Skip to main content
Log in

Type 2 Myocardial Infarction and Long-Term Mortality Risk Factors: A Retrospective Cohort Study

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Advances in Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

In-hospital risk factors for type 1 myocardial infarction (MI) have been extensively investigated, but risk factors for type 2 MI are still emerging. Moreover, type 2 MI remains an underdiagnosed and under-researched condition. Our aim was to assess survival rates after type 2 MI and to analyze the risk factors for patient prognosis after hospitalization.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective database analysis of patients with MI diagnosis who were treated in Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos. A total of 6495 patients with the diagnosis of MI were screened. The primary study endpoint was long-term all-cause mortality. The predictive value of laboratory tests was estimated including blood hemoglobin, D dimer, creatinine, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), C-reactive protein (CRP), and troponin levels.

Results

Out of all the patients diagnosed with MI there were 129 cases of type 2 MI (1.98%). Death rate almost doubled from 19.4% at 6 months to 36.4% after 2 years of follow-up. Higher age and impaired kidney function were risk factors for death both during hospitalization and after 2 years of follow-up. Lower hemoglobin (116.6 vs. 98.9 g/L), higher creatinine (90 vs. 161.9 μmol/L), higher CRP (31.4 vs. 63.3 mg/l), BNP (707.9 vs. 2999.3 ng/L), and lower left ventricle ejection fraction were all predictors of worse survival after 2 years of follow-up. Preventive medication during hospitalization can decrease the mortality risk: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) (HR 0.485, 95% CI 0.286–0.820) and statins (HR 0.549, 95% CI 0.335–0.900). No significant influence was found for beta blockers (HR 0.662, 95% CI 0.371–1.181) or aspirin (HR 0.901, 95% CI 0.527–1.539).

Conclusions

There is significant underdiagnosis of type 2 MI (1.98% out of all MIs). If the patient is prescribed a preventive medication like ACEi or statins, the mortality risk is lower. Increased awareness of elevation of laboratory results could help to improve the treatment of these patients and identify the most vulnerable groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Falk E, Shah PK, Fuster V. Coronary plaque disruption. Circulation. 1995;92(3):657–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD. Universal definition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50(22):2173–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). Eur Heart J. 2019;40(3):237–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Melberg T, Burman R, Dickstein K. The impact of the 2007 ESC-ACC-AHA-WHF Universal definition on the incidence and classification of acute myocardial infarction: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Cardiol. 2010;139(3):228–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stein GY, et al. Type-II myocardial infarction—patient characteristics, management and outcomes. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(1):e84285.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Gonzalez MA, et al. The universal classification is an independent predictor of long-term outcomes in acute myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2011;12(1):35–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sandoval Y, et al. Type 1 and 2 myocardial infarction and myocardial injury: clinical transition to high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I. Am J Med. 2017;130(12):1431–1439.e4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Meigher S, et al. Causes of elevated cardiac troponins in the emergency department and their associated mortality. Acad Emerg Med. 2016;23(11):1267–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nestelberger T, et al. Effect of definition on incidence and prognosis of type 2 myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(13):1558–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cediel G, et al. Outcomes with type 2 myocardial infarction compared with non-ischaemic myocardial injury. Heart. 2017;103(8):616.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Neumann JT, et al. Discrimination of patients with type 2 myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(47):3514–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Saaby L, et al. Classification of myocardial infarction: frequency and features of type 2 myocardial infarction. Am J Med. 2013;126(9):789–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Montone RA, et al. Patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-obstructive coronary arteries: safety and prognostic relevance of invasive coronary provocative tests. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(2):91–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Agewall S, et al. Troponin elevation in coronary vs. non-coronary disease. Eur Heart J. 2011;32(4):404–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bril F, Gonzalez CD, Di Girolamo G. Antimicrobial agents-associated with QT interval prolongation. Curr Drug Saf. 2010;5(1):85–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Winkel P, et al. Excess sudden cardiac deaths after short-term clarithromycin administration in the CLARICOR trial: why is this so, and why are statins protective? Cardiology. 2011;118(1):63–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schartum-Hansen H, et al. Use of loop diuretics is associated with increased mortality in patients with suspected coronary artery disease, but without systolic heart failure or renal impairment: an observational study using propensity score matching. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(6):e0124611.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Sandoval Y, Jaffe AS. Type 2 myocardial infarction: JACC review topic of the week. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(14):1846–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Raphael CE, et al. Incidence, trends, and outcomes of type 2 myocardial infarction in a community cohort. Circulation. 2020;141(6):454–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Braam B, et al. Cardiorenal syndrome–current understanding and future perspectives. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2014;10(1):48–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Olatidoye AG, et al. Prognostic role of troponin T versus troponin I in unstable angina pectoris for cardiac events with meta-analysis comparing published studies. Am J Cardiol. 1998;81(12):1405–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Heidenreich PA, et al. The prognostic value of troponin in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38(2):478–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Heeschen C, et al. Troponin concentrations for stratification of patients with acute coronary syndromes in relation to therapeutic efficacy of Tirofiban. PRISM Study Investigators. Platelet receptor inhibition in ischemic syndrome management. Lancet. 1999;354(9192):1757–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sternberg M, et al. Elevated cardiac troponin in clinical scenarios beyond obstructive coronary artery disease. Med Sci Monit. 2019;25:7115–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Vasile VC, et al. Aborted myocardial infarction: is it real in the troponin era? Am Heart J. 2009;157(4):636–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Roos A, et al. Stable high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T levels and outcomes in patients with chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(18):2226–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lambrecht S, et al. Different causes of death in patients with myocardial infarction type 1, type 2, and myocardial injury. Am J Med. 2018;131(5):548–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chapman AR, et al. Long-term outcomes in patients with type 2 myocardial infarction and myocardial injury. Circulation. 2018;137(12):1236–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. DuGoff EH, et al. Multiple chronic conditions and life expectancy: a life table analysis. Med Care. 2014;52(8):688–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos for allowing us to collect data.

Funding

This study has received funding from the European Social Fund (Lietuvos Mokslų Akademija) (project No 09.3.3-LMT-K- 712-0148) under a grant agreement with Research Council of Lithuania (LMTLT). The authors are funding the journal’s Rapid Service Fee.

Author Contributions

Data curation: Mindaugas Lizaitis, Egle Majauskienė, Petras Navickas, Rokas Šerpytis; Concept and design: Rokas Šerpytis., Sigita Glaveckaitė, Žaneta Petrulionienė, Qin M Chen, Joseph S Alpert, Pranas Šerpytis; Project administration: Rokas Šerpytis; Writing—original draft: Rokas Šerpytis, Mindaugas Lizaitis; Writing—review and editing: Rokas Šerpytis, Sigita Glaveckaitė, Žaneta Petrulionienė, Nomeda Valevičienė, Aleksandras Laucevičius, Qin M Chen, Joseph S Alpert, Pranas Šerpytis. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Disclosures

Rokas Šerpytis, Mindaugas Lizaitis, Egle Majauskienė, Petras Navickas, Sigita Glaveckaitė, Žaneta Petrulionienė, Nomeda Valevičienė, Aleksandras Laucevičius, Qin M Chen, Joseph S Alpert, and Pranas Šerpytis have nothing to disclose.

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Local Ethics Committee of Vilnius University (consent Nr.158200- 18/4-1015-522, 2018-04-03). Patient consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study and the analysis used anonymous clinical data.

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rokas Šerpytis.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Šerpytis, R., Lizaitis, M., Majauskienė, E. et al. Type 2 Myocardial Infarction and Long-Term Mortality Risk Factors: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Adv Ther 40, 2471–2480 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-023-02485-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-023-02485-2

Keywords

Navigation