Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of Geosite for Sustainable Planning and Management in Geotourism

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Geoheritage Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Geosites are sites of scientific interest based on geology or geomorphology that can serve various purposes such as research, conservation, education, tourism, and sustainable development. Quantifying their value to potential visitors and researchers is widely recognized as a useful tool for the effective development and management and for the protection of geological heritage of a certain area. Although many quantitative evaluation schemes have been proposed for various types of sites in Europe, over the past two decades, the schemes can give widely variable results for the same sites due to differences in needs and expectations, which can present difficulties for inter-site comparison for management purposes. It therefore remains necessary to develop a uniform evaluation scheme with low overall complexity to assist with prioritization and management. This study presents a new evaluation scheme based on the most commonly used attributes for quantifying geosites as applied to geomorphological landscapes and geological processes with natural and/or cultural heritage. The utility of the evaluation scheme is demonstrated through application to selected geosites in Japan, Germany, and Poland. The results clearly show the present condition of geosites, identify their promotional advantages and disadvantages, and provide a widely applicable reference for planning and development of such sites for geotourism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bruschi VM, Cendrero A (2005) Geosite evaluation; can we measure intangible values? II Quaternario, Italian J Quarternary Sci 18(1):293–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Coratza P, Giusti C (2005) Methodological proposal for the assessment of the scientific quality of geomorphosites. Il Quaternario 18(1):307–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Geological Society of Japan (2010) Exploration map of Jogashima Island (in Japanese)

  • Geological Survey of Japan/AIST 1:200,000 Geological map of: Tokyo NI-54-25 (1987), Utsunomiya NJ-54-30 (1991), Nagano NJ-54-36 (1998), Kofu NI-54-21 (2002), Yokosuka NI-54-26 (2015) 

  • Gusti C, Gonzalez-Diez A (2000) A methodological approach for the evaluation of impacts on sites of geomorphological interest (SGI), using GIS techniques. ISPRS Archive 33(Suppl. B7):47–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Hara H, Hisada K (2007) Tectono-metamorphic evolution of the Cretaceous Shimanto accretionary complex, central Japan: constrains from a fluid inclusion analysis of syn-tectonic veins. Island Arc 17:57–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haracz P, Iwlecz B, Jagiełło K, Koźma J, Maciantowicz M (2012) European Geopark Muskau Arch. Three different perspectives… (in Polish). Association of Geopark Muskau Arch

  • Ielenicz M (2009) Geotope, geosite, geomorphosite. Ann Valahia Univ Târgovişte, Geogr Series 9(Issue I):7–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishiyama D, Miyata M, Shibata S, Satoh H, Mizuta T, Fukuyama M, Ogasawara M (2011) Geochemical characteristics of Miocene Fe-Cu–Pb–Zn granitoids associated mineralization in the Chichibu skarn deposit (central Japan): evidence for magmatic fluids generation coexisting with granitic melt. Geol Soc, London (Special Publications) 350:69–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IUGS Geoheritage Task Group (2014) Annual report 2014 (retrieved from http://geoheritage-iugs.mnhn.fr)

  • Kapuścik DA (2015) Geoeducation and disaster prevention through exploring the Jogashima geosites. JpGU Meeting Abstract. O01-P02, Tokyo

  • Koźma J, Kupetz M (2008) The transboundary Geopark Muskau Arch (Geoparku Łuk Mużakowa, Geopark Muskauer Faltenbogen). Przegl Geol 56(8/1):692–698

    Google Scholar 

  • Koźma J, Sandak D, Bieniasz J (2013) Geotouristic “Babina” path as an example of sustainable development in the Muskau Arch Geopark. Soc Geol Ital 28:93–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubalikova L (2013) Geomorphosite assessment for geotourism purposes. Czech J Tour 2(2):80–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Panizza M (2001) Geomorphosites: concepts, methods and examples of geomorphological survey. Chin Sci Bull 46:4–6

  • Panizza M, Marchetti M, Patrono A (1995) A proposal for a simplified method for assessing impacts on landforms. ITC J 4:324

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira P, Pereira D, Caetano Alves M (2007) Geomorphosite assessment in Montesinho Natural Park (Portugal). Geogr Helv 62:159–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pralong J-P (2005) A method for assessing tourist potential and use of geomorphological sites. Géomorphologie 3:189–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynard E, Fontana G, Kozlik L, Scapozza C (2007) A method for assessing <<scientific>> and <<additional values>> of geomorphosites. Geogr Helv 62:148–158

  • Ruban DA, Kuo I (2010) Essentials of geological heritage site (geosite) management: a conceptual assessment of interests and conflicts. Nat Nascosta 41:16–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Rybár P (2010) Assessment of attractiveness (value) of geotouristic objects. Acta Geot 1(2):13–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Serrano E, González-Trueba J (2005) Assessment of geomorphosites in natural protected areas: the Picos de Europa National Park (Spain). Géomorphologie 3:197–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skoczyńska-Gajda S, Labus M (2011) Metal speciation in river bed sediments within the polish part of Muskau Arch Geopark. Arch Environ Protection 37(3):87–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Stow D, Taira A, Ogawa Y, Soh W, Taniguchi H, Pickering K (1998) Volcaniclastic sediments, process interaction and depositional setting of the Mio-Pliocene Miura group, SE Japan. Sediment Geol 115:351–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Štrba L, Rybár P (2015) Revision of the “Assessment of attractiveness (value) of geotouristic objects”. Acta Geot 6(1):30–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Štrba L, Rybár P, Baláž B, Molokáč M, Hvizdák L, Kršák B, Lukáč M, Muchová L, Tometzová D, Ferenčíková J (2015) Geosite assessments: comparison of methods and results. Curr Issues in Tourism 18(5):496–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takagi H (2012) Creating a geopark in Sanriku region: for saving lives in future (in Japanese). Waseda University Booklet No. 013, 90p

  • Takahashi O (2000) Tectonostratigraphic study of the Chichibu and Shimanto belts in the Kanto Mountains, central Japan. Jour Geol Soc Japan 106(12):836–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomić N, Božić S (2014) A modified geosite assessment model (M-GAM) and its application on the Lazar Canyon area (Serbia). Int J Environ Res 8(4):1041–1052

    Google Scholar 

  • Ueno H, Tonouchi S (1987) Paleomagnetic evidence for the timing of formation of the Chichibu pyrometasomatic deposits. Japan Econ Geol 82:1723–1731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vujičić MD, Vasiljević DA, Marković SB, Hose T, Lukić T, Hadžić O, Janićević S (2011) Preliminary geosite assessment model (GAM) and its application on Fruška Gora Mountain, potential geotourism destination of Serbia. Acta Geogr Slov 51:361–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warszyńska J (1970) A methodological framework for evaluation of the village in terms of tourism attractiveness (in Polish). Prace Geogr UJ 27:103–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimbledon WAP (1999) GEOSITES—an International Union of Geological Sciences initiative to conserve our geological heritage. PGI (special papers) 2:5–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Zouros NC (2007) Geomorphosite assessment and management in protected areas of Greece. Case study of the Lesvos Island coastal geomorphosites. Geogr Helv 62:169–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express their sincere thanks to Mr. Jacek Koźma of the Committee of the Muskau Arch Global Geopark for the support and materials included in this work. Thanks are also due to the many graduate students at Waseda University who supported this research in 2015. This research was supported in part by funding from the Institute of Advanced Studies in Education, Waseda University, 2015.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Institute for Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo, 169-8050, Japan

    Dorota Anna Suzuki

  2. Department of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Education and Integrated Arts and Sciences, Waseda University, Tokyo, 169-8050, Japan

    Hideo Takagi

Authors
  1. Dorota Anna Suzuki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hideo Takagi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dorota Anna Suzuki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Suzuki, D., Takagi, H. Evaluation of Geosite for Sustainable Planning and Management in Geotourism. Geoheritage 10, 123–135 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-017-0225-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-017-0225-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation