Skip to main content
Log in

Taxation avoidance in overtrading firms as determinants of board independence (BvD)

  • Review
  • Published:
Operational Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the liaison between taxation and corporate governance issues of listed multinational firms and the core characteristics of their boards’ functioning. The aim is to capture the determinant factors of board independency of listed firms as well as taxation, through a multiple regression analysis. For this reason, two models are examined, in order to get the impact of financial and non-financial factors in board independence and taxation, such as the number of directors and/or managers, the number of recorded shareholders and subsidiaries. In order to confirm results, taxation, as a compulsory expense, is examined so as to identify whether and in what extent impacts to board independency. Corporate governance indicators are also used as financial factors that relate directly with the viability and efficiency of a firm. The sample data is comprised of 918 listed European companies, over the period 2006–2015. Country determinant, as a supportive element in this research, enhances understanding of the core topic, that of board independency and taxation. Results are very promising regarding corporate governance practices, implemented by sample firms, providing at the same time evidence about their corporate profile and the possibility of overtrading.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Large and very large companies are few in number and usually spread across different sectors. Each large and very large firm is nearly unique. In terms of definition, large companies employ more than 250 employees and records Revenues over €50 mil. or Total Assets over € 43 mil. Compliance with the criterion of the number of employees is compulsory in order for the firm to be considered a large one. However, a large firm may choose to meet either the criterion of Turnover or Total Assets. It does not need to meet both requirements and may exceed one of them without affecting its status.

  2. ROE equals Net income before tax to Average shareholder's equity.

  3. Solvency Ratio equals Total Liabilities to Shareholders' Equity or alternatively Total Debt to Total Assets.

  4. Lyroudi and Lazaridis (2000) found that there is a significant positive relationship, between the cash conversion cycle and the traditional liquidity measures. Even though that in current study we are focusing on food industry as they did, still this is a representative study supporting the good performance of Greek Food Industry (either small or large).

References

  • Aebi V, Sabato G, Schmid M (2012) Risk management, corporate governance, and bank performance in the financial crisis. J Bank Financ 36:3213–3226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albertazzi U, Gambacorta L (2010) Bank profitability and taxation. J Bank Financ 34(11):2801–2810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong C, Blouin J, Jagolinzer A (2015) Corporate governance, incentives, and tax avoidance. J Account Econ 60:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry BD, Henry B (1985) Corporate governance and the board of directors; Performance effects of changes in board composition. J Law Econ Organ 1:101–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Boynton CE, Dobbins PS, Plesko G (1992) Earnings management and the corporate alternative minimum tax. J Account Res 30:131–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter DA, Simkins BJ, Simpson WG (2003) Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financ Rev 38:33–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courtis J (1976) Relationships between timeliness in corporate reporting and corporate attributes. Account Bus Res 25(2):45–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaggi B, Leung S, Gul F (2009) Family control, board independence and earnings management: evidence based on Hong Kong firms. Journal of Accounting Public Policy 28:281–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamasb T (2006) Between the state and market: electricity sector reform in developing countries. Util Policy 14:14–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johna K, Senbet L (1998) Corporate governance and board effectiveness. J Bank Financ 22:371–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyroudi K, Lazaridis Y (2000) The cash conversion cycle and liquidity analysis of the food industry in Greece. In: EFMA 2000, Athens

  • Mirrlees JA (1971) An exploration in the theory of optimum income taxation. Rev Econ Stud 38(2):175–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christos Lemonakis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zopounidis, C., Floros, C., Lemonakis, C. et al. Taxation avoidance in overtrading firms as determinants of board independence (BvD). Oper Res Int J 20, 1189–1204 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-018-0389-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-018-0389-y

Keywords

Navigation