Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Projection of the temperature and precipitation impacts on the runoff using a representative concentration pathway scenario in the Agh-Darband basin, Iran

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Assessment of the impact of climate change on the hydrological cycle of river basins plays an essential role in managing water resources in areas facing challenges in future periods. Hydrological models are used as a tool for water and soil management in watersheds, which is a framework for assessing the relationship between climate, human activities, and water resources. The present study investigates the impact of future climate changes (2041–2060) on runoff in the Agh-Darband basin. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model was used. At the first step, the runoff was calibrated and validated from 1980 to 2011. The most sensitive parameters were moisture condition II curve number (CN2) and baseflow alpha factor (ALPHA_BF) in the Agh-Darband basin. The model simulation results showed acceptable performance for monthly simulation runoff in the study area. Then, the climatic data using the HadGEM2-ES model were micro-scaled under the Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 emission scenario with the LARS-WG model during 2041–2060. Also, the performance of the LARS-WG model to generate climatic data was evaluated. The results indicated that it generated satisfactory results. In the next section, the micro-scale data were introduced to the SWAT model, and runoff changes were examined for the future. The results showed that maximum and minimum temperatures will increase by 3.36 °C and 3.23 °C, respectively, during 2041–2060 in the Agh-Darband basin. Precipitation will vary between 54 and −95% under the RCP8.5 scenario in different months. The amount of runoff in the future period will decrease between 97 and 100% in different months.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data and material would be made available on request.

References

  • Abbaspour KC (2008) SWAT-CUP2: SWAT calibration and uncertainty programs–a user manual. Department of Systems Analysis. Integrated Assessment and Modelling (SIAM), Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Duebendorf, Switzerland

  • Abbaspour KC, Faramarzi M, Ghasemi SS, Yang H (2009) Assessing the impact of climate change on water resources in Iran. Water Resour Res 45:

  • Abbaspour KC, Yang J, Maximov I et al (2007) Modelling hydrology and water quality in the pre-alpine/alpine Thur watershed using SWAT. J Hydrol 333:413–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afshar NR, Fahmi H (2019) Impact of climate change on water resources in Iran. Int J Energy Water Res 3:55–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadi M, Etedali HR, Elbeltagi A (2021) Evaluation of the effect of climate change on maize water footprint under RCPs scenarios in Qazvin plain, Iran. Agric Water Manag 254:106969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed N, Wang G, Booij MJ et al (2022) Separation of the impact of landuse/landcover change and climate change on runoff in the upstream area of the Yangtze river, China. Water Res Manag 36:181–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akoko G, Le TH, Gomi T, Kato T (2021) A review of SWAT model application in Africa. Water 13:1313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold JG, Moriasi DN, Gassman PW et al (2012) SWAT: model use, calibration, and validation. Transactions of the ASABE 55:1491–1508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Muttiah RS, Williams JR (1998) Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: model development 1. JAWRA J Am Water Res Assoc 34:73–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashofteh P-S, Bozorg-Haddad O, Loáiciga HA, Mariño MA (2016) Evaluation of the impacts of climate variability and human activity on streamflow at the basin scale. J Irrig Drain Eng 142:4016028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydin G (2014) The modeling of coal-related CO2 emissions and projections into future planning. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 36:191–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydin G (2015) Regression models for forecasting global oil production. Pet Sci Technol 33:1822–1828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydin G, Kaya S, Karakurt I (2015) Modeling of coal consumption in Turkey: An application of trend analysis. In: 24th International Mining Congress and Exhibition of Turkey. Antalya, pp 83–87

  • Bayatvarkeshi M, Zhang B, Fasihi R et al (2020) Investigation into the effects of climate change on reference evapotranspiration using the HadCM3 and LARS-WG. Water 12:666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellouin N, Collins WJ, Culverwell ID et al (2011) The HadGEM2 family of met office unified model climate configurations. Geosci Model Dev 4:723–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busico G, Colombani N, Fronzi D et al (2020) Evaluating SWAT model performance, considering different soils data input, to quantify actual and future runoff susceptibility in a highly urbanized basin. Journal of Environmental Management 266:110625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Guo J, Zhang Z, Xu C-Y (2013) Prediction of temperature and precipitation in Sudan and South Sudan by using LARS-WG in future. Theor Appl Climatol 113:363–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiew FHS, Whetton PH, McMahon TA, Pittock AB (1995) Simulation of the impacts of climate change on runoff and soil moisture in Australian catchments. J Hydrol 167:121–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coles AE, McConkey BG, McDonnell JJ (2017) Climate change impacts on hillslope runoff on the northern Great Plains, 1962–2013. J Hydrol 550:538–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dakhlaoui H, Ruelland D, Tramblay Y, Bargaoui Z (2017) Evaluating the robustness of conceptual rainfall-runoff models under climate variability in northern Tunisia. J Hydrol 550:201–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fanta SS, Sime CH (2022) Performance assessment of SWAT and HEC-HMS model for runoff simulation of Toba watershed, Ethiopia. Sustain Water Res Manag 8:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golmohammadi G, Rudra R, Dickinson T et al (2017) Predicting the temporal variation of flow contributing areas using SWAT. J Hydrol 547:375–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Himanshu SK, Pandey A, Shrestha P (2017) Application of SWAT in an Indian river basin for modeling runoff, sediment and water balance. Environ Earth Sci 76:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houghton E (1996) Climate change 1995: The science of climate change: contribution of working group I to the second assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovenga PA, Wang D, Medeiros SC et al (2016) The response of runoff and sediment loading in the Apalachicola River, Florida to climate and land use land cover change. Earth’s Future 4:124–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jothityangkoon C, Sivapalan M, Farmer DL (2001) Process controls of water balance variability in a large semi-arid catchment: downward approach to hydrological model development. J Hydrol 254:174–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karimi S, Karimi S, Yavari AR, Niksokhan MH (2015) Prediction of temperature and precipitation in Damavand catchment in Iran by using LARS–WG in future. Earth Sci 4:95–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavwenje S, Zhao L, Chen L, Chaima E (2022) Projected temperature and precipitation changes using the LARS-WG statistical downscaling model in the Shire River Basin, Malawi. Int J Climatol 42:400–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khaleghi MR, Varvani J (2018) Sediment rating curve parameters relationship with watershed characteristics in the semiarid river watersheds. Arab J Sci Eng 43:3725–3737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim SB, Shin HJ, Park M, Kim SJ (2015) Assessment of future climate change impacts on snowmelt and stream water quality for a mountainous high-elevation watershed using SWAT. Paddy Water Environ 13:557–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumilachew YW, Hatiye SD (2022) The dual impact of climate change on irrigation water demand and reservoir performance: a case study of Koga irrigation scheme, Ethiopia. Sustain Water Res Manag 8:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Yang M, Meng X et al (2019) Assessing the impact of reservoir parameters on runoff in the Yalong River Basin using the SWAT Model. Water 11:643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotfi M, Kamali GA, Meshkatee AH, Varshavian V (2020) Study on the impact of climate change on evapotranspiration in west of Iran. Arab J Geosci 13:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotfirad M, Adib A, Salehpoor J et al (2021) Simulation of the impact of climate change on runoff and drought in an arid and semiarid basin (the Hablehroud, Iran). Appl Water Sci 11:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma Q, Xiong L, Xu C-Y et al (2021) Flood wave superposition analysis using quantitative matching patterns of peak magnitude and timing in response to climate change. Water Res Manag 35:2409–2432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marengo JA, Chou SC, Kay G et al (2012) Development of regional future climate change scenarios in South America using the Eta CPTEC/HadCM3 climate change projections: climatology and regional analyses for the Amazon, São Francisco and the Paraná River basins. Climate Dynamics 38:1829–1848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinec J (1975) Snowmelt-runoff model for stream flow forecasts. Hydrol Res 6:145–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masih I, Maskey S, Uhlenbrook S, Smakhtin V (2011) Assessing the impact of areal precipitation input on streamflow simulations using the SWAT Model 1. JAWRA J Am Water Res Assoc 47:179–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meinshausen M, Smith SJ, Calvin K et al (2011) The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300. Climatic change 109:213–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moazami Goudarzi F, Sarraf A, Ahmadi H (2020) Prediction of runoff within Maharlu basin for future 60 years using RCP scenarios. Arab J Geosci 13:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muelchi R, Rössler O, Schwanbeck J et al (2021) River runoff in Switzerland in a changing climate–runoff regime changes and their time of emergence. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 25:3071–3086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10:282–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR et al (2000) Soil and water assessment tool. Theoretical documentation, version

    Google Scholar 

  • Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Williams JR (2011) Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation version 2009. Tex Water Res Inst

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilawar AP, Waikar ML (2018) Use of SWAT to determine the effects of climate and land use changes on streamflow and sediment concentration in the Purna River basin, India. Environ Earth Sci 77:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osman Y, Al-Ansari N, Abdellatif M (2019) Climate change model as a decision support tool for water resources management in northern Iraq: a case study of Greater Zab River. J Water Climate Change 10:197–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrin C, Michel C, Andréassian V (2003) Improvement of a parsimonious model for streamflow simulation. J Hydrol 279:275–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pichuka S, Maity R (2020) Assessment of extreme precipitation in future through time-invariant and time-varying downscaling approaches. Water Res Manag 34:1809–1826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Racsko P, Szeidl L, Semenov M (1991) A serial approach to local stochastic weather models. Ecol Model 57:27–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramly S, Tahir W (2016) Application of HEC-GeoHMS and HEC-HMS as rainfall–runoff model for flood simulation. In: ISFRAM 2015. Springer, pp 181–192

  • Riahi K, Rao S, Krey V et al (2011) RCP 8.5—A scenario of comparatively high greenhouse gas emissions. Clim Chang 109:33–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson CW, Wright DA (1984) WGEN: a model for generating daily weather variables. ARS (USA)

  • Risal A, Parajuli PB (2022) Evaluation of the impact of best management practices on streamflow, sediment and nutrient yield at field and watershed scales. Water Res Manag 1–13

  • Sælthun NR (1996) The``Nordic``HBV model. Description and documentation of the model version developed for the project. Clim Chang Energy Prod

  • Schuol J, Abbaspour KC (2007) Using monthly weather statistics to generate daily data in a SWAT model application to West Africa. Ecol Model 201:301–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semenov MA, Brooks RJ (1999) Spatial interpolation of the LARS-WG stochastic weather generator in Great Britain. Clim Res 11:137–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semenov MA, Brooks RJ, Barrow EM, Richardson CW (1998) Comparison of the WGEN and LARS-WG stochastic weather generators for diverse climates. Clim Res 10:95–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semenov MA, Halford NG (2009) Identifying target traits and molecular mechanisms for wheat breeding under a changing climate. J Exp Bot 60:2791–2804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semenov MA, Stratonovitch P (2010) Use of multi-model ensembles from global climate models for assessment of climate change impacts. Clim Res 41:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sha J, Li X, Wang Z-L (2019) Estimation of future climate change in cold weather areas with the LARS-WG model under CMIP5 scenarios. Theor Appl Climatol 137:3027–3039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahvari N, Khalilian S, Mosavi SH, Mortazavi SA (2019) Assessing climate change impacts on water resources and crop yield: a case study of Varamin plain basin. Iran. Environ Monit Assess 191:134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharafati A, Pezeshki E, Shahid S, Motta D (2020) Quantification and uncertainty of the impact of climate change on river discharge and sediment yield in the Dehbar river basin in Iran. J Soils Sediments 20:2977–2996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha B, Cochrane TA, Caruso BS et al (2016) Uncertainty in flow and sediment projections due to future climate scenarios for the 3S Rivers in the Mekong Basin. J Hydrol 540:1088–1104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sime CH, Demissie TA, Tufa FG (2020) Surface runoff modeling in Ketar watershed, Ethiopia. J Sediment Environ 5:151–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon S, Manning M, Marquis M, Qin D (2007) Climate change 2007-the physical science basis: Working group I contribution to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC. Cambridge university press

  • Stocker T (2014) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis: working group I contribution to the Fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge university press

  • Su Y, Li Y, Liu Y et al (2021) An integrated multi-GCMs Bayesian-neural-network hydrological analysis method for quantifying climate change impact on runoff of the Amu Darya River basin. Int J Climatol 41:3411–3424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tegegne G, Park DK, Kim Y-O (2017) Comparison of hydrological models for the assessment of water resources in a data-scarce region, the Upper Blue Nile River Basin. J Hydrol Reg Stud 14:49–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Teshager AD, Gassman PW, Secchi S et al (2016) Modeling agricultural watersheds with the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT): calibration and validation with a novel procedure for spatially explicit HRUs. Environ Manag 57:894–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uniyal B, Jha MK, Verma AK (2015) Assessing climate change impact on water balance components of a river basin using SWAT model. Water Res Manag 29:4767–4785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Vuuren DP, Edmonds J, Kainuma M et al (2011) The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Climatic change 109:5–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Qi J, Wu H et al (2020) Freeze-thaw cycle representation alters response of watershed hydrology to future climate change. Catena 195:104767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weichert A, Bürger G (1998) Linear versus nonlinear techniques in downscaling. Clim Res 10:83–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilby RL, Harris I (2006) A framework for assessing uncertainties in climate change impacts: Low-flow scenarios for the River Thames, UK. Water Resour Res 42

  • Worku T, Khare D, Tripathi SK (2017) Modeling runoff–sediment response to land use/land cover changes using integrated GIS and SWAT model in the Beressa watershed. Environ Earth Sci 76:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Zheng H, Xi Y (2019) SWAT-based runoff simulation and runoff responses to climate change in the headwaters of the Yellow River. China. Atmosphere 10:509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang K, Chen T, Ao T et al (2022) Response of runoff in the upper reaches of the Minjiang River to climate change. J Water Clim Chang 13:260–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin J, Yuan Z, Yan D et al (2018) Addressing climate change impacts on streamflow in the Jinsha River basin based on CMIP5 climate models. Water 10:910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamani R, Ali AMA, Roozbahani A (2020) Evaluation of adaptation scenarios for climate change impacts on agricultural water allocation using fuzzy MCDM methods. Water Resour Manag 34:1093–1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S, Li Z, Hou X, Yi Y (2019) Impacts on watershed-scale runoff and sediment yield resulting from synergetic changes in climate and vegetation. Catena 179:129–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhihua LV, Zuo J, Rodriguez D (2020) Predicting of runoff using an optimized SWAT-ANN: a case study. J Hydrol Reg Stud 29:100688

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuo D, Xu Z, Zhao J et al (2015) Response of runoff to climate change in the Wei River basin, China. Hydrol Sci J 60:508–522

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate from Dr. Karim Abbaspour to solve software errors and his useful information in modeling.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Ghasem Panahi: conceptualization, visualization, editing of the manuscript, data acquisition

Mahya Hassanzadeh Eskafi: conceptualization, supervision, methodology, writing—original draft preparation

Alireza Faridhosseini: conceptualization, supervision, editing of the manuscript

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahya Hassanzadeh Eskafi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable

Consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Broder J. Merkel

Highlights

• Using the SWAT model had a significant contribution to simulating runoff.

• The performance of the LARS-WG model to downscaling the HadGEM2-ES model was acceptable.

• The results showed that the minimum and maximum temperatures will increase in the Agh-Darband basin.

• The amount of precipitation will vary for different months in the future period in the Agh-Darband basin.

• The runoff will decrease in the future period.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Panahi, G., Eskafi, M.H. & Faridhosseini, A. Projection of the temperature and precipitation impacts on the runoff using a representative concentration pathway scenario in the Agh-Darband basin, Iran. Arab J Geosci 15, 1167 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-10443-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-10443-5

Keywords

Navigation