Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Insights of Forest Dynamics for the Regional Ecological Fragility Assessment

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forest ecosystems play a vital role in sustaining various life forms on the earth. These ecosystems support society through the provision of goods (timber, fuelwood, etc.) and an array of ecological services (carbon sequestration, nutrient cycling, etc.). However, unplanned developmental activities have been affecting the ecological integrity evident from the fragmentation of forests, barren hilltops, conversion of perennial streams to intermittent or seasonal streams, etc. During the past three decades, forests have undergone major transitions with the breaking of contiguous native forests into small parcels of land, restricting the movement of species thereby limiting the potential of species for dispersal and colonization. This paper analyzes the landscape dynamics and spatial patterns of forests fragmentation of Shimoga District, Central Western Ghats and prioritizes ecologically fragile or Ecologically Sensitive regions (ESR) at village levels based on bio-geo-climatic-social variables with the land use dynamics considering temporal remote sensing data. Results revealed that there was a net loss of 10% in forest cover from 43.83% (1973) to 34.02% (2018), primarily caused by the expansion of agriculture, horticulture, and forest plantations. Forest fragmentation has increased, evident from the decline of the interior forest to an extent of 11% from 26% (1973–2018). ESR prioritization at village level in the Shimoga district considering the ecological, geo-climatic and social variables indicate that 11% villages are ESR 1 (highest sensitivity), 30% are in ESR 2 (higher sensitivity), 36% are in ESR 3 (high sensitivity) and the remaining 23% are in ESR 4 or moderate sensitivity category. The analysis illustrates the importance of understanding spatiotemporal patterns of landscape structure for sustainable management of tropical forests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data and Accessibility

Data used in the analyses are compiled from the field. Data are analyzed and organized in the form of table, which are presented in the manuscript. Also, synthesized data are archived at http://wgbis.ces.iisc.ernet.in/energy/water/paper/researchpaper2.html#ce. http://wgbis.ces.iisc.ernet.in/biodiversity/.

References

  • Ben-zhi, Z., Mao-yi, F., Jin-zhong, X., et al. (2005). Ecological functions of bamboo forest: Research and application. Journal of Forestry Research, 16, 143–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02857909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bharath, S., Rajan, K. S., & Ramachandra, T. V. (2013). Land surface temperature responses to land use land cover dynamics. Geoinformatics Geostatistics An Overv. https://doi.org/10.4172/2327-4581.1000112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bharath S, Rajan KS, Ramachandra TV (2017) Geo-Visualization of land cover transitions in Karwar region of Central Western Ghats. In International symposium on water urbanism and infrastructure development in eco-sensitive Zones. Kolkata.

  • Bhatta, B., Saraswati, S., & Bandyopadhyay, D. (2010). Quantifying the degree-of-freedom, degree-of-sprawl, and degree-of-goodness of urban growth from remote sensing data. Applied Geography, 30, 96–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.08.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, T. J. B. (2001). Interventions to enhance the conservation of biodiversity. The forests handbook (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 82–101). Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., Franklin, J. F., & Spies, T. A. (1993). Contrasting microclimates among clearcut, edge, and interior of old-growth Douglas-fir forest. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 63, 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1923(93)90061-L.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig, L. (2003). Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 34, 487–515. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2010) Global forest resources assessment. Main report, FAO Forest paper, 163. Doi: 10.18356/2bca14df-en.

  • Forman, R. T. T., & Wilson, E. O. (1995). Land mosaics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gadgil, M., Daniels, R. R., Ganeshaiah, K. N., et al. (2011). Mapping ecologically sensitive, significant and salient areas of Western Ghats: Proposed protocols and methodology. Current Science, 100, 175–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, G. H., & Lee, J. (2000). Landscape pattern and species richness; regional scale analysis from remote sensing. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21, 2685–2704. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160050110232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, R. K., Prasad, T. S., Rao, P. K., & Manikavelu, P. B. (2000). Problems in upscaling of high resolution remote sensing data to coarse spatial resolution over land surface. Advances in Space Research, 26, 1111–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper, K. A., Macdonald, S. E., Burton, P. J., et al. (2005). edge influence on forest structure and composition in fragmented landscapes. Conservation Biology, 19, 768–782. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00045.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herold, M., Goldstein, N. C., & Clarke, K. C. (2003). The spatiotemporal form of urban growth: Measurement, analysis and modeling. Remote Sensing of Environment, 86, 286–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00075-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herold, M., Scepan, J., & Clarke, K. C. (2002). The use of remote sensing and landscape metrics to describe structures and changes in urban land uses. Environment a nd Planning A, 34, 1443–1458. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J., Lu, X. X., & Sellers, J. M. (2007). A global comparative analysis of urban form: Applying spatial metrics and remote sensing. Landscape and Urban Planning, 82, 184–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenson, J. (1982). Detecting residential land use development at the urban fringe. Photogram Engineering and Remote Sens, 48, 629–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha, C. S., Goparaju, L., Tripathi, A., Gharai, B., Raghubanshi, A. S., & Singh, J. S. (2005). Forest fragmentation and its impact on species diversity: An analysis using remote sensing and GIS. Biodiversity and Conservation, 14(7), 1681–1698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji, W., Ma, J., Twibell, R. W., & Underhill, K. (2006). Characterizing urban sprawl using multi-stage remote sensing images and landscape metrics. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 30, 861–879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2005.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, M. P., Talukdar, G., Panigrahy, R. K., & Singh, S. (2010). Patterns of fragmentation and identification of possible corridors in north Western Ghats. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 38(3), 401–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, U., Kerle, N., Punia, M., & Ramachandra, T. V. (2010). Mining land cover information using multilayer perceptron and decision tree from MODIS data. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 38, 592–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurance, W. F. (1999). Reflections on the tropical deforestation crisis. Biological Conservation, 91, 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00088-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurance, W. F., Laurance, S. G., & Delamonica, P. (1998). Tropical forest fragmentation and greenhouse gas emissions. Forest Ecology and Management, 110, 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00291-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lele, N., Joshi, P. K., & Agrawal, S. P. (2008). Assessing forest fragmentation in northeastern region (NER) of India using landscape matrices. Ecological Indicator, 8, 657–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2007.10.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macleod, R. D., & Congalton, R. G. (1998). A quantitative comparison of change-detection algorithms for monitoring eelgrass from remotely sensed data. Photogram Engineering and Remote Sens, 64, 207–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madanian, M., Soffianian, A. R., Koupai, S. S., et al. (2018). Analyzing the effects of urban expansion on land surface temperature patterns by landscape metrics: A case study of Isfahan city, Iran. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 190, 189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6564-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhi, Y., Roberts, J. T., Betts, R. A., et al. (2008). Climate change, deforestation, and the fate of the amazon. Science, 80(319), 169–172. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1146961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandal, M., & Chatterjee, N. D. (2020). Spatial alteration of fragmented forest landscape for improving structural quality of habitat: A case study from Radhanagar Forest Range, Bankura District, West Bengal, India. Geology Ecology and Landscapes, 31, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/24749508.2020.1720483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Regan C (2005) Quantifying terrestrial habitat loss and fragmentation: A protocol. University of Massachusetts, Department of Natural Resources Conservation.

  • McMahon, G., Wiken, E. B., & Gauthier, D. A. (2004). Toward a scientifically rigorous basis for developing mapped ecological regions. Environmental Management, 34, S111–S124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0170-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naughton-Treves, L., Holland, M. B., & Brandon, K. (2005). The role of protected areas in conserving biodiversity and sustaining local livelihoods. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 219–252. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.164507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neel, M. C., McGarigal, K., & Cushman, S. A. (2004). Behavior of class-level landscape metrics across gradients of class aggregation and area. Landsc Ecol, 19, 435–455. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LAND.0000030521.19856.cb.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. F. (1983). Detecting forest canopy change due to insect activity using Landsat MSS. Photogram Engineering and Remote Sens., 49, 1303–1314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, R., & Banerjee, K. (2020). Deforestation and forest fragmentation in the highlands of Eastern Ghats, India. Journal of Forestry Research, 25, 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pohl C (1996) Geometric aspects of multisensor image fusion for topographic map updating in the humid Tropics. ITC publication No. 39 (Enschede: ITC), ISBN 90 6164 121 7.

  • Ramachandra, T. V., & Bharath, S. (2018). Geoinformatics based valuation of forest landscape dynamics in central Western Ghats, India. Journal of Remote Sensing GIS. https://doi.org/10.4172/2469-4134.1000227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandra, T. V., Bharath, S., & Bharath, H. A. (2012a). Peri-urban to urban landscape patterns elucidation through spatial metrics. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, 2, 58–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandra, T. V., Bharath, S., & Bharath, H. A. (2014). Spatio-temporal dynamics along the terrain gradient of diverse landscape. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management, 22, 50–63. https://doi.org/10.3846/16486897.2013.808639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandra, T. V., Bharath, S., & Chandran, M. D. S. (2016a). Geospatial analysis of forest fragmentation in Uttara Kannada District, India. Forest Ecosystems, 3, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-016-0069-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandra, T. V., Bharath, H. A., & Durgappa, D. S. (2012b). Insights to urban dynamics through landscape spatial pattern analysis. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 18, 329–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2012.03.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandra, T. V., Bharath, S., & Nimish, G. (2018). Modelling landscape dynamics with LST in protected areas of Western Ghats, Karnataka. Journal of Environmental Management, 206, 1253–1262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.08.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandra, T. V., Bharath, S., Rajan, K. S., & Subash Chandran, M. D. (2016b). Stimulus of developmental projects to landscape dynamics in Uttara Kannada, Central Western Ghats, Egypt. Journal of Remote Sensing and Space, 19, 175–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2016.09.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandra, T. V., Bharath, S., & Vinay, S. (2019). Ecological sustainability of riverine ecosystems in central western Ghats. Journal of Biodiversity, 9, 25–42. https://doi.org/11.258359/KRE-159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandra, T. V., & Kumar, U. (2011). Characterisation of landscape with forest fragmentation dynamics. Journal of Geographical Systems, 03, 242–253. https://doi.org/10.4236/jgis.2011.33021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandra, T. V., Tara, N. M., & Bharath, S. (2017). Web based spatial decision support system for sustenance of Western Ghats biodiversity, ecology and hydrology. In S. Aneesha & R. Jamuna (Eds.), Creativity and cognition in art and design (1st ed., pp. 58–70). Bangalore: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, C. S., Sreelekshmi, S., Jha, C. S., & Dadhwal, V. K. (2013). National assessment of forest fragmentation in India: Landscape indices as measures of the effects of fragmentation and forest cover change. Ecological Engineering, 60, 453–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.09.064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riitters, K. H., Wickham, J. D., & Coulston, J. W. (2004). A preliminary assessment of montréal process indicators of forest fragmentation for the United States. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 91, 257–276. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EMAS.0000009240.65355.92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riitters, K., Wickham, J. D., O’Neill, R., et al. (2000). Global-scale patterns of forest fragmentation. Conservation Ecology, 4, 3. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00209-040203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, D. P., Lewis, P. E., & Justice, C. O. (2002). Burned area mapping using multi-temporal moderate spatial resolution data—A bi-directional reflectance model-based expectation approach. Remote Sensing of Environment, 83, 263–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00077-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satish, K. V., Saranya, K. R., Reddy, C. S., Krishna, P. H., Jha, C. S., & Rao, P. V. (2014). Geospatial assessment and monitoring of historical forest cover changes (1920–2012) in Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve, Western Ghats, India. Environ Monit Assess, 186(12), 8125–8140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-3991-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, D. A., Arnold, G. W., Burbridge, A. A., & Hopkins, A. J. M. (1987). Nature conservation, the role of remnants of native vegetation. Chiiping Norton: Surrey Beatty.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxe, H., Cannell, M. G. R., Johnsen, Ø., et al. (2002). Tree and forest functioning in response to global warming. New Phytologist, 149, 369–399. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2001.00057.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, M., Chakraborty, A., Garg, J. K., & Joshi, P. K. (2017). Assessing forest fragmentation in north-western Himalaya: A case study from Ranikhet forest range, Uttarakhand. India. Journal of Forestry Research, 28(2), 319–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-016-0311-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Termorshuizen, J. W., & Opdam, P. (2009). Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape Ecology, 24, 1037–1052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-008-9314-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trani, M. K., & Giles, R. H., Jr. (1999). An analysis of deforestation: Metrics used to describe pattern change. Forest Ecology and Management, 114, 459–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00375-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinay S, Bharath S, Bharath HA, Ramachandra T V (2013) Hydrologic model with landscape dynamics for drought monitoring. In Joint international workshop of ISPRS VIII/1 and WG IV/4 on geospatial data for disaster and risk reduction. Hyderabad.

  • Vogelmann, J. E. (1995). Assessment of forest fragmentation in Southern New England using remote sensing and geographic information systems technology. Conservation Biology, 9, 439–449. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.9020439.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, T. O., Le Page, Y., Huang, M., Wolf, J., & Thomson, A. M. (2014). Downscaling global land cover projections from an integrated assessment model for use in regional analyses: Results and evaluation for the US from 2005 to 2095. Environmental Research Letters, 9, 064004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/6/064004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiken EB, Gauthier D (1997) Conservation and ecology in North America. In Caring for the home place: Protected areas and landscape ecology conference. 29.

  • Wilkinson, D. M. (2006). Fundamental processes in ecology: An earth systems approach. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198568469.001.0001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WRI (1997) The last frontier forests: Ecosystems and economies on the edge, World Resources Institute.

  • Zhang, J., & Zhang, Y. (2007). Remote sensing research issues of the National Land Use Change Program of China. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens, 62, 461–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2007.07.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We acknowledge the financial support for ecological research in the Western Ghats from (i) UNSD–United Nations Statistics Division, (ii) The Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, (iii) ENVIS Division, the Ministry of Environment Forests and Climate Change, Government of India and (iv) Indian Institute of Science. We thank Vishnu D Mukri and G R Rao for the assistance during the field data collection. We thank all the stakeholders in Shimoga (Forest Department, Western Ghats Task Force and Karnataka Biodiversity Board, Government of Karnataka, NGO:Vrikashalaksha Andolan, Sagar, Shimoga) for actively taking part in the scientific discussions and cooperation during field data compilation. We are grateful to the official languages section at IISc for the assistance in language editing.

Funding

This research was supported the grant from (i) UNSD–United Nations Statistics Division, (ii) The Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, (iii)) ENVIS Division, the Ministry of Environment Forests and Climate Change, Government of India and (iv) Indian Institute of Science.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. V. Ramachandra.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We have conflict of interest either financial or non-financial.

Ethical Approval

The publication is based on the original research and has not been submitted elsewhere for publication or web hosting.

Human and Animal Rights

The research does not involve either humans, animals or tissues.

Permission to Carry Out Fieldwork

Our research is commissioned by the Ministry of Environment and Forests (ENVIS Division), Government of India, and hence no further permission is required as the field work was carried out in the non-restricted areas/protected areas.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: Recommendations

Appendix: Recommendations

The regions of high ecological sensitivity include regions having the dense forests of Western Ghats, such regions are rich with the presence of endemic and threatened biodiversity with high biomass and have great potential in carbon sequestration. Hence, it is recommended to implement forest policies, conservation plans, strict laws, and regulations with respect to developmental activities. The ESR-1 represents a zone of highest conservation, no further degradation allowed. ESR-2 has the potentiality to become ESR-1 provided with strict regulations and improvement of forests and its environs by more protection. A small change in ESR-2 will have more adverse effects in ESR-1. The following recommendations are suggested for effective management and enrichment of forests in the region.

  • Forest Rights Act to be implemented in its true spirit by reaching out to people. Impose a complete ban on illegal occupations, illegal NTFP collection, over-exploitation of forest resources.

  • River diversion, stream alternations should not be allowed even in the name of drinking water projects as the region is already facing a severe water crisis. In the view of ecological flow measures, the diversion of water should not be allowed.

  • In the case of fragmented forests (especially Soraba, Sagara, Bhadravathi taluks), connectivity between forest patches should be established by enriching native forest cover (biological corridors to ensure food and fodder) that allow species to move and genes to flow from one region to other. Improved connectivity with reduced fragmentation will aid in endemic species conservation.

  • Monoculture plantations are not allowed, existing exotics should be replaced by planting native or endemic species (Table 6). The open fields and barren hilltops should be considered for grassy blocks creations with native varieties (Table 7).

  • Promote decentralized electricity, use of renewable energy sources such as (solar, wind power).

  • The local bio resource-based industry should be promoted. All should be strictly regulated and be subject to social audits.

  • Adapt development projects which will have the least environmental impact by involving local community members in decision making and environmental monitoring.

  • No new major roads, railway lines are allowed, except when highly essential and subject to EIA, by imposing strict regulations and social audits.

  • Small-scale tourism should be encouraged by adopting benefit sharing with local communities such as homestay, spice farms, eco-friendly boating, etc.

  • Tourism Master Plan should be based on MoEFCC regulations (after taking into account social and environmental costs).

  • The uncontrolled development should be discouraged in and around of pristine lakes, primeval forest patches, perennial water bodies. The site-specific (clustered base) sustainable developments can be taken up at each panchayat, which least affects the ecosystem.

  • Controlled activities are permitted based on socio-economic importance and activities such as depriving wetlands, natural forests, the introduction of alien invasive species are not permitted.

  • Enrich the grasslands, grassy patches by native grass varieties to improve herbivorous population in forest areas. Forests should be a healthy combination of different landscape elements, including the grasslands that provide a bulk of the fodder needs of the ungulates. The trailing habit of many grasses (e.g., Cynodon dactylon, Oplismenus burmanii, Arundinella leptochloa, Panicum auritum, etc.) helps them to withstand grazing pressure, trampling and even fires.

  • Leguminous fodder herbs (Cassia fistula, Desmodium triflorum, Entada scandens, Erythrina spp, etc., may be planted in abandoned agricultural fields to promote wildlife, which would aid in enriching the soil while providing required nutrition to the dependent fauna. Herbaceous climbers of legumes, that provide forage for wildlife may be promoted experimentally in monoculture plantations.

  • The task force under VFCs should be set up involving local stakeholders and forest departments to tackle and maintain harmony between the administration and people. The task force should also involve in demarcating borders, detecting and enforcing violations of regulations, and planning and implementing management activities.

  • Creation of fodder reserves: It is very necessary to enrich the forests impoverished of wild animal fodder plants, using the land resources of poor-grade monoculture plantations, degraded forests, abandoned mine areas, underneath high tension power lines and such identified stretches.

  • The fencing of small blocks of land for three to five years from human impact and grazing by domestic cattle will have a very positive impact on forest succession and healthy growth of grasses in overgrazed areas. Once tall saplings are naturally established, the forest will flourish on its own. The protection may be shifted to other unprotected areas after the three to five-year period. The forest lands thus protected may be named “Regeneration Blocks”. The vegetation succession in such blocks to be monitored and recorded, preferably by local volunteers. Seeds of suitable tree and shrub species may be disseminated in such areas to promote diversity.

  • Creation/maintenance of water bodies: Water bodies are to be created intermittently in the forest areas so that the movement of animals in dry months could be minimized. Several old village ponds and tanks need desilting and maintenance. Watershed-based forest management is critical for creating healthy habitats for elephants and other wildlife.

  • Development of nurseries involving local people and self-help women groups. People be encouraged and guided to make nurseries of native forest trees and medicinal plants.

  • NTFP collection (removal of the contract system of middlemen) and value addition, developing bee-keeping involving forests. As bee-keeping is recommended as an important activity for almost all clusters, roadsides, common lands, under-stocked, or degraded forest patches around villages be planted with appropriate nectar plant species.

  • The contract system for collection of NTFP from forests found to be highly detrimental to forests and biodiversity and economic well-being of local people be stopped forthwith and co-management system involving local people be adopted.

  • Production of bamboo-based products by local craftsman and effective utilization of bamboo for local development is important.

  • Regular conduct of training in bird-watching, wildlife studies, trekking trails, hygiene, and solid waste management involving VFCs, local youth in forest, and wildlife related tourism areas be arranged with the view of generating eco-friendly employment potential.

  • Kan forests are the remnants of climax evergreen forests, preserved through generations by the village communities, the abode of endemic ecologically sensitive plant species, and also acting as a sustainable source for water resources for the villages located. The restoring these climax patches would be difficult if they are perturbed by an external influence. Hence, the Kan forests should be demarcated and fenced by protecting from further degradation.

  • Recommended to consider for heritage sites status to ‘kans’ under Sect. 37(1) of Biological Diversity Act 2002, Government of India as kans are the repository of a biological wealth of rare kind, and the need for adoption of holistic ecosystem management for conservation of, particularly the rare and endemic flora of the Western Ghats.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramachandra, T.V., Bharath, S. & Bharath, A.H. Insights of Forest Dynamics for the Regional Ecological Fragility Assessment. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 48, 1169–1189 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-020-01146-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-020-01146-z

Keywords

Navigation