Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Six-year experience with antegrade intramedullary nail for the treatment of proximal and diaphyseal humeral fractures

  • Original Article
  • Published:
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Proximal and shaft humeral fractures are very common worldwide; surgical treatment can be a viable option to reduce limb immobilization and to allow the patient an earlier return to daily activities. The aim of our study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients treated with intramedullary nail in our Institute from January 2010 to December 2016.

Materials and methods

This is an observational cohort study. Inclusion criteria were: traumatic proximal and diaphyseal humeral fractures treated with antegrade nail; a minimum follow-up of 6 months. We evaluated the fracture healing time, the functional recovery (using the Constant score) and postoperative complications (need of blood transfusion, infections and need of re-intervention). The t test was used for statistical analysis.

Results

Ninety-five patients were included (20 proximal and 75 diaphyseal fractures). Bone callus formation was evident a mean of 57 days after surgery. In all patients, there was an improvement in the functional recovery over time, but those younger than 65 years had better outcomes. The type of fracture and patients’ gender did not affect these results at one and 6 months of follow-up. In 18 cases, blood transfusions were needed; infections never occurred; finally, revision surgery was performed in 10 cases (two reverse total shoulder arthroplasties, one open reduction and internal fixation with plate and screws and seven nail removals for intolerance).

Conclusion

In our study, intramedullary nail proved to be a minimally invasive technique with a rapid improvement in range of motion, an earlier rehabilitation and acceptable pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Palvanen M, Kannus P, Niemi S, Parkkari J (2006) Update in the epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 442:87–92. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000194672.79634.78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ge W, Sun Q, Li G, Lu G, Cai M, Li S (2017) Efficacy comparison of intramedullary nails, locking plates and conservative treatment for displaced proximal humeral fractures in the elderly. Clin Interv Aging 12:2047–2054. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S144084

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Li Y, Zhao L, Zhu L, Li J, Chen A (2013) Internal fixation versus nonoperative treatment for displaced 3-part or 4-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS ONE 8(9):e75464. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075464

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Handoll HH, Brorson S (2015) Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd000434.pub4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Neer CS (1970) Displaced proximal humeral fractures. Part I. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52(6):1077–1089. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000198718.91223.ca

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mallick E, Hazarika S, Assad S, Scott M (2008) The fixion nailing system for stabilising diaphyseal fractures of the humerus: a 2-year clinical experience. Acta Orthop Belg 74(3):308–316

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Singisetti K, Ambedkar M (2009) Nailing vs plating in humerus shaft fractures: a prospective comparative study. Int Orthop 34(4):571–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0813-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Chao TC, Chou WY, Chung JC, Hsu CJ (2005) Humeral shaft fractures treated by dynamic compression plate, Ender nails and interlocking nails. Int Orthop 29(2):88–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-004-0620-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Dilisio MF, Nowinski RJ, Hatzidakis AM, Fehringer EV (2016) Intramedullary nailing of the proximal humerus: evolution, technique, and results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 25:e130–e138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2015.11.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nho SJ, Brophy RH, Barker JU, Cornell CN, MacGillivray JD (2007) Management of proximal humeral fractures based on current literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(Suppl 3):44–58. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.g.00648

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. RuediI TP, Buckley R, Moran CG (2007) AO principles of fracture management. Thieme, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  12. Campochiaro G, Baudi P, Loschi R, Serafini F, Catani F (2015) Complex fractures of the humeral shaft treated with antegrade locked intramedullary nail: clinical experience and long-term results. Acta Biomed 86(1):69–76

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Popescu D, Fernandez-Valencia JA, Rios M, Cuñé J, Domingo A, Prat S (2009) Internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures using the T2-proximal humeral nail. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129:1239–1244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-008-0789-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Biggi F, Di Fabio S, D’Antimo C, Carnielli F, Trevisani S (2008) Inchiodamento endomidollare anterogrado e retrogrado nelle fratture diafisarie dell’omero. GIOT 34:194–198

    Google Scholar 

  15. Füchtmeier B, Bröckner S, Hente R, Maghsudi M, Nerlich M, Prantl L (2008) The treatment of dislocated humeral head fractures with a new proximal intramedullary nail system. Int Orthop 32:759–765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-007-0390-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhu Y, Lu Y, Wang M, Jiang C (2010) Treatment of proximal humeral fracture with a proximal humeral nail. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19:297–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.05.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Blum J, Hansen M, Rommens PM (2009) Angle-stable intramedullary nailing of proximal humerus fractures with the PHN (proximal humeral nail). Oper Orthop Traumatol 21:296–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00064-009-1806-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hatzidakis AM, Shevlin MJ, Fenton DL, Curran-Everett D, Nowinski RJ, Fehringer EV (2011) Angular-stable locked intramedullary nailing of two part surgical neck fractures of the proximal humerus. A multicenter retrospective observational study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:2172–2179. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J.00754

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Freynik F, Freynik S, Zenker W, Pflugmacher R (2013) Angular and sliding stable internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures using the “Varion” intramedullary nail. Z Orthop Unf 51(4):343–349. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1350626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bisaccia M, Meccariello L, Rinonapoli G, Rollo G, Pellegrino M, Schiavone A, Ibáñez Vicente C, Ferrara P, Filipponi M, Caraffa A (2017) Comparison of plate, nail and external fixation in the management of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus. Med Arch 71(2):97–102. https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2017.71.97-102

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Fan Y, Li YW, Zhang HB, Liu JF, Han XM, Chang X, Weng XS, Lin J, Zhang BZ (2015) Management of humeral shaft fractures with intramedullary interlocking nail versus locking compression plate. Orthopedics 38(9):e825–e829. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20150902-62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Maniscalco P, Caforio P, Del Vecchio EO, D’Ascolà J, Crainz E, Ferratà P (2013) Preliminary experience with Diphos Nail in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures. GIOT 39:48–55

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lanting B, MacDermid J, Drosdowech D, Faber KJ (2008) Proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review of treatment modalities. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17:42–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.03.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Studies in Turin, Via Gianfranco Zuretti 29, 10126, Turin, Italy

    A. Pautasso, S. Lea & F. Castoldi

  2. San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Via Regione Gonzole 10, 10043, Orbassano (Turin), Italy

    A. Arpaia, G. Ferrero & E. Bellato

Authors
  1. A. Pautasso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Lea
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Arpaia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. G. Ferrero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. E. Bellato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. F. Castoldi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Pautasso.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors, their immediate family and any research foundation with which they are affiliated did not receive any financial payments or other benefits from any commercial entity related to the subject of this article.

Ethical approval

For this type of study, formal consent is not required. According to the Italian law, no institutional review board approval was needed for this study. The study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and was carried out in accordance with relevant regulations of the Italian National Health Care System.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all the patients included in our study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pautasso, A., Lea, S., Arpaia, A. et al. Six-year experience with antegrade intramedullary nail for the treatment of proximal and diaphyseal humeral fractures. Musculoskelet Surg 102 (Suppl 1), 67–74 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-018-0561-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-018-0561-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation