Abstract
The goal of this paper is to explain the evolution of life through the evolution of cellular and supra-cellular closures, two distinct ways of strict delimitation against the surroundings. Such closures are a necessary precondition of organisation, semiosis, and agency. We argue that in addition to the basic, first-order, cellular closures, which have been in existence without interruption since the dawn of life, there also exist second-order closures (cell communities), which are dynamic and often formed ad hoc. Moreover, a living entity may belong simultaneously to different kinds of such second-order closures. It is these second-order closures which organise cellular (and higher-order) communities and form the core of the bonds that hold the biosphere together. In second-order closures, there exist countless crisscrossing pathways leading to manifold interpretations of particular situations. We provide examples of such relationships and point to an elaborate network connecting all denizens of the biosphere.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
According to a model we believe to be likely, such agents may have evolved in the tiny cavities of water-percolated rocks or at the bottom of oceans (Markoš & Švorcová, 2019) through a process of serpentinization, where Fe/Mg silicates gave rise to hydrogen and methane (Martin & Russell, 2007; Russell et al., 2015; for a review, see Sojo et al., 2016). In this model, the cold and acidic oceanic water (app. 10 °C and pH 5.5) interaced with alkaline vents, which rose from below bringing with them sulphides of various metals, silicates, and ion hydroxides. These substances subsequently precipitated and formed a porous mineral membrane. Such porous membranes (i) separated the anoxic oceanic waters from waters rising from below; (ii) their surfaces enabled the catalysis of organic syntheses and, most importantly, (iii) they separated two environments with different pH, thus creating an electrochemical potential (about one volt) and the first primitive closure with an energy source. This energy source could have enabled certain key metabolic reactions, such as the synthesis of pyrophosphate (an equivalent of ATP in extant cells; for more detailed information and other models of the evolution of life, see Markoš and Švorcová 2019). To conclude, we believe that with the emergence of life, the emergence of closure had to go hand in hand together with the emergence of the first metabolic syntheses.
Secondary, or even tertiary, semiautonomous organelles can emerge in different eukaryotic lineages by capturing algae, which contain primary chloroplasts (e.g., Euglena), or even lifeforms already equipped by such secondary chloroplasts (e.g., Dinophlagellates).
References
Al-Shayeb, B., Schoelmerich, M. C., West-Roberts, J., et al. (2022). Borgs are giant genetic elements with potential to expand metabolic capacity. Nature, 610, 731–736.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05256-1
Ankersmit, F. R. (1994). History and tropology: the rise and fall of metaphor. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Barfield, O. (1988 [1957]). Saving the appearances. A study in idolatry. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
Bokhari, R. J., Amirjan, N., Jeong, H., et al. (2020). Bacterial origin and reductive evolution of the CPR group. Genome Biology and Evolution, 12, 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evaa024.
Dombrowski, N., Lee, J. H., Williams, T. A., et al. (2019). Genomic diversity, lifestyles and evolutionary origins of DPANN archaea. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 366, fnz008. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnz008.
Gilbert, S. F. (2016). Ecological developmental biology: interpreting developmental signs. Biosemiotics, 9, 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-016-9257-4.
Graham, E. R., Fay, S. A., Davey, A., & Sanders, R. W. (2013). Intracapsular algae provide fixed carbon to developing embryos of the salamander Ambystoma maculatum. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 216, 452–459. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.076711.
Haluzík, R. (2011). How war was hatched from peace: political aesthetics, mass performance and ecstasy of the post-communist ethnic conflicts in the former Yugoslavia and in the Caucasus Ph.D. Thesis, University College London.
Haluzík, R. (2018). [in Czech] Proč jdou chlapi do války: emoce a estetika u počátku etnických konfliktů [Why men go to war: Emotions and aesthetics at the beginning of ethnic conflicts] Dokořán, Prague.
He, C., Keren, R., Whittaker, M. L., et al. (2021). Genome-resolved metagenomics reveals site-specific diversity of episymbiotic CPR bacteria and DPANN archaea in groundwater ecosystems. Nature Microbiology, 6, 354–365. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-020-00840-5.
Hoffmeyer, J. (1996). Signs of meaning in the universe. The natural history of signification. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Hoffmeyer, J. (2000). Code-duality and the epistemic cut. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 901, 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06277.x.
Hug, L. A., Baker, B. J., Anantharaman, K., et al. (2016). A new view of the tree of life. Nature Microbiology, 1, 16048. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.48.
Imachi, M., Nobu, M. K., Nakahara, N., et al. (2020). Isolation of an archaeon at the prokaryote–eukaryote interface. Nature, 577, 519–525. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1916-6.
Jaeger, J. (to be published in 2023). Ontogenesis and Organismal agency. In J. Švorcová (Ed.), Organismal Agency: Biological Concepts and Their Philosophical Foundations. Springer.
Jovel, J., Patterson, J., Wang, W. (2016). Characterization of the gut microbiome using 16S or shotgun metagenomics. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7, 459. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00459.eCollection 2016
Kauffman, S. (2000). Investigations. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kerney, R., Kim, E., Hangarter, R. P., et al. (2011). Intracellular invasion of green algae in a salamander host. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 6497–6502. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1018259108.
Koselleck, R. (2004 [1979]). Futures past. On the semantics of historical time. New York: Columbia University Press.
Lane, N. (2016). The vital question. Why is life the way it is?. London: Profile Books.
Luef, B., Frischkorn, K. R., Wrighton, K. C., et al. (2015). Diverse uncultivated ultra-small bacterial cells in groundwater. Nature Communication, 6, 6372. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7372.
Markoš, A. (2002). Readers of the Book of life. Contextualizing developmental evolutionary biology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Markoš, A. (2004). In the quest for novelty: Kauffman’s biosphere and Lotman’s semiosphere. Sign System Studies, 32, 309–327. https://doi.org/signsystems2004321/241
Markoš, A. (2016). The birth and life of species–cultures. Biosemiotics, 9, 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-015-9252-1.
Markoš, A., Grygar, F., Hajnal, L., Kratochvíl, Z., & Neubauer, Z. (2009). Life as its own designer. Darwins Origin and Western thought. Springer.
Markoš, A., & Švorcová, J. (2019). Epigenetic processes and the evolution of life. CRC Press. Taylor and Francis.
Martin, W., & Russell, M. J. (2007). On the origin of biochemistry at an alkaline hydrothermal vent. Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society B, 362, 1887–1925. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.1881.
Maturana, H., & Varela, F. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: the realization of the living. London: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Moreno, A., & Mossio, M. (2015). Biological Autonomy. A philosophical and theoretical Enquiry. Springer Dordrecht.
McGlynn, S. E., Chadwick, G. L., Kempes, C. P., & Orphan, V. J. (2015). Single cell activity reveals direct electron transfer in methanotrophic consortia. Nature, 526, 531–535. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15512.
Morris, B. E. L., Henneberger, R., Huber, H., & Moissl-Eichinger, C. (2013). Microbial syntrophy: interaction for the common good. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 37, 384–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6976.12019.
Ntarlagiannis, D., Atekwana, E. A., Hill, E. A., & Gorby, Y. (2007). Microbial nanowires: is the subsurface hardwired? Geophysical Research Letters, 34, L17305. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030426.
Pfeffer, C., Larsen, S., Song, J., et al. (2012). Filamentous bacteria transport electrons over centimetre distances. Nature, 491, 218–221. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11586.
Ricoeur, P. (1990). Time and narrative. Vols. 1–3. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Russell, M. J., Nitschke, W., & Branscomb, E. (2015). The inevitable journey to being. Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society B, 362, 20120254. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0254.
Schön, M. E., Zlatogursky, V. V., Singh, R. P., et al. (2021). Single cell genomics reveals plastid-lacking Picozoa are close relatives of red algae. Nature Communication, 12, 6651. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26918-0.
Seenivasan, R., Sausen, N., Medlin, L. K., & Melkonian, M. (2013). Picomonas judraskeda Gen. Et Sp. Nov.: the first identified member of the picozoa phylum nov., a widespread group of picoeukaryotes, formerly known as ‘Picobiliphytes’. PLOS One, 8, e59565. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059565.
Sharma, U., Sun, F., Conine, C. C., et al. (2018). Small RNAs are trafficked from the Epididymis to developing mammalian sperm. Developmental Cell, 46, 481–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2018.06.023.
Sharov, A., & Tønnessen, M. (2021). Semiotic Agency. Science Beyond mechanism. Biosemiotics Springer Cham.
Sojo, V., Herschy, B., Whicher, A., et al. (2016). The origin of life in alkaline hydrothermal vents. Astrobiology, 16, 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2015.1406.
Szathmáry, E., & Maynard Smith, J. (1995). The major evolutionary transitions. Nature, 374, 227–232. https://doi.org/10.1038/374227a0.
Švorcová, J. (2023). Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance of traumatic experience in mammals. Genes, 14, 120. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14010120.
Švorcová, J. (2012). The phylotypic stage as a boundary of modular memory: non mechanistic perspective. Theory in Biosciences, 131, 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-012-0149-0.
Varela, F. J. (1997). Patterns of life: intertwining identity and cognition. Brain and Cognition, 34, 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.1997.0907.
Funding
Supported by the Czech Science Foundation, grant No. 20-16633 S, recipient Jana Švorcová. We are grateful to Anna Pilátová for her proofreading and editing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Both authors contributed equally to the paper, both reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by authors of this article.
Conflict of Interests
The authors, Jana Švorcová and Anton Markoš, declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Švorcová, J., Markoš, A. Closures as a Precondition of Life, Agency, and Semiosis. Biosemiotics 16, 45–59 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-023-09520-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-023-09520-3