsu K, Kato C (2001) The deepest living foraminifera, Challenger Deep, Mariana Trench. Mar Micropaleontol 42:95–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Aranda da Silva AAS (2005) Benthic Protozoa community attributes in relation to environmental gradients in the Arabian Sea. PhD thesis, University of Southampton

  • Bernhard JM (1988) Post-mortem vital staining in benthic foraminifera; duration and importance in population and distributional studies. J Foramin Res 18:143–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhard JM, Sen Gupta BK, Borne P (1997) Benthic foraminifera as a proxy to estimate dysoxic bottom-water concentrations, Santa Barbara Basin, U.S. Pacific continental margin. J Foramin Res 27:301–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhard, JM, Sen Gupta BK (1999) Foraminifera of oxygen-depleted environments. In: Sen Gupta BK (ed) Modern foraminifera, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 201–216

  • Bernhard JM, Habura A, Bowser SS (2006) An endobiont-bearing allogromiid from the Santa Barbara Basin: implications for the early diversification of foraminifera. J Geophys Res 111, G03002. doi:10.1029/2005JG000158

  • Boulinier T, Nichols JD, Sauer JR, Hines JE, Pollock KH (1998) Estimating species richness: the importance of heterogeneity in species detectability. Ecology 79:1018–1028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady HB (1879) Notes on the reticularian Rhizopoda of the ‘Challenger’ expedition. I. On new and little known arenaceous types. Q J Microsc Sci 19:20–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady HB (1884) Report on the Foraminifera dredged by H.M.S Challenger during the years 1873–1876. Report of the scientific results of the voyage of H.M.S. Challenger, 1873–1876. Zoology 9:1–814

    Google Scholar 

  • Brönnimann P, Whittaker JE (1980) A revision of Reophax and its type species with remarks on several other recent hormosinids (Protozoa: Foraminifera) in the collections of the British Museum (Natural History). Bull Br Mus Nat Hist Zool 39:259–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Burmistrova II (1976) Benthic foraminifera in the deep-sea sediments of the Arabian Sea. Oceanology 16:394–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Cedhagen T (1993) Taxonomy and biology of Pelosina arborescens with comparative notes on Astrorhiza limicola (Foraminifera). Ophelia 37:143–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushman J (1912) New arenaceous Foraminifera from the Philippine Islands and contiguous waters. Proc US Nat Hist Mus 42:227–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushman J (1918) The Foraminifera of the Atlantic Ocean Part 1. Astrorhizidae. Bull US Nat Hist Mus 104:1–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz RJ, Rosenberg R (1995) Marine benthic hypoxia - review of ecological effects and behavioral responses on macrofauna. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 33:245–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Dulk M, Reichart GJ, Van Heyst S, Zachariasse WJ, Van der Zwaan, GJ (2000) Benthic foraminifera as proxies of organic matter flux and bottom water oxygenation? A case history from the northern Arabian Sea. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 161:337–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Erbacher J, Nelskamp S (2006) Comparison of benthic foraminifera inside and outside a sulphur-oxidising bacterial mat from the present oxygen-minimum zone off Pakistan (NE Arabian Sea). Deep-Sea Res I 53:751–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flint JM (1899) Recent foraminifera. A descriptive catalogue of specimens dredged by the U.S. Fish Commission steamer Albatross. Rep US Nat Mus for 1897:249–349

  • Fontanier C, Metzger E, Waelbroeck C, Joufreau M, LeFloch N, Jorissen F, Etcheber H, Bichon S, Chabaud G, Poirier D, Grémare A, Deflandre B (2013) Live (stained) benthic foraminifera off Walvis Bay, Namibia: a deep-sea ecosystem under the influence of bottom nepheloid layers. J Foramin Res 43:55–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geslin E, Heinz P, Hemleben Ch (2004) Behaviour of Bathysiphon sp. and Siphonammina bertholdii n.gen n.sp. under controlled oxygen conditions in the laboratory: implication for bioturbation. In: Bubik M, Kaminski MA (eds) 2004. Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Agglutinated Foraminifera, Grzybowski Foundation Special Publication 8:105–118

  • Gooday AJ (2003) Benthic foraminifera (Protista) as tools in deep-water palaeoceanography: environmental influences on faunal characteristics. Adv Mar Biol 46:1–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Gooday AJ, Hughes JA (2002) Foraminifera associated with phytodetritus deposits at a bathyal site in the northern Rockall Trough (NE Atlantic): seasonal contrasts and comparison of stained and dead assemblages. Mar Micropaleontol 46:83–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gooday AJ, Bernhard JM, Levin LA, Suhr SB (2000) Foraminifera in the Arabian Sea oxygen minimum zone and other oxygen-deficient settings: taxonomic composition, diversity, and relation to metazoan faunas. Deep-Sea Res II 47:25–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gooday AJ, Jorissen F, Levin LA, Middelburg JJ, Naqvi SWA, Rabalais NN, Scranton M, Zhang J (2009a) Historical records of coastal eutrophication-induced hypoxia. Biogeosciences 6:1707–1745

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gooday AJ, Levin LA, Aranda da Silva A, Bett BJ, Cowie GL, Dissard D, Gage JD, Hughes DJ, Jeffreys R, Lamont PA, Larkin KE, Murty SJ, Schumacher S, Whitcraft C, Woulds C (2009b) Faunal responses to oxygen gradients on the Pakistan margin: a comparison of foraminiferans, macrofauna and megafauna. Deep-Sea Res II 56:488–502

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gooday AJ, Bett BJ, Escobar E, Ingole B, Levin LA, Neira C, Raman AV, Sellanes J (2010a) Biodiversity and habitat heterogeneity in oxygen minimum zones. Mar Ecol 31:125–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gooday AJ, Malzone MG, Bett BJ, Lamont PA (2010b) Decadal-scale changes in shallow-infaunal foraminiferal assemblages at the Porcupine Abyssal Plain, NE Atlantic. Deep-Sea Res II 57:1362–1382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK (2001) Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol Lett 4:379–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinz P, Hemleben C (2003) Regional and seasonal variations of recent benthic deep-sea foraminifera in the Arabian Sea. Deep-Sea Res I 50:435–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinz P, Hemleben C (2006) Foraminiferal response to the Northeast Monsoon in the western and southern Arabian Sea. Mar Micropaleontol 58:103–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helly JJ, Levin LA (2004) Global distribution of naturally occurring marine hypoxia on continental margins. Deep-Sea Res I 51:1159–1168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hermelin JOR, Shimmield GB (1990) The importance of the oxygen minimum zone and sediment geochemistry in the distribution of recent benthic foraminifera in the Northwest Indian Ocean. Mar Geol 91:1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess S, Kuhnt W, Hill S, Kaminski MA, Holbourn A, de Leon M (2001) Monitoring the recolonization of the Mt Pinatubo 1991 ash layer by benthic foraminifera. Mar Micropaleontol 43:119–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofker J (1972) Primitive Agglutinated Foraminifera. Brill, Leiden

  • Hunter WR (2011) Epi-benthic megafaunal zonation across an oxygen minimum zone at the Indian continental margin. Deep-Sea Res I 58:699–710

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ingole BS, Sautya S, Sivades S, Singh R, Nanajkar M (2010) Macrofaunal community structure in the western Indian continental margin including the oxygen minimum zone. Mar Ecol 31:148–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jannink NT, Zachariasse WJ, Van der Zwan GJ (1998) Living (Rose Bengal stained) benthic foraminifera from the Pakistan continental margin (northern Arabian Sea). Deep-Sea Res I 45:1483–1513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorissen FJ (1999) Benthic foraminiferal microhabitats below the sediment water interface. In: Sen Gupta BK (ed) Modern Foraminifera. Kluwer, Norwell, pp 161–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorissen FJ, Wittling I (1999) Ecological evidence from taphonomical studies; living-dead comparisons of benthic foraminiferal faunas off Cape Blanc (NW Africa). Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 149:151–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorissen FJ, de Stigter HC, Widmark JGV (1995) A conceptual model explaining benthic foraminiferal microhabitats. Mar Micropaleontol 19:131–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaminski MA, Boersma A, Tyszka J, Holbourn AEL (1995) Response of deep-water agglutinated foraminifera to dysoxic conditions in the California borderland basins. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Agglutinated Foraminifera. Grzybowski Foundation Spec Publ 3:131–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaminski MA, Grassle JF, Whitlatch RB (1988) Life history and recolonization among agglutinated foraminifera in the Panama Basin. In: Gradstein FM, Rögl F (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Agglutinated Foraminifera. Abhandlungen der Geologischen Bundesanstalt, Wien, 41:229–244

  • Kamykowski D, Zentara SJ (1990) Hypoxia in the world ocean as recorded in the historical data set. Deep-Sea Res 37:1861–1874

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karstensen J, Stramma L, Visbeck M (2008) Oxygen minimum zones in the eastern tropical Atlantic and Pacific oceans. Prog Oceanogr 77:331–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurbjeweit F, Hemleben CH, Schmiedl G, Schiebel R, Pfannkuche O, Wallmann K, Schafer P (2000) Distribution, biomass and diversity of benthic foraminifera in relation to sediment geochemistry in the Arabian Sea. Deep-Sea Res II 47:2913–2955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larkin KE (2006) Community and trophic responses of benthic foraminifera to oxygen gradients and organic enrichment. Dissertation, University of Southampton

  • Larkin KE, Gooday AJ (2009) Foraminiferal faunal responses to monsoon driven changes in organic matter and oxygen availability at 140 and 300 m water depth in the NE Arabian Sea. Deep-Sea Res II 56:403–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loeblich AR, TappanH (1987) Foraminiferal genera and their classification. Van Nostra and Reinhold, New York

  • Levin LA (2003) Oxygen minimum zone benthos: adaptation and community response to hypoxia. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 41:1–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin LA (2005) Deep-Ocean life where oxygen is scarce. Am Sci 90:436–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin LA, Gage JD (1998) Relationships between oxygen, organic matter and the diversity of bathyal macrofauna. Deep-Sea Res II 45:129–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levin LA, Childers SE, Smith CR (1991) Epibenthic, agglutinating foraminiferans in the Santa Catalina Basin and their response to disturbance. Deep-Sea Res 38:465–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin LA, Gage J, Lamont P, Cammidge L, Martin C, Patience A, Crooks J (1997) Infaunal community structure in a low-oxygen, organic rich habitat on the Oman continental slope, NW Arabian Sea. In: Hawkins L, Hutchinson S (eds) Responses of marine organisms to their environments: proceedings of the 30th European Marine Biology Symposium. University of Southampton, United Kingdom, pp 223–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin LA, Rathburn AE, Neira C, Sellanes J, Munoz P, Gallardo V, Salamanca M (2002) Benthic processes on the Peru margin: a transect across the oxygen-minimum zone during the 1997–1998 El Niño. Prog Oceanogr 53:1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadows A, Meadows PS, West FJC, Murray JMH (2000) Bioturbation, geochemistry and geotechnics of sediments affected by the oxygen minimum zone on the Oman continental slope and abyssal plain, Arabian Sea. Deep-Sea Res II 47:259–280

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Milliman JD, Troy PJ, Balch WM, Adams AK, Li YH, Mackenzie FT (1999) Biologically mediated dissolution of calcium carbonate above the chemical lysocline? Deep-Sea Res I 46:1653–1669

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murray JW (1991) Ecology and palaeoecology of benthic foraminifera. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray JW, Bowser SE (2000) Mortality, protoplasm decay rate, and reliability of staining techniques to recognise “living” foraminifera: a review. J Foramin Res 30:66–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nozawa F, Kitazato H, Tsuchiya M, Gooday AJ (2006) ‘Live’ benthic foraminifera at an abyssal site in the equatorial Pacific nodule province: abundance, diversity and taxonomic composition. Deep-Sea Res I 53:1406–1422

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver PG (2001) Functional morphology and description of a new species of Amygdalum (Mytiloidea) from the oxygen-minimum zone of the Arabian Sea. J Molluscan Stud 67:225–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phleger FB, Soutar A (1973) Production of benthic foraminifera in three east Pacific oxygen minima. Micropaleontology 19:110–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichart GL, Lourens LJ, Zachariasse WJ (1998) Temporal variability in the northern Arabian Sea oxygen-minimum zone during the last 225,000 years. Paleoceanography 13:607–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resig JM, Glenn CR (1997) Foraminifera encrusting phosphoritic hardgrounds of the Peruvian upwelling zone: taxonomy, geochemistry, and distribution. J Foramin Res 27:133–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhumbler L (1911) Die Foraminiferen (Thalamophoren) der Plankton Expedition. Zugleich Entwurf eines natuerlichen Systems der Foraminiferen auf Grund selektonischer und mechanisch-physiologischer Faktoren. Erste Teil, Die allgemeinen Organizationsverhaltnisse der Foraminiferen. Ergebnisse der Plankton-Expedition der Humboldt Stiftung. von Lipsius & Tischer, Kiel und Leipzig

  • Schiebel R (1992) Rezente benthische Foraminiferen in Sedimenten des Schelfes und oberen Kontinentalhanges im Golf von Guinea (Westafrika). Ber Geol-Paläontol Inst Univ Kiel 51:1–126, tables I–XII, pls 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmiedl G, Mackensen A, Müller PJ (1997) Recent benthic foraminifera from the eastern South Atlantic Ocean: dependence on food supply and water masses. Mar Micropaleontol 32:249–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schröder CJ (1986) Deep-water arenaceous foraminifera in the northwest Atlantic Ocean. Can Tech Rep Hydrogr Ocean Sci 71:1–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröder CJ, Scott DB, Medioli FS, Bernstein BB, Hessler RR (1988) Larger agglutinated foraminifera: Comparison of assemblages from central North Pacific and western North Atlantic (Nares Abyssal Plain). J Foramin Res 18:25–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher S, Jorissen FJ, Dissard D, Larkin KE, Gooday AJ (2007) Live (Rose Bengal stained) and dead benthic foraminifera from the oxygen minimum zone of the Pakistan continental margin (Arabian Sea). Mar Micropaleontol 65:45–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott DB, Franco SM, Schafer CT (2001) Monitoring in coastal environments using foraminifera and thecamobian indicators. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Setty MGAP (1982) Recent marine microfauna from the continental margin, west coast of India. J Sci Ind Res India 41:674–679

    Google Scholar 

  • Setty MGAP, Nigam R (1982) Foraminiferal assemblages and organic carbon relationship in benthic marine ecosystem of western Indian continental shelf. Indian J Mar Sci 11:225–232

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Timm S (1992) Rezente Tiefsee-Benthosforaminiferen aus Oberflächensedimenten des Golfes von Guinea (Westafrika) - Taxonomie, Verbreitung, Ökologie und Korngrößenfraktionen. Ber Geol-Paläontol Inst Univ Kiel 59:1–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Todo Y, Kitazato H, Hashimoto J, Gooday AJ (2005) Simple foraminifera flourish at the ocean’s deepest point. Science 307:689

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton WR (1952) Techniques for recognition of living foraminifera. Contrib Cushman Found Foramin Res 3:56–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyrtki K (1973) Physical oceanography of the Indian Ocean: The Biology of the Indian Ocean. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng S, Fu Z (2001) Fauna Sinica; Phylum Granuloreticulosa, Class Foraminifera, Agglutinated Foraminifera. Science Press, Beijing, China

  • Zobel B (1973) Biostratigraphische Untersuchungen an Sedimenten des indisch-pakistanischen Kontinentalrandes (Arabisches Meer). ‘Meteor’ Forsch-Ergeb C 12:9–73

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the captain and crew of the RV “Yokosuka” and the pilots and staff of the “Shinkai 6500” for their assistance with the field operations. We thank the scientists participating in RV “Yokosuka” cruise YK08-11 for their assistance, especially Kazumasa Oguri and Hisami Suga, who generously provided the environmental data in Table 1, Lisa Levin, Hidetaka Nomaki and Ursula Witte for permission to cite their unpublished observations, and Will Hunter, Lisa Levin, Hidetaka Nomaki, Ursula Witte and Claire Woulds, who helped with the faunal work at sea. We thank Dr Kate Larkin for permission to use her photographs of Pakistan margin Reophax species (Figs. 5, 6). Two anonymous reviewers made helpful comments that improved the manuscript. We are particularly grateful to Hiroshi Kitazato for inviting one of us (A.J.G.) to participate in YK08-11.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy Taylor.

Appendix 1: Species descriptions

Appendix 1: Species descriptions

The following section provides brief descriptions of the species recognised in this study. Some species originally assigned to Reophax have been assigned to other genera by later authors (e.g. R. dentaliniformis to Hormosina and Nodulina). For simplicity, we have adopted a conservative approach by retaining the majority of our species in the genus Reophax. Most are illustrated in Figs. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Hormosinaceans from the Indian margin. SEM images (a, b, d, f, h, j); reflected light images (c, e, g, i). Hormosinella ovicula Brady, 1879; Dive 1098, 2,000 m (a). Nodosinella gaussica Rhumbler, 1913; Dive 1098, 2,000 m (b). Reophax agglutinatus Cushman, 1913; Dive 1101, 800 m (c, d). Reophax aff bilocularis Flint, 1899 (e, f). Dive 1101, 800 m. Reophax dentaliniformis Brady 1881; Dive 1101, 800 m (g, h). Reophax horridus Cushman, 1912; Dive 1101-2, 900m (i, j). All scale bars 500 μm

Fig. 8
figure 8

Hormosinaceans from the Indian margin. Left-hand column reflected light images; right-hand column SEM images. Reophax aff. scorpiurus de Montfort, 1808, same specimen; Dive 1098, 2,000 m (a, b). Reophax aff spiculifer Brady, 1881, same specimen; Dive 1100, 900 m (c, d). Reophax sp. 1, same specimen; Dive 1099, 1,100 m (e, f). Reophax sp. 2; Dive 1101, 800 m (g, h). Reophax sp. 3; Dive 1099, 1,100 m (i, j). Reophax sp. 4 (the apertural neck appears to be damaged in this specimen); Dive 1099, 1,100 m (k, l). All scale bars 500 μm except where indicated otherwise

Fig. 9
figure 9

Hormosinaceans from the Indian margin. Left-hand column reflected light images; right-hand column SEM images. In all cases, the same specimen has been illustrated using the two methods. Reophax sp. 5; Dive 1100, 900 m (a, b). Reophax sp. 6; Dive 1098, 2,000 m (c, d). Reophax sp. 7; Dive 1102, 500 m (e, f). Reophax sp. 8; Dive 1101, 800 m (g, h). Reophax sp. 9; Dive 1099, 1,100 m (i, j). All scale bars  500 μm

Fig. 10
figure 10

Hormosinaceans from the Indian margin. Left-hand column reflected light images; right-hand column SEM images. Reophax sp. 10, same specimen; Dive 1101, 800 m (a, b). Reophax sp. 10A same specimen; Dive 1101, 800 m (c, d). Reophax sp. 11; Dive 1101, 800 m (e, f). Reophax sp. 12; Dive 1100, 900 m (g, h). Reophax sp. 13; Dive 1099, 1,100 m (i, j). Reophax sp. 14 same specimen; Dive 1099, 1,100 m (k, l). All scale bars 500 μm

Fig. 11
figure 11

Hormosinaceans from the Indian margin. Left-hand column reflected light images; right-hand column SEM images. In all cases, the same specimen has been illustrated using the two methods. Reophax sp. 15; Dive 1101, 800 m (a, b). Reophax sp. 16; initial chamber lost during preparation for SEM; Dive 1099, 1,100 m (c, d). Reophax sp. 17; Dive 1100, 900 m (e, f). Reophax sp. 18; same specimen; Dive 1100, 900 m (g, h). Reophax sp. 19; Dive 1100, 900 m (i, j). Reophax sp. 20; Dive 1100–1, 835 m (k, l). All scale bars 500 μm

Superfamily Hormosinacea Haeckel 1894

Family Hormosinidae Haeckel 1894

Hormosinella distans (Brady, 1881)

Chambers ovate and well separated by thin neck. Wall very thin, composed of fine-grained material. All specimens in our material were broken. They resemble those illustrated by Brady (1884, pl. 31, figs. 18–22).

Hormosinella ovicula Brady, 1879

Fig. 7a

Chambers droplet-shaped with adjacent chambers separated by elongated necks. Apertural neck well defined. Test wall fine-grained. Length up to 1.7 mm. Our specimens resemble those illustrated by Brady (1879, pl. 4, fig. 6)

Hormosina globulifera Brady, 1879

Four to five large, globular chambers. Wall composed of fine-grained material. Terminal aperture located at end of narrow neck. Our specimens resemble those illustrated by Brady (1879, pl. 4, figs. 4 and 5).

Nodosinella gaussica Rhumbler, 1913

Fig. 7b

Large, robust species with flask-shaped chambers. Test fine-grained, well cemented, with a smooth outer surface. Length up to 2.25 mm. Our specimens resemble those illustrated by Zheng and Fu (2001, pl. 15, figs. 1, 2).

Reophax agglutinatus Cushman, 1913

Fig. 7c, d

Test large, compact, comprising 3 or more chambers increasing rapidly in size but largely obscured by the globigerinacean shells of which the wall is composed. In particular, the final two chambers are dominated by large Globorotalia shells. Coccoliths and other fine particles fill in the small spaces between the large particles. Gently tapered apertural neck made of small Globigerina shells distinctly developed. Length up to 2.25 mm.

Remarks A variety of test morphologies have been illustrated under this name. Our specimens resemble those illustrated by Zheng and Fu (2001, pl. 13, figs. 12a–13b). Schröder (1986, pl. 23, top left specimen from 2750 m depth in the NW Atlantic) illustrates a similar specimen as Reophax scorpiurus.

Reophax aff. bilocularis Flint, 1899

Fig. 7e, f

Test comprises two fairly well-rounded chambers, each longer than broad, and with the final chamber larger than initial chamber. Wall with fairly smooth surface, composed of coccoliths and small globigerinacean shells. Aperture located at end of short neck. Length up to 960 μm.

Remarks The name Reophax bilocularis has been applied to a variety of 2-chambered hormosinaceans with walls composed of different types of agglutinated particle. It probably represents a species complex rather than a single species. In our form, the test is asymmetrical about the longitudinal axis and there is no constriction between the two chambers. Several of the specimens from the North Carolina margin (1,423 m depth) illustrated by Flint (1899, pl. 17, fig. 2) are also not symmetrical, although the two chambers are more clearly delineated than in this Indian margin form. The only other similar species, R. subfusiformis Earland 1934, usually has 3–4 chambers, the final one being clearly tapered.

Reophax dentaliniformis Brady, 1881

Figs. 5a and 7g, h

Test slender, tapering, composed of up to 8 chambers arranged along a straight or curved axis. Final chamber typically elongate with more or less parallel sides. Wall made of coarse sand grains with relatively smooth outer surface and incorporating a few sponge spicules. Short cylindrical apertural neck. Length 1,030–1,550 μm.

Remarks Brönnimann and Whittaker (1980) placed Reophax dentaliniformis in Hormosina because of its symmetrical chambers, lack of an upturned “tail” and distinct neck. We follow Schröder (1986) and several other authors in retaining it within Reophax. Except for having more chambers, our Indian margin specimens are fairly similar to Brady’s (1884, pl. 30, figs. 21, 22) syntypes, one of which we illustrate in Fig. 5b for comparison. The photograph of R. aff. R. dentaliniformis, also from the Indian margin, in Zobel (1973, pl. 1, fig. 27) seems more similar to R. dentaliniformis of Larkin and Gooday (2009). The two specimens illustrated by Hermelin and Shimmield (1990, pl. 1, figs. 1–2) have fewer chambers than our specimens and the final chambers have a bulbous or tapered outline, rather than being parallel sided.

Reophax aff. horridus Cushman, 1912

Fig. 7i, j

Chambers globular and clearly differentiated from each other. Wall coarse-grained, composed of mineral grains with numerous randomly protruding sponge spicules, giving a bristly appearance. Terminal chamber tapers to an apertural neck made of same material as the rest of the test. Length up to 1,900 μm.

Remarks In specimens of Reophax horridus illustrated by both Cushman (1912, pl. 28, figs. 3, 4) and Schröder (1986, pl. 15, figs. 6, 7) the sponge spicules are all oriented in one direction (backwards). In the Indian margin specimens, however, the spicules are randomly oriented. This could reflect a species-level difference and our identification is therefore tentative.

Reophax aff. scorpiurus de Montfort, 1808

Fig. 8a, b

Test elongate and slender, comprising 4–6 fairly chambers that become more elongate distally. Most chambers with ventricose asymmetry (shorter on one side than on outer side); final chamber tapering into slender neck. Earliest chambers curved or angled upwards, producing scorpion-like proximal “flick”. Wall coarse-grained, composed of mineral grains with scattered sponge spicules. Length typically ∼1,000 μm.

Remarks Since Reophax scorpiurus was first described from Adriatic beach sands (Brönnimann and Whittaker 1980), the name has been applied to a wide range of forms from shallow and deep water, which almost certainly represent different species (e.g. Schröder 1986). One of the specimens illustrated by Schröder (1986, pl. 14, fig. 5) is fairly similar to our form, although it is more slender and originates from much deeper water. Reophax scorpiurus of Zobel (1973, pl. 1, fig. 54) from the Indian margin appears to be a different species.

Reophax aff. spiculifer Brady, 1879

Fig. 8c, d

Test elongate, more or less straight, comprising several slim chambers that increase in size distally. Walls composed of sponge spicules and fairly coarse-grained mineral particles. Terminal chamber elongate and tapering slightly to apertural neck. Small fragments of sponge spicules form ring around terminal aperture. Length typically ∼660 μm.

Remarks The chambers are similar in shape to those of Brady’s (1884, pl. 31, figs. 16, 17) species, but the wall incorporates mineral grains in addition to sponge spicules, and the spicules themselves are arranged less neatly than in Brady’s illustration. On the other hand, spicules are more numerous, and the chambers are more streamlined, than in Schiebel’s (1992, pl. 8, fig. 10) illustration.

Reophax species 1

Fig. 8e, f

Test composed of 4 or more approximately spherical chambers, fairly well differentiated from one another and arranged along a slightly curved or nearly straight axis. Wall composed of heterogeneous mixture of mineral grains, intact and fragmentary radiolarians, and sponge spicules, resulting in highly irregular surface. Spaces between larger grains filled with coccoliths and other fine particles. Narrow but clearly-developed, parallel-sided apertural neck. Length typically ∼1,690 μm (Fig. 6a, b).

Remarks

This species most closely resembles Hormosina spiculifera Hofker 1972, from bathyal depths in the Caribbean but has less distinct sutures between the chambers and an even more irregular test surface due to the incorporation of radiolarian tests into the wall.

Reophax species 2

Fig. 8g, h

Test comprises 3 chambers arranged along a straight axis and increasing in size distally; the final chamber is flask-shaped with relatively large aperture. Wall coarse-grained, composed of a mixture of mineral grains and projecting sponge spicules giving the test a bristly appearance. Most spicules are directed backwards. Length ∼1,200 μm.

Reophax species 3

Fig. 8i, j

Test comprises at least 4 chambers arranged along a straight axis and increasing gradually in size. Wall composed of a wide variety of particles, including mineral grains, radiolarian and sponge spicule fragments with fine-grained material dominated by coccoliths filling the interstices between the larger grains. Apertural neck fairly wide and well developed, composed mainly of smaller mineral grains. Length typically ∼1,000 μm.

Reophax species 4

Figs. 5e and 8k, l

Test composed of 6–7 rounded, clearly-defined chambers. Test coarse-grained and consisting mainly of mineral grains with occasional protruding sponge spicules. Aperture at end of short neck composed of finer-grained material than rest of test. Length 1,100–1,500 μm.

Reophax species 5

Fig. 9a, b

Test comprises at least 3 slender, flask-shaped chambers arranged along a more or less linear axis. Wall made of fairly small mineral grains and sponge spicules set in a fine-grained matrix. Most of the spicules are flat-lying and do not protrude from the wall. Terminal chamber tapers into a slender apertural neck. Length 600 μm.

Remarks The flask-shaped, clearly delimited chambers distinguish this species from R. spiculifer.

Reophax species 6

Fig. 9c, d

Test with at least 4 chambers arranged on a linear axis. Chambers are rather globular but closely abutting; apertural neck not developed. Wall fairly coarse-grained, composed of mineral grains and flat-lying sponge spicules. Length ∼1,220 μm.

Reophax species 7

Figs 6a, 9e, f

Test comprises 3 or more indistinct chambers, arranged along a more or less linear axis. Final chamber tapers to distinct apertural neck. Wall muddy-brown in colour, fine-grained, composed of coccoliths and clay particles. Length ∼1,180 μm.

Remarks This species is identical to Reophax sp. 2 of Larkin and Gooday (2009), which is common at 300 m depth on the Pakistan margin.

Reophax species 8

Fig. 9g, h

Test comprises 4–5 bulbous and fairly distinct chambers. The final flask-shaped chamber tapers to short, fairly wide apertural neck. Wall composed of globigerinacean shells set in matrix of fine-grained particles with scattered, proximally directed sponge spicules. Length ∼1,920 μm.

Reophax species 9

Fig. 9i, j

Test composed of 6 chambers that are not clearly differentiated on the test exterior. Wall appears “muddy” under light microscope, composed of fairly large mineral grains embedded in a matrix consisting mainly of coccoliths. Prominent apertural neck composed of finer-grained material than rest of test. Terminal aperture with fine-grained flange. Length 1,500 μm.

Remarks This species resembles R. helenae (Rhumbler 1911) of Schröder (1986, pl. 15, fig. 8), from the abyssal NE Atlantic (4,180–5,779 m) and Timm (1992, pl. 2, fig. 5) from the Gulf of Guinea (3,987–4,970 m), but is rather more elongate with the widest point closer to the distal end and a shorter apertural neck. According to the original description (Rhumbler 1911), based on material collected at >4,000 m depth off St Vincent in the Caribbean, R. helenae has a test composed of large planktonic foraminiferal shell fragments, very different from the wall structure of the present species.

Reophax species 10

Fig. 10a, b

Test slender and delicate, composed of 4–5 poorly-defined chambers arranged along gently curved axis and increasing in size towards elongate final chamber, which merges into the apertural neck. Wall composed mainly of larger and smaller globigerinacean shells (many damaged or slightly dissolved) that tend to obscure the chamber shape. Fine-grained material (mainly coccoliths) fills the small spaces between the planktonic shells. Length ∼960 μm.

Remarks This fairly common species is similar in general form to Reophax aff. scorpiurus of the present study but has a completely different test wall composition (globigerinacean shells rather than mineral grains and sponge spicules). It also lacks the upturned early chambers of typical ‘Reophax scorpiurus’ morphotypes.

Reophax species 10A

Fig. 10c, d

Remarks This single specimen (length 1,040 μm) is probably a shorter and relatively wider variant of Reophax sp. 10, which it resembles in wall structure as well as general morphology. However, it is treated as a distinct form for the purposes of the present study.

Reophax species 11

Fig. 10e, f

Test comprising 2 chambers that tend to be more inflated than those of R. sp. 10. Final chamber produced into apertural neck composed of juvenile globigerinacean shells. Remainder of test wall consists of mainly small, but also scattered larger, globigerinacean shells with little intervening matrix. Length 770 μm.

Remarks The status of this bilocular form requires further investigation. At least some examples have broken proximal ends and probably represent incomplete specimens of Reophax sp. 10, which they closely resemble in wall structure and composition. However, in others, including the figured specimens, the proximal end is complete, suggesting that they may represent a distinct species.

Reophax species 12

Fig. 10g, h

Test comprising 2 rather bulbous, flask-shaped chambers (the proximal ends of the illustrated specimens are intact). Wall consists of larger and smaller globigerinacean shells with a few randomly arranged sponge spicules. Apertural neck not clearly developed. Length 1,460 μm.

Remarks This rare species differs from Reophax aff. bilocularis in having two chambers separated by a clearly developed constriction and a completely different test wall composition. It is about twice as large as the other bilocular form, Reophax sp. 11, from which it also differs in having a wall that incorporates sponge spicules as well as globigerinacean shells. It resembles R. bilocularis morphotype A of Fontanier et al. (2013, fig. 3.2) from much deeper water (2,974 m) on the Namibian margin, although the chambers are rather more elongate than the Namibian form.

Reophax species 13

Fig. 10i, j

Test slender, curved or straight consisting of up to 8 reasonable well-defined chambers, sometimes with upturned initial chambers as in R. scorpiurus. Wall consists mainly of larger and smaller planktonic foraminiferal shells with little intervening fine-grained material. Some dissolution of these planktonic shells is evident. Short cylindrical apertural neck composed of finer-grained material (mineral grains) than the rest of the test. Length ∼2,100 μm.

Remarks Larger and relatively wider than Reophax sp. 10 with rather more clearly-defined chambers composed entirely of globigerinacean shells, giving the test a ‘cleaner’, more uniform appearance. The chambers, particularly the final one, are more bulbous than those of R. sp. 10 and 10A.

Reophax species 14

Fig. 10k, l

Test elongate, comprising 5–6 chambers arranged along a curved axis; their shape is obscured by the mixture of larger and smaller planktonic foraminiferan shells of which the wall is constructed. A few benthic tests are also incorporated, and fine-grained material dominated by coccoliths fills spaces between the large particles. Long, cylindrical apertural neck composed of juvenile globigerinacean shells and with fine-grained rim around terminal aperture. Length ∼1,600 μm.

Remarks Larger and more robust than Reophax sp. 10 and with a more distinct apertural neck. Compared with R. sp. 10, the wall is composed of a more heterogeneous mixture of smaller and larger globigerinacean shells, which include flat Globorotalia tests.

Reophax species 15

Fig. 11a, b

Test elongate comprising 4–5 chambers arranged along a straight or slightly curved axis. Wall a very heterogeneous mixture of larger and smaller globigerinacean shells. Relatively short apertural neck made of small globigerinacean shells. Length 1,600–1,700 μm.

Remarks Similar to Reophax sp. 10 in general shape but considerably larger, straighter, and with a more irregular appearance due to the incorporation of large shells into the test wall. In both these respects it resembles R. sp. 14 but the test is straight rather than curved and lacks the distinctive neck of that species.

Reophax species 16

Fig. 11c, d

Test with 2–3 chambers arranged on a straight axis. Chambers globular and well differentiated, each tapering towards the next chamber. Wall composed mainly of globigerinacean shells and sponge spicules. Final chamber tapers into a long apertural neck made from progressively finer-grained material, including some juvenile planktonic shells. Length ∼1,700 μm.

Reophax species 17

Fig. 11e, f

Test with up to 4 chambers arranged along a slightly curved axis and ranging in shape from spherical at the proximal end to flask-shaped at the distal end. Final chamber produced into a pronounced apertural neck composed of small juvenile globigerinacean shells grading into finer mineral particles and ending in a distinctive flange, formed of very fine particles. Main part of test wall composed of globigerinacean shells and shell fragments together with sponge spicules and occasional benthic foraminiferal tests and radiolarian fragments. Some dissolution of globigerinacean shells observed. Length ∼1,550 μm.

Reophax species 18

Fig. 11g, h

Test comprising 3 chambers arranged on a linear axis. Wall composed of globigerinacean shells set in a fine-grained matrix composed mainly of coccoliths. Final chamber flask-shaped, tapering to a distinct apertural neck made of finer-grained material than the rest of the test. Length 1,400 μm.

Reophax species 19

Fig. 11i, j

Test compact, comprising 2 chambers arranged on a linear axis. Final chamber appears flask-shaped. However, both chambers are obscured by the very coarsely agglutinated wall, which is composed of a jumble of larger and smaller globigerinacean shells and large shell fragments with little intervening fine-grained matrix. Scattered sponge spicules, most directed backwards, protrude from wall. Apertural neck relatively short, broad and cylindrical and composed of fine mineral grains. Length ∼1,400 μm.

Remarks It is possible that this form is a variant of Reophax species 18. It requires further study.

Reophax species 20

Fig. 11k, l

Test comprises 2 or more slender, indistinct chambers, arranged on a straight or slightly curving axis. Wall composed of globigerinacean shells that are set into the wall and do not project to any significant extent. As a result, the wall appears white and shiny under the light microscope. Terminal chamber tapers to an apertural neck which is made of finer-grained juvenile globigerinacean shells. Length ∼1,000 μm.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taylor, A., Gooday, A.J. Agglutinated foraminifera (superfamily Hormosinacea) across the Indian margin oxygen minimum zone (Arabian Sea). Mar Biodiv 44, 5–25 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12526-013-0178-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12526-013-0178-z

Keywords

Navigation