Abstract
Drought alters rice morphophysiology and reduces grain yield. This study hypothesized that the combined analysis of morphophysiological and agronomic traits enables a systemic approach to responses to water deficit, allowing the selection of resistance markers to upland rice. The objectives were to evaluate the effects of water deficit applied at the reproductive stage in plant water status, leaf gas exchanges, leaf non-structural carbohydrate contents, and agronomic traits in upland rice genotypes; and to verify if the analyzed variables may be applied to group the genotypes according to their tolerance level. Water deficit was induced by irrigation suppression in eight genotypes at R2-R3. Physiological and biochemical traits were evaluated at the end of the water deficit period, thenceforth irrigation was restored until grain maturation for the analysis of the agronomic traits. Water deficit reduced: Ψw (63.64%, average); gs (28–90%); transpiration rate (40.63–65.45%); RWC from Serra Dourada to Esmeralda (43.36–61.48%); net CO2 assimilation from Serra Dourada to Primavera (70.04–99.91%); iWUE from Esmeralda to Primavera (83.98–99.85%); iCE in Esmeralda (99.92%); 100-grain weight in CIRAD and Soberana (13.65–20.63%); and grain yield from Primavera to IAC 164 (34.60–78.85%). Water deficit increased Ci from Cambará to Early mutant (79.64–215.23%), and did not affect the tiller number, shoot dry biomass, fructose, and sucrose contents. The alterations in the variables distinguished groups according to the water regime. RWC, Ψw, leaf gas exchanges, and iCE were valuable traits to distinguish the water regime treatments, but not to group the genotypes according to the drought tolerance level.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adeboye KA, Oduwaye OA, Daniel IO, Fofana M, Semon M (2021) Characterization of flowering time response among recombinant inbred lines of WAB638-1/PRIMAVERA rice under reproductive stage drought stress. Plant Genet Res 19:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479262121000010
Agro Norte Pesquisa e Sementes Ltda, 2020. AN Cambará: características. http://www.agronorte.com.br/Produtos/Arroz/7-AN_Cambara. Accessed 1 June 2020
Amaral LIV, Gaspar M, Costa PMF, Aidar MPM, Buckeridge MS (2007) Novo método enzimático rápido e sensível de extração e dosagem de amido em materiais vegetais. Hoehnea 34:425–431. https://doi.org/10.1590/S2236-89062007000400001
Anupama A, Bhugra S, Lall B, Chaudhury S, Chugh A (2019) Morphological, transcriptomic and proteomic responses of contrasting rice genotypes towards drought stress. Environ Exp Bot 166:103795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2019.06.008
Asch F, Dingkuhn M, Sow A, Audebert A (2005) Drought-induced changes in rooting patterns and assimilate partitioning between root and shoot in upland rice. Field Crops Res 93:223–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2004.10.002
Babu RC, Nguyen BD, Chamarerk V, Shanmugasundaram P, Chezhian P, Jeyaprakash P, Ganesh SK, Palchamy A, Sadasivam S, Sarkarung S, Wade LJ, Nguyen HT (2003) Genetic analysis of drought resistance in rice by molecular markers: association between secondary traits and field performance. Crop Sci 43:1457–1469. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2003.1457
Boonjung H, Fukai S (1996) Effects of soil water deficit at different growth stages on rice growth and yield under upland conditions. 1. Growth during Drought Field Crops Res 48:37–45
Bota J, Medrano H, Flexas J (2004) Is photosynthesis limited by decreased rubisco activity and RuBP content under progressive water stress? New Phytol 162:671–681. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01056.x
Brown MB, Forsythe AB (1974) Robust tests for the equality of variances. J Am Stat Assoc 69:364–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1974.10482955
Cabuslay GS, Ito O, Alejar AA (2002) Physiological evaluation of responses of rice (Oryza sativa L.) to water deficit. Plant Sci 163:815–827. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(02)00217-0
Castro AP, Guimarães CM, Morais OP, Colombari-Filho JM (2013) Avaliação de cultivares de arroz (Oryza sativa) de terras altas quanto à tolerância à deficiência hídrica, In: SBMP (Ed.), Anais Do 7 Congresso Brasileiro de Melhoramento de Plantas. Viçosa, pp. 1918–1922.
Castro AP, Morais OP, Breseghello F, Lobo VLS, Guimarães CM, Bassinello PZ, Colombari-Filho JM, Santiago CM, Furtini IV, Torga PP, Utumi MM, Pereira JA, Cordeiro ACC, Azevedo R, Sousa NRG, Soares AA, Radmann V, Peters VJ (2014) BRS Esmeralda: cultivar de arroz de terras altas com elevada produtividade e maior tolerância à seca. Embrapa Arroz e Feijão -Comunicado Técnico. Embrapa Arroz e Feijão, Santo Antônio de Goiás.
Cavatte PC, Oliveira ÁAG, Morais LE, Martins SCV, Sanglard LMVP, Damatta FM (2012) Could shading reduce the negative impacts of drought on coffee? A morphophysiological analysis. Physiol Plant 144:111–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2011.01525.x
Centritto M, Lauteri M, Monteverdi MC, Serraj R (2009) Leaf gas exchange, carbon isotope discrimination, and grain yield in contrasting rice genotypes subjected to water deficits during the reproductive stage. J Exp Bot 60:2325–2339. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp123
Cha-Um S, Yooyongwech S, Supaibulwatana K (2010) Water deficit stress in the reproductive stage of four indica rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes. Pak J Bot 42:3387–3398
Chaves MM, Maroco JP, Pereira JS (2003) Understanding plant responses to drought—from genes to the whole plant. Funct Plant Biol 30:239. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP02076
Chow PS, Landhausser SM (2004) A method for routine measurements of total sugar and starch content in woody plant tissues. Tree Physiol 24:1129–1136. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/24.10.1129
Colombari-Filho JM, Resende MDV, Morais OP, Castro AP, Guimarães ÉP, Pereira JA, Utumi MM, Breseghello F (2013) Upland rice breeding in Brazil: a simultaneous genotypic evaluation of stability, adaptability and grain yield. Euphytica 192:117–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-013-0922-2
Costa NB, Bezerra GDA, Pinheiro-Filho GDO, Moraes MG (2021) Distribution of non-structural carbohydrates in the vegetative organs of upland rice. Cienc Agrotec 45:e008721. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-7054202145008721
Counce PA, Keisling TC, Mitchell AJ (2000) A uniform, objective, ad adaptive system for expressing rice development. Crop Sci 40:436–443. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2000.402436x
Dionex Corporation (2006) Chromeleon—chromatography management system software v.6.8 Sunnyvale, United States of America.
Farooq M, Kobayashi N, Ito O, Wahid A, Serraj R (2010) Broader leaves result in better performance of indica rice under drought stress. J Plant Physiol 167:1066–1075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2010.03.003%3c/div%3e
Ferreira DF (2011) Sisvar: a computer statistical analysis system. Cienc Agrotec 35:1039–1042. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542011000600001
Flexas J (2002) Drought-inhibition of photosynthesis in C3 plants: stomatal and non-stomatal limitations revisited. Ann Bot 89:183–189. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcf027
GRiSP (2013) Rice almanac: source book for one of the most economic activities on Earth., 4th edn International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, Philippines
Guimarães CM, Castro AP, Stone LF, Oliveira JP (2016) Drought tolerance in upland rice: identification of genotypes and agronomic characteristics. Acta Sci Agron 38:201–206. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v38i2.27164
Guimarães PHR, de Lima IP, Castro AP, Lanna AC, Melo PGS, Raïssac M (2020) Phenotyping root systems in a set of japonica rice accessions: can structural traits predict the response to drought? Rice 13:67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-020-00404-5
Haefele SM, Kato Y, Singh S (2016) Climate ready rice: augmenting drought tolerance with best management practices. Field Crops Res 190:60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.02.001
Hu H, Xiong L (2014) Genetic engineering and breeding of drought-resistant crops. Annu Rev Plant Biol 65:715–741. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-040000
Jaimez RE, Rada F, García-Núñez C, Azócar A (2005) Seasonal variations in leaf gas exchange of plantain cv. Hartón (Musa AAB) under different soil water conditions in a humid tropical region. Sci Hortic 104:79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2004.07.002
Ji K, Wang Y, Sun W, Lou Q, Mei H, Shen S, Chen H (2012) Drought-responsive mechanisms in rice genotypes with contrasting drought tolerance during reproductive stage. J Plant Physiol 169:336–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2011.10.010
Jolliffe IT, Cadima J (2016) Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments. Philos Trans Royal Soc A 374:20150202. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0202
Kaur G, Asthir B (2017) Molecular responses to drought stress in plants. Biol Plant 61:201–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-016-0700-9
Korres NE, Norsworthy JK, Burgos NR, Oosterhuis DM (2017) Temperature and drought impacts on rice production: an agronomic perspective regarding short- and long-term adaptation measures. Water Resour Rural Dev 9:12–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wrr.2016.10.001
Kumar A, Nayak AK, Das BS, Panigrahi N, Dasgupta P, Mohanty S, Kumar U, Panneerselvam P, Pathak H (2019) Effects of water deficit stress on agronomic and physiological responses of rice and greenhouse gas emission from rice soil under elevated atmospheric CO2. Sci Tot Environ 650:2032–2050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.332
Landhäusser SM, Chow PS, Dickman LT, Furze ME, Kuhlman I, Schmid S, Wiesenbauer J, Wild B, Gleixner G, Hartmann H, Hoch G, McDowell NG, Richardson AD, Richter A, Adams HD (2018) Standardized protocols and procedures can precisely and accurately quantify non-structural carbohydrates. Tree Physiol 38:1764–1778
Lanna AC, Coelho GRC, Moreira AS, Terra TGR, Brondani C, Saraiva GR, Lemos FS, Guimarães PHR, Morais-Júnior OP, Vianello RP (2021) Upland rice: phenotypic diversity for drought tolerance. Sci Agr 78:e20190338. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-992X-2019-0338
Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical Ecology, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, New York
Lenz TI, Wright IJ, Westoby M (2006) Interrelations among pressure-volume curve traits across species and water availability gradients. Physiol Plant 127:423–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00680.x
Machado EC, Schmidt PT, Medina CL, Ribeiro ERV (2005) Photosynthetic responses of three citrus species to environmental factors. Pesqui Agropecu Bras 40:1161–1170. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2005001200002
McCune B, Mefford MJ (1999) PC-ORD: multivariate analysis of ecological data. Version 4 for Windows;[User's Guide]. MjM software design
Melo PGSM, Morais OP, Diniz JDA, Lobo VL, Bresegghello F, Fonseca JR, Castro AP, Bassinello PZ, Castro EDM (2009) BRSGO Serra Dourada: cultivar de arroz para a agricultura familiar de Goiás. Embrapa Arroz e Feijão -Comunicado Técnico, Embrapa Arroz e Feijão, Santo Antônio de Goiás
Mugford ST, Fernandez O, Brinton J, Flis A, Krohn N, Encke B, Feil R, Sulpice R, Lunn JE, Stitt M, Smith AM (2014) Regulatory properties of ADP glucose pyrophosphorylase are required for adjustment of leaf starch synthesis in different photoperiods. Plant Physiol 166:1733–1747. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.114.247759
O’Toole JC, Cruz RT (1980) Response of leaf water potential, stomatal resistance, and leaf rolling to water stress. Plant Physiol 65:428–432. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.65.3.428
O’Toole JC (2004) Rice and water: the final frontier In: the first international conference on rice for the future. Bangkok, Thailand, pp. 1–26
Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Henry M, Stevens H, Szoecs E, Wagner H (2017) Vegan: community ecology package. R package
Pandey V, Shukla A (2015) Acclimation and tolerance strategies of rice under drought stress. Rice Sci 22:147–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2015.04.001
Pieters AJ, Souki SE (2005) Effects of drought during grain filling on PS II activity in rice. J Plant Physiol 162:903–911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2004.11.001
Pinheiro C, Chaves MM (2011) Photosynthesis and drought: can we make metabolic connections from available data? J Exp Bot 62:869–882. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq340
Prathap V, Kishwar A, Archana S, Chandrapal V, Veda K, Viswanathan C, Aruna T (2019) Starch accumulation in rice grains subjected to drought during grain filling stage. Plant Physiol Biochem 142:440–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.07.027
R Development Core Team, 2017. R: a language and environment for statistical computing, version 4.0.2. R Foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. Available in: http://www.R-project.org/
Royston P (1982) An extension of Shapiro and Wilk’s W test for normality to large samples. Appl Stat 31:115–124. https://doi.org/10.2307/2347973
Saito K, Asai H, Zhao D, Laborte AG, Grenier C (2018) Progress in varietal improvement for increasing upland rice productivity in the tropics. Plant Prod Sci 21:145–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/1343943X.2018.1459751
Scholander PF, Hammel HT, Brandstreet ED, Hemmingsen EA (1965) Sap pressure in vascular plants. Science 148:339–346
Shimazaki K, Doi M, Assmann SM, Kinoshita T (2007) Light regulation of stomatal movement. Ann Rev Plant Biol 58:219–247. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105434
Smart RE, Bingham GE (1974) Rapid estimates of relative water content. Plant Physiol 53:258–260. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.53.2.258
Stitt M, Zeeman SC (2012) Starch turnover: pathways, regulation and role in growth. Curr Opin Plant Biol 15:282–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2012.03.016
Swann ALS (2018) Plants and drought in a changing climate. Curr Clim Change Rep 4:192–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-018-0097-y
Swapna S, Shylaraj KS (2017) Screening for osmotic stress responses in rice varieties under drought condition. Rice Sci 24:253–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2017.04.004
Tang T, Xie H, Wang Y, Lu B, Liang J (2009) The effect of sucrose and abscisic acid interaction on sucrose synthase and its relationship to grain filling of rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Exp Bot 60:2641–2652. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp114
Terra TGR, Leal TCADB, Rangel PHN, Oliveira ABD (2015) Características de tolerância à seca em genótipos de uma coleção nuclear de arroz de terras altas. Pesqui Agropecu Bras 50:788–796. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2015000900007
Thomas H, Smart CM (1993) Crops that stay green. Ann Appl Biol 123:193–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1993.tb04086.x
Tominaga J, Kawamitsu Y (2015) Cuticle affects calculations of internal CO2 in leaves closing their stomata. Plant Cell Physiol 56:1900–1908. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcv109
Tonello LP, Tavares TCDO, Rocha RDO, Santos GR, Sousa SA, Fidelis RR (2016) Agronomic performance of upland rice cultivars in the southern region of the state of Tocantins. Semin Cienc Agrar 37:1699
Vijayaraghavareddy P, Xinyou Y, Struik PC, Makarla U, Sreeman S (2020) Responses of lowland, upland and aerobic rice genotypes to water limitation during separate phases. Rice Sci 27:345–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2020.05.009
Wang Z, Xu Y, Chen T, Zhang H, Yang J, Zhang J (2015) Abscisic acid and the key enzymes and genes in sucrose-to-starch conversion in rice spikelets in response to soil drying during grain filling. Planta 241:1091–1107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-015-2245-0
Wang X, Du T, Huang J, Peng S, Xiong D (2018) Leaf hydraulic vulnerability triggers the decline in stomatal and mesophyll conductance during drought in rice. J Exp Bot 69:4033–4045. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ery188
Xia H, Luo Z, Xiong J, Ma X, Lou Q, Wei H, Qiu J, Yang H, Liu G, Fan L, Chen L, Luo L (2019) Bi-directional selection in upland rice leads to its adaptive differentiation from lowland rice in drought resistance and productivity. Mol Plant 12:170–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2018.12.011
Yang PM, Huang QC, Qin GY, Zhao SP, Zhou JG (2014) Different drought-stress responses in photosynthesis and reactive oxygen metabolism between autotetraploid and diploid rice. Photosynthetica 52:193–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-014-0020-2
Yang X, Wang B, Chen L, Li P, Cao C (2019) The different influences of drought stress at the flowering stage on rice physiological traits, grain yield, and quality. Sci Rep 9:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40161-0%3c/div%3e
Zu X, Lu Y, Wang Q, Chu P, Miao W, Wang H, La H (2017) A new method for evaluating the drought tolerance of upland rice cultivars. Crop J 5:488–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2017.05.002
Acknowledgements
Cristiane R. da Mata thanks to Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES, Brasília, Brasil). All the authors thank Embrapa Arroz e Feijão (Santo Antônio de Goiás, Brasil) for financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors have read and approved this version of the article, and due care has been taken to ensure the integrity of the work. No conflict of interest exists in the submission of this manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
da Mata, C.R., de Castro, A.P., Lanna, A.C. et al. Physiological and yield responses of contrasting upland rice genotypes towards induced drought. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 29, 305–317 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-023-01287-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-023-01287-8