Skip to main content
Log in

Model Based Four and Six Component Decompositions for Soil Moisture Retrieval

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soil moisture in bare and vegetation covered soil and its spatio-temporal variation is of great importance for various applications in the field of environment, hydrology, and agriculture. In this study, the fully polarimetric capabilities of longer wavelength (L-band, \({\lambda }_{c}\) = 23 cm) synthetic aperture radar (SAR) sensor (PALSAR-2) were combined with model based polarimetric scattering power decomposition techniques to separate the different individual scattering contributions for soil moisture retrieval. Model based six-component scattering power decomposition (M6CSD) developed by (Singh and Yamaguchi, 2018) and Yamaguchi four-component decomposition (Y4CD) (Yamaguchi et al., 2011) algorithms with rotation of coherency matrix were implemented over the agricultural land for the separation of different scattering powers and calculation of surface & dihedral scattering mechanism ratios. Extended Bragg (X-Bragg) and extended Fresnel (X-Fresnel) models were used for inverting ground scattering components into soil dielectric constant (SDC). Volumetric soil moisture was modelled using a widely used transformation model (Topp et al., 1980). The retrieved results shows an optimistic trend in terms of soil moisture (vol. %) inversion under diverse fields of bare and vegetation cover. SAR retrieved soil moisture (vol. %) content over agricultural land was validated with the field survey data collected by time-domain reflectometry (TDR) probes. The performance and comparison of both the models was evaluated in terms of mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), Pearson’s coefficient of correlation (r) and Nash–Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficient (NSE) (Wang et al., 2016). The Y4CD model result yields MAE of 9.00 vol. %, RMSE of 10.72 vol. %, r of 0.71 and NSE of 0.95 whereas those of M6CSD model are 5.24 vol. %, 6.27 vol. %, 0.91, and 0.98 respectively. These values clearly indicate that the M6CSD model performs better than the Y4CD model for the inversion of volumetric soil moisture using fully polarimetric SAR data. M6CSD model achieved 30.93% of inversion rate for soil moisture retrieval over large agricultural land while that of Y4CD was 24.34%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hari Shankar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

This is to inform you that the proposed reviewers have no conflict of interest for reviewing the manuscript. Also all the authors have no conflict in any manner. No known competing financial interest or personal relationship that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shankar, H., Singh, D. & Chauhan, P. Model Based Four and Six Component Decompositions for Soil Moisture Retrieval. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 50, 435–450 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-021-01471-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-021-01471-x

Keywords

Navigation