Abstract
Sugarcane (Saccharum hybrid spp.) breeders at the Hawaiian Sugar Planters’ Association used biparental and melting pot (modified polycross) crossing methods concurrently from 1935 to 1985. While the annual effort expended to make biparental crosses exceeded the effort to make melting pot crosses over this 50-year period, annual viable seed yield from biparental crosses was usually less than 15% of that from melting pot crosses and hence, the numbers of seedlings planted to the field from those crosses usually accounted for less than 20% of the total seedling population. In 1985, nine of the 10 sugarcane cultivars listed in Hawaii’s variety census originated from melting pot crosses; only one originated from a biparental cross. In the face of a shrinking sugar industry in Hawaii and a smaller work force in the breeding program, the decision was made in 1985 to rely primarily on melting pot crosses for the production of commercial cultivars. From 1985 to 2005, twelve additional clones that were bred prior to 1985 eventually attained “commercial cultivar” status by exceeding 1% of the total cane growing area. All twelve originated from melting pot crosses. Over the 50-year period that the two crossing methods were used, the melting pot method proved to be more labour efficient and ultimately contributed more than the biparental crossing procedure toward the development of new commercial cultivars for the Hawaiian sugar industry. From 1985 forward, the biparental crossing method was used more for introgressing desired traits from exotic germplasm than for the development of commercial cultivars.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allard RW (1960). Principles of Plant Breeding. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. NY. 485 p.
Empig LT, Gardner CO, Compton WA (1972). Theoretical gains for different population improvement procedures. Nebr. Ag. Exp. Stn. Bull. MP26 (revised).
Heinz DJ, Meyer H, Wu KK (1979). Registration of ‘H62-4671’ sugarcane. Crop Sci. 19: 413.
Heinz DJ, Osgood RV (2009). A history of the Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters’ Association: 1946–1996. Hawaiian Planters’ Record 61(3): 58–64.
Heinz DJ, Tew TL, Meyer HK, Wu KK (1981a). Registration of ‘H65-7052’ sugarcane. Crop Sci. 21: 634–635.
Heinz DJ, Tew TL, Meyer HK, Wu KK (1981b). Registration of ‘H68-1158’ sugarcane. Crop Sci. 21: 635.
Heinz DJ, Tew TL, Meyer HK, Wu KK (1983). Registration of ‘H70-144’ sugarcane. Crop Sci. 23: 402.
Heinz DJ, Tew TL, Meyer HK, Wu KK (1984). Registration of ‘H73-6110’ sugarcane. Crop Sci. 24: 825.
Hogarth DM, Skinner JC (1986). Computerization of cane breeding records. Proc. Int. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. 19: 478–491.
Mangelsdorf AJ (1953). Sugarcane breeding in Hawaii. Part II. 1921 to 1952. Hawaiian Planters’ Record 54: 101–137.
Meyer HK, Heinz DJ (1975). “Hawaiianizing” wild species derivatives. Hawaiian Sugar Planters’ Assoc. Exp. Stn. Ann. Rpt. 1974. p. 8.
Meyer HK, Madriaga A, Tew TL (1982). Backcrossing S. ispontaneum derivatives. Hawaiian Sugar Planters’ Assoc. Exp. Stn. Ann. Rpt. 1981. p. 5.
Nagai C (1985). Emasculation of sugarcane tassels by hot-water treatment. Hawaiian Sugar Planters’ Assoc. Exp. Stn. Ann. Rpt. 1984. p. 3–4.
Skinner JC (1959). Controlled pollination of sugarcane. Bureau of Sugar Experiment Stations (Queensland) Technical Communication 1: 7–20.
Stevenson GC (1965). Genetics and Breeding of Sugar Cane. Longmans, Green and Co., London. 284 p.
Tew TL, Wu KK, Schnell RJ, Nagai C (1988). Registration of ‘H74-1715’ sugarcane. Crop Sci. 28: 197.
Tew TL, Wu KK, Nagai C, Wells WC (1992a). Registration of ‘H73-7324’ sugarcane. Crop Sci. 32: 281.
Tew TL, Wu KK, Nagai C, Wells WC (1992b). Registration of ‘H74-4527’ sugarcane. Crop Sci. 32: 281.
Tew TL, Wu KK, Nagai C, Wells WC (1992c). Registration of ‘H78-0292’ sugarcane. Crop Sci. 32: 282.
Tysdal HM, Kiesselbach TA, Westover HL (1942). Alfalfa breeding. Nebr. Ag. Exp. Stn. Res. Bull., 124. 45 p.
Warner JN (1953). The evolution of a philosophy on sugarcane breeding in Hawaii. Hawaiian Planters’ Record 54: 139–162.
Wu KK (1983). Visual selection: I. First year cane volume versus second year cane weight in FT5 [preliminary yield trials]. Hawaiian Sugar Planters’ Assoc. Exp. Stn. Ann. Rpt. 1982. p. 7–8.
Wu KK, Tew TL (1990). Evaluation of sugarcane crosses by family yields. Int. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. 20(2): 925–931.
Wu KK (2003). Registration of ‘H78-4153’ sugarcane. Crop Sci. 43: 431–432.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
All authors not currently affliated with HARC (formely HSPA) were formally affiliated with HSPA.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tew, T.L., Wu, K.K., Schnell, R.J. et al. Comparison of biparental and melting pot methods of crossing sugarcane in Hawaii. Sugar Tech 12, 139–144 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-010-0027-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-010-0027-3