Abstract
Digital elevation models (DEMs) are used for many geosciences studies; hence, their accuracy is essential. Throughout the world, there are many small islands of various sizes and densities; hence, it is important to assess the DEM accuracy on very small islands since DEMs serve as the major data source for many investigations, particularly in geomorphology, land-use planning, and disaster management. Therefore, this paper aims to validate the accuracy of an open-source Indonesian DEM (DEMNAS) in the very small islands of Karimunjawa–Indonesia. Validation was conducted by comparing elevation values from DEMNAS to the true elevation values in four very small islands in Karimunjawa, namely Cemara Besar, Cemara Kecil, Menjangan Besar, and Menjangan Kecil. The true elevation values were obtained by orthorectification of aerial imagery using a DJI Mavic Air-2 Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV). The orthorectification came from ground control points (GCP) from the geodetic Global Positioning System (GPS). In the study area, fourteen GCP were erected; for more significant coverage, they were placed along the edges of the very small islands. After that, Agisoft software analyzed the images to produce a DEM using GCP orthorectification. Based on 280 sampling points, we applied a root-mean-square error (RMSE) to calculate elevation errors, and we performed the linear error 90% (LE90) calculation to judge the average errors with the 90% threshold of absolute values of discrepancies. The DEMNAS RMSE and LE90 calculation results in the Karimunjawa archipelago were 6.33 m and 10.45 m, respectively. Citing Regulation Number 15 of the Head of the Indonesian Geospatial Information Agency of 2014 concerning Technical Guidelines for Basic Map Accuracy, DEMNAS with 10.45 m LE90 can be utilized for producing geomorphological maps with scales of 1:25,000 or smaller. However, detailed geomorphological mapping of a very small island (less than 100 km2) needs better DEM data that is usually produced using aerial photogrammetry. Using UAVs for DEMs creation may benefit small island developing states (SIDS) worldwide.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
References
Agarwal R, Sur K, Rajawat AS (2020) Accuracy assessment of the CARTOSAT DEM using robust statistical measures. Model Earth Syst Environ 6:471–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-019-00694-9
Ahmed R, Mahmud KH, Tuya JH (2021) A GIS-based mathematical approach for generating 3D terrain model from high-resolution UAV imageries. J Geovis Spat Anal 5:24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41651-021-00094-7
Akturk E (2013) Rapid riparian buffer width and quality analysis using Lidar in South Carolina. All Theses 1830 https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/1830
Al-Tahir R, Arthur M (2012) Unmanned aerial mapping solution for small island developing states. In: Proceedings of the global geospatial conference, Quebec City, QC, Canada, pp 1–9
Alwi M, Mutaqin BW (2022) Geospatial mapping of tsunami susceptibility in Parangtritis coastal area of Yogyakarta – Indonesia. Arab J Geosci 15(15):1332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-10608-2
Aronoff S (2005) Remote sensing for GIS managers. ESRI Press, University of Minnesota, p 487
Bannari A, Kadhem G, Hameid N, El-Battay A (2017) Small islands DEMs and topographic attributes analysis: a comparative study among SRTM-V4.1, ASTER-V2.1, high topographic contours map and DGPS. J Earth Sci Eng 7(2). https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-581x/2017.02.003
Biagi L, Caldera S, Carcano L, Negretti M (2016) The open data HELI-DEM DTM for the western alpine area: computation and publication. Appl Geomat 8:191–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-016-0176-5
BIG (2021a) Gazeter Republik Indonesia Edisi ke-1 Tahun 2021. Badan Informasi Geospasial, Bogor, p 959
BIG (2021b) DEMNAS Seamless digital elevation model (DEM) dan Batimetri Nasional. https://tanahair.indonesia.go.id/demnas/. It was accessed on December 3rd, 2021
Bopche L, Rege P (2022) An approach to extracting digital elevation model for undulating and hilly terrain using de-noised stereo images of Cartosat-1 sensor. Appl Geomat 14:39–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-021-00412-0
Casbeer DW, Beard RW, McLain TW, Li SM, Mehra RK (2005) Forest fire monitoring with multiple small UAVs. In: Proceedings of the 2005, American Control Conference, vol 5, pp 3530–3535. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.2005.1470520
Elmahdy SI (2015) Application of hydromorphometric parameterization and ASTER DEM to characterize hydrological indicators in the Musandam Peninsula, UAE and Oman. Appl Geomat 7:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-014-0143-y
El-Quilish M, El-Ashquer M, Dawod G, Fiky GE (2018) Development and accuracy assessment of high-resolution digital elevation model using GIS approaches for the Nile Delta region. Egypt Am J Geogr Inf Syst 2018(4):107–117. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ajgis.20180704.02
Erol B, Çelik RN (2000) Modelling local GPS/levelling geoid with the assessment of inverse distance weighting and geostatistical kriging methods. In: ISPRS XX Congress, İstanbul, Turkey, pp 1–5
Farr TG, Rosen PA, Caro E, Crippen R, Duren R, Hensley S, Kobrick M, Paller M, Rodriguez E, Roth L, Seal D, Shaffer S, Shimada J, Umland J, Werner M, Oskin M, Burbank D, Alsdorf D (2007) The shuttle radar topography mission. Rev Geophys 45:RG2004. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005RG000183
Federal Geographical Data Committee (1998) Geospatial positioning accuracy standards part 3 : national standard for spatial data accuracy. National Spatial Data Infrastructure http://www.fgdc.gov/standards/projects/FGDC-standards-projects/accuracy/part3/chapter3. It was accessed on December 3rd, 2021
Feng Q, Liu J, Gong J (2015) UAV Remote sensing for urban vegetation mapping using random forest and texture analysis. Remote Sens 7(1):1074–1094. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70101074
Forbes DL, James TS, Sutherland M, Nichols SE (2013) Physical basis of coastal adaptation on tropical small islands. Sustain Sci 8(3):327–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-013-0218-4
Galin E, Guérin E, Peytavie A, Cordonnier G, Cani M-P, Benes B, Gain J (2019) A review of digital terrain modeling. Comput Graph Forum 38:553–577. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.13657
Government of Indonesia (2007) Law of the government of Indonesia Number 27/2007 on management of coastal areas and small islands. State Gazette Republic of Indonesia Year 2007 Number 84; Supplement to the State Gazette Number 4739., 27, 43. http://bk.menlh.go.id/files/UU_no_27_th_2007.pdf
Granados-Bolaños S, Quesada-Román A, Alvarado GE (2021) Low-cost UAV applications in dynamic tropical volcanic landforms. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 410:107143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2020.107143
Guo B, Yang F, Wu H, Zhang R, Zang W, Wei C, Jiang G, Meng C, Zhao H, Zhen X, Zhang D, Zhang H (2021) How the variations of terrain factors affect the optimal interpolation methods for multiple types of climatic elements? Earth Sci Inform 14:1021–1032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-021-00609-2
Guth PL (2006) Geomorphometry from SRTM: comparison to NED. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 72(3):269–277. https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.72.3.269
Habib A, Khoshelham K, Akdim N, El Ghandour F, Labbassi K, Menenti M (2018) Impact of spatial resolution, interpolation and filtering algorithms on DEM accuracy for geomorphometric research: a case study from Sahel-Doukkala. Morocco Model Earth Syst Environ 4:1537–1554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-018-0512-3
Horritt MS, Bates PD (2001) Effects of spatial resolution on a raster-based model of flood flow. J Hydrol 253(1–4):239–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00490-5
Ibrahim PO, Sternberg H, Samaila-Ija HA, Adgidzi D, Nwadialor IJ (2023) Modelling topo-bathymetric surface using a triangulation irregular network (TIN) of Tunga Dam in Nigeria. Appl Geomat 15:281–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-022-00438-y
Iswari MY, Anggraini K (2018) DEMNAS: Model Digital Ketinggian Nasional untuk Aplikasi Kepesisiran. Oseana. 43(4):68–80. https://doi.org/10.14203/oseana.2018.Vol.43No.4.2
KC N, Thapa L, Shukla DP (2023) Processing CORONA image for generation of digital elevation model (DEM) and orthophoto of Bilaspur district, Himachal Pradesh. Appl Geomat 15:295–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-022-00453-z
Kenward T, Lettenmaier DP, Wood EF, Fielding E (2000) Effects of digital elevation model accuracy on hydrologic predictions. Remote Sens Environ 74(3):432–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00136-X
Khosravipour A, Skidmore AK, Wang T, Isenburg M, Khoshelham K (2015) Effect of slope on treetop detection using a LiDAR canopy height model. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 104:44–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.02.013
Kršák B, Blišťan P, Pauliková A, Puškárová P, Kovaniča L, Palková J, Zelizňaková V (2016) Use of low-cost UAV photogrammetry to analyze the accuracy of a digital elevation model in a case study. Measurement 91:276–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.05.028
Laliberte AS, Herrick JE, Rango A, Winters C (2010) Acquisition, orthorectification, and object-based classification of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery for rangeland monitoring. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 76(6):661–672. https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.76.6.661
Lapon L, De Maeyer P, Gaines S (2014) Changing small island developing states: a space perspective on environmental change in the Caribbean. UNESCO and Universiteit Gent, p 126
Marhaento H, Booij MJ, Rahardjo N, Ahmed N (2021) Impacts of forestation on the annual and seasonal water balance of a tropical catchment under climate change. For Ecosyst 8:64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-021-00345-5
Maune DF (2007) Digital elevation model techniques and applications: The DEM user’s manual. In: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2nd edn. The University of Minnesota, pp 1–35
Moffitt DL, Kumar L (2018) Remote sensing of a shallow, fringing reef platform for analysis of island sector susceptibility and development of a Coastal Vulnerability Index. J Coast Res 34(1):122–135 http://www.jstor.org/stable/26296449
Mokarram M, Hojati M (2015) Comparis of digital elevation model (DEM) and aerial photographs for drainage. Model Earth Syst Environ 1:46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-015-0050-1
Mukherjee S, Joshi PK, Mukherjee S, Ghosh A, Garg RD, Mukhopadhyay A (2012) Evaluation of vertical accuracy of open source digital elevation model (DEM). Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 21:205–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2012.09.004
Mutaqin BW, Lavigne F, Sudrajat Y, Handayani L, Lahitte P, Virmoux C, Hiden HDS, Komorowski JC, Hananto N, Wassmer P, Hartono B-AK (2019) Landscape evolution on the eastern part of Lombok (Indonesia) related to the 1257 CE eruption of the Samalas Volcano. Geomorphology 327:338–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.11.010
Mutaqin BW, Handayani W, Rosaji FSC, Wahyuningtyas D, Marfai MA (2021) geomorphological analysis for the identification of small volcanic islands in North Maluku. Indonesia Jurnal Geografi 13(2):184–194. https://doi.org/10.24114/jg.v13i2.21526
Niethammer U, James MR, Rothmund S, Travelletti J, Joswig M (2012) UAV-based remote sensing of the Super-Sauze landslide: evaluation and results. Eng Geol 128:2–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.03.012
Nitheshnirmal S, Thilagaraj P, Rahaman SA, Jegankumar R (2019) Erosion risk assessment through morphometric indices for prioritisation of Arjuna watershed using ALOS-PALSAR DEM. Model Earth Syst Environ 5:907–924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-019-00578-y
NOAA (2021) National Geodetic Survey. https://geodesy.noaa.gov/. It was accessed on December 3rd, 2021
Nurtyawan R, Fiscarina N (2020) Assessment of the accuracy of DEM from Panchromatic Pleiades Imagery (case study: Bandung CityWest Java). Int J Remote Sens Earth Sci (IJReSES) 17(1):34 https://doi.org/10.30536/j.ijreses.2020.v17.a3329
Nwilo PC, Onyegbula JC, Okolie CJ, Daramola OE, Abolaji OE, Arungwa ID (2022a) Influence of land cover, slope, and aspect on the vertical accuracy of SPOT DEM at selected sites in Nigeria. Appl Geomat 14:17–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-021-00404-0
Nwilo PC, Okolie CJ, Onyegbula JC, Arungwa ID, Ayoade OQ, Daramola OE, Orji MJ, Maduako ID, Uyo II (2022b) Positional accuracy assessment of historical Google Earth imagery in Lagos State, Nigeria. Appl Geomat 14:545–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-022-00449-9
Pakoksung K, Suppasri A, Muhari A, Imamura F (2020) Global optimization of a numerical two-layer model using observed data: a case study of the 2018 Sunda Strait tsunami. Geosci Lett 7:15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-020-00165-5
Pakoksung K, Takagi M (2021) Assessment and comparison of digital elevation model (DEM) products in varying topographic, land cover regions and its attribute: a case study in Shikoku Island Japan. Model Earth Syst Environ 7:465–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-00891-x
Paris A, Heinrich P, Paris R, Abadie S (2020) The December 22, 2018 Anak Krakatau, Indonesia, landslide and tsunami: preliminary modeling results. Pure Appl Geophys 177:571–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-019-02394-y
Patria A, Putra PS (2020) Development of the Palu–Koro fault in NW Palu Valley, Indonesia. Geosci Lett 7:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-020-0150-2
Peckham RJ, Jordan G (2007) Digital terrain modelling: development and applications in a policy support environment. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, p 313. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-36731-4
Perka BIG (2014) Regulation of the Head of the Indonesian Geospatial Information Agency number 15 of 2014. Technical Guidelines for Basic Map Accuracy, Cibinong, Bogor, p 20
Polat N, Uysal M (2015) Investigating performance of Airborne LiDAR data filtering algorithms for DTM generation. Measurement 63:61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2014.12.017
Quesada-Román A, Ballesteros-Cánovas JA, Granados-Bolaños S, Birkel C, Stoffel M (2020) Dendrogeomorphic reconstruction of floods in a dynamic tropical river. Geomorphology 359:107133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107133
Quesada-Román A, Ballesteros-Cánovas JA, Granados-Bolaños S, Birkel C, Stoffel M (2022) Improving regional flood risk assessment using flood frequency and dendrogeomorphic analyses in mountain catchments impacted by tropical cyclones. Geomorphology 396:108000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.108000
Rana VK, Suryanarayana TMV (2019) Visual and statistical comparison of ASTER, SRTM, and Cartosat digital elevation models for watershed. J Geovis Spat Anal 3:12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41651-019-0036-z
Ratnasari RN, Tanioka Y, Gusman AR (2020) Determination of source models appropriate for tsunami forecasting: application to tsunami earthquakes in Central Sumatra Indonesia. Pure Appl Geophys 177:2551–2562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-020-02483-3
Remondino F, Barazzetti L, Nex F, Scaioni M, Sarazzi D (2012) UAV Photogrammetry for mapping and 3D modeling – current status and future perspectives. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci - ISPRS Arch XXXVIII-1/C22:25–31. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XXXVIII-1-C22-25-2011
Reuter HI, Hengl T, Gessler P, Soille P (2009) Chapter 4 preparation of DEMs for geomorphometric analysis. In: Hengl T, Reuter HI (eds) Geomorphometry: Concepts, Software, Applications. Developments in Soil Science, vol 33. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 87–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2481(08)00004-4
Santamarta JC, Lario-Bascones RJ, Rodríguez-Martín J, Hernández-Gutiérrez LE, Poncela R (2014) Introduction to hydrology of volcanic islands. IERI Procedia 9:135–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ieri.2014.09.053
Scobie M (2014) The 2014, Third International Conference on Small Island Developing ping States : Regional Preparations and Perspectives. 1(3):31–45
Sefercik UG, Ozendi M (2013) Comprehensive comparison of VHR 3D spatial data acquired from IKONOS and TerraSAR-X imagery. Adv Space Res 52(9):1655–1667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2013.07.044
Shaikh M, Yadav S, Manekar V (2021) Accuracy assessment of different open-source digital elevation model through morphometric analysis for a semi-arid river basin in the western part of India. J Geovis Spat Anal 5:23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41651-021-00089-4
Shetty S, Vaishnavi PC, Umesh P, Shetty A (2022) Vertical accuracy assessment of open source digital elevation models under varying elevation and land cover in Western Ghats of India. Model Earth Syst Environ 8:883–895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-021-01119-2
Shi W, Deng S, Xu W (2018) Extraction of multi-scale landslide morphological features based on local Gi* using airborne LiDAR-derived DEM. Geomorphology 303:229–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.12.005
Šiljeg A, Barada M, Marić I, Roland V (2019) The effect of user-defined parameters on DTM accuracy—development of a hybrid model. Appl Geomat 11:81–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-018-0243-1
Singh S, Kumar KV, Rao MJ (2020) Utilization of LiDAR DTM for systematic improvement in mapping and classification of coastal micro-geomorphology. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 48(5):805–816. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-020-01114-7
Skilodimou HD, Antoniou V, Bathrellos GD, Tsami E (2021) Mapping of coastline changes in Athens Riviera over the past 76 year’s measurements. Water 13:2135. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13152135
Soliman A, Han L (2019) Effects of vertical accuracy of digital elevation model (DEM) data on automatic lineaments extraction from shaded DEM. Adv Space Res 64(3):603–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2019.05.009
Sonneveld MPW, Schoorl JM, Veldkamp A (2006) Mapping hydrological pathways of phosphorus transfer in apparently homogeneous landscapes using a high-resolution DEM. Geoderma 133(1–2):32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.03.035
Statistics Indonesia (2017) Luas Daerah dan Jumlah Pulau Menurut Provinsi, 2002-2016. BPS, Jakarta
Stokes M, Gomes A (2020) Alluvial fans on volcanic islands: a morphometric perspective (São Vicente, Cape Verde). Geomorphology 368:107356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107356
Sulistiana T, Parapat AD, Aristomo D (2019) Analisis akurasi vertikal digital elevation model nasional (DEMNAS) studi kasus Kota Medan. FIT ISI 2019 dan ASEANFLAG 72nd COUNCIL MEETING Analisis 1:37–45
Suprayogi S, Latifah R, Marfai MA (2020) Preliminary analysis of floods induced by urban development in Yogyakarta City. Indonesia Geogr Tech 15(2):57–71. https://doi.org/10.21163/GT_2020.152.07
Teng J, Vaze J, Tuteja NK, Gallant JC (2008) A GIS-based tool for spatial and distributed hydrological modelling: CLASS spatial analyst. Trans GIS 12(2):209–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9671.2008.01096.x
Uuemaa E, Ahi S, Montibeller B, Muru M, Kmoch A (2020) Vertical accuracy of freely available global digital elevation models (ASTER, AW3D30, MERIT, TanDEM-X, SRTM, and NASADEM). Remote Sens 12(21):3482. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12213482
Uysal M, Toprak AS, Polat N (2015) DEM generation with UAV Photogrammetry and accuracy analysis in Sahitler Hill. Measurement 73:539–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2015.06.010
Vaka DS, Kumar V, Rao YS, Deo R (2019) Comparison of various DEMs for height accuracy assessment over different terrains of India. In: IGARSS 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2019, pp 1998–2001. https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2019.8898492
Vink APA (1975) Land use in advancing agriculture. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, p 396. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-66049-8
Wilkinson E, Lovell E, Carby B, Barclay J, Robertson RE (2016) The dilemmas of risk-sensitive development on a small volcanic island. Resources 5(2):21. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources5020021
World Bank and Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team (2019) Technical guidelines for small island mapping with UAVs, Washington, DC License: Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0. 72 p
Xiong L, Tang G, Yang X, Li F (2021) Geomorphology-oriented digital terrain analysis: progress and perspectives. J Geogr Sci 31(3):456–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-021-1853-9
Yamazaki D, Baugh CA, Bates PD, Kanae S, Alsdorf DE, Oki T (2012) Adjustment of a spaceborne DEM for use in floodplain hydrodynamic modeling. J Hydrol 436-437:81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.02.045
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Mulyadi Alwi, Azis Musthofa, Fabia Hulwa, Irfan Fahmi, Natasya Michelle, Husyien Albani, and Rizali Umarella for their assistance during the fieldwork, as well as Remember Entertainment for their support during the writing process. Furthermore, the authors also thank anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on this paper.
Funding
Universitas Gadjah Mada funded this research through the Program of Penelitian Terapan Unggulan Perguruan Tinggi (Padepokand Project) with contract number 1669/UN1/DITLIT/Dit-Lit/PT.01.03/2022.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The authors confirm their contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: BWM, MAM; data collection: BWM, MNI, MAM, HF; analysis and interpretation of results: BWM, MNI, HF, AQ, NK; draft manuscript preparation: BWM, MNI, MAM, AQ. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors were compliant with the ethical standards.
Ethics approval
Our paper does not have negative societal impacts. There are no humans or animals used in this research.
Consent for publication
All authors are aware of this submission.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Mutaqin, B.W., Isnain, M.N., Marfai, M.A. et al. Assessing the accuracy of open-source digital elevation models for the geomorphological analysis of very small islands of Indonesia. Appl Geomat 15, 957–974 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-023-00533-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-023-00533-8