Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influence of Shannon’s entropy on landslide-causing parameters for vulnerability study and zonation—a case study in Sikkim, India

تأثير Shannon’s entropy على الانزلاقات التي تسبب لدراسة الضعف (الوهن) والتمنطق – دراسة حالة في سيكم بالهند

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Landslide is a common hazard in the hilly regions, which causes heavy losses to life and properties every year. Since 1980, various researches and analyses have been carried out in the geographic information systems (GIS) environment to identify factors responsible for causing landslides. The important conditioning factors identified by the researchers are slope, geological, geomorphologic structures, and land use coupled with triggering factors like rainfall and a few of the anthropogenic activities. Almost all landslides vulnerability studies carried out so far used parameters of landslide events of the past as essential inputs and advanced methods like information value, regression analysis, fuzzy logic, etc. The present research is an attempt to investigate the landslide vulnerabilities in different slope areas with simple and realistic method of assignments of weights to the parameters based on experts’ opinion and generic logic, without using the parameters of past landslide events as inputs. The identified factors were assigned appropriate weights based on experts’ opinion and these weights were further balanced with respect to the Shannon’s entropy of their occurrences within the study area. The study area was finally classified into three zones namely least vulnerable zone, moderately vulnerable zone, and most vulnerable zone. When compared with the actual landslide history of the past, it was found that Shannon’s entropy applied zonation model matched to real landslide events with higher value of landslide density as compared to the model developed without Shannon’s entropy.

Abstract

الانزلاقات هي خطر شائع من مناطق التلال والتي تسبب خسائر كبيرة في الاروح والممتلكات كل عام. تم تنفيذ العديد من الابحاث والتحليلات في بيئة الGIS لتحديد العناصر المسئولة عن إحداث الانزلاقات. العناصر الهامة المسببة التي حددها الباحثين هي الميل و الجيولوجية و التراكيب الجيوموفولوجية واستخدام الأرض مندمجة مع عوامل الإشعال (trigger) مثل هطول الأمطار وبعض الأنشطة البشرية المصطنعة. تقريبا كل دراسات الوهن التي تمت حتى الآن استخدمت معاملات من الانزلاقات اليت حدثت سابقا كمدخل رئيسي والطرق المتطورة مثل قيم المعلومات والتحليل التراجعي و الfuzzy logic وغيرها. البحث الحالي هو محاولة لبحث وهن الانزلاقات الأرضية في مختلف المناطق المائلة بطريقة سهلة وواقعية لتقييم ثقل المعاملات استناداً إلى أراء الخبراء والمنطق العام بدون استخدام معاملات احداث الإنزلاقات السابقة كمدخلات. العوامل التي تحدد ـاخذ ثقل مناسب استناداً على أراء الخبراء ثم تتوازن هذه الاثقال بالنسبة ل Shannon’s entropy حسب تواجدها خلال منطقة الدراسة. تم ، أخيرا ، تصنيف منطقة الدراسة إلى 3 مناطق هي منطقة أقل توهن ومنطقة متوسطة التوهن ومنطقة أكثر توهن, وعند مقارنتها مع تاريخ الانزلاقات الحقيقي في الماضي وجد أن Shannon’s entropy طبق نموذج تمنطق متوافق مع احداث الانزلاقات الحقيقية مع قيم أعلى لكثافة الانزلاقات الأرضية عند مقارنتها بنموذج طور بدون استخدام الShannon’s entropy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bianca CV, Nelson FF (2004) Landslide in Rio de Ianeiro: the role played by variations in soil hydraulic conductivity. Hydrol Process 18(4):791–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady NC, Weil RR (2007) The nature and properties of soils. Pearson Education Inc., New Delhi, pp 756–761

    Google Scholar 

  • Carro M, Amicis MD, Luzi L, Marzorati S (2003) The application of predictive modeling techniques to landslides induced by earthquakes: the case study of the 26 September 1997 Umbria–Marche earthquake (Italy). Eng Geol 69(1–2):139–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das DK, Agarwal RP (2002) Physical properties of soil. Fundamental of soil science. Indian Society of Soil Science IARI, New Delhi, pp 75–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhakal AS, Sidle RC (2002) Physically based landslide hazard model ‘U’ method and issues. EGS XXVII General Assembly, Nice, pp 21–26

  • George YL, Long SC, David WW (2007) Vulnerability assessment of rainfall-induced debris flows in Department of Earth Systems and GeoInformation Sciences, College of Science, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, ETATS-UNIS. Available at http://www.springerlink.com/content/uj26871v2831nx44

  • Gupta M, Ghose MK, Sharma LP (2009) Application of remote sensing and GIS for landslides hazard and assessment of their probabilistic occurrence—a case study of NH31A between Rangpo and Singtam. J Geomatics 3(1):13–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee S (2007) Application and verification of fuzzy algebraic operators to landslide susceptibility mapping. Environ Geol 52:615–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pachouri AK, Pant M (1992) Landslide hazard mapping based on geological attributes. Eng Geol 32:81–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pachouri AK, Gupta PV, Chander R (1998) Landslide zoning in a part of the Garhwal Himalayas. Environ Geol 36(3–4):325–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patanakanog B (2001) Landslide hazard potential area in 3 dimension by remote sensing and GIS technique. Land Development Department, Thailand. Available at (www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/landslides/help/drainage.html)

  • Ramakrishna D, Ghose MK, Vinu Chandra R, Jeyaram A (2005) Probabilistic techniques, GIS and remote sensing in landslide hazard mitigation: A case study from Sikkim Himalayas, India. Geocarto International 20(4):53–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth RA (1983) Factors affecting landslide susceptibility in San Mateo County, California. Bull Assoc Eng Geol 20(4):353–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakellariou MG, Ferentinou MD (2001) GIS-based estimation of slope stability. nat Hazard Rev 2(1):12–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shu-Quiang W, Unwin DJ (1992) Modeling landslide distribution on loess soils in China: an investigation. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 6(5):391–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivakumar GL, Mukesh MD (2002) Landslide analysis in geographic information systems. Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of science, Bangalore. India. Available at www.gisdevelopment.net/application/natural_hazards/landslides/nhls0011pf.htm

  • Uromeihy A, Mahdavifar MR (2000) Landslide hazard zonation of Khorshrostam area, Iran. Bull Eng Geol Environ 58:207–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Westen CJ, Rengers N, Terlien MTJ, Soeters R (1997) Prediction of the occurrence of slope instability phenomena through GIS-based hazard zonation. Geol Rundsch 86:404–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varnes DJ (1984) Landslide hazard zonation: a review of principles and practice. UNESCO, Paris, pp 1–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadge G (1988) The potential of GIS modeling of gravity flows and slope instabilities. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 2:143–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wischmeier WH, Smith DD (1978) Predicting rainfall-erosion losses—a guide to conservation planning, Agricultural Handbook No-537. US Department of Agriculture, USA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors are thankful to the National Informatics Centre, India; Department of Remote Sensing, Birla Institute of Technology, Meshra, Ranchi, India; Sikkim Manipal Institute of Technology, Mazitar, Sikkim, India; and College of Agriculture Engineering and Post Harvest, Ranipool, Sikkim, India for their valuable support in sharing data and research infrastructures.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. P. Sharma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharma, L.P., Patel, N., Ghose, M.K. et al. Influence of Shannon’s entropy on landslide-causing parameters for vulnerability study and zonation—a case study in Sikkim, India. Arab J Geosci 5, 421–431 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-010-0205-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-010-0205-3

Keywords

Navigation